1887
image of Motion-related image schemas in Serbian journalistic articles
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

The paper explores various aspects of conceptualization based on motion-related image schemas and their combinations. It does so based on a custom-made and self-annotated linguistic corpus belonging to the journalistic register in Serbian, used for obtaining various descriptive and inferential statistical data interpreted qualitatively. It demonstrates that image schemas exhibit a marked clustering tendency and that they appear to interact with one another and with the categorical variables (newspaper, topic) in non-trivial ways. It reinterprets as a higher order principle (rather than an image schema per se) specifying the intensity with which other schemas occur. This, in turn, has enabled formalization of intensities of individual image schemas participating in the established image schema complexes, with important consequences for further research, including the exploration of the dynamic nature of schema interaction and meaning construction not only in language but also other semiotic domains.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/rcl.00210.pav
2024-12-03
2025-01-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Antović, M.
    (2010) From oceanic feeling to image schemata — embodied mind and the construction of identity. InV. Lopičić & B. Mišić Ilić (Eds.), Identity issues — Literary and linguistic landscapes (pp.–). Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. 10.2139/ssrn.1690347
    https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1690347 [Google Scholar]
  2. Antović, M., Jovanović, Ž. V., & Figar, V.
    (2023) Dynamic schematic complexes: Image schema interaction in music and language cognition reveals a potential for computational affect detection. Pragmatics and Cognition, (), –. 10.1075/pc.00032.ant
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.00032.ant [Google Scholar]
  3. Aurnague, M.
    (2011) How motion verbs are spatial: The spatial foundations of intransitive motion verbs in French. Lingvisticæ Investigationes, (), –. 10.1075/li.34.1.01aur
    https://doi.org/10.1075/li.34.1.01aur [Google Scholar]
  4. Cameron, L. J., & Stelma, J. H.
    (2004) Metaphor clusters in discourse. Journal of Applied Linguistics, (), –. 10.1558/japl.2004.1.2.107
    https://doi.org/10.1558/japl.2004.1.2.107 [Google Scholar]
  5. Cienki, A.
    (1997) Some properties and groupings of image schemas. InM. Verspoor, K. D. Lee & E. Sweetser (Eds.), Lexical and syntactical constructions and the construction of meaning (pp.–). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.150.04cie
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.150.04cie [Google Scholar]
  6. Clausner, T. C., & Croft, W.
    (1999) Domains and image schemas. Cognitive Linguistics, (), –. 10.1515/cogl.1999.001
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1999.001 [Google Scholar]
  7. Dewell, R.
    (2005) Dynamic patterns of CONTAINMENT. InB. Hampe (Ed.), From perception to meaning. Image schemas in cognitive linguistics (pp.–). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110197532.5.369
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197532.5.369 [Google Scholar]
  8. Evans, V., & Green, M.
    (2006) Cognitive linguistics: An introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Figar, V., & Veličković, M.
    (2022, May6th and 7th). The power of image schemas in structuring the political discourse of daily newspapers [Conference presentation] International scientific conference Language, literature, power. Faculty of Philosophy, University of Niš, Serbia. https://bit.ly/477iSCJ
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Filipović, L.
    (2007) Talking about motion. A crosslinguistic investigation of lexicalization patterns [Studies in Language Companion Series, 91]. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.91
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.91 [Google Scholar]
  11. Gibbs Jr, R. W., & Colston, H. L.
    (1995) The cognitive psychological reality of image schemas and their transformations. InD. Geeraerts, R. Dirven & J. R. Taylor (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics: Basic readings (pp.–). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Hampe, B.
    (Ed.) (2005) From perception to meaning: Image schemas in cognitive linguistics. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110197532
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197532 [Google Scholar]
  13. Hasko, V., & Perelmutter, R.
    (Eds.) (2010) New approaches to Slavic verbs of motion. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.115
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.115 [Google Scholar]
  14. Hedblom, M. M., Kutz, O., & Neuhaus, F.
    (2015) Choosing the right path: Image schema theory as a foundation for concept invention. Journal of Artificial General Intelligence, (), –. 10.1515/jagi‑2015‑0003
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jagi-2015-0003 [Google Scholar]
  15. Hickmann, M., & Robert, S.
    (Eds.) (2006) Space in languages: linguistic systems and cognitive categories. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.66
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.66 [Google Scholar]
  16. Israel, M.
    (2011) The grammar of polarity: Pragmatics, sensitivity, and the logic of scales (Vol.). Cambridge: CUP. 10.1017/CBO9780511975288
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511975288 [Google Scholar]
  17. Jackendoff, R.
    (2002) Foundations of language. New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198270126.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198270126.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  18. JASP Team
    JASP Team (2024) JASP (Version 0.18.0) [Computer software].
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Johnson, M.
    (1987) The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226177847.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226177847.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  20. (2005) The philosophical significance of image schemas. InB. Hampe (Ed.), From perception to meaning: Image schemas in cognitive linguistics (pp.–). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110197532.1.15
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197532.1.15 [Google Scholar]
  21. (2007) The meaning of the body. Aesthetics of human understanding. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226026992.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226026992.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  22. Kimmel, M.
    (2005) From metaphor to the “Mental Sketchpad”: Literary macrostructure and compound image schemas in Heart of Darkness. Metaphor and Symbol, (), –. 10.1207/s15327868ms2003_3
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms2003_3 [Google Scholar]
  23. Lakoff, G.
    (1987) Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  24. (1990) The invariance hypothesis: Is abstract reason based on image schemas?. Cognitive Linguistics, (), –. 10.1515/cogl.1990.1.1.39
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1990.1.1.39 [Google Scholar]
  25. Lakoff, G., & Turner, M.
    (1989) More than cool reason: The power of poetic metaphor. Berkeley: University of California. 10.7208/chicago/9780226470986.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226470986.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  26. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
    (1999) Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. (2003[1980]) Metaphors we live by. London: The University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226470993.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226470993.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  28. Langacker, R. W.
    (1987) Foundations of cognitive grammar (Vol. 1). Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Mandler, J.
    (2004) The foundations of mind: Origins of conceptual thought. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Oakley, T.
    (2007) Image schemas. InD. Geeraerts & H. Cyckens (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp.–). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Pallant, J.
    (2020) SPSS survival manual (4th edition). Maidenhead: McGraw Hill.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Peña-Cervel, M. S., & Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J.
    (2009) The metonymic and metaphoric grounding of two image-schema transformations. InK.-U. Panther, L. L. Thornburg & A. Barcelona (Eds.). Metonymy and metaphor in grammar (pp.–). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/hcp.25.21pen
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.25.21pen [Google Scholar]
  33. Pragglejaz Group
    Pragglejaz Group (2007) MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, (), –. 10.1080/10926480709336752
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10926480709336752 [Google Scholar]
  34. Rohrer, T.
    (2005) Image schemata in the brain. InB. Hampe & J. Grady (Eds.), From perception to meaning: Image schemas in cognitive linguistics (pp.–) Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110197532.2.165
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197532.2.165 [Google Scholar]
  35. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J.
    (2017) Conceptual complexes in cognitive modeling. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics, (), –. 10.1075/resla.30.1.12rui
    https://doi.org/10.1075/resla.30.1.12rui [Google Scholar]
  36. Scott, M.
    (2004) WordSmith tools, version 4. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN: 0-19-459400-9.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. (2008) Developing WordSmith. International Journal of English Studies, (), –.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Stadler, M. W.
    (2020) The ontological nature of part-whole oscillations: An interdisciplinary determination. Vienna: Austrian Academy of Sciences Press. 10.1553/0x003ba901
    https://doi.org/10.1553/0x003ba901 [Google Scholar]
  39. Steen, G. J.
    (2007) Finding metaphor in grammar and usage. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/celcr.10
    https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.10 [Google Scholar]
  40. Steen, G. J., Dorts, A. G., Herrmann, J. B., Kaal, A. A., Krennmayr, T., & Pasma, T.
    (2010) A method for linguistic metaphor identification: From MIP to MIPVU. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/celcr.14
    https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.14 [Google Scholar]
  41. Talmy, L.
    (1985) Lexicalization patterns: semantic structure in lexical forms. InT. Shopen (Ed.), Language typology and syntactic description (pp.–). Cambridge: CUP.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. (1991) Path to realization: A typology of event conflation. Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistic Society, , –. 10.3765/bls.v17i0.1620
    https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v17i0.1620 [Google Scholar]
  43. (2000) Toward a cognitive semantics (Vol.). Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Tasić, M., & Stamenković, D.
    (2022a) Pictorial and multimodal metonymy in political newspaper discourse: The case of Brexit reports. Philologia Mediana, , –. 10.46630/phm.14.2022.27
    https://doi.org/10.46630/phm.14.2022.27 [Google Scholar]
  45. (2022b) From statics to dynamics: Intersemiotic conversion of metaphor and its consequences. InS. Wuppuluri & A. C. Grayling (Eds.), Metaphors and analogies in sciences and humanities (pp.–). Cham: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑90688‑7_25
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90688-7_25 [Google Scholar]
  46. Tribble, C.
    (2010) What are concordances and how are they used?. InA. O’Keeffe & M. McCarthy (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of corpus linguistics (pp.–). London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203856949‑13
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203856949-13 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/rcl.00210.pav
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/rcl.00210.pav
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error