1887
Volume 13, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1877-9751
  • E-ISSN: 1877-976X
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This paper investigates metonymies for person in Chinese and English in the framework of Cognitive Linguistics with an emphasis on cross-linguistic variation. Our central goal is to highlight the important role of cultural elements on the use of metonymy. Three main types of cross-linguistic variation were found at different degrees of granularities of metonymies: variation in metonymic patterns for the general target category person, variation in metonymic patterns for a specific kind of person, and variation in metonymic sources in a specific pattern. The variation was examined against its cultural background, and we conclude that some cross-linguistic differences are to a large extent rooted in culturally relevant factors. The findings suggest that although bodily experience as the general cognitive basis for metonymic pattern/source selection implies the universality of metonymies across different languages, cultural elements contribute to the language-specific preferences for metonymies of a given target.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/rcl.13.1.09zha
2015-06-23
2019-12-12
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abdi, H
    (2007) Bonferroni and Šidák corrections for multiple comparisons. In N.J. Salkind (Ed.), Encyclopedia of measurement and statistics (pp.103–107). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Aksan, Y. , & Kantar, D
    (2007) When love is a journey in English and in Turkish. In P. Cap & J. Nijakowska (Eds.), Current trends in Pragmatics (pp. 93–109). Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Allan, K
    (2006) On groutnolls and nog-heads: A case study of the interaction between culture and cognition in intelligence metaphors. In A. Stefanowitsch & S.T. Gries (Eds.), Corpus-based approaches to metaphor and metonymy (pp. 175–190). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. (2008) Metaphor and metonymy: A diachronic Approach. Wiley-Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Barcelona, A
    (2003) Names: A metonymic “return ticket” in five languages. Jezikoslovlje,4(1), 11–41.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. (2004) Metonymy behind grammar: The motivation of the seemingly “irregular” grammatical behavior of English paragon names. In G. Radden & K.-U. Panther (Eds.), Studies in linguistic motivation (pp. 357–374). Berlin/New York: Mouton De Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. (2011) Reviewing the properties and prototype structure of metonymy. In R. Benczes , A. Barcelona , & F.J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez (Eds.), Defining metonymy in Cognitive Linguistics: Towards a consensus view (pp. 7–58). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/hcp.28.02bar
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.28.02bar [Google Scholar]
  8. Boers, F
    (2003) Applied linguistics perspectives on cross-cultural variation in conceptual metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol, 18(4), 231–238. doi: 10.1207/S15327868MS1804_1
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327868MS1804_1 [Google Scholar]
  9. Brdar, M. , & Brdar-Szabó, R
    (2003) Metonymic coding of linguistic action in English, Croatian and Hungarian. In K.-U. Panther & L. Thornburg (Eds.), Metonymy and pragmatic inferencing (pp. 241–266). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/pbns.113.17brd
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.113.17brd [Google Scholar]
  10. Brdar-Szabó, R. , & Brdar, M
    (2002) MANNER-FOR-ACTIVITY metonymy in a cross-linguistic perspective. In B. Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk & K. Turewicz (Eds.), Cognitive Linguistics today (pp.225–246): Peter Lang Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. (2012) The problem of data in the cognitive linguistic research on metonymy: a cross-linguistic perspective. Language Sciences, 34, 728–745. doi: 10.1016/j.langsci.2012.04.012
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2012.04.012 [Google Scholar]
  12. Brdar, M. , & Brdar-Szabó, R
    (2014) Where does metonymy begin? Some comments on Janda (2011). Cognitive Linguistics,25(2), 313–340. doi: 10.1515/cog‑2014‑0013
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2014-0013 [Google Scholar]
  13. Ceccagno, A. , & Basciano, B
    (2009) Sino-Tibetan: Mandarin Chinese. In R. Lieber & P. Stekauer (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of compounding (pp. 478–490). New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Chao, Y
    (1968) A grammar of spoken Chinese. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Charteris-Black, J
    (2001) Cultural resonance in English and Malay figurative phrases: The case of “hand”. In J. Cotterill & A. Ife (Eds.), Language across boundaries (pp.151–170): London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. (2003) Speaking with forked tongue: A comparative study of metaphor and metonymy in English and Malay phraseology. Metaphor and Symbol, 18(4), 289–310. doi: 10.1207/S15327868MS1804_5
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327868MS1804_5 [Google Scholar]
  17. Charteris-Black, J. , & Ennis, T
    (2001) A comparative study of metaphor in Spanish and English financial reporting. English for Specific Purposes, 20(3), 249–266. doi: 10.1016/S0889‑4906(00)00009‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(00)00009-0 [Google Scholar]
  18. Chen, G
    (1937) Zhong guo hun yin shi [The history of Chinese marriage]. HongKong: Commerce Publishing House.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Chen, S.H
    (1953) An innovation in Chinese biographical writing. The Journal of Asian Studies, 13, 49–62.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Chen, W
    (1997) Xiu ci xue fa fan [Introduction to Rhetoric]. Shanghai: Shanghai Education Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Deignan, A. , & Potter, L
    (2004) A corpus study of metaphors and metonyms in English and Italian. Journal of Pragmatics, 36(7), 1231–1252. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2003.10.010
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2003.10.010 [Google Scholar]
  22. Dirven, R
    (1994) Metaphor and nation. Frankfurt: Peter Lang GmbH.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. (2003) Metonymy and metaphor: Conceptualisation strategies. In R. Dirven & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (pp. 75–111). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110219197
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110219197 [Google Scholar]
  24. Dobrovol’skij, D. , & Piiraninen, E
    (2005) Figurative language: Cross-cultural and cross-linguistic perspectives. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Eberhard, W
    (1971) What is beautiful in a Chinese woman. In W. Eberhard (Ed.), Moral and social values of the Chinese: Selected essays (pp. 271–304). Taipei: Chengwen.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Feyaerts, K
    (1999) Metonymic hierarchies: The conceptualization of stupidity in German idiomatic expressions. In K.-U. Panther & G. Radden (Eds.), Metonymy in language and thought (pp. 309–332). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/hcp.4.18fey
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.4.18fey [Google Scholar]
  27. Geeraerts, D
    (2002) The interaction of metaphor and metonymy in composite expressions. In R. Dirven & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (pp. 435–465). Berlin/New York: Mouton De Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110219197.435
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110219197.435 [Google Scholar]
  28. Geeraerts, D. , & Kristiansen, G
    (2014) Cognitive Linguistics and language variation. In J. Littlemore & J. Taylor (Eds.), The Bloomsbury companion to Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 202–218). London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Han, C
    (1995) Han yu jie dai yi ci dian [Dictionary of Chinese metonymic senses]. Guangzhou: Guangdong Education Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Herrero Ruiz, J
    (2011) The role of metonymy in complex tropes: Cognitive operations and pragmatic implications. In R. Benczes , A. Barcelona , & F.J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez (Eds.), Defining metonymy in Cognitive Linguistics: Towards a consensus view (pp. 167–194). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/hcp.28.09her
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.28.09her [Google Scholar]
  31. Hofstede, G.H
    (1984) Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. California: Sage Publications Ltd.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Hui, C.H. , & Triandis, H.C
    (1986) Individualism-collectivism: A study of cross-cultural researchers. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 17(2), 225–248. doi: 10.1177/0022002186017002006
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002186017002006 [Google Scholar]
  33. Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I
    (2005) Limitations for cross-linguistic metonymies and metaphors. In J.L. Otal Campo , I. Navarro i Ferrando , & B. Bellés Fortuño (Eds.), Cognitive and discourse approaches to metaphor and metonymy (pp.187–200). Castellón, Spain: Universitat Jaume I.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Janda, L
    (2011) Metonymy in word-formation. Cognitive Linguistics, 22(2), 359–392. doi: 10.1515/cogl.2011.014
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2011.014 [Google Scholar]
  35. Kövecses, Z
    (2003) Metaphor and emotion: Language, culture, and body in human feeling. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. (2005) Metaphor in culture: Universality and variation. New York: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511614408
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511614408 [Google Scholar]
  37. Kim, U
    (1994) Individualism and collectivism: Conceptual clarification and elaboration. In U. Kim , H.C. Triandis , Ç. Kâğitçibaşi , S.-C. Choi , & G. Yoon (Eds.), Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method, and applications (pp. 19–40). Thousand Oaks, CA/London: Sage Publications Ltd.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. (1997) Asian collectivism: An indigenous perspective. In H.S.E. Kao & D. Sinha (Eds.), Asian perspectives on psychology (pp. 147–163). New Delhi: SAGE Publications India.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Kleparski, G
    (1996) Semantic change in onomasiological perspective. Paper presented atthe Male and Female Terms in English, Umeå University.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. (1997) Theory and practice of Historical Semantics: The case of Middle English and Early Modern English synonyms of girl/young woman. Lublin: University Press of the Catholic University of Lublin.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Koch, P
    (2011) The pervasiveness of contiguity and metonymy in semantic change. In K. Allan & J.A. Robinson (Eds.), Current methods in Historical Semantics (pp. 259–312). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. doi: 10.1515/9783110252903.259
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110252903.259 [Google Scholar]
  42. Kuwahara, Y
    (2004) Social representations of self and society: A cross-cultural investigation in Britain and Japan. PhD dissertation, School of Human Sciences, University of Surrey.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Lakoff, G
    (1987) Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal anout the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. doi: 10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  44. Lakoff, G. , & Johnson, M
    (1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University Of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Liu, F
    (1999) “Li ci” biao zhu ji qi ta [Swearwords annotation and others]. Ci Shu Yan Jiu [Lexicographical Studies], 2, 40–41.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Łodej, S
    (2012) Concept-driven semasiology and onomasiology of CLERGY. In M. Markus , Y. Iyeiri , R. Heuberger , & E. Chamson (Eds.), Middle and Modern English Corpus Linguistics: A multi-dimensional approach (pp. 93–108). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/scl.50.10lod
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.50.10lod [Google Scholar]
  47. Lou, Z
    (1993) Han yu da ci dian [The great Chinese cictionary]. Shanghai: Publishing House of The Great Chinese Dictionary.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Maalej, Z
    (2004) Figurative language in anger expressions in Tunisian Arabic: An extended view of embodiment. Metaphor and Symbol, 19(1), 51–75. doi: 10.1207/S15327868MS1901_3
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327868MS1901_3 [Google Scholar]
  49. (2007) The embodiment of fear expressions in Tunisian Arabic. In F. Sharifian & G.B. Palmer (Eds.), Applied Cultural Linguistics: Implications for second language learning and intercultural communication (pp. 87–104). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/celcr.7.07maa
    https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.7.07maa [Google Scholar]
  50. Maalej, Z. , & Yu, N
    (2011) Introduction: Embodiment via body parts. In Z. Maalej & N. Yu (Eds.), Embodiment via body parts: Studies from various languages and cultures (pp. 1–20). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/hcp.31.03maa
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.31.03maa [Google Scholar]
  51. Macfarlane, A
    (1978) The origins of English individualism: The family, property and social transition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Nesset, T
    (2010) The art of being negative: metonymical morphological constructions in contrast. Oslo Studies in Language, 2(2), 261–279.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Nivison, D.S
    (1962) Aspects of traditional Chinese biography. Journal of Asian Studies, 21(4), 457–463. doi: 10.2307/2050875
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2050875 [Google Scholar]
  54. Panther, K.-U. , & Thornburg, L
    (1999) The potentiality for actuality metonymy in English and Hungarian. In K.-U. Panther & G. Radden (Eds.), Metonymy in language and thought (pp. 333–357). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/hcp.4.19pan
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.4.19pan [Google Scholar]
  55. Peirsman, Y. , & Geeraerts, D
    (2006) Metonymy as a prototypical category. Cognitive Linguistics, 17(3), 269–316. doi: 10.1515/COG.2006.007
    https://doi.org/10.1515/COG.2006.007 [Google Scholar]
  56. Radden, G
    (2005) The ubiquity of metonymy. In J.L. Otal Campo , I. Navarro i Ferrando , & B. Bellés Fortuño (Eds.), Cognitive and discourse approaches to metaphor and metonymy (pp.11–28). Castellón, Spain: Universitat Jaume I.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Radden, G. , & Kövecses, Z
    (1999) Towards a theory of metonymy. In K.-U. Panther & G. Radden (Eds.), Metonymy in language and thought (pp. 17–59). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/hcp.4.03rad
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.4.03rad [Google Scholar]
  58. Radden, G. , & Seto, K
    (2003) Metonymic construals of shopping requests in HAVE-and BE-languages. In K.-U. Panther & L. Thornburg (Eds.), Metonymy and pragmatic inferencing (pp. 223–240). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/pbns.113.16rad
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.113.16rad [Google Scholar]
  59. Sampson, E.E
    (2000) Reinterpreting individualism and collectivism: Their religious roots and monologic versus dialogic person-other relationship. American Psychologist, 55(12), 1425–1432. doi: 10.1037/0003‑066X.55.12.1425
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.12.1425 [Google Scholar]
  60. Schwartz, S.H
    (1990) Individualism-collectivism: Critique and proposed refinements. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 21(2), 139–157. doi: 10.1177/0022022190212001
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022190212001 [Google Scholar]
  61. Sharifian, F. , Dirven, R. , Yu, N. , & Niemeier, S
    (2008) Culture, body, and language: Conceptualizations of internal body organs across cultures and languages. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. doi: 10.1515/9783110199109
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110199109 [Google Scholar]
  62. Simó, J
    (2008) Chess metaphors in American English and Hungarian. Metaphor and Symbol, 24(1), 42–59. doi: 10.1080/10926480802568463
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10926480802568463 [Google Scholar]
  63. (2011) Metaphors of blood in American English and Hungarian: A cross-linguistic corpus investigation. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(12), 2897–2910. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2011.05.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.05.004 [Google Scholar]
  64. Stenroos, M.B
    (2002) Words for MAN in the transmission of Piers Plowman. In J.E.D. Vera (Ed.), A changing world of words: Studies in English Historical Lexicography, Lexicology and Semantics (pp. 375–409). New York/Amsterdam: Rodopi.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Triandis, H.C
    (1988) Collectivism vs. individualism: A reconceptualization of a basic concept in cross-cultural social psychology. In G. Verma & C. Bagley (Eds.), Cross-cultural studies of personality, attitudes and cognition (pp. 60–95). London: MacMillan. doi: 10.1007/978‑1‑349‑08120‑2_3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-08120-2_3 [Google Scholar]
  66. (1990) Cross-cultural studies of individualism and collectivism. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 37, 41–133.
    [Google Scholar]
  67. (1995) Individualism and collectivism. San Francisco: Westview Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Weber, M
    (1930[1904]) The protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism ( T. Parson , Trans.). New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Wu, H
    (2008) Zhong guo gu nv fu shi yu shen ti ge ming, 1911–1935 [Dress and body revolution of Chinese women: 1911–1935]. Shanghai: Oriental Publishing Center.
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Yang, S
    (1980) Han wen wen yan xiu ci [Rhetoric in Classical Chinese]. Beijing: Zhonghua Book Company.
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Yu, N
    (2008a) Metaphor from body and culture. In R.W. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 247–261). New York: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511816802.016
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816802.016 [Google Scholar]
  72. (2008b) The relationship between metaphor, body and culture. In R.M. Frank , R. Dirven , T. Ziemke , & E. Bernárdez (Eds.), Body, language and mind: Sociocultural situatedness (pp. 387–407). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  73. (2009) The Chinese HEART in a cognitive perspective: Culture, body, and language. Berlin/New York: Mouton De Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110213348
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110213348 [Google Scholar]
  74. Zhang, Gong
    (1963) Xian dai han yu xiu ci xue [The modern Chinese Rhetoric]. Tianjin: Tianjin People’s Publishing House.
    [Google Scholar]
  75. Zhang, Gonggui
    (1993) Han yu dai yu ci dian [Dictionary of Chinese substitutive words]. Nanjing: Jiangshu Education Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  76. Zhao, W
    (2001) Shu xi de mo sheng ren: Chuan tong wen hua zhong de nv xing shen mei [The damilar stranger: The female aesthetics in the traditional culture]. Shi Jia Zhuang: He Bei People’s Publishing House.
    [Google Scholar]
  77. Zheng, J
    (2008) Tu shuo zhong guo chuan tong fu shi [A pictorial introduction to traditional Chinese clothing]. Xi’an: World Publishing Corporation.
    [Google Scholar]
  78. Zhou, X. , & Gao, C
    (1994) Zhong guo gu dai fu shi da guan [An introduction to ancient Chinese articles of clothing]. Chongqing: Chongqing Publishing House.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/rcl.13.1.09zha
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Chinese-English , contrastive , cultural influences , embodiment , metonymy and person
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error