GO (a)round and V vs. GO (a)round Ving

References

1. Bresnan, J., Cueni, A., Nikitina, T., & Baayen, H.
   (2007) Predicting the dative alternation. InG. Boume, I. Kraemer, & J. Zwarts (Eds.), Cognitive foundations of interpretation (pp.–). Amsterdam: Royal Netherlands Academy of Science.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Croft, W. A.
   (2001) Radical construction grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299554.001.0001
   https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299554.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
3. Croft, W. A.
   (2005) Logical and typological arguments for Radical Construction Grammar. InJ.-O. Östman (Ed.), Construction grammars: Cognitive grounding and theoretical extensions (pp.–). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cal.3.11cro
   https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.3.11cro [Google Scholar]
4. Davies, M.
   (2008–) The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA). Retrieved fromhttps://www.english-corpora.org/coca/
   [Google Scholar]
5. Fillmore, C. J.
   (1988) The mechanics of “Construction Grammar”. BLS, , –. 10.3765/bls.v14i0.1794
   https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v14i0.1794 [Google Scholar]
6. Fillmore, C. J., Kay, P., & O’Connor, M. C.
   (1988) Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone. Language, (), –. 10.2307/414531
   https://doi.org/10.2307/414531 [Google Scholar]
7. Gilquin, G., & Gries, S. Th.
   (under review). Collostructional analysis. InH. Nesi & P. Milin Eds. International encyclopedia of language and linguistics (3rd ed.). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Goldberg, A. E.
   (1995) Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Goldberg, A. E.
   (2006) Constructions at work. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Gries, S. Th.
    (2003) Multifactorial analysis in corpus linguistics: A study of Particle Placement. London & New York: Continuum Press.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Gries, S. Th.
    (2010) Behavioral Profiles: A fine-grained and quantitative approach in corpus-based lexical semantics. The Mental Lexicon, (), –. 10.1075/ml.5.3.04gri
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.5.3.04gri [Google Scholar]
12. Gries, S. Th., & Stefanowitsch, A.
    (2004a) Extending collostructional analysis: A corpus-based perspective on ‘alternations’. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, (), –. 10.1075/ijcl.9.1.06gri
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.9.1.06gri [Google Scholar]
13. Gries, S. Th., & Stefanowitsch, A.
    (2004b) Co-varying collexemes in the into-causative. InM. Achard & S. Kemmer (Eds.), Language, culture, and mind (pp.–). Stanford, CA: CSLI.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Hahsler, M., Gruen, B., & Hornik, K.
    (2005) arules — A computational environment for mining association rules and frequent item sets. Journal of Statistical Software, (), –. 10.18637/jss.v014.i15
    https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v014.i15 [Google Scholar]
15. Hampe, B., & Gries, S. Th.
    (2018) Syntax from and for discourse II: More on complex-sentences as meso-constructions. InB. Hampe & S. Flach (Eds.), Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association (pp.–). Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/gcla‑2018‑0006
    https://doi.org/10.1515/gcla-2018-0006 [Google Scholar]
16. Herbst, T.
    (2018) Is language a collostructicon? A proposal for looking at collocations, valency, argument structure and other constructions. InP. Cantos-Gómez & M. Almela-Sánchez (Eds.), Lexical collocation analysis: Advances and applications (pp.–). Cham: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑92582‑0_1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92582-0_1 [Google Scholar]
17. Hilpert, M.
    (2012) Diachronic collostructional analysis: How to use it and how to deal with confounding factors. InK. Allan & J. A. Robinson (Eds.), Current methods in historical semantics (pp.–). Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Hilpert, M.
    (2019) Construction grammar and its application to English (2nd ed.). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. 10.1515/9781474433624
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781474433624 [Google Scholar]
19. Hunston, S., & Francis, G.
    (1999) Pattern grammar: The principles and practices of corpus-driven grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.4
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.4 [Google Scholar]
20. Jackendoff, R.
    (1997) Twistin’ the night away. Language, (), –. 10.2307/415883
    https://doi.org/10.2307/415883 [Google Scholar]
21. Jensen, K. E.
    (2017) Kan konstruktioner have semantisk prosodi? [Can constructions have semantic prosody?]. Ny Forskning i Grammatik, , –. 10.7146/nfg.v25i24.97245
    https://doi.org/10.7146/nfg.v25i24.97245 [Google Scholar]
22. Jensen, K. E.
    (2024) Well, maybe you shouldn’t go around shaving poodles: Collostructional semantic and discursive prosody in the go (a)round Ving and go (a)round and V constructions. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory. 10.1515/cllt‑2024‑0018
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2024-0018 [Google Scholar]
23. Kemmer, S., & M. Barlow
    (2000) Introduction: A usage-based conception of language. InM. Barlow & S. Kemmer (Eds.), Usage-based models of language (pp.–). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Olguín Martínez, J. F., & Gries, S. Th.
    (2024) If not for-if it weren’t/wasn’t for counterfactual constructions: A multivariate extension of collostructional analysis. Cognitive Semantics, (), –. 10.1163/23526416‑bja10067
    https://doi.org/10.1163/23526416-bja10067 [Google Scholar]
25. Patten, A. L.
    (2014) The historical development of the it-cleft: A comparison of two different approaches. InN. Gisborne & W. B. Hollmann (Eds.), Theory and data in cognitive linguistics (pp.–). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/bct.67.04pat
    https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.67.04pat [Google Scholar]
26. Schönefeld, D.
    (2013) It is … quite common for theoretical predictions to go untested (BNC_CMH). A register-specific analysis of the English go un-V-en construction. Journal of Pragmatics, , –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.12.012
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.12.012 [Google Scholar]
27. Stefanowitsch, A.
    (2000) The English GO-(PRT)-AND-VERB construction. BLS, , –. 10.3765/bls.v26i1.1158
    https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v26i1.1158 [Google Scholar]
28. Stefanowitsch, A., & Flach, S.
    (2020) “Too big to fail but big enough to pay for their mistakes”: A collostructional analysis of the patterns [too ADJ to V] and [ADJ enough to V]. InG. Corpas & J. P. Colson (Eds.), Computational and corpus-based phraseology (pp.–). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/ivitra.24.13ste
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ivitra.24.13ste [Google Scholar]
29. Stefanowitsch, A., & Gries, S. Th.
    (2003) Collostructions: Investigating the interaction between words and constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, (), –. 10.1075/ijcl.8.2.03ste
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.8.2.03ste [Google Scholar]
30. Stefanowitsch, A., & Gries, S. Th.
    (2005) Covarying collexemes. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, (), –. 10.1515/cllt.2005.1.1.1
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt.2005.1.1.1 [Google Scholar]
31. Stubbs, M.
    (2001) Words and phrases: Corpus studies of lexical semantics. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Traugott, E. C., & Trousdale, G.
    (2014) Contentful constructionalization. Journal of Historical Linguistics, (), –. 10.1075/jhl.4.2.04tra
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jhl.4.2.04tra [Google Scholar]