oa Accent-induced coder bias

References

1. Boersma, P. , & Weenink, D
   (2010) Praat: Doing phonetics by computer. [computer program].
   [Google Scholar]
2. Brennan, E.M. , & Brennan, J.S
   (1981) Accent scaling and language attitudes: Reactions to Mexican American English speech. Language and Speech, 24(3), 207–221.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bybee, J.L
   (1999) Usage-based phonology. Functionalism and Formalism in Linguistics, 1, 211–242. doi: 10.1075/slcs.41.12byb
   https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.41.12byb [Google Scholar]
4. Bybee, J.L
   (2007) From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition. Language, 82(4), 711–733. doi: 10.1353/lan.2006.0186
   https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2006.0186 [Google Scholar]
5. Christy, A.L
   (2010) The effects of explicit knowledge of and implicit attitudes about race on adult perceptions of children’s speech. Unpublished MA thesis, University of Minnesota.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Cronbach, L.J
   (1951) Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334. doi: 10.1007/BF02310555
   https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555 [Google Scholar]
7. Cutler, A. , Eisner, F. , McQueen, J.M. , & Norris, D
   (2010) How abstract phonemic categories are necessary for coping with speaker-related variation. Laboratory Phonology,10, 91–111.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Drager, K
   (2005) From bad to bed: The relationship between perceived age and vowel perception in New Zealand English. Te Reo, 48, 55–68.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Drager, K
   (2010) Sociophonetic variation in speech perception. Language and Linguistics Compass, 4(7), 473–480. doi: 10.1111/j.1749‑818X.2010.00210.x
   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2010.00210.x [Google Scholar]
10. Drager, K
    (2011) Speaker age and vowel perception. Language and Speech, 54(1), 99–121. doi: 10.1177/0023830910388017
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830910388017 [Google Scholar]
11. Escudero, P. , Boersma, P. , Rauber, A.S. , & Bion, R.A.H
    (2009) A cross-dialect acoustic description of vowels: Brazilian and European Portuguese RID E-6746-2011. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 126(3), 1379–1393. doi: 10.1121/1.3180321
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3180321 [Google Scholar]
12. Evans, K.E
    (2012) Unpacking listener bias: The effects of attitudes, knowledge, and experience on clinician’s ratings of African-American children’s speech. Unpublished MA thesis, University of Minnesota.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Giles, H
    (1973) Accent mobility: A model and some data. Anthropological Linguistics, 15, 87–105.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Hall-Lew, L. , & Fix, S
    (2012) Perceptual coding reliability of (L)-vocalization in casual speech data. Lingua, 122(7), 794–809. doi: 10.1016/j.lingua.2011.12.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2011.12.005 [Google Scholar]
15. Hay, J. , & Drager, K
    (2010) Stuffed toys and speech perception. Linguistics, 48(4), 865–892. doi: 10.1515/ling.2010.027
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2010.027 [Google Scholar]
16. Hay, J. , Nolan, A. , & Drager, K
    (2006) From fush to feesh: Exemplar priming in speech perception. The Linguistic Review, 23(3), 351–379. doi: 10.1515/TLR.2006.014
    https://doi.org/10.1515/TLR.2006.014 [Google Scholar]
17. Hay, J. , Warren, P. , & Drager, K
    (2006) Factors influencing speech perception in the context of a merger-in-progress. Journal of Phonetics, 34(4), 458–484. doi: 10.1016/j.wocn.2005.10.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2005.10.001 [Google Scholar]
18. Heeringa, W. , & Hinskens, F
    (2014) Convergence between dialect varieties and dialect groups in the Dutch language area. In B. Szmrecsanyi & B. Wälchli (Eds.), Aggregating dialectology, typology, and register analysis: Linguistic variation in text and speech (pp. 26–52). Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110317558.26
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110317558.26 [Google Scholar]
19. Hinskens, F. , & van Oostendorp, M
    (2009) Sources of phonological variation in a large database for Dutch dialects. In S. Tsiplakou , M. Karyolemou , & P.Y. Pavlou (Eds.), Language variation-European perspectives II: Selected papers from the 4th international conference on language variation in Europe (ICLaVE 4), Nicosia, June 2007 (pp. 103–118). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/silv.5.09hin
    https://doi.org/10.1075/silv.5.09hin [Google Scholar]
20. Hove, I
    (2002) Die Aussprache der Standardsprache in der deutschen Schweiz. Tübingen: Niemeyer. doi: 10.1515/9783110919936
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110919936 [Google Scholar]
21. Huesmann, A
    (1998) Zwischen Dialekt und Standard: Empirische Untersuchung zur Soziolinguistik des Varietätenspektrums im deutschen. Tübingen, Niemeyer.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Kang, O. , & Rubin, D.L
    (2009) Reverse linguistic stereotyping: Measuring the effect of listener expectations on speech evaluation. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 28(4), 441–456. doi: 10.1177/0261927X09341950
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X09341950 [Google Scholar]
23. Klausmann, H
    (1985) Die breisgauer Mundarten. Teil 1. Textband. Marburg: N.G. Elwert Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
24. König, W
    (1989) Atlas zur Aussprache des Schriftdeutschen in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Ismaening: Max Hueber Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Kinzler, K.D. , Shutts, K. , Dejesus, J. , & Spelke, E.S
    (2009) Accent trumps race in guiding children’s social preferences. Social Cognition, 27(4), 623–634. doi: 10.1521/soco.2009.27.4.623
    https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2009.27.4.623 [Google Scholar]
26. Labov, W
    (1972) Sociolinguistic patterns. Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Labov, W
    (2006) The social stratification of English in New York City. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511618208
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511618208 [Google Scholar]
28. Löffler, H
    (1994) Germanistische Soziolinguistik. Berlin: Ehrich Schmidt Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Mangold, M
    (1994) Duden Aussprachewörterbuch. Mannheim: Duden Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Munro, M.J. , Derwing, T.M. , & Flege, J.E
    (1999) Canadians in Alabama: A perceptual study of dialect acquisition in adults. Journal of Phonetics, 27(4), 385–403. doi: 10.1006/jpho.1999.0101
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.1999.0101 [Google Scholar]
31. Niedzielski, N
    (1999) The effect of social information on the perception of sociolinguistic variables. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 18(1), 62–85. doi: 10.1177/0261927X99018001005
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X99018001005 [Google Scholar]
32. Noth, H
    (1993) Alemannisches Dialekthandbuch vom Kaiserstuhl und seiner Umgebung. Freiburg i. Br: Schillinger Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Noth, H
    (1996) Breisgauer Alemannische Kurzgrammatik. Freiburg: Verein zur Förderung der Landeskunde an den Schulen e.V.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Palmeri, T.J. , Goldinger, S.D. , & Pisoni, D.B
    (1993) Episodic encoding of voice attributes and recognition memory for spoken words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,19(2), 309–328. doi: 10.1037/0278‑7393.19.2.309
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.19.2.309 [Google Scholar]
35. Pierrehumbert, J.B
    (2001) Exemplar dynamics: Word frequency, lenition and contrast. Typological Studies in Language, 45, 137–158. doi: 10.1075/tsl.45.08pie
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.45.08pie [Google Scholar]
36. Pietraszewski, D. , & Schwartz, A
    (2014) Evidence that accent is a dimension of social categorization, not a byproduct of perceptual salience, familiarity, or ease-of-processing. Evolution and Human Behavior, 35(1), 43–50. doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2013.09.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2013.09.006 [Google Scholar]
37. Preston, D.R
    (1993) Folk dialect maps. In A.W. Glowka & D.M. Lance (Eds.), Language variation in North American English: Research and teaching (pp.333–377). New York: Modern Language Association of America.
    [Google Scholar]
38. R Development Core Team
    (2009) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Rakić, T. , Steffens, M.C. , & Mummendey, A
    (2011) Blinded by the accent! the minor role of looks in ethnic categorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(1), 16–29. doi: 10.1037/a0021522
    https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021522 [Google Scholar]
40. Repp, B.H. , & Liberman, A.M
    (1987) Phonetic category boundaries are flexible. In S. Harnad (Ed.), Categorical perception: The groundwork of cognition (89–112). New York: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Rubin, D.L
    (1992) Nonlanguage factors affecting undergraduates’ judgments of nonnative english-speaking teaching assistants. Research in Higher Education, 33(4), 511–531. doi: 10.1007/BF00973770
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00973770 [Google Scholar]
42. Sloos, M
    (2012) Standard or dialect? A new online elicitation method. Dialectologia, 9, 98–113.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Sloos, M
    (2013a) Frequency and phonological grammar: An integrated approach. evidence from German, Indonesian, and Japanese. PhD dissertation. University of Groningen.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Sloos, M
    (2013b) Halo! don’t always trust the native speaker. In C. Conlan (Ed.), Evolving paradigms: Language and applied linguistics in a changing world (pp. 325–350). Perth: Applied Linguistics Association of Australia.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Spiekermann, H
    (2008) Sprache in Baden-Württemberg: Merkmale des regionalen Standards. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag. doi: 10.1515/9783484971028
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783484971028 [Google Scholar]
46. Stearns, M.J. , & Voge, W
    (1979) The contemporary pronunciation of long in Modern Standard German: A data-based, computer-assisted analysis. In J. Köster (Ed.), Hamburger Phonetische Beiträge. Untersuchungen zur Phonetik und Linguistik. Miszellen VI (pp. 127–181). Hamburg: Helmut Buske Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Steger, H
    (1989) Südwestdeutscher Sprachatlas. Marburg: Elwert.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Traunmüller, H
    (1990) Analytical expressions for the tonotopic sensory scale. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 88(1), 97–100. doi: 10.1121/1.399849
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.399849 [Google Scholar]
49. van Bezooijen, R. , & van Heuven, V
    (2010) Avant-garde Dutch: A perceptual, acoustic and evaluational study. In D.R. Preston , & N.A. Niedzielski (Eds.), A reader in sociophonetics (pp. 357–378). New York: Walter de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Veer, B. van der
    (2006) The Italian ‘mobile diphthongs’: A test case for experimental phonetics and phonological theory. PhD dissertation. Utrecht: LOT Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
51. van Heugten, M. , & Johnson, E.K
    (2014) Learning to contend with accents in infancy: Benefits of brief speaker exposure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(1), 340–350. doi: 10.1037/a0032192
    https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032192 [Google Scholar]
52. van Heuven, V. , van Bezooijen, R. , & Edelman, L
    (2005) Pronunciation of /ɛi/ in avant-garde Dutch: A cross–sex acoustic study. In M. Filppula , J. Klemola , M. Palander , & E. Penttila (Eds.), Dialects across borders (pp. 185–210). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/cilt.273.12heu
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.273.12heu [Google Scholar]
53. van Heuven, V. , & van der Veer, B
    (2003) Speech shadowing as an elicitation technique in variation research: The case of the Italian mobile diphthongs. Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences , Barcelona (pp. 2805–2808).
    [Google Scholar]
54. Wiesinger, P
    (1970) Phonetisch-phonologische Untersuchungen zur Vokalentwicklung in den deutschen Dialekten. I. die Langvokale im Hochdeutschen. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter & Co.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Williams, A. , Garrett, P. , & Coupland, N
    (1999) Dialect recognition. In D. Preston (Ed.), Handbook of perceptual dialectology (pp. 345–358). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/z.hpd1.29wil
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.hpd1.29wil [Google Scholar]