1887
image of Between the subject and the self

Abstract

Abstract

Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) uses metaphor extensively in its exercises with clients (Hayes et al., 2012). This paper analyzes a corpus of ACT defusion exercises to identify the patterns of construal they typically evoke. Findings show frequent use of the Divided-Person metaphor (Lakoff, 1996), with the two aspects of the mind (the Self and Subject) operating within an actual or potential force dynamic (FD) configuration (Talmy, 2000). Two main types of configurations emerge. Deliteralization exercises show shifts in the balance of strength between the Subject and Self. Observation exercises draw a contrast between a steady-state FD configuration involving a coerced Agonist and a secondary steady-state FD pattern in which a potentially coercing force was no longer impinging on the Agonist. The results demonstrate how FD and the Divided-Person metaphor systematically combine to construe mental phenomenology and dispositions. The analysis thus sheds light on the conceptual structures underlying therapeutic discourse in ACT.

Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/rcl.00249.mue
2026-01-20
2026-02-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/10.1075/rcl.00249.mue/rcl.00249.mue.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/rcl.00249.mue&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Bach, Patricia A., & Moran, Daniel J.
    (2008) ACT in practice: Conceptualization in acceptance and commitment therapy. New Harbinger.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Barnes-Holmes, Dermot, Hayes, Steven C., & Gregg, Jennifer
    (2001) Religion, spirituality, and transcendence. InHayes, Steven C., Dermot Barnes-Holmes & Bryan Roche (Eds.), Relational frame theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition (pp.–). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Blackledge, John T.
    (2015) Cognitive defusion in practice: A physician’s guide to assessing, observing and supporting change in your client. Context Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. (2018) Cognitive defusion. InHayes, Steven C. & Stefan G. Hofmann (Eds.), Process-based CBT: The science and core clinical competencies of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (pp.–). New Harbinger.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Cameron, Lynne
    (1999) Identifying and describing metaphor in spoken discourse. InCameron, Lynne & Graham D. Low (Eds.), Researching and applying metaphor (pp.–). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139524704.009
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524704.009 [Google Scholar]
  6. (2008) Metaphor shifting in the dynamics of talk. InZanotto, Mara S., Cameron, Lynne & Marilda C. Cavalcanti (Eds.), Confronting metaphor in use: An applied linguistics approach (pp.–). John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.173.04cam
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.173.04cam [Google Scholar]
  7. Coll-Florit, Marta, Climent, Salvador, Sanfilippo, Marco & Hernández-Encuentra, Eulàlia
    (2021) Metaphors of depression: Studying first person accounts of life with depression published in blogs. Metaphor and Symbol, (), –. 10.1080/10926488.2020.1845096
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2020.1845096 [Google Scholar]
  8. Dennett, Daniel C.
    (1991) Real patterns. The Journal of Philosophy, (), –. 10.2307/2027085
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2027085 [Google Scholar]
  9. Frankfurt, Harry G.
    (1971) Freedom of the will and the concept of a person. The Journal of Philosophy, (), –. 10.2307/2024717
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2024717 [Google Scholar]
  10. Grady, Joseph E.
    (1999) A typology of motivation for conceptual metaphor: Correlation vs. resemblance. InGibbs, Raymond W., Jr. & Gerard J. Steen (Eds.), Metaphor in cognitive linguistics (pp.–). John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.175.06gra
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.175.06gra [Google Scholar]
  11. Hayes, Steven C., Barnes-Holmes, Dermot, & Roche, Bryan
    (2001) Relational frame theory: A précis. InHayes, Steven C., Barnes-Holmes, Dermot & Bryan Roche (Eds.), Relational frame theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition (pp.–). Kluwer Academic Publishers. 10.1007/b108413
    https://doi.org/10.1007/b108413 [Google Scholar]
  12. Hayes, Steven C., & Smith, Spencer
    (2005) Get out of your mind and into your life: The new acceptance and commitment therapy. New Harbinger.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Hayes, Steven C., Strosahl, Kirk D., & Wilson, Kelly G.
    (1999) Acceptance and commitment therapy: An experiential approach to behavior change. Guilford Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. (2012) Acceptance and commitment therapy: The process and practice of mindful change (2nd ed.). Guilford Press. 10.1037/17335‑000
    https://doi.org/10.1037/17335-000 [Google Scholar]
  15. Lakoff, George, & Johnson, Mark
    (1980) Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Lakoff, George
    (1993) The contemporary theory of metaphor. InAnthony Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp.–). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139173865.013
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173865.013 [Google Scholar]
  17. (1996) Sorry, I’m not myself today: The metaphor system for conceptualizing the self. InFauconnier, Gilles & Eve E. Sweetser (Eds.), Spaces, worlds, and grammar (pp.–). University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Langacker, Ronald W.
    (1987) Foundations of cognitive grammar. Vol. 1: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Luoma, Jason B., Hayes, Steven C., & Walser, Robyn D.
    (2017) Learning ACT: An acceptance & commitment therapy skills-training manual for therapists (2nd ed.). New Harbinger.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Miró-Sastre, Ignasi
    (2018) Combining metaphors: From metaphoric amalgams to binary systems. Australian Journal of Linguistics, (), –. 10.1080/07268602.2018.1393860
    https://doi.org/10.1080/07268602.2018.1393860 [Google Scholar]
  21. Mueller, Charles M., & Richardson, Peter
    (2025) Modern Buddhist and Christian mysticism: Construal and transformation. Routledge. 10.4324/9781003476399
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003476399 [Google Scholar]
  22. Musolff, Andreas
    (2006) Metaphor scenarios in public discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, (), –. 10.1207/s15327868ms2101_2
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms2101_2 [Google Scholar]
  23. (2016) Political metaphor analysis: Discourse and scenarios. Bloomsbury Academic.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Needham-Didsbury, Isabelle M.
    (2014) Metaphor in psychotherapeutic discourse: Implications for utterance interpretation. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics, (), –. 10.1515/psicl‑2014‑0005
    https://doi.org/10.1515/psicl-2014-0005 [Google Scholar]
  25. Peña-Cervel, María S.
    (1999) Subsidiarity relationships between image-schemas: an approach to the force schema. Journal of English Studies, , –. 10.18172/jes.49
    https://doi.org/10.18172/jes.49 [Google Scholar]
  26. Pragglejaz Group
    Pragglejaz Group (2007) MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, (), –. 10.1080/10926480709336752
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10926480709336752 [Google Scholar]
  27. R Core Team
    R Core Team (2025) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. [Computer software]. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Richardson, Peter & Mueller, Charles M.
    (2022) Contested paths: Analyzing unfolding metaphor usage in a debate between Dawkins and Lennox. Metaphor and the Social World, (), –. 10.1075/msw.20004.ric
    https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.20004.ric [Google Scholar]
  29. Richardson, Peter, Mueller, Charles M., & Pihlaja, Stephen
    (2021) Cognitive linguistics and religious language: An introduction. Routledge. 10.4324/9781003041139
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003041139 [Google Scholar]
  30. Ruiz, Francisco J., Gil-Luciano, Bárbara, & Segura-Vargas, Miguel A.
    (2023) Cognitive defusion. InTwohig, Michael P., Levin, Michael E. & Julie M. Petersen (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of acceptance and commitment therapy (pp.–). Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197550076.013.9
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197550076.013.9 [Google Scholar]
  31. Ruiz de Mendoza, Francisco J.
    (2024) Metaphor as a resemblance phenomenon: A re-examination of the role of similarity in conceptual metaphor. Cognitive Linguistic Studies, (), –. 10.1075/cogls.00110.rui
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.00110.rui [Google Scholar]
  32. Ruiz de Mendoza, Francisco J., & Galera-Masegosa, Alicia
    (2014) Cognitive models. A linguistic perspective. John Benjamins. 10.1075/hcp.45
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.45 [Google Scholar]
  33. Saulsman, Lisa M.
    (2025) Using metaphor to facilitate cognitive detachment in cognitive behaviour therapies. The Cognitive Behaviour Therapist, , . 10.1017/S1754470X25000054
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1754470X25000054 [Google Scholar]
  34. Semino, Elena
    (2008) Metaphor in discourse. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Silvestre-López, Antonio J.
    (2016) The discourse of mindfulness: What language reveals about the mindfulness experience. InOrdóñez-López, Pilar & Nuria Edo-Marzá (Eds.), Medical discourse in professional, academic and popular settings (pp.–). Multilingual Matters. 10.2307/jj.26931984.12
    https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.26931984.12 [Google Scholar]
  36. (2019) Deliberate metaphors in Buddhist teachings about meditation. InIgnasi Navarro i Ferrando (Ed.), Current approaches to metaphor analysis in discourse (pp.–). De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110629460‑010
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110629460-010 [Google Scholar]
  37. (2022) Uses and functions of conceptual metaphor in pedagogical meditation discourse. ELUA: Estudios de Lingüística. Universidad de Alicante, , –. 10.14198/ELUA.22349
    https://doi.org/10.14198/ELUA.22349 [Google Scholar]
  38. Silvestre-López, Antonio J. & Navarro i Ferrando, I.
    (2017) Metaphors in the conceptualisation of meditative practices. Metaphor and the Social World, (), –. 10.1075/msw.7.1.03sil
    https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.7.1.03sil [Google Scholar]
  39. Silvestre-López, Antonio J., Pinazo, Daniel & Barrós-Loscertales, Alfonso
    (2023) Metaphor can influence meta-thinking and affective levels in guided meditation. Current Psychology, (), –. 10.1007/s12144‑021‑01655‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01655-1 [Google Scholar]
  40. Smith, Lee & Klein, Raymond
    (1990) Evidence for semantic satiation: Repeating a category slows subsequent semantic processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, (), –. 10.1037/0278‑7393.16.5.852
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.16.5.852 [Google Scholar]
  41. Sperber, Dan
    (1996) Explaining culture: A naturalistic approach. Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Stoddard, Jill A., & Afari, Niloofar
    (2014) The big book of ACT metaphors: A practitioner’s guide to experiential exercises and metaphors in acceptance and commitment therapy. New Harbinger.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Stott, Richard, Mansell, Warren, Salkovskis, Paul, Lavender, Anna, & Cartwright-Hatton, Sam
    (2010) Oxford guide to metaphors in CBT: Building cognitive bridges. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/med:psych/9780199207497.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/med:psych/9780199207497.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  44. Talmy, Leonard
    (2000) Toward a cognitive semantics: Concept structuring systems (Vol.). MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Tay, Dennis
    (2013) Metaphor in psychotherapy: A descriptive and prescriptive analysis. John Benjamins. 10.1075/milcc.1
    https://doi.org/10.1075/milcc.1 [Google Scholar]
  46. (2016) Finding the middle ground between therapist-centred and client-centred metaphor research in psychotherapy. InO’Reilly, Michelle & Jessica N. Lester (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of adult mental health: Discourse and conversation studies (pp.–). Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781137496850_29
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137496850_29 [Google Scholar]
  47. (2017) The nuances of metaphor theory for constructivist psychotherapy. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, (), –. 10.1080/10720537.2016.1161571
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10720537.2016.1161571 [Google Scholar]
  48. Tay, Dennis & Jordan, Jennifer
    (2015) Metaphor and the notion of control in trauma talk. Text and Talk, (), –. 10.1515/text‑2015‑0009
    https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2015-0009 [Google Scholar]
  49. Tay, Dennis, & Qiu, Han
    (2024) Source domain associations as conceptual assemblages in trauma talk — an association rule mining approach. Metaphor and Symbol, (), –. 10.1080/10926488.2023.2300431
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2023.2300431 [Google Scholar]
  50. Törneke, Niklas
    (2017) Metaphor in practice: A professional’s guide to using the science of language in psychotherapy. Context Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. (2020) Strategies for using metaphor in psychological treatment. Metaphor and the Social World, (), –. 10.1075/msw.00004.tor
    https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.00004.tor [Google Scholar]
  52. Tyler, Andrea, & Evans, Vyvyan
    (2003) The semantics of English prepositions: Spatial scenes, embodied meaning, and cognition. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486517
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486517 [Google Scholar]
  53. Wolff, Phillip & Barbey, Aron K.
    (2015) Causal reasoning with forces. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, , Article 1. 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00001
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00001 [Google Scholar]
  54. Zettle, Robert D.
    (2005) The evolution of a contextual approach to therapy: From comprehensive distancing to ACT. International Journal of Behavioral Consultation and Therapy, (), –. 10.1037/h0100736
    https://doi.org/10.1037/h0100736 [Google Scholar]
  55. Zettle, Robert D., & Wilson, Kelly G.
    (2023) Progression of ACT. InTwohig, Michael P., Levin, Michael E., & Julie M. Petersen (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of acceptance and commitment therapy (pp.–). Oxford Academic. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197550076.013.1
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197550076.013.1 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/rcl.00249.mue
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/rcl.00249.mue
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error