1887
image of Cognitive mechanisms in Chinese and English diagonal direction compounds encoding order
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

The absolute frame of reference determines a fixed encoding order for cardinal direction compounds formed by pairing east, west, north, and south. However, the encoding order for diagonal direction compounds — based on an internal frame of reference — varies due to the competitive dynamics between structural pattern differentiation in horizontal and vertical directions. The dominant contender assumes the preceding position if its differentiation or stability is significantly greater than that of its competitor. This tug-of-war is influenced by language- specific cognitive styles: the figure-preference cognitive style in English, rooted in egocentric philosophy, and the ground-preference cognitive style in Chinese, based on object-centered philosophy. This distinction typically results in a reversed encoding order between Chinese diagonal directions and their English counterparts, with a minor proportion showing similar encoding orders.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/rcl.00245.zho
2026-01-26
2026-02-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bryant, D. J., Tversky, B., & Franklin, N.
    (1992) Internal and external spatial frameworks for representing described scenes. Journal of Language and Memory, –. 10.1016/0749‑596X(92)90006‑J
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(92)90006-J [Google Scholar]
  2. Chen, R.
    (2003) English Inversion: A ground-before-figure construction. New York, NY: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110895100
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110895100 [Google Scholar]
  3. Chen, Z.
    (2016) Case analysis of cognitive switch between Chinese and English languages: Encouraging learners to explore on their own the reasons behind. Bloomington, IN: Xlibris.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. (2021a) Cognitive styles underlying the contradiction of temporal direction between Chinese qián/hòu and Their English Counterparts forward/back. InM. Liu; C. Kit & Q. Su (Eds). Chinese lexical semantics (pp. –). Hong Kong: Springer Nature Switzerland AG. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑81197‑6_69
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81197-6_69 [Google Scholar]
  5. (2021b) Variables underlying Chinese-English contradictory conceptualization of temporal direction: From cognitive style to culture-specific philosophic notion, Contemporary Linguistics, , –.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. (2021c) A comparative study on cognition of temporal and spatial direction between Chinese and English. Beijing: Peking University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Levinson, S. C.
    (1996a) Language and space. Annual Review of Anthropology, , –. 10.1146/annurev.anthro.25.1.353
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.25.1.353 [Google Scholar]
  8. (1996b) Frames of reference and Molyneux’s question: Crosslinguistic evidence. InP. Bloom & M. Peterson (Eds.), Language and space (pp. –). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/4107.003.0006
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/4107.003.0006 [Google Scholar]
  9. (2003) Space in language and cognition: Explorations in cognitive diversity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511613609
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613609 [Google Scholar]
  10. Lu, B.
    (2005) Word order dominance and its cognitive explanation. Contemporary Linguistics, , –.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Talmy, L.
    (1978) Figure and ground in complex sentence. InJ. Greenberg & C. A. Ferguson (Eds.), Universals of human language (pp. –). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. (2000) Toward a cognitive semantics, Vol I: Concept structuring systems (pp. –). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Zhang, D.
    (1985) Analysis of the thought of oneness of man and nature in Chinse philosophy, Journal of Peking University (Philosophy and Social Science), , –.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Zhang, L.
    (2002) The cognitive process reflected in Chinese-English word order from the perspective of “east, west, south, north”, Studies in Language and Linguistics, , –.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/rcl.00245.zho
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/rcl.00245.zho
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error