Review of Molina-Plaza & Maroto (2024): Aspects of cognitive terminology studies

References

1. Cabré, M. T.
   (1993) La terminología: teoría, metodología, aplicaciones. Empúries: Antártida.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Cabré, M. T.
   (1999) La Terminología. Representación y comunicación. Barcelone: IULA.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Cabré, M. T.
   (2000) Elements for a theory of terminology. Towards an alternative paradigm. Terminology6(1). 35–57.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Cabré, M. T.
   (2003) Theories of terminology: their description, prescription and explanation. Terminology, 9(2), 163–200.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Dubuc, R.
   (1985) Manuel pratique de terminologie. Paris: Conseil international de la langue française.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Faber, P., Márquez Linares, C., & Vega Expósito, M.
   (2005) Framing terminology: A process-oriented approach. Meta: Journal des traducteurs / Meta: Translators’ Journal, 50(4).
   [Google Scholar]
7. Faber, P.
   (2009) The cognitive shift in terminology and specialized translation. MonTI. Monografías de Traducción e Interpretación, (1), 107–134. 10.6035/MonTI.2009.1.5
   https://doi.org/10.6035/MonTI.2009.1.5 [Google Scholar]
8. Faber, P.
   (Ed.) (2012) A cognitive linguistics view of terminology and specialized language. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110277203
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110277203 [Google Scholar]
9. Faber, P.
   (2022) Frame-based terminology. InP. Faber & M.-C. L’Homme (Eds.), Theoretical perspectives on terminology: Explaining terms, concepts and specialized knowledge (pp. 353–376). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tlrp.23.16fab
   https://doi.org/10.1075/tlrp.23.16fab [Google Scholar]
10. Felber, H.
    (1984) Terminology Manual. Paris: Unesco.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Fillmore, C. J.
    (1976) Frame semantics and the nature of language. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences: Conference on the origin and development of language and speech, 280(1), 20–32. 10.1111/j.1749‑6632.1976.tb25467.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1976.tb25467.x [Google Scholar]
12. Fillmore, C. J.The Linguistic Society of Korea
    (1982) Frame Semantics. InThe Linguistic Society of Korea (Ed.), Linguistics in the morning calm (pp. 111–137). Seoul: Hanshin Publishing Co.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Gaudin, P.
    (1993) Socioterminologie: des problèmes semantiques aux pratiques institutionnelles. Rouen: Presses universitaires.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Lakoff, G.
    (1987) Women, fire and dangerous things. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
15. L’Homme, M.-C.
    (2020) Revisiting polysemy in terminology. InZ. Gavriilidou, M. Mitsiaki & A. Fliatouras (Eds.), Proceedings of XIX EURALEX Congress: Lexicography for inclusion. Vol. I (pp. 415–424). Democritus University of Thrace.
    [Google Scholar]
16. L’Homme, M.-C.
    (2024) Managing polysemy in terminological resources. Terminology, 31(1). 10.1075/term.22017.lho
    https://doi.org/10.1075/term.22017.lho [Google Scholar]
17. Martín Mingorance, L.
    (1984) Lexical Fields and Stepwise Lexical Decomposition in a Contrastive English-Spanish Verb Valency Dictionary. InR. R. K. Hartmann (Ed.), LEXeter ‘83 Proceedings. Papers from the International Conference on Lexicography at Exeter, 9–12 September, 19831 (pp. 226–236). Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. 10.1515/9783111593166‑031
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111593166-031 [Google Scholar]
18. Lu, W., Shurma, S., & Kemmer, S.
    (2020) Delivering the unconventional across languages: A Cognitive Grammar analysis of nonce words in “Jabberwocky” and its Ukrainian renditions. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 18(1), 244–274. 10.1075/rcl.00058.lu
    https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.00058.lu [Google Scholar]
19. Picht, H. & Draskau, J.
    (1985) Terminology: An introduction. Guildford: University of Surrey.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Pragglejaz Group
    Pragglejaz Group (2007) MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 22(1), 1–39. 10.1080/10926480709336752
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10926480709336752 [Google Scholar]
21. Rosch, E.
    (1978) Principles of categorization. InE. Rosch & B. B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and categorization (pp. 27–48). Hillsdale & N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Steen, G.
    (2004) Can discourse properties of metaphor affect metaphor recognition?Journal of Pragmatics, 36(7). 295–313. 10.1016/j.pragma.2003.10.014
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2003.10.014 [Google Scholar]
23. Steen, G., Dorst, A. G., Herrmann, J. B., Kaal, A. A., Krennmayr, T., & Pasma, T.
    (2010) A method for linguistic metaphor identification: From MIP to MIPVU. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/celcr.14
    https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.14 [Google Scholar]
24. Temmerman, R.
    (2000) Towards new ways of terminology description: The sociocognitive-approach. (Terminology and lexicography research and practice 3). Amsterdam & New York: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tlrp.3
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tlrp.3 [Google Scholar]
25. Temmerman, R.
    (2001) Sociocognitive terminology theory. InM. T. Cabré & J. Feliu (Eds.), Terminología y Cognición (pp. 75–92). Barcelona: Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Wüster, E.
    (1979) Introduction to the general theory of terminology and terminological lexicography. Vienna: Springer.
    [Google Scholar]