1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Review of Cognitive Linguistics. Published under the auspices of the Spanish Cognitive Linguistics Association
  4. Online First Articles
  5. Online First Article
image of Conceptual overlap and multiple symbolization in signed languages
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

In this paper we explore conceptual overlap in two signed languages. Our data comes from natural discourse in Brazilian Sign Language (Libras) and Argentine Sign Language (LSA). Our analysis relies on theoretical constructs derived from cognitive grammar, which posits just three core elements: semantic structures, phonological structures, and symbolic structures which are associations of the first two. Signed languages use symbolic structures we call Places to conceptualize space in signed discourse. We show that one way signed languages express conceptual overlap is with phonological overlap: placing signs at the same spatial location. Our data demonstrates how Places establish nominal referents and discourse topics, create associations among referents, and structure the flow of information. We also offer an account of agreement as a type of conceptual overlap expressed by phonological overlap. A currently popular account of agreement in signed languages argues that these expressions consist of “fusions” of language and gesture. Our account relies solely on linguistic elements and is compatible with that of agreement as multiple symbolization.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/rcl.00247.wil
2026-01-20
2026-02-14

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/rcl.00247.wil
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Barlow, Michael
    (1999) Agreement as a discourse phenomenon. Folia Linguistica, (), –. 10.1515/flin.1999.33.1‑2.187
     https://doi.org/10.1515/flin.1999.33.1-2.187 [Google Scholar]
  2. Borges, Jorge L.
    (1954) Funes, the Memorious. InAvon Modern Writing No. 2 (pp.–). Avon.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Chafe, Wallace
    (1987) Cognitive constraints on information flow. InR. S. Tomlin (Ed.), Coherence and grounding in discourse (pp.–). John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.11.03cha
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.11.03cha [Google Scholar]
  4. Clark, Herbert H.
    (2003) Pointing and placing. InKita, Sotaro (Ed.), Pointing: Where language, culture, and cognition meet (pp.–). Psychology Press. web.stanford.edu/~clark/2000s/Clark,H.H._Pointing.and.placing_2003.pdf
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Cooperrider, Kensy, Slotta, James, & Núñez, Rafael
    (2018) The preference for pointing with the Hand Is Not Universal. Cogn Sci, (), –. 10.1111/cogs.12585
     https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12585 [Google Scholar]
  6. Corbett, Greville
    (2006) Agreement. Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Croft, William
    (2001) Radical construction grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299554.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299554.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  8. (2013) Agreement as anaphora, anaphora as coreference. InBakker, Dik & Martin Haspelmath (Eds.), Languages across boundaries: Studies in memory of Anna Siewierska (pp.–). De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110331127.95
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110331127.95 [Google Scholar]
  9. Declerck, Mathieu, & Philipp, Andrea M.
    (2015) The unusual suspect: Influence of phonological overlap on language control. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, (), –. 10.1017/S1366728914000236
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728914000236 [Google Scholar]
  10. Douven, Igor, Elqayam, Shira, Gärdenfors, Peter, & Mirabile, Patricia
    (2022) Conceptual spaces and the strength of similarity-based arguments. Cognition: International Journal of Cognitive Science, , . 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104951
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104951 [Google Scholar]
  11. Dudis, Paul G.
    (2004) Body partitioning and real-space blends. Cognitive Linguistics, , –. 10.1515/cogl.2004.009
     https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2004.009 [Google Scholar]
  12. Edelman, Gerald M.
    (1987) Neural Darwinism: The theory of neuronal group selection. Basic Books.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Fischer, Susan D., & Gough, Bonnie
    (1978) Verbs in American Sign Language. Sign Language Studies, , –. 10.1353/sls.1978.0014
     https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.1978.0014 [Google Scholar]
  14. Fowler, Carol A.
    (2006) Compensation for coarticulation reflects gesture perception, not spectral contrast. Perception & Psychophysics, , –. 10.3758/BF03193666
     https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193666 [Google Scholar]
  15. Gopnik, Alison, & Meltzoff, Andrew
    (1987) The development of categorization in the second year and its relation to other cognitive and linguistic developments. Child Development, –. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1130692
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Hou, Lynn
    (2022a) A usage-based proposal for argument structure of directional verbs in American Sign Language. Frontiers in Psychology, . 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.808493
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.808493 [Google Scholar]
  17. (2022b) LOOKing for multi-word expressions in American Sign Language. Cognitive Linguistics, (), –. 10.1515/cog‑2020‑0086
     https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2020-0086 [Google Scholar]
  18. Janzen, Terry
    (1999) The grammaticization of topics in American Sign Language. Studies in Language, , –. 10.1075/sl.23.2.03jan
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.23.2.03jan [Google Scholar]
  19. (2019) Shared spaces, shared mind: Connecting past and present viewpoints in American Sign Language narratives. Cognitive Linguistics, (), –. 10.1515/cog‑2018‑0045
     https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2018-0045 [Google Scholar]
  20. Janzen, Terry, Shaffer, Barbara, & Leeson, Lorraine
    (2023) What I know is here; what I don’t know is somewhere else: Deixis and gesture spaces in American Sign Language and Irish Sign Language. InJanzen, Terry & Barbara Shaffer (Eds.), Signed language and gesture research in cognitive linguistics (Vol., pp.–). De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110703788‑009
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110703788-009 [Google Scholar]
  21. Janzen, Terry, Shaffer, Barbara, & Wilcox, Sherman
    (2000) Signed language pragmatics. InVerschueren, Jef, Jan-Ola Östman, Jan Blommaert & Chris Bulcaen (Eds.), Handbook of Pragmatics (pp.–). John Benjamins.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Jarque, Maria Josep
    (2016) What about?InPascual, Esther & Sergeiy Sandler (Eds.), The Conversation Frame: Forms and functions of fictive interaction (pp.–). John Benjamins. 10.1075/hcp.55.09jar
     https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.55.09jar [Google Scholar]
  23. Kibrik, Andrej A.
    (2019) Rethinking agreement: Cognition-to-form mapping. Cognitive Linguistics, (), –. 10.1515/cog‑2017‑0035
     https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2017-0035 [Google Scholar]
  24. Langacker, Ronald W.
    (1987) Foundations of cognitive grammar: Volume I, Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. (1993) Reference-point constructions. Cognitive Linguistics, , –. 10.1515/cogl.1993.4.1.1
     https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1993.4.1.1 [Google Scholar]
  26. (1999) Grammar and conceptualization. Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110800524
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110800524 [Google Scholar]
  27. (2001a) Discourse in cognitive grammar. Cognitive Linguistics, , –. 10.1515/cogl.12.2.143
     https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.12.2.143 [Google Scholar]
  28. (2001b) Topic, subject, and possessor. InSimonsen, Hanne G. & Rolf T. Endresen (Eds.), A cognitive approach to the verb: Morphological and constructional perspectives (pp.–). Walter de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. (2008) Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  30. (2009) Investigations in cognitive grammar (Vol.). Walter de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110214369
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110214369 [Google Scholar]
  31. (2023) Structure, iconicity, and access. InJanzen, Terry & Barbara Shaffer (Eds.), Signed language and gesture research in cognitive linguistics (Vol., pp.–). De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110703788‑005
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110703788-005 [Google Scholar]
  32. Liddell, Scott K.
    (2003) Grammar, gesture, and meaning in American Sign Language. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511615054
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615054 [Google Scholar]
  33. Liddell, Scott K., & Johnson, Robert E.
    (2019) Sign language articulators on phonetic bearings. Sign Language Studies, (), –. 10.1353/sls.2019.0016
     https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.2019.0016 [Google Scholar]
  34. Lillo-Martin, Diane, & Meier, Richard P.
    (2011) On the linguistic status of ‘agreement’ in sign languages. Theoretical Linguistics, (), –. 10.1515/thli.2011.009
     https://doi.org/10.1515/thli.2011.009 [Google Scholar]
  35. Martínez, Rocío, & Wilcox, Sherman
    (2019) Pointing and placing: Nominal grounding in Argentine Sign Language. Cognitive Linguistics, (), –. 10.1515/cog‑2018‑0010
     https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2018-0010 [Google Scholar]
  36. Massone, María Ignacia, Rocío Anabel Martínez, Bárbara Carboni, & Mariana Marchese
    (2012) Curso de Lengua de Señas Argentina. La etnografía como punto de partida epistemológico y metodológico. Cultura Sorda.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Meier, Richard P., & Lillo-Martin, Diane
    (2013) The points of language. Humana.Mente Journal of Philosophical Studies, , –.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Meir, Irit, Padden, Carol A., Aronoff, Mark, & Sandler, Wendy
    (2007) Body as subject. Journal of Linguistics, , –. 10.1017/S0022226707004768
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226707004768 [Google Scholar]
  39. Nilsson, Anna-Lena
    (2016) Embodying metaphors: Signed language interpreters at work. Cognitive Linguistics, , –. 10.1515/cog‑2015‑0029
     https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2015-0029 [Google Scholar]
  40. Nurmi, Petteri & Johan Koolwaaij
    (2006) Identifying meaningful locations. InMobile and Ubiquitous Systems: Networking & Services, 2006 Third Annual International Conference on (pp.–). IEEE. 10.1109/MOBIQ.2006.340429
     https://doi.org/10.1109/MOBIQ.2006.340429 [Google Scholar]
  41. Padden, Carol A.
    (1988) Interaction of morphology and syntax in American Sign Language. Garland Publishing, Inc.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Pfau, Roland, Salzmann, Martin, & Steinbach, Markus
    (2018) The syntax of sign language agreement: Common ingredients, but unusual recipe. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics, (), –. 10.5334/gjgl.511
     https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.511 [Google Scholar]
  43. Potì, Patrizia
    (1996) Spatial aspects of spontaneous object grouping by young chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). International Journal of Primatology, (), –. 10.1007/BF02696161
     https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02696161 [Google Scholar]
  44. Quer, Josep
    (2011) When agreeing to disagree is not enough: Further arguments for the linguistic status of sign language agreement. Theoretical Linguistics, , –. 10.1515/thli.2011.014
     https://doi.org/10.1515/thli.2011.014 [Google Scholar]
  45. Schembri, Adam, Cormier, Kearsy, & Fenlon, Jordan
    (2018) Indicating verbs as typologically unique constructions: Reconsidering verb ‘agreement’ in sign languages. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics, (), –. 10.5334/gjgl.468
     https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.468 [Google Scholar]
  46. Shaffer, Barbara, Leeson, Lorraine, & Janzen, Terry
    (2018) What I know is here; what I don’t know is somewhere else: Deixis and gesture spaces in American Sign Language and Irish Sign Language. InProceedings from International Society of Gesture Studies. Cape Town, South Africa.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Siyavoshi, Sara, & Wilcox, Sherman
    (2021) Exerting control: the grammatical meaning of facial displays in signed languages. Cognitive Linguistics, (), –. 10.1515/cog‑2021‑0051
     https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2021-0051 [Google Scholar]
  48. Slobin, Dan I.
    (1985) The child as a linguistic icon-maker. InJ. Haiman (Ed.), Iconicity in syntax (pp.–). John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/tsl.6.11slo
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.6.11slo [Google Scholar]
  49. Steel, Susan
    (1978) Word order variation: A typological survey. InJ. H. Greenberg, C. A. Ferguson, & E. A. Moravcsik (Eds.), Universals of Human Language: IV: Syntax (pp.–). Stanford Universitiy Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Stokoe, William C.
    (1960) Sign language structure: An outline of the visual communication systems of the American deaf (Vol. 8 Studies in Linguistics Occasional Papers). University of Buffalo.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Stokoe, William C., Casterline, D., & Croneberg, C.
    (1965) A dictionary of American Sign Language on linguistic principles. Gallaudet College Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Wilbur, Ronnie B.
    (2013) The point of agreement: Changing how we think about sign language, gesture, and agreement. Sign language and Linguistics, , –. 10.1075/sll.16.2.05wil
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sll.16.2.05wil [Google Scholar]
  53. Wilcox, Sherman, & Martínez, Rocío
    (2020) The conceptualization of space: Places in signed language discourse. Frontiers in Psychology. :. 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01406
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01406 [Google Scholar]
  54. Wilcox, Sherman, Martínez, Rocío, & Morales, Diego
    (2022) The conceptualization of space in signed languages: Placing the signer in narratives. InA. Jucker & H. Hausendorf (Eds.), Pragmatics of space (pp.–). Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110693713‑003
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110693713-003 [Google Scholar]
  55. Wilcox, Sherman, & Occhino, Corrine
    (2016) Constructing signs: Place as a symbolic structure in signed languages. Cognitive Linguistics, , –. 10.1515/cog‑2016‑0003
     https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2016-0003 [Google Scholar]
  56. Wilcox, Sherman, Xavier, André N., & Siltaloppi, Satu
    (2023) List constructions in two signed languages. Language & Cognition, –. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/language-and-cognition/article/list-constructions-in-two-signed-languages/F5649EEE439474A7709A81C5A014DBBA
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Winston, Elizabeth
    (1995) Spatial mapping in comparative discourse frames. InEmmorey, Karen & Judy S. Reilly (Eds.), Language, gesture, and space (pp.–). Lawrence Erlbaum.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Zima, Elisabeth, & Bergs, Alexander
    (2017) Multimodality and construction grammar. Linguistics Vanguard, (), –. 10.1515/lingvan‑2016‑1006
     https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2016-1006 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/rcl.00247.wil
Loading
Conceptual overlap and multiple symbolization in signed languages
John Benjamins ; https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.00247.wil
/content/journals/10.1075/rcl.00247.wil
/content/journals/10.1075/rcl.00247.wil
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: Brazilian Sign Language ; signed language ; discourse ; Argentine Sign Language ; cognitive grammar

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error