1887
image of Review of Ounis (2024): Unpacking metaphor-related prepositions in political discourse
Preview this online first article:

Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/rcl.00213.nav
2025-01-13
2025-02-15
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/10.1075/rcl.00213.nav/rcl.00213.nav.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/rcl.00213.nav&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Al-Jurjani, Abd al-Qahir
    (1991) Asrar al-Balaghah [The mysteries of eloquence]. Jeddah KSA. Dar-Al-Madani.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Charteris-Black, J.
    (2004) Corpus approaches to critical metaphor analysis. New York, NY: Palgrave MacMillan. 10.1057/9780230000612
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230000612 [Google Scholar]
  3. Coventry, K. R., & Garrod, S. C.
    (2004) Saying, seeing and acting: The psychological semantics of spatial prepositions. London: Psychology Press. 10.4324/9780203641521
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203641521 [Google Scholar]
  4. Feist, M. I.
    (2000) On in and on : An investigation into the linguistic encoding of spatial scenes. Ph.D. dissertation. Evanston: Northwestern University.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Gärdenfors, P.
    (2015) The geometry of preposition meanings. Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication, , –. 10.4148/1944‑3676.1098
    https://doi.org/10.4148/1944-3676.1098 [Google Scholar]
  6. Ibn Ezra, M.
    (1975) Kitab al-Muhadarah wa-al-Mudhakarah. (Ed.) Halkim, Abraham Solomon. Mekize Nirdamim.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Kövecses, Z.
    (2020) Extended conceptual metaphor theory. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108859127
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108859127 [Google Scholar]
  8. Lu, W. -L.
    (2022) A conceptual exploration of polysemy: A case study of [V] — [UP] and [V] — [SHÀNG]. Brno. Masaryk University Press. 10.5817/CZ.MUNI.M280‑0039‑2022
    https://doi.org/10.5817/CZ.MUNI.M280-0039-2022 [Google Scholar]
  9. Navarro i Ferrando, I.
    (2024) Embodied semantic parameters for the lexical representation of spatial relationships. Cognitive Linguistic Studies, () –. 10.1075/cogls.00118.nav
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.00118.nav [Google Scholar]
  10. Richards, I. A.
    (1936) The philosophy of rhetoric. London: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Ricoeur, P.
    (1975) La metàphore vive. Paris, France: editions du Seuil.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Steen, G. J., Dorst, A. G., Berenike Herrmann, J., Kaal, A., Krennmayr, T., & Pasma T.
    (2010) A Method for Linguistic Metaphor Identification: From MIP to MIPVU. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/celcr.14
    https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.14 [Google Scholar]
  13. Tyler, A. & Evans, V.
    (2003) The semantics of English prepositions: Spatial scenes, embodied meaning and cognition. Cambridge, England. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486517
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486517 [Google Scholar]
  14. Trim, R.
    (2007) Metaphor networks. The comparative evolution of figurative language. Basingstoke, England: Palgrave MacMillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. (2011) Metaphor and the historical evolution of conceptual mapping. Basingstoke, England: Palgrave MacMillan. 10.1057/9780230337053
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230337053 [Google Scholar]
  16. Vandeloise, C.
    (1991) Spatial prepositions: A case study from French. Chicago: University Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/rcl.00213.nav
Loading
  • Article Type: Book Review
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error