1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Review of Cognitive Linguistics. Published under the auspices of the Spanish Cognitive Linguistics Association
  4. Online First Articles
  5. Online First Article
image of Metaphorical polysemy and cognitive mechanism of tactile terms
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This study investigates the metaphorical polysemy and cognitive mechanism of tactile terms through a comprehensive analysis of the Chinese lexeme (, ‘hard’), an area that remains less explored than visual terms among sensory vocabulary. Using a corpus-based behavioral profile methodology, 1,300 occurrences of from the CCL Corpus were annotated across 41 contextual features, encompassing 118 variable levels. Hierarchical agglomerative clustering, random forest classification, and correlation analyses were employed to organize the 13 identified metaphorical senses into three coherent categories, each characterized by approximately ten salient features and their patterned co-occurrences. The findings provide an empirically grounded account of how tactile metaphors differ from visual ones in cognitive schemas (interaction-centrality vs attributes-centrality), illustrating how embodiment shape metaphorical extensions in modern Chinese.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/rcl.00257.yan
2026-05-18
2026-06-07

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/rcl.00257.yan
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ackerman, Joshua M., Nocera, Christopher C., & Bargh, John A.
    (2010) Incidental haptic sensations influence social judgments and decisions. Science, (), –. 10.1126/science.1189993
     https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1189993 [Google Scholar]
  2. Apresjan, Juri D.
    (1974) Regular polysemy. Linguistics, (), –. 10.1515/ling.1974.12.142.5
     https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1974.12.142.5 [Google Scholar]
  3. Barsalou, Lawrence W.
    (1999) Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, (), –. 10.1017/S0140525X99002149
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X99002149 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bowdle, Brian F., & Gentner, Dedre
    (2005) The career of metaphor. Psychological Review, (), –. 10.1037/0033‑295X.112.1.193
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.112.1.193 [Google Scholar]
  5. Brenda, Maria
    (2017) A cognitive perspective on the semantics of near. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, (), –. 10.1075/rcl.15.1.06bre
     https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.15.1.06bre [Google Scholar]
  6. Chen, Hongzhi
    (2021) A cognitive-semantic comparison of Chinese and Russian tactile-pressure adjectives hard and твёрдый. Russian Language Literature and Culture Studies, , –. https://www.sinoss.net/c/2021-11-24/567707.shtml
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Coschignano, Serena
    (2021) The semantic network of temperature: Non-sensory domains accessed with metaphorical extensions of the Italian adjectives caldo and freddo. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, (), –. 10.1075/rcl.00082.cos
     https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.00082.cos [Google Scholar]
  8. Croft, William
    (2012) Verbs: Aspect and causal structure. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199248582.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199248582.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  9. Deignan, Alice
    (1999) Metaphorical polysemy and paradigmatic relations: A corpus study. Word, (), –. 10.1080/00437956.1999.11432491
     https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1999.11432491 [Google Scholar]
  10. Díaz-Vera, Javier E.
    (2022) Soft hearts and hard souls: The multiple textures of Old English feelings and emotions. Cognitive Linguistic Studies, (), –. 10.1075/cogls.20025.dia
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.20025.dia [Google Scholar]
  11. Dictionary Editorial Office, Institute of Linguistics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences
    Dictionary Editorial Office, Institute of Linguistics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences (2016) Contemporary Chinese dictionary (7th ed.). The Commercial Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Divjak, Dagmar, & Fieller, Nick
    (2014) Cluster analysis: Finding structure in linguistic data. InGlynn, Dylan & Justyna A. Robinson (Eds.), Corpus methods for semantics: Quantitative studies in polysemy and synonymy (Human Cognitive Processing, 43, pp. 405–441). John Benjamins. 10.1075/hcp.43.16div
     https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.43.16div [Google Scholar]
  13. Divjak, Dagmar, & Gries, Stefan Th.
    (2006) Ways of trying in Russian: Clustering behavioral profiles. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, (), –. 10.1515/CLLT.2006.002
     https://doi.org/10.1515/CLLT.2006.002 [Google Scholar]
  14. (2009) Corpus-based cognitive semantics: A contrastive study of phasal verbs in English and Russian. InBarbara Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk & Krzysztof Dziwirek (Eds.), Studies in cognitive corpus linguistics (Lodz Studies in Language, pp. 273–296). Peter Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Dövencioǧlu, Dicle N., Üstün, F. Seyhun, Doerschner, Katja, & Drewing, Knut
    (2022) Hand explorations are determined by the characteristics of the perceptual space of real-world materials from silk to sand. Scientific Reports, , . 10.1038/s41598‑022‑18901‑6
     https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-18901-6 [Google Scholar]
  16. Dou, Jinmeng, & Liu, Meichun
    (2023) Exploring color metaphor with behavioral profiles: A usage-based analysis on the metaphorical meanings of the Chinese color term bái “white”. Lingua, , . 10.1016/j.lingua.2023.103539
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2023.103539 [Google Scholar]
  17. Editorial Committee of The Chinese Dictionary Compendium
    Editorial Committee of The Chinese Dictionary Compendium (1991) Chinese dictionary compendium. Chinese Dictionary Compendium Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Falkum, Ingrid Lossius, & Vicente, Agustin
    (2015) Polysemy: Current perspectives and approaches. Lingua, , –. 10.1016/j.lingua.2015.02.002
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2015.02.002 [Google Scholar]
  19. Fan, Shiqiuhong
    (2017) A comparison of synesthetic metaphors in Chinese and Vietnamese tactile words. Journal of Wuhan University of Technology (Social Science Edition), , –.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Geeraerts, Dirk
    (2009) Theories of lexical semantics. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198700302.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198700302.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  21. Gibbs, Raymond W., & Colston, Herbert L.
    (1995) The cognitive psychological reality of image schemas and their transformations. Cognitive Linguistics, (), –. 10.1515/cogl.1995.6.4.347
     https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1995.6.4.347 [Google Scholar]
  22. Glynn, Dylan
    (2015) The conceptual profile of the lexeme home: A multifactorial diachronic analysis. InJavier E. Díaz-Vera (Ed.), Metaphor and metonymy across time and cultures (pp.–). De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110335453.265
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110335453.265 [Google Scholar]
  23. Glynn, Dylan, & Biryukova, Avgustina
    (2022) Death, enemies, and illness: How English and Russian metaphorically conceptualise boredom. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association, (), –. 10.1515/gcla‑2022‑0003
     https://doi.org/10.1515/gcla-2022-0003 [Google Scholar]
  24. Goddard, Cliff, & Wierzbicka, Anna
    (2013) Words and meanings: Lexical semantics across domains, languages, and cultures. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199668434.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199668434.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  25. Goldberg, Adele E.
    (1995) A Construction Grammar approach to argument structure. The University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Gries, Stefan Th.
    (2010) Behavioral profiles: A fine-grained and quantitative approach in corpus-based lexical semantics. The Mental Lexicon, (), –. 10.1075/ml.5.3.04gri
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.5.3.04gri [Google Scholar]
  27. Harpaintner, Marcel, Sim, Eun-Jin, Trumpp, Natalie M., Ulrich, Martin, & Kiefer, Markus
    (2020) The grounding of abstract concepts in the motor and visual system: An fMRI study. Cortex, , –. 10.1016/j.cortex.2019.10.014
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2019.10.014 [Google Scholar]
  28. Ibarretxe-Antuñano, Iraide
    (2006) Cross-linguistic polysemy in tactile verbs. InJune Luchjenbroers (Ed.), Cognitive linguistics investigations across languages, fields, and philosophical boundaries (pp.–). John Benjamins. 10.1075/hcp.15.16iba
     https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.15.16iba [Google Scholar]
  29. Jia, Yanzi
    (2019) The diachronic evolution of the Chinese “hard” semantic field from the perspective of lexical typology. Linguistic Research, , –. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/detail.aspx?dbcode=CJFD&filename=YWYJ201904002
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Johnson, Mark
    (1987) The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Kaiser, Elsi
    (2021) Consequences of sensory modality for perspective-taking: Comparing visual, olfactory and gustatory perception. Frontiers in Psychology, , . 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.701486
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.701486 [Google Scholar]
  32. Kermer, Franka
    (2021) Semantic network of the German preposition hinter. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, (), –. 10.1075/rcl.00089.ker
     https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.00089.ker [Google Scholar]
  33. Lakoff, George
    (1987) Women, fire and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  34. (1993) The contemporary theory of metaphor. InAndrew Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp.–). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139173865.013
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173865.013 [Google Scholar]
  35. Lakoff, George, & Johnson, Mark
    (1980) Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Littlemore, Jeannette, Bolognesi, Marianna, Julich-Warpakowski, Nina, Leung, Chung-hong Danny, & Pérez Sobrino, Paula
    (2023) Metaphor, metonymy, the body and the environment: An exploration of the factors that shape emotion-colour associations and their variation across cultures. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781009042468
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009042468 [Google Scholar]
  37. Liu, Meichun, & Dou, Jinmeng
    (2024) Metaphorical polysemy of the Chinese color term hēi “black”: A corpus-based cognitive semantic analysis with behavioral profiles. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, (), –. 10.1075/ijcl.21067.liu
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.21067.liu [Google Scholar]
  38. Liu, Meili
    (2023) Towards a dynamic behavioral profile of the Mandarin Chinese temperature term re: A diachronic semasiological approach. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, (), –. 10.1515/cllt‑2021‑0046
     https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2021-0046 [Google Scholar]
  39. Ludwig, Vera U., & Simner, Julia
    (2013) What colour does that feel? Tactile–visual mapping and the development of cross-modality. Cortex, (), –. 10.1016/j.cortex.2012.04.004
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2012.04.004 [Google Scholar]
  40. Menete, Sérgio N., & Jiang, Guiying
    (2025) The semantics of the polysemic Amharic word fit ‘face’: For a new perspective in the cross-linguistic study of body-part terms. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, (), –. 10.1075/rcl.00173.men
     https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.00173.men [Google Scholar]
  41. Morucci, Piermatteo, Bottini, Roberto, & Crepaldi, Davide
    (2019) Augmented modality exclusivity norms for concrete and abstract Italian property words. Journal of Cognition, (), . 10.5334/joc.88
     https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.88 [Google Scholar]
  42. Nordmark, Henrik, & Glynn, Dylan
    (2013) Anxiety between mind and society: A corpus-driven cross-cultural study of conceptual metaphors. Explorations in English Language and Linguistics, (), –. https://hrcak.srce.hr/117778
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Rosch, Eleanor
    (1975) Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, (), –. 10.1037/0096‑3445.104.3.192
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.104.3.192 [Google Scholar]
  44. Ruhl, Charles
    (1989) On monosemy: A study in linguistic semantics. State University of New York Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Sandford, Jodi L.
    (2011) Warm, cool, light, dark, or afterimage: Dimensions and connotations of conceptual color metaphor/metonym. InBiggam, Carole P., Hough, Carole, Kay, Christian & David R. Simmons (Eds.), New directions in colour studies (pp.–). John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.167.24san
     https://doi.org/10.1075/z.167.24san [Google Scholar]
  46. Shao, Zhiyu, Li, Jingwei, Feng, Wanlu, & Tang, Hongru
    (2023) Potential haptic perceptual dimensionality of rendered compliance. Biomimetics, (), . 10.3390/biomimetics8010064
     https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics8010064 [Google Scholar]
  47. Shen, Yeshayahu
    (1997) Cognitive constraints on poetic figures. Cognitive Linguistics, (), –. 10.1515/cogl.1997.8.1.33
     https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1997.8.1.33 [Google Scholar]
  48. Strik Lievers, Francesca, & Winter, Bodo
    (2018) Sensory language across lexical categories. Lingua, , –. 10.1016/j.lingua.2017.11.002
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2017.11.002 [Google Scholar]
  49. Sweetser, Eve
    (1990) From etymology to pragmatics: Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511620904
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620904 [Google Scholar]
  50. Talmy, Leonard
    (1988) Force dynamics in language and cognition. Cognitive Science, (), –. 10.1207/s15516709cog1201_2
     https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1201_2 [Google Scholar]
  51. Taylor, John R.
    (2003) Linguistic categorization. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780199266647.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199266647.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  52. Ullmann, Stephen
    (1962) Semantics: An introduction to the science of meaning. Basil Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Viberg, Åke
    (1984) The verbs of perception: A typological study. InButterworth, Brian, Comrie, Bernard & Östen Dahl (Eds.), Explanations for language universals (pp.–). Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110868555.123
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110868555.123 [Google Scholar]
  54. Wang, Hongzhu, & Zhong, Yin
    (2024) A cognitive approach to the semantic change of the polysemy gàng ‘wooden bar’. InDong, Minghui, Hong, Jia-Fei, Lin, Jingxia & Peng Jin (Eds.), Chinese Lexical Semantics. CLSW 2023 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 14514). Springer, Singapore. 10.1007/978‑981‑97‑0583‑2_28
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-0583-2_28 [Google Scholar]
  55. Wang, Li
    (1980) A draft history of the Chinese language. The Commercial Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Wang, Wenjian, Duan, Lijuan, En, Qing, Zhang, Baochang, & Liang, Fangfang
    (2022) TPSN: Transformer-based multi-Prototype Search Network for few-shot semantic segmentation. Computers & Electrical Engineering, , . 10.1016/j.compeleceng.2022.108326
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2022.108326 [Google Scholar]
  57. Winter, Bodo
    (2019) Sensory linguistics: Language, perception and metaphor. John Benjamins. 10.1075/celcr.20
     https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.20 [Google Scholar]
  58. Winter, Bodo, Perlman, Marcus, & Majid, Asifa
    (2018) Vision dominates in perceptual language: English sensory vocabulary is optimized for usage. Cognition, , –. 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.05.008
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.05.008 [Google Scholar]
  59. Xu, Shiyi
    (2016) Semantic evolution of soft-hard antonymic aggregation. Journal of Shanghai Normal University (Philosophy & Social Sciences Edition), , –. 10.13852/J.CNKI.JSHNU.2016.02.011
     https://doi.org/10.13852/J.CNKI.JSHNU.2016.02.011 [Google Scholar]
  60. Yin, Siyuan
    (2021) A synchronic investigation and comparative study of the grammaticalization of unexpectedness markers “yìng” “yìngshì”. Language Teaching and Linguistic Studies, , –. 10.3969/j.issn.0257‑9448.2021.02.021
     https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.0257-9448.2021.02.021 [Google Scholar]
  61. Yu, Ning
    (2023) Metaphors from perception and culture: The case of solidity. Cognitive Linguistic Studies, (), –. 10.1075/cogls.00106.yu
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.00106.yu [Google Scholar]
  62. Zhan, Weidong, Guo, Rui, Chang, Baobao, Chen, Yirong, & Chen, Long
    (2019) The building of the CCL corpus: Its design and implementation. Corpus Linguistics, , –.
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Zhan, Weidong, Guo, Rui, & Chen, Yirong
    (2003) The CCL corpus of Chinese texts. Center for Chinese Linguistics, Peking University. ccl.pku.edu.cn:8080/ccl_corpus
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Zhong, Yong
    (2017) A corpus-based cognitive-semantic comparative study of Chinese and Japanese tactile-pressure adjectives: Taking ‘hard’ and “katai” as examples. Journal of Japanese Language Study and Research, , –.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/rcl.00257.yan
Loading
Metaphorical polysemy and cognitive mechanism of tactile terms
John Benjamins ; https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.00257.yan
/content/journals/10.1075/rcl.00257.yan
/content/journals/10.1075/rcl.00257.yan
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: behavioral profile ; tactile term ; metaphorical polysemy

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error