1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Review of Cognitive Linguistics. Published under the auspices of the Spanish Cognitive Linguistics Association
  4. Online First Articles
  5. Online First Article
image of Weight effects in Slovak
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This corpus study investigates the principle of end-weight, i.e., the role of constituent weight in determining postverbal NP and PP order, in Slovak. Drawing on a 266-token sample from the Slovak National Corpus, I examine whether Slovak, reflecting findings from research on English, exhibits a preference for placing lighter constituents before heavier ones and whether Heavy NP Shift (HNPS) occurs when NPs outweigh PPs.

Corroborating experimental studies, the findings reveal that Slovak prefers light-before-heavy ordering, underscoring the cross-linguistic applicability of the principle of end-weight. HNPS is observed in the Slovak data as well. Furthermore, the results suggest that while weight is a robust predictor for postverbal NP and PP ordering, the influence of verb transitivity and individual verbs is less clear. As the first corpus-based investigation of weight effects in Slovak, the study demonstrates that weight effects are a general cognitive constraint that also applies to Slovak.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/rcl.00258.hor
2026-05-19
2026-06-07

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/rcl.00258.hor
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Arnold, Jennifer, Losongco, Anthony, Wasow, Thomas & Ginstrom, Ryan
    (2000) Heaviness vs. newness: The effects of structural complexity and discourse status on constituent ordering. Language, (), –. 10.2307/417392
     https://doi.org/10.2307/417392 [Google Scholar]
  2. Behaghel, Otto
    (1909) Beziehungen zwischen Umfang und Reihenfolge von Satzgliedern [Relationships between size and ordering of constituents]. Indogermanische Forschungen, , –. 10.1515/9783110242652.110
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110242652.110 [Google Scholar]
  3. (1930) Von deutscher Wortstellung [Of German word order]. Zeitschrift für Deutschkunde, Jahrgang 44 der Zeitschrift für deutschen Unterricht, –.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Givón, Talmy
    (1988) The pragmatics of word order: Predictability, importance, and attention. InHammond, Michael, Moravcsik, Edith A. & Jessica Wirth (Eds.), Studies in syntactic typology (pp.–). John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.17.18giv
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.17.18giv [Google Scholar]
  5. Goldberg, Adele E.
    (2003) Constructions: A new theoretical approach to language. TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences, (), –. 10.1016/S1364‑6613(03)00080‑9
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00080-9 [Google Scholar]
  6. Gries, Stefan Th.
    (2007) Coll.analysis 3.2a. A program for R for Windows 2.x.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. (2015) The role of quantitative methods in cognitive linguistics: Corpus and experimental data on (relative) frequency and contingency of words and constructions. InDaems, Jocelyne, Heylen, Kris, Speelman, Dirk & Hubert Cuyckens (Eds.), Change of paradigms-new paradoxes: Recontextualizing language and linguistics (pp.–). De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110435597‑018
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110435597-018 [Google Scholar]
  8. (2019) 15 years of collostructions: Some long overdue additions/corrections (to/of actually all sorts of corpus-linguistic measures). International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, (), –. 10.1075/ijcl.00011.gri
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.00011.gri [Google Scholar]
  9. (2022) Toward more careful corpus statistics: Uncertainty estimates for frequencies, dispersions, association measures, and more. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, (), –. 10.1016/j.rmal.2021.100002
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmal.2021.100002 [Google Scholar]
  10. Gries, Stefan Th., Hampe, Beate & Schönefeld, Doris
    (2005) Converging evidence: Bringing together experimental and corpus data on the association of verbs and constructions. Cognitive Linguistics, (), –. 10.1515/cogl.2005.16.4.635
     https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2005.16.4.635 [Google Scholar]
  11. Gries, Stefan Th. & Stefanowitsch, Anatol
    (2004) Extending collostructional analysis. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, (), –. 10.1075/ijcl.9.1.06gri
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.9.1.06gri [Google Scholar]
  12. Hawkins, John A.
    (1994) A performance theory of order and constituency (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 73). Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. (2004) Efficiency and complexity in grammars. Oxford UP. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199252695.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199252695.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  14. (2014) Cross-linguistic variation and efficiency. Oxford UP. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199664993.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199664993.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  15. Hoffmann, Thomas
    (2011) Preposition placement in English: A usage-based approach (Studies in English Language). Cambridge UP. 10.1017/CBO9780511933868
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511933868 [Google Scholar]
  16. (2019) English comparative correlatives: Diachronic and synchronic variation at the lexicon-syntax interface (Studies in English Language). Cambridge UP. 10.1017/9781108569859
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108569859 [Google Scholar]
  17. Hoffmann, Thomas, Brunner, Thomas & Horsch, Jakob
    (2020) English comparative correlative constructions: A usage-based account. Open Linguistics, (), –. 10.1515/opli‑2020‑0012
     https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2020-0012 [Google Scholar]
  18. Horsch, Jakob
    (2021) Slovak comparative correlatives: A usage-based construction grammar account. Constructions and Frames, (), –. 10.1075/cf.00051.hor
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cf.00051.hor [Google Scholar]
  19. (2023a) The comparative correlative construction in World Englishes: A usage-based construction grammar approach. University of Eichstätt-IngolstadtPhD Thesis. https://opus4.kobv.de/opus4-ku-eichstaett/frontdoor/index/index/docId/833
     [Google Scholar]
  20. (2023b) From corpus data to constructional networks: Analyzing language with the usage-based construction grammar framework. Jazykovedný časopis [Journal of Linguistics of the Slovak Academy of Sciences], (), –. 10.2478/jazcas‑2024‑0019
     https://doi.org/10.2478/jazcas-2024-0019 [Google Scholar]
  21. Horsch, Jakob & Ivanová, Martina
    (2024) Looking beyond information structure: Evidence from MET experiments for weight effects on Slovak word order. Journal of Slavic Linguistics, (), –. 10.1353/jsl.2024.a978718
     https://doi.org/10.1353/jsl.2024.a978718 [Google Scholar]
  22. Ivanová, Martina, Sokolová, Miloslava, Kyseľová, Miroslava & Perovská, Veronika
    (2014) Valenčný slovník slovenských slovies na korpusovom základe [Valency dictionary of Slovak verbs based on corpus data]. Filozofická Fakulta Prešovskej Univerzity [Philosophical Faculty of the University of Prešov]. https://www.ff.unipo.sk/sloval/Slovnik/slovnik.html. (10 March, 2026.)
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Kačala, Ján
    (2025) Skladba slovenského jazyka [The composition of the Slovak language]. Matica Slovenská.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Kizach, Johannes
    (2012) Evidence for weight effects in Russian. Russian Linguistics, (), –. 10.1007/s11185‑012‑9096‑0
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11185-012-9096-0 [Google Scholar]
  25. Mains, Paul, McGowan, Kevin & Medeiros, David J.
    (2015) Gradient acceptability by length in heavy NP shift. Presented at the89th Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, Portland OR.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Medeiros, David, Mains, Paul & McGowan, Kevin B.
    (2021) Ceiling effects on weight in heavy NP shift. Linguistic Inquiry, (), –. 10.1162/ling_a_00382
     https://doi.org/10.1162/ling_a_00382 [Google Scholar]
  27. Melnick, Robin Jeffrey
    (2017) Consistency in variation: On the provenance of end-weight. Stanford University PhD Thesis.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan
    (1985) A comprehensive grammar of the English language. Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Ross, John Robert
    (1967) Constraints on variables in syntax. MIT PhD Thesis.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Schmid, Hans-Jörg & Küchenhoff, Helmut
    (2013) Collostructional analysis and other ways of measuring lexicogrammatical attraction: Theoretical premises, practical problems and cognitive underpinnings. Cognitive Linguistics, (), –. 10.1515/cog‑2013‑0018
     https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2013-0018 [Google Scholar]
  31. Stallings, Lynne M. & MacDonald, Maryellen C.
    (2011) It’s not just the “heavy NP”: Relative phrase length modulates the production of heavy-NP shift. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, (), –. 10.1007/s10936‑010‑9163‑x
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-010-9163-x [Google Scholar]
  32. Stallings, Lynne M., MacDonald, Maryellen C. & O’Seaghdha, Padraig G.
    (1998) Phrasal ordering constraints in sentence production: Phrase length and verb disposition in heavy-NP shift. Journal of Memory and Language, (), –. 10.1006/jmla.1998.2586
     https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1998.2586 [Google Scholar]
  33. Stefanowitsch, Anatol
    (2013) Collostructional analysis. InHoffmann, Thomas & Graeme Trousdale (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Construction Grammar (pp.–). Oxford UP. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.013.0016
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.013.0016 [Google Scholar]
  34. Stefanowitsch, Anatol & Gries, Stefan Th
    (2003) Collostructions: Investigating the interaction of words and constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, (), –. 10.1075/ijcl.8.2.03ste
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.8.2.03ste [Google Scholar]
  35. (2005) Covarying collexemes. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, (), –. 10.1515/cllt.2005.1.1.1
     https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt.2005.1.1.1 [Google Scholar]
  36. Szmrecsányi, Benedikt
    (2004) On operationalizing syntactic complexity. InPurnelle, Gérard, Fairon, Cédrick & Anne Dister (Eds.), Le poids des mots. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Textual Data Statistical Analysis (pp.–). UCL.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Wasow, Thomas
    (1997) Remarks on grammatical weight. Language Variation and Change, (), –. 10.1017/S0954394500001800
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394500001800 [Google Scholar]
  38. (2002) Postverbal behavior. Center for the Study of Language and Information.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Wasow, Thomas & Arnold, Jennifer
    (2003) Post-verbal constituent ordering in English. InRohdenburg, Günter & Britta Mondorf (Eds.), Determinants of grammatical variation in English (pp.–). De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110900019.119
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110900019.119 [Google Scholar]
  40. Woods, Anthony, Fletcher, Paul & Hughes, Arthur
    (1986) Statistics in language studies. Cambridge UP. 10.1017/CBO9781139165891
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139165891 [Google Scholar]
  41. Zec, Draga & Inkelas, Sharon
    (1990) Prosodically constrained syntax. InInkelas, Sharon & Draga Zec (Eds.), The phonology-syntax connection (pp.–). The University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/rcl.00258.hor
Loading
Weight effects in Slovak
John Benjamins ; https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.00258.hor
/content/journals/10.1075/rcl.00258.hor
/content/journals/10.1075/rcl.00258.hor
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: constituent order ; Heavy NP Shift ; weight effects ; Slovak ; principle of end-weight

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error