1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Review of Cognitive Linguistics. Published under the auspices of the Spanish Cognitive Linguistics Association
  4. Online First Articles
  5. Online First Article
image of Multisensory and synaesthetic features in Russian onomatopoeias
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This study investigates whether Russian onomatopoeias can generate multisensory mental imagery and evoke synaesthetic sensations going beyond sound depiction. The experiment with Russian native speakers identified six word clusters linked to a specific set of sensory associations involved in depicting extralinguistic phenomena: (1) words reflecting delicate body movements with moderate kinetic and subtle visual and auditory sensations; (2) one word referring to flatulence formed its own cluster triggering strong auditory, olfactory and kinetic sensations; (3) words depicting food consumption uniquely activated associations with taste; (4) words linked to movements evoked strong visual and kinetic sensations with no auditory focus; (5) words representing environmental sounds spatially remote from the observer triggered auditory, visual and kinetic sensations; (6) words for human bodily sounds generated auditory, visual and kinetic sensations, with tactile and interoceptive implications. The results indicate that Russian onomatopoeias elicit vivid, multisensory mental imagery, some with synaesthetic properties, akin to ideophones.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/rcl.00246.kan
2025-12-11
2026-01-24

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/rcl.00246.kan
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Akita, K., & Parudeshi, P.
    (Eds.) (2019) Ideophones, mimetics and expressives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/ill.16
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ill.16 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bańko, M.
    (2008) Współczesny polski onomatopeikon. Ikoniczność w języku. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Barcelona, A.
    (2012) Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads: A cognitive perspective (Vol.). Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110894677
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110894677 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bergen, B. K.
    (Ed.) (2012) Louder than words: The new science of how the mind makes meaning. New York: Basic Books.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Bertelson, P.
    (1999) Ventriloquism: A case of cross-modal perceptual grouping. InG. Aschersleben, T. Bachmann & J. Músseler (Eds.), Cognitive contributions to the perception of spatial and temporal events (pp.–). Amsterdam: Elsevier. 10.1016/S0166‑4115(99)80034‑X
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(99)80034-X [Google Scholar]
  6. Botvinick, M., & Cohen, J.
    (1998) Rubber hands ‘feel’ touch that eyes see. Nature (London), (), –. 10.1038/35784
     https://doi.org/10.1038/35784 [Google Scholar]
  7. Calvert, G. A.
    (2001) Crossmodal processing in the human brain: insights from functional neuroimaging studies. Cerebral Cortex (New York, N.Y. 1991), (), –. 10.1093/cercor/11.12.1110
     https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/11.12.1110 [Google Scholar]
  8. Chesnokova, L. D.
    (Ed.) (1991) Russkiy yazyk: trudnyye sluchai morfologicheskogo razbora: uchebnoye posobiye dlya studentov filologov [The Russian language: difficult cases of morphological analysis]. Moskva: Vysshaya shkola.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Dalton, P., Doolittle, N., Nagata, H., & Breslin, P. A. S.
    (2000) The merging of the senses: Integration of subthreshold taste and smell. Nature Neuroscience, (), –. 10.1038/74797
     https://doi.org/10.1038/74797 [Google Scholar]
  10. Dingemanse, M.
    (2012) Advances in the cross-linguistic study of ideophones. Language and Linguistics Compass, (), –. 10.1002/lnc3.361
     https://doi.org/10.1002/lnc3.361 [Google Scholar]
  11. Dingemanse, M., & Majid, A.
    (2012) The semantic structure of sensory vocabulary in an African language. InN. Miyake, D. Peebles & R. P. Cooper (Eds.), Proceedings of the 34th annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp.–). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Efremova, T. F.
    (Ed.) (2000) Novyy slovar’ russkogo yazyka. Tolkovo slovoobrazovatel’nyy [The new dictionary of the Russian language: explanatory and word-formation]. Moskva: Russkiy yazyk.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Fábregas, A.
    (2015) Una nota sobre la expresión icónica del aspecto léxico en las onomatopeyas [A note about the iconic expression of lexical aspect in onomatopoeia]. Lenguas modernas (Santiago), , –.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Gick, B., & Derrick, D.
    (2009) Aero-tactile integration in speech perception. Nature (London), (), –. 10.1038/nature08572
     https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08572 [Google Scholar]
  15. Goldstein, E. B.
    (Ed.) (2010) Encyclopedia of perception. Sage. 10.4135/9781412972000
     https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412972000 [Google Scholar]
  16. Griffiths, T. D., & Warren, J. D.
    (2004) What is an auditory object?Nature Reviews. Neuroscience, (), –. 10.1038/nrn1538
     https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1538 [Google Scholar]
  17. Ho, H.-N., Van Doorn, G. H., Kawabe, T., Watanabe, J., & Spence, C.
    (2014) Colour-temperature correspondences: When reactions to thermal stimuli are influenced by colour. PloS One, (), –. 10.1371/journal.pone.0091854
     https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0091854 [Google Scholar]
  18. Iida, H., & Akita, K.
    (2023) Perceptual strength norms for 510 Japanese words, including ideophones: a comparative study with English. InM. Goldwater, F. K. Anggoro, B. K. Hayes & D. C. Ong (Eds.), Proceedings of the 45th annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp.–). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1cg0835m
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Jääskeläinen, A.
    (2013) Todisteena äänen kuva: suomen kielen imitatiivikonstruktiot. Helsinki: Unigrafia.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Kanerva, O.
    (2018) Correlation between expressiveness and syntactic independence of Russian onomatopoeic verbal interjections. Poljarnyj Vestnik: Norwegian Journal of Slavic Studies, , –. 10.7557/6.4435
     https://doi.org/10.7557/6.4435 [Google Scholar]
  21. Kanerva, O. A.
    (2020) Russian onomatopoeic verbal interjections. Why use ‘non-words’ instead of ordinary ones?RSUH/RGGU Bulletin. ‘Literary Theory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies’ Series, –. 10.28995/2686‑7249‑2020‑7‑130‑146
     https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2020-7-130-146 [Google Scholar]
  22. Kartsevskiy, S. O.
    (1984) Vvedeniye v izucheniye mezhdometiy [Introduction to the study of interjections]. Voprosy yazykoznaniya, , –.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Kassambara, A., & Mundt, F.
    (2020) Factoextra: Extract and visualize the results of multivariate data analyses. R package version 1.0.7. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=factoextra
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Kor Chahine, I.
    (2008) Plyukh! ― plyukh ― plyukhnut’(sya). K voprosu ob evolyutsii narrativnykh predikatov v svete korpusnykh dannykh. [Plyukh! → plyukh → plyukhnut’(sja). On the evolution of narrative predicates in the light of corpus data]. InA. Mustajoki, M. V. Kopotev, L. A. Biryulin & E.Yu. Protasova (Eds.), Instrumentariy rusistiki: korpusnyye podkhody [Tools of Russian studies: corpus-based approaches] (pp.–). Helsinki: Department of Slavonic and Baltic Languages and Literatures.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Körtvélyessy, L., & Štekauer, P.
    (Eds.) (2024) Onomatopoeia in the world’s languages: a comparative handbook. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter, Inc. 10.1515/9783111053226
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111053226 [Google Scholar]
  26. Kubovy, M., & Van Valkenburg, D.
    (2001) Auditory and visual objects. Cognition, (), –. 10.1016/S0010‑0277(00)00155‑4
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(00)00155-4 [Google Scholar]
  27. Kulemeka, A. T.
    (1995) Sound symbolic and grammatical frameworks: a typology of ideophones in Asian and African languages. South African Journal of African Languages, (), –. 10.1080/02572117.1995.10587062
     https://doi.org/10.1080/02572117.1995.10587062 [Google Scholar]
  28. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
    (1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Leont’yev, A. A.
    (1997) Osnovy psikholingvistiki [Foundations of Psycholinguistics]. Moskva: Smysl.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Lynott, D., & Connell, L.
    (2009) Modality exclusivity norms for 423 object properties. Behavior Research Methods, (), –. 10.3758/BRM.41.2.558
     https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.2.558 [Google Scholar]
  31. Maechler, M., Rousseeuw, P., Struyf, A., Hubert, M., & Hornik, K.
    (2022) cluster: cluster analysis basics and extensions. R package version 2.1.4. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/cluster/index.html
     [Google Scholar]
  32. McGurk, H., & MacDonald, J.
    (1976) Hearing lips and seeing voices. Nature (London), (), –. 10.1038/264746a0
     https://doi.org/10.1038/264746a0 [Google Scholar]
  33. McLean, B.
    (2021) Revising an implicational hierarchy for the meanings of ideophones, with special reference to Japonic. Linguistic Typology, (), –. 10.1515/lingty‑2020‑2063
     https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2020-2063 [Google Scholar]
  34. Miklashevsky, A.
    (2018) Perceptual experience norms for 506 Russian nouns: modality rating, spatial localization, manipulability, imageability and other variables. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, (), –. 10.1007/s10936‑017‑9548‑1
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-017-9548-1 [Google Scholar]
  35. Mkhitar’yan, G. S.
    (2016) Grammaticheskiy status i funktsionirovaniye glagol’no-mezhdometnykh form v sovremennom russkom yazyke [Grammatical status and functioning of verbal interjectional forms in contemporary Russian]. Pyatigorsk.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Nikitina, T.
    (2012) Russian verboids: A case study in expressive vocabulary. Linguistics, (), –. 10.1515/ling‑2012‑0007
     https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2012-0007 [Google Scholar]
  37. Nudds, M.
    (2001) Experiencing the production of sounds. European Journal of Philosophy, (), –. 10.1111/1468‑0378.00136
     https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0378.00136 [Google Scholar]
  38. O’Callaghan, C.
    (2007) Sounds: A philosophical theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199215928.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199215928.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  39. (2011) Lessons from beyond vision (sounds and audition). Philosophical Studies, (), –. 10.1007/s11098‑010‑9652‑7
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-010-9652-7 [Google Scholar]
  40. R Core Team
    R Core Team (2023) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URLhttps://www.R-project.org/
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Rakova, M.
    (Ed.) (2003) The extent of the literal: metaphor, polysemy and theories of concepts. Palgrave Macmillan UK. 10.1057/9780230512801
     https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230512801 [Google Scholar]
  42. Rhodes, R.
    (1994) Aural images. InL. Hinton, J. Nichols & J. J. Ohala (Eds.), Sound symbolism (pp.–). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511751806.019
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511751806.019 [Google Scholar]
  43. Rowland, B. A., Quessy, S., Stanford, T. R., & Stein, B. E.
    (2007) Multisensory integration shortens physiological response latencies. The Journal of Neuroscience, (), –. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4986‑06.2007
     https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4986-06.2007 [Google Scholar]
  44. Shams, L., Kamitani, Y., & Shimojo, S.
    (2002) Visual illusion induced by sound. Brain Research. Cognitive Brain Research, (), –. 10.1016/S0926‑6410(02)00069‑1
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-6410(02)00069-1 [Google Scholar]
  45. Shvedova, N. Yu.
    (Ed.) (1980) Russkaya grammatika [Russian Grammar]. Moskva: Nauka.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Spence, C.
    (2020) Temperature-based crossmodal correspondences: causes and consequences. Multisensory Research, (), –. 10.1163/22134808‑20191494
     https://doi.org/10.1163/22134808-20191494 [Google Scholar]
  47. Spence, C., Senkowski, D., & Röder, B.
    (2009) Crossmodal processing. Experimental Brain Research, (), –. 10.1007/s00221‑009‑1973‑4
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-009-1973-4 [Google Scholar]
  48. Stanford, T. R., & Stein, B. E.
    (2007) Superadditivity in multisensory integration: putting the computation in context. Neuroreport, (), –. 10.1097/WNR.0b013e3280c1e315
     https://doi.org/10.1097/WNR.0b013e3280c1e315 [Google Scholar]
  49. Stanford, T. R., Quessy, S., & Stein, B. E.
    (2005) Evaluating the operations underlying multisensory integration in the cat superior colliculus. The Journal of Neuroscience, (), –. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5095‑04.2005
     https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5095-04.2005 [Google Scholar]
  50. Stein, B. E., & Meredith, M. A.
    (1993) Merging of the senses. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Strik Lievers, F., Huang, C-R., & Xiong, J.
    (2021) Linguistic synaesthesia. InJ. R. Taylor & X. Wen (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp.–). Routledge. 10.4324/9781351034708‑25
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351034708-25 [Google Scholar]
  52. Svantesson, J.
    (2017) Sound symbolism: the role of word sound in meaning. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews. Cognitive Science, (), e1441-n/a. 10.1002/wcs.1441
     https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1441 [Google Scholar]
  53. Van Hoey, Th.
    (2022) A semantic map for ideophones. InTh. F. Li (Ed.), Handbook of Cognitive Semantics. Leiden: Brill. Preprint. 10.31219/osf.io/muhpd
     https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/muhpd [Google Scholar]
  54. Viimaranta, J., & Kanerva, O.
    (2024) The uses of the Russian onomatopoeic interjection bats ‘bam, bang.’Studia z filologii polskiej i słowiańskiej, 59, Article 3278. 10.11649/sfps.3278
     https://doi.org/10.11649/sfps.3278 [Google Scholar]
  55. Viimaranta, J., & Vihervä, M.
    (2019) The use of onomatopoeic interjections in predicate function in Russian and other languages: A perspective from the corpus of parallel texts of the Russian national corpus. Scando-Slavica, (), –. 10.1080/00806765.2019.1672092
     https://doi.org/10.1080/00806765.2019.1672092 [Google Scholar]
  56. Voeltz, E. F. K., & Kilian-Hatz, C.
    (Eds.) (2001) Ideophones. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.44
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.44 [Google Scholar]
  57. Vroomen, J., & De Gelder, B.
    (2004) Perceptual effects of cross-modal stimulation: Ventriloquism and the freezing phenomenon. InG. A. Calvert, C. Spence & B. E. Stein (Eds.), Handbook of multisensory processes (pp.–). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/3422.003.0012
     https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/3422.003.0012 [Google Scholar]
  58. Wickham, H.
    (2016) ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis. New York: Springer-Verlag. https://ggplot2.tidyverse.org. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑24277‑4
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24277-4 [Google Scholar]
  59. Wickham, H., François, R., Henry, L., Müller, K., & Vaughan, D.
    (2023) dplyr: a grammar of data manipulation. R package version 1.1.4. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=dplyr
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Winter, B.
    (2019) Sensory linguistics: Language, perception and metaphor. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/celcr.20
     https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.20 [Google Scholar]
  61. Xu, M.
    (2020) The repetition of Chinese onomatopoeia. InY. Zhang, P. Liu & J.-F. Hong (Eds.), Chinese lexical semantics (Vol., pp.–). Springer International Publishing AG. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑38189‑9_18
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38189-9_18 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/rcl.00246.kan
Loading
Multisensory and synaesthetic features in Russian onomatopoeias
John Benjamins ; https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.00246.kan
/content/journals/10.1075/rcl.00246.kan
/content/journals/10.1075/rcl.00246.kan
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: onomatopoeia ; Russian ; ideophones ; multimodal sensations ; synaesthesia

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error