Applying Cognitive Linguistics

References

1. Achard, M. , & Niemeier, S
   (Eds.) (2004) Cognitive Linguistics, second language acquisition, and foreign language teaching. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110199857
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110199857 [Google Scholar]
2. Alejo, R
   (2010a) Making sense of phrasal verbs: A cognitive linguistic account of L2 learning. AILA Review, 23(1), 50–71. doi: 10.1075/aila.23.04ale
   https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.23.04ale [Google Scholar]
3. Alejo, R
   (2010b) Where does the money go? An analysis of the container metaphor in economics: The market and the economy. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(4), 1137–1150. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2009.08.013
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.08.013 [Google Scholar]
4. Aske, J
   (1989) Path predicates in English and Spanish: A closer look. In K. Hall , M. Meacham , & R. Shapiro (Eds.), Proceedings of the fifteenth annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (pp.1–14). Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Barcelona, A
   (Ed.) (2000) Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads: A cognitive perspective. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Barcelona, A
   (2003) Metonymy in Cognitive Linguistics: An analysis and a few modest proposals. In H. Cuyckens , K.U. Panther , & T. Berg (Eds.), Motivation in language: Studies in honor of Günter Radden (pp.223–255). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/cilt.243.15bar
   https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.243.15bar [Google Scholar]
7. Barcelona, A. , & Valenzuela, J
   (2011) An overview of cognitive linguistics. In M. Brdar , S.T. Gries , & M.Z. Fuchs (Eds.), Cognitive Linguistics: Convergence and expansion (pp.17–44). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/hcp.32.05bar
   https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.32.05bar [Google Scholar]
8. Beger, A
   (2011) Deliberate metaphors?: An exploration of the choice and functions of metaphors in US-American college lectures. metaphorik.de, 20, 39–60.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Benczes, R. , Barcelona, A. , & Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F.J
   (Eds.) (2011) Defining metonymy in cognitive linguistics: Towards a consensus view. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/hcp.28
   https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.28 [Google Scholar]
10. Bielak, J
    (2011) Cognitive linguistics and foreign language pedagogy: An overview of recent trends and developments. In M. Pawlak (Ed.), Extending the boundaries of research on second language learning and teaching (pp.241–262) Heidelberg: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978‑3‑642‑20141‑7_19
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20141-7_19 [Google Scholar]
11. Blumenthal-Dramé, A
    (2012) Entrenchment in usage-based theories: What corpus data do and do not reveal about the mind. Berlin: Walter De Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110294002
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110294002 [Google Scholar]
12. Boers, F
    (2000) Metaphor awareness and vocabulary retention. Applied Linguistics, 21(4), 553–571. doi: 10.1093/applin/21.4.553
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/21.4.553 [Google Scholar]
13. Boers, F
    (2011) Cognitive semantic ways of teaching figurative phrases: An assessment. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 9(1), 227–261. doi: 10.1075/rcl.9.1.11boe
    https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.9.1.11boe [Google Scholar]
14. Boers, F
    (2014) Cognitive Linguistics and language pedagogy: Finding ways forward. Paper presented at the 9th AELCO International conference , Badajoz, Spain.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Boers, F. , & Demecheleer, M
    (1998) A cognitive semantic approach to teaching prepositions. English Language Teaching Journal, 53, 197–204. doi: 10.1093/elt/52.3.197
    https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/52.3.197 [Google Scholar]
16. Boers, F. , De Rycker, A. , & De Knop. S
    (2010) Fostering language teaching efficiency through cognitive linguistics: Introduction. In S. De Knop , F. Boers , & A. De Rycker (Eds.), Fostering language teaching efficiency through Cognitive Linguistics (pp.1–26). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110245837.1
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110245837.1 [Google Scholar]
17. Boers, F. , & Lindstromberg, S
    (2006) Cognitive Linguistic approaches to second or foreign language instruction: Rationale, proposals and evaluation. In G. Kristaensen , R. Dirven , M. Achard , & F.J. Ruiz-Mendoza (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics: Current applications and future perspectives (pp.305–358). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Boers, F. , & Lindstromberg, S
    (Eds.) (2008) Cognitive linguistic approaches to teaching vocabulary and phraseology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110199161
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110199161 [Google Scholar]
19. Boers, F. , & Lindstromberg, S
    (2009) Optimizing a lexical approach to instructed second language acquisition. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1057/9780230245006
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230245006 [Google Scholar]
20. Boers, F. , Piquer-Píriz, A. Mª , Stengers, H. , & Eyckmans, J
    (2009) Does pictorial elucidation foster recollection of idioms?Language Teaching Research, 13(4), 367–382. doi: 10.1177/1362168809341505
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168809341505 [Google Scholar]
21. Brooks, P.J. , & Tomasello, M
    (1999a) Young children learn to produce passives with nonce verbs. Developmental Psychology, 35(1), 29–44. doi: 10.1037/0012‑1649.35.1.29
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.35.1.29 [Google Scholar]
22. Brooks, P.J. , & Tomasello, M
    (1999b) How children constrain their argument structure constructions. Language, 75, 720–738. doi: 10.2307/417731
    https://doi.org/10.2307/417731 [Google Scholar]
23. Butler, C.S.
    (2009) The Lexical Constructional Model: Genesis, strengths and challenges. In C.S. Butler & J. Martín Arista (Eds.), Deconstructing constructions (pp.117–152). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/slcs.107.07the
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.107.07the [Google Scholar]
24. Caballero, R
    (2006) Re-viewing space: Figurative language in architects’ assessment of built space. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110893892
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110893892 [Google Scholar]
25. Caballero, R. , & Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I
    . (forthcoming) And yet they DON’T move: A genre approach to metaphorical motion. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Caballero, R. , & Suárez-Toste, E
    (2008) Translating the senses: Teaching the metaphors in winespeak. In F. Boers & S. Lindstromberg , (Eds.), Cognitive linguistic approaches to teaching vocabulary and phraseology (241–259). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Cadierno, T
    (2004) Expressing motion events in a second language: A cognitive typological perspective. In M. Achard & S. Neimeier (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics, second language acquisition, and foreign language teaching (pp.13–49). The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110199857.13
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110199857.13 [Google Scholar]
28. Cadierno, T. , & Lund, K
    (2004) Cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition: Motion events in a typological framework. In B. VanPatten , J. Williams , S. Rott , & M. Overstreet (Eds.), Form-meaning connections in second language acquisition (pp.139–154). Hillsdale, N.J: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Cadierno, T. , & Ruiz, L
    (2006) Motion events in Spanish L2 acquisition. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 4(1), 183–216. doi: 10.1075/arcl.4.08cad
    https://doi.org/10.1075/arcl.4.08cad [Google Scholar]
30. Cameron, L
    (2003) Metaphor in educational discourse. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Charteris-Black, J
    (2005) Politicians and rhetoric: The persuasive power of metaphor. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1057/9780230501706
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230501706 [Google Scholar]
32. Cienki, A. , & Müller, C
    (Eds.) (2008) Metaphor and gesture. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/gs.3
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gs.3 [Google Scholar]
33. Condon, N
    (2008) How cognitive linguistic motivations influence the phrasal verbs. In F. Boers & S. Lindstromberg (Eds.), Cognitive linguistic approaches to teaching vocabulary and phraseology (pp.133–158). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Croft, W
    (2001) Radical construction grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299554.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299554.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
35. Croft, W
    (2007) Construction grammar. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuykens (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp.463–508). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Croft, W. , & Cruse, D.A.
    (2004) Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511803864
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803864 [Google Scholar]
37. Cuenca, M.J. , & Hilferty, J
    (1999) Introducción a la lingüística cognitiva. Barcelona: Ariel.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Dabrowska, E
    (2009) Constructing a second language: Some final thoughts. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 7(1), 277–290. doi: 10.1075/arcl.7.11dab
    https://doi.org/10.1075/arcl.7.11dab [Google Scholar]
39. Dabrowska, E. , & Divjak, D
    (Eds.) (2015) Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110292022
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110292022 [Google Scholar]
40. Deignan, A. , Gabrys, D. , & Solska, A
    (1997) Teaching English metaphors using cross-linguistic awareness-raising activities. English Language Teaching Journal, 51(4), 352–360. doi: 10.1093/elt/51.4.352
    https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/51.4.352 [Google Scholar]
41. Deignan, A. , Littlemore, J. , & Semino, E
    (2013) Figurative language, genre and register. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
42. De Knop, S. , Boers, F. , & De Rycker, T
    (Eds.) (2010) Fostering language teaching efficiency through Cognitive Linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110245837
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110245837 [Google Scholar]
43. Dirven, R
    (2001) English phrasal verbs: Theory and didactic application. In M. Pütz , S. Niemeier , & R. Dirven (Eds.), Applied Cognitive Linguistics II: Language pedagogy (pp.3–27). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110866254
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110866254 [Google Scholar]
44. Ellis, N.C.
    (2010) Construction learning as category learning. In M. Pütz & L. Sicola (Eds.), Cognitive processing and second language acquisition (pp.27–48). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/celcr.13.05ell
    https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.13.05ell [Google Scholar]
45. Ellis, N.C. , & Cadierno, T
    (2009) Constructing a second language: Introduction to the Special Section. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 7(1), 111–139. doi: 10.1075/arcl.7.05ell
    https://doi.org/10.1075/arcl.7.05ell [Google Scholar]
46. Ellis, N.C. , & Ferreira-Junior, F
    (2009) Constructions and their acquisition Islands and the distinctiveness of their occupancy. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 7(1), 187–220.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Ellis, N.C. , & O’Donnell, M
    (2011) Robust language acquisition: An emergent consequence of language as a complex adaptive system. In L. Carlson , C. Hölscher , & T. Shipley (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp.3512–3517). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Ellis, N.C. , O’Donnell, M. , & Römer, U
    (2015) Usage-based language learning. In B. MacWhinney & W. O’Grady (Eds.), The handbook of language emergence (pp.163–180). Wiley-Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Ellis, N.C. , & Robinson, P
    (2008) An introduction to cognitive linguistics, second language acquisition, and language instruction. In P. Robinson & N. Ellis (Eds.), The handbook of Cognitive Linguistics and second language acquisition (pp.3–23). New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Evans, V. , Bergen, B.K. , & Zinken, J
    (2007a) (Eds.). The Cognitive Linguistics reader. London: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Evans, V. , Bergen, B.K. , & Zinken, J
    (2007b). The Cognitive Linguistics enterprise: An overview. In V. Evans , B.K. Bergen , & J. Zinken (Eds.), The Cognitive Linguistics reader (pp.2–36). London: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Evans, V. , & Green, M
    (2006) Cognitive linguistics: An introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Filipović, L. , & Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I
    (2015) Motion. In E. Dabrowska & D. Divjak (Eds.), Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp.526–537). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Fillmore, C.J. , & Kay, P
    (1993) Construction grammar coursebook: Chapters 1 thru 11. Berkeley: University of California Berkeley.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Geeraerts, D. , & Cuyckens, H
    (2007a) Introducing cognitive linguistics. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp.3–21). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Geeraerts, D. , & Cuyckens, H
    (Eds.) (2007b) The Oxford handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
57. Gibbs, R.W.
    (1994) The poetics of mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
58. Gibbs, R.W.
    (2001) Evaluating contemporary models of figurative language understanding. Metaphor and Symbol, 16, 317–333. doi: 10.1080/10926488.2001.9678900
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2001.9678900 [Google Scholar]
59. Gibbs, R.W
    (Ed.) (2008) The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511816802
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816802 [Google Scholar]
60. Gibbs, R.W.
    (2015) Metaphor. In E. Dabrowska & D. Divjak (Eds.), Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp.167–189). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
61. Goldberg, A
    (1995) Constructions: A Construction Grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
62. Goldberg, A.E.
    (2013) Constructionist approaches. In T. Hoffmann & G. Trousdale (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of construction grammar (pp.15–31). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
63. Gonzálvez-García, F. , & Butler, C.S.
    (2006) Mapping functional-cognitive space. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 4(1), 39–96. doi: 10.1075/arcl.4.04gon
    https://doi.org/10.1075/arcl.4.04gon [Google Scholar]
64. Gries, S.T. , & Wulff, S
    (2005) Do foreign language learners also have constructions? Evidence from primining, sorting, and corpora. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 3, 182–200. doi: 10.1075/arcl.3.10gri
    https://doi.org/10.1075/arcl.3.10gri [Google Scholar]
65. Han, Z. , & Cadierno, T
    (Eds.) (2010) Linguistic relativity in SLA: Thinking for speaking. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
66. Herrera-Soler, H. , & White, M
    (Eds.) (2012) Metaphor and mills: Figurative language in business and economics. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110274585
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110274585 [Google Scholar]
67. Herrmann, J.B.
    (2013) Metaphor in academic discourse: Linguistic forms, conceptual structures, communicative functions and cognitive representations. VU University, Amsterdam.
    [Google Scholar]
68. Hijazo-Gascón, A. , & Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I
    (2013) Las lenguas románicas y la tipología de los eventos de movimiento. Romanische Forschungen, 125(4), 467–494. doi: 10.3196/003581213808754483
    https://doi.org/10.3196/003581213808754483 [Google Scholar]
69. Hoffmann, T. , & Trousdale, G
    (2013) The Oxford handbook of construction grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
70. Holme, R
    (2009) Cognitive linguistics and language teaching. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1057/9780230233676
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230233676 [Google Scholar]
71. Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I
    (2009) Path salience in motion events. In E.L.J. Guo , N. Budwig , S. Ervin-Tripp , N. Nakamura , & S. Özçaliskan (Eds.), Crosslinguistic approaches to the psychology of language: Research in the tradition of Dan Isaac Slobin (pp.403–14). New York: Psychology Press.
    [Google Scholar]
72. Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I. , & Valenzuela, J
    (Eds.) (2012) Lingüística cognitiva. Barcelona: Anthropos.
    [Google Scholar]
73. Imbert, C
    (2012) Path: Ways typology has walked through it. Language and Linguistics Compass, 6(4), 236–258. doi: 10.1002/lnc3.329
    https://doi.org/10.1002/lnc3.329 [Google Scholar]
74. Jarvis, S. , & Pavlenko, A
    (2008) Crosslinguistic influence in language and cognition. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
75. Kaschak, M.P. , & Glenberg, A.M.
    (2000) Constructing meaning: The role of affordances and grammatical constructions in sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 43, 508–529. doi: 10.1006/jmla.2000.2705
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.2000.2705 [Google Scholar]
76. Koller, V
    (2004) Metaphor and gender in business media discourse: A critical cognitive study. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1057/9780230511286
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230511286 [Google Scholar]
77. Kövecses, Z
    (2002) Metaphor: A practical introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
78. Kövecses, Z
    (2005) Metaphor in culture: Universality and variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511614408
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511614408 [Google Scholar]
79. Kövecses, Z. , & Radden, G
    (1998) Metonymy: Developing a cognitive linguistic view. Cognitive Linguistics, 9(1), 37–78. doi: 10.1515/cogl.1998.9.1.37
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1998.9.1.37 [Google Scholar]
80. Kövecses, Z. , & Szabó, P
    (1996) Idioms: A view from Cognitive Semantics. Applied Linguistics, 17(3), 326–355. doi: 10.1093/applin/17.3.326
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/17.3.326 [Google Scholar]
81. Kristiansen, G. , Achard, M. , Dirven, R. , & Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F.J.
    (Eds.) (2006) Cognitive Linguistics: Current applications and future perspectives. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110197761
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197761 [Google Scholar]
82. Lakoff, G
    (1987) Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. doi: 10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
83. Lakoff, G
    (1993) The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (2nd edition) (pp.202–251). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139173865.013
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173865.013 [Google Scholar]
84. Lakoff, G. , & Johnson, M
    (1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
85. Langacker, R.W.
    (1987) Foundations of cognitive grammar. Vol. 1, Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Standford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
86. Lazar, G
    (1996) Using figurative language to expand students’ vocabulary. English Language Teaching Journal, 50(1), 43–51. doi: 10.1093/elt/50.1.43
    https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/50.1.43 [Google Scholar]
87. Lazar, G
    (2003) Meanings and metaphor: Activities to practise figurative language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
88. Lindstromberg, S
    (1996) Prepositions: Meaning and method. English Language Teaching Journal, 50(3), 225–236. doi: 10.1093/elt/50.3.225
    https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/50.3.225 [Google Scholar]
89. Lindstromberg, S
    (2010) English prepositions explained (revised edition). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/z.157
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.157 [Google Scholar]
90. Littlemore, J
    (2009) Applying Cognitive Linguistics to second language learning and teaching. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1057/9780230245259
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230245259 [Google Scholar]
91. Littlemore, J
    (2015) Metonymy. Hidden shortcuts in language, thought and communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781107338814
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107338814 [Google Scholar]
92. Littlemore, J. , Chen, P. , Barnden, J. , & Koester, A
    (2011) Difficulties in metaphor comprehension faced by international students whose first language is not English. Applied Linguistics, 32(4), 208–429. doi: 10.1093/applin/amr009
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amr009 [Google Scholar]
93. Littlemore, J. , & Juchem-Grundmann, C
    (Eds.) (2010) Applied Cognitive Linguistics in second language learning and teaching. AILA Review, 23 (special issue). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/aila.23
    https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.23 [Google Scholar]
94. Littlemore, J. , & Low, G
    (2006) Figurative thinking and foreign language learning. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1057/9780230627567
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230627567 [Google Scholar]
95. Littlemore, J. , & Taylor, J.R.
    (Eds.) (2014) The Bloomsbury companion to cognitive linguistics. London: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
96. Low, G
    (1988) On teaching metaphor. Applied linguistics, 9(2), 125–147. doi: 10.1093/applin/9.2.125
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/9.2.125 [Google Scholar]
97. Low, G. , Littlemore, J. , & Koester, A
    (2008) The use of metaphor in three university academic lectures. Applied Linguistics, 29(3), 428–455. doi: 10.1093/applin/amn008
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amn008 [Google Scholar]
98. MacArthur, F. , & Littlemore, J
    (2008) A discovery approach using corpora in the foreign language classroom. In F. Boers & S. Lindstromberg (Eds.), Cognitive linguistic approaches to teaching vocabulary and phraseology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
99. MacLennan, C.H.
    (1994) Metaphors and prototypes in the learning teaching of grammar and vocabulary. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 32(3), 97–110. doi: 10.1515/iral.1994.32.2.97
    https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.1994.32.2.97 [Google Scholar]
100. Musolff, A
     (2004) Metaphor and political discourse: Analogical reasoning in debates about Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1057/9780230504516
     https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230504516 [Google Scholar]
101. Odlin, T
     (1989) Language transfer: Cross-linguistic influence in language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139524537
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524537 [Google Scholar]
102. Özçaliskan, S
     (2004) Encoding the manner, path, ground components of a metaphorical motion event. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 2, 73−102. doi: 10.1075/arcl.2.03ozc
     https://doi.org/10.1075/arcl.2.03ozc [Google Scholar]
103. Özçaliskan, S
     (2005) Metaphor meets typology: Ways of moving metaphorically in English and Turkish. Cognitive Linguistics, 16(1): 207−246. doi: 10.1515/cogl.2005.16.1.207
     https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2005.16.1.207 [Google Scholar]
104. Özçaliskan, S
     (2015) Ways of crossing a spatial boundary in typologically distinct languages. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36(2), 485–508. doi: 10.1017/S0142716413000325
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716413000325 [Google Scholar]
105. Panther, K.U. , & Radden, G
     (Eds.) (1999) Metonymy in language and thought. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. doi: 10.1075/hcp.4
     https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.4 [Google Scholar]
106. Piquer-Píriz, A.M.
     (2008) Reasoning figuratively in early EFL: Some implications for the development of vocabulary. In F. Boers & S. Lindstromberg (Eds.), Cognitive linguistic approaches to teaching vocabulary and phraseology (pp.219–240). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
107. Ponterotto, D
     (1994) Metaphors we can learn by. English Teaching Forum, 32(3), 2–7. exchanges.state.gov/forum/vols/vol32/no3/p2.htm.
     [Google Scholar]
108. Pütz, M. , Niemeier, S. , & Dirven, R
     (Eds.) (2001a) Applied Cognitive Linguistics I: Theory and language acquisition. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110866247
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110866247 [Google Scholar]
109. Pütz, M. , Niemeier, S. , & Dirven, R
     (Eds.) (2001b) Applied Cognitive Linguistics II: Language pedagogy. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
110. Robinson, P. , & Ellis, N
     (2008) The handbook of Cognitive Linguistics and second language acquisition. New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
111. Rudzka-Ostyn, B
     (2003) Word power: Phrasal verbs and compounds. A cognitive approach. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110197235
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197235 [Google Scholar]
112. Schmid, H. , & Ungerer, F
     (2013) Cognitive linguistics. In J. Simpson (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp.611–624). Oxford: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
113. Slobin, D
     (2004) The many ways to search for a frog: linguistic typology and the expression of motion events. In S. Strömqvist & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Relating events in narrative: Typological and contextual perspectives (pp.219–57). Mahawah, NJ/London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
     [Google Scholar]
114. Slobin, D.I.
     (1996) Two ways to travel: Verbs of motion in English and Spanish. In M. Shibatani , and S.A. Thompson (Eds.), Grammatical constructions: Their form and meaning (pp.195–219). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
     [Google Scholar]
115. Stefanowitsch, A. , & Gries, S.T.
     (2003) Collostructions: Investigating the interaction of words and constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 8(2), 209–243. doi: 10.1075/ijcl.8.2.03ste
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.8.2.03ste [Google Scholar]
116. Talmy, L
     (1985) Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In T. Shopen (Ed.)Language typology and syntactic description (Vol. 3) (pp.57–149). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
117. Talmy, L
     (2000) Toward a cognitive semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
118. Ungerer, F. , & Schmid, H.J.
     (1996)[2008] An introduction to Cognitive Linguistics. London: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
119. Van der Auwera, J. , & Nuyts, J
     (2007) Cognitive linguistics and linguistic typology. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuykens (Eds.), Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp.1074–1091). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
120. Wilcox, P
     (2000) Metaphor in American Sign Language. Washington, D.C.: Gallaudet University Press.
     [Google Scholar]