Introduction

References

1. Athanasiadou, A.
   (Ed.) (2017) Studies in figurative thought and language. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/hcp.56
   https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.56 [Google Scholar]
2. Athanasiadou, A., & Colston, H.
   (Eds.) (2017) Irony in language use and communication. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/ftl.1
   https://doi.org/10.1075/ftl.1 [Google Scholar]
3. Benczes, R., Barcelona, A., & Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J.
   (Eds.) (2011) Defining metonymy in Cognitive Linguistics: Towards a consensus view. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/hcp.28
   https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.28 [Google Scholar]
4. Bergen, B. K.
   (2012) Louder than words: The new science of how the mind makes meaning. New York: Basic Books.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Boroditsky, L.
   (2001) Does language shape thought? Mandarin and English speakers’ conceptions of time. Cognitive Psychology, 43(1), 1–22. 10.1006/cogp.2001.0748
   https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.2001.0748 [Google Scholar]
6. Boroditsky, L., & Ramscar, M.
   (2002) The roles of body and mind in abstract thought. Psychological Science, 13(2), 185–189. 10.1111/1467‑9280.00434
   https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00434 [Google Scholar]
7. Cameron, L.
   (2008) Metaphor and talk. InR. Gibbs (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp.197–211). New York: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511816802.013
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816802.013 [Google Scholar]
8. Cameron, L., & Deignan, A.
   (2006) The emergence of metaphor in discourse. Applied Linguistics, 27(4), 671–690. 10.1093/applin/aml032
   https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/aml032 [Google Scholar]
9. Cienki, A., & Müller, C.
   (Eds.) (2008) Metaphor and gesture. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/gs.3
   https://doi.org/10.1075/gs.3 [Google Scholar]
10. Charteris-Black, J.
    (2014) Analysing political speeches: Rhetoric, discourse and metaphor. Basingstoke & New York: Palgrave MacMillan. 10.1007/978‑1‑137‑36833‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-36833-1 [Google Scholar]
11. Colston, H.
    (2015) Using figurative language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781316226414
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316226414 [Google Scholar]
12. Dancygier, B., & Sweetser, E.
    (2014) Figurative language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Deignan, A.
    (2006) Metaphor in corpus linguistics. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/celcr.6
    https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.6 [Google Scholar]
14. Deignan, A., Littlemore, J., & Semino, E.
    (2013) Figurative language, genre and register. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Dirven, R., & Pörings, R.
    (Eds.) (2003) Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110219197
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110219197 [Google Scholar]
16. Entman, R. M.
    (1993) Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 431, 51–58. 10.1111/j.1460‑2466.1993.tb01304.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x [Google Scholar]
17. Fahlenbrach, K.
    (Ed.) (2016) Embodied metaphors in film, television and video games: Cognitive approaches. New York & Oxon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M.
    (2002) The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Forceville, C. J., & Urios-Aparisi, E.
    (Eds.) (2009) Multimodal metaphor. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110215366
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110215366 [Google Scholar]
20. Friedenberg, J.
    2009 Dynamical psychology: Complexity, self-organization and mind. New York: ISCE Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Gibbs, R. W.
    (1994) The Poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Gibbs, R. W.
    (2006) Embodiment and Cognitive Science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Gibbs, R. W.
    (2011) The social nature of embodied cognition: A view from the world of metaphors. Intellectica, 561, 81–98. 10.3406/intel.2011.1148
    https://doi.org/10.3406/intel.2011.1148 [Google Scholar]
24. Gibbs, R. W.
    (Ed.) (2016) Mixing metaphor. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/milcc.6
    https://doi.org/10.1075/milcc.6 [Google Scholar]
25. Gibbs, R. W., & Cameron, L.
    (2008) The socio-cognitive dynamics of metaphor performance. Cognitive Systems Research, 91, 64–75. 10.1016/j.cogsys.2007.06.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2007.06.008 [Google Scholar]
26. Gibbs, R. W., & Colston, H. L.
    (1995) The cognitive psychological reality of image schemas and their transformations. Cognitive Linguistics, 6(4), 347–378. 10.1515/cogl.1995.6.4.347
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1995.6.4.347 [Google Scholar]
27. Gibbs, R. W., & Colston, H.
    (2012) Interpreting figurative meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139168779
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139168779 [Google Scholar]
28. Gibbs, R. W., & Tendahl, M.
    (2006) Cognitive effort and effects in metaphor comprehension: Relevance theory and psycholinguistics. Mind and Language, 211, 379–403. 10.1111/j.1468‑0017.2006.00283.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.2006.00283.x [Google Scholar]
29. Hart, C.
    (2008) Critical discourse analysis and metaphor: Toward a theoretical framework. Critical Discourse Studies, 5(2), 91–106. 10.1080/17405900801990058
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405900801990058 [Google Scholar]
30. Hong, J.
    (2018) Automatic metaphor detection using constructions and frames. InM. R. L. Petruck (Ed.), Metanet (pp.167–193). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/bct.100.07hon
    https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.100.07hon [Google Scholar]
31. Johnson, M.
    (1987) The body in the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226177847.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226177847.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
32. Kövecses, Z.
    (2005) Metaphor in culture: Universality and Variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511614408
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511614408 [Google Scholar]
33. Kövecses, Z.
    (2015) Where metaphors come from: Reconsidering context in metaphor. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190224868.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190224868.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
34. Kövecses, Z.
    (2017) Levels of metaphor. Cognitive Linguistics, 28(2), 321–347. 10.1515/cog‑2016‑0052
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2016-0052 [Google Scholar]
35. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
    (1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Lakoff, G.
    (2008) The neural theory of metaphor. InR. W. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp.17–38). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511816802.003
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816802.003 [Google Scholar]
37. Littlemore, J.
    (2015) Metonymy: Hidden shortcuts in language, thought and communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781107338814
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107338814 [Google Scholar]
38. Lonergan, J. E., & Gibbs, R. W.
    (2016) Tackling mixed metaphors in discourse. InR. W. Gibbs (Ed.), Mixing metaphor (pp.57–71). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Jοhn Benjamins. 10.1075/milcc.6.04lon
    https://doi.org/10.1075/milcc.6.04lon [Google Scholar]
39. Musolff, A.
    (2006) Metaphor scenarios in public discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 21(1), 23–38. 10.1207/s15327868ms2101_2
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms2101_2 [Google Scholar]
40. Musolff, A.
    (2016) Political metaphor analysis: Discourse and scenarios. London: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Panther, K.-U., & Radden, G.
    (Eds.) (1999) Metonymy in language and thought. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/hcp.4
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.4 [Google Scholar]
42. Pragglejaz Group
    Pragglejaz Group (2007) MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 22(1), 1–39. 10.1080/10926480709336752
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10926480709336752 [Google Scholar]
43. Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J., & Galera Masegosa, A.
    (2014) Cognitive modelling. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/hcp.45
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.45 [Google Scholar]
44. Semino, E.
    (2008) Metaphor in discourse. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Semino, E., & Demjén, S.
    (2017) The Routledge handbook of metaphor and language. London & New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Sharifian, F.
    (2017) Cultural Linguistics. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/clscc.8
    https://doi.org/10.1075/clscc.8 [Google Scholar]
47. Steen, G. J., Dorst, A. G., Herrmann, J. B., Kaal, A., Krennmayr, T., & Pasma, T.
    (2010) A method for linguistic metaphor identification. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/celcr.14
    https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.14 [Google Scholar]
48. Sullivan, K.
    (2013) Frames and constructions in metaphoric language. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cal.14
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.14 [Google Scholar]
49. Taub, S. F.
    (2001) Language from the body: Iconicity and metaphor in American Sign Language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511509629
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511509629 [Google Scholar]
50. Taylor, K.
    (2018) Rejecting objectivity: Reflections of a black feminist researcher interviewing black women, a/b. Auto/Biography Studies, 33(3), 721–726. 10.1080/08989575.2018.1499505
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08989575.2018.1499505 [Google Scholar]
51. Violi, P.
    (2012) How our bodies become us: Embodiment, semiosis and intersubjectivity. Journal of Cognitive Semiotics, 4(1), 57–75. 10.1515/cogsem.2012.4.1.57
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogsem.2012.4.1.57 [Google Scholar]
52. Ziemke, T., Zlatev, J., & Frank, R. M.
    (Eds.) (2007) Body, language, and mind. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Zlatev, J.
    (1997) Situated embodiment: Studies in the emergence of spatial meaning. Stockholm: Gotab.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Zlatev, J., Racine, T., Sinha, C., & Itkonen, E.
    (Eds.) (2008) The shared mind: Perspectives on intersubjectivity. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/celcr.12
    https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.12 [Google Scholar]