Applying Cognitive Linguistics
  • ISSN 1877-9751
  • E-ISSN: 1877-976X
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes


Twenty-seven semi-guided office hours’ consultations between lecturers and Spanish-speaking undergraduate students were recorded at five different universities in Europe where English is the medium of instruction. The linguistic data gathered show that metaphor plays a significant role in the way that lecturers explain to visiting Erasmus students how assignments, exams or course contents should be approached and understood. When mentoring their students, lecturers often frame the advice they are giving in metaphorical ways; occasionally this is done overtly, through establishing analogies or non-literal comparisons, but more often it is done covertly, through the use of conventional metaphorical expressions that are not accompanied by words or phrases that signal that the lecturers’ words should be understood as metaphors. This article examines extracts of talk from 5 academic conversations, looking at the different ways that ideas are framed metaphorically and the kind of responses they provoke in a conversational partner. The initial hypothesis was that overt metaphors would be a particularly effective means of communicating an idea in these cross-cultural mentoring sessions. However, when we compare this with covert uses of metaphor in the corpus, there is only weak evidence that it is so. Rather, the communicative success of any use of metaphor seems to depend very largely on the way that the conversational partners enact their roles as collaborative partners in an academic conversation.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Alejo, R
    (2010) Making sense of phrasal verbs: A cognitive linguistics account. In J. Littlemore & C. Juchem-Grundmann (Eds.), Applied cognitive linguistics in second language learning and teaching. AILA Review, 23, 50–71.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Beger, A
    (2011) Deliberate metaphors?: An exploration of the choice and functions of metaphors in US-American college lectures. metaphorik. de, 20, 39–60.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Brooke-Rose, C
    (1958) A grammar of metaphor. London: Secker and Warburg.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Cameron, L
    (2003) Metaphor in educational discourse. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. (2008) Metaphor and talk. In R.W. Gibbs (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp.197–211). New York, N.Y.: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511816802.013
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816802.013 [Google Scholar]
  6. (2010) The discourse dynamics framework for metaphor. In L. Cameron & R. Maslen (Eds.), Metaphor analysis: Research practice in Applied Linguistics, Social Sciences and the Humanities (pp.77–94). London: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Cameron, L. , & Deignan, A
    (2003) Combining large and small corpora to investigate tuning devices around metaphor in spoken discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 18(3), 149–160. doi: 10.1207/S15327868MS1803_02
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327868MS1803_02 [Google Scholar]
  8. Cameron, L. , Maslen, R. , & Low, G
    (2010) Finding systematicity in metaphor use. In L. Cameron & R. Maslen (Eds.), Metaphor analysis: Research practice in Applied Linguistics, Social Sciences and the Humanities (pp.116–146). London: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Coleman, J.A.
    (2006) English-medium teaching in European higher education. Language Teaching, 39(1), 1–14. doi: 10.1017/S026144480600320X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S026144480600320X [Google Scholar]
  10. Corts, D. , & Pollio, H
    (1999) Spontaneous production of figurative language and gesture in college lectures. Metaphor and Symbol, 14(2), 81–100. doi: 10.1207/s15327868ms1402_1
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms1402_1 [Google Scholar]
  11. Deignan, A. , & Cameron, L
    (2009) A re-examination of understanding is seeing. Cognitive Semiotics, 5(1–2), 220–243. doi: 10.1515/cogsem.2013.5.12.220
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogsem.2013.5.12.220 [Google Scholar]
  12. Goatly, A
    (1997) The language of metaphors. London/New York, N.Y.: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780203210000
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203210000 [Google Scholar]
  13. Hartley, L.P.
    (1987) The go-between. London: Penguin.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Herrmann, J.B.
    (2013) Metaphor in academic discourse: Linguistic forms, conceptual structures, communicative functions and cognitive representations. VU University, Amsterdam.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Kövecses, Z
    (2003) Metaphor and emotion: Language, culture, and body in human feeling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Lakoff, G
    (1993) The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (2nd edition, pp.202–251). New York, N.Y.: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139173865.013
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173865.013 [Google Scholar]
  17. Lakoff, G. , & Johnson, M (1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL.: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. (1999) Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York, N.Y.: Basic books.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Littlemore, J
    (2001) The use of metaphor by university lecturers and the problems that it causes for overseas students. Teaching in Higher Education, 6(3), 335–351. doi: 10.1080/13562510120061205
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510120061205 [Google Scholar]
  20. (2003) The effect of cultural background on metaphor interpretation. Metaphor and Symbol, 18(4), 273–288. doi: 10.1207/S15327868MS1804_4
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327868MS1804_4 [Google Scholar]
  21. Littlemore, J. , Chen, P. , Barnden, J. , & Koester, A
    (2011) Difficulties in metaphor comprehension faced by international students whose first language is not English. Applied Linguistics, 32(4), 208–429. doi: 10.1093/applin/amr009
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amr009 [Google Scholar]
  22. Low, G
    (2010) Wot no similes? The curious absence of similes in university lectures. In G. Low , A. Deignan , L. Cameron , & Z. Todd (Eds.), Researching and applying metaphor in the real world (pp.291–308). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/hcp.26.17low
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.26.17low [Google Scholar]
  23. Low, G. , Littlemore, J. , & Koester, A
    (2008) The use of metaphor in three university academic lectures. Applied Linguistics, 29(3), 428–455. doi: 10.1093/applin/amn008
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amn008 [Google Scholar]
  24. MacArthur, F. , Krennmayr, T. , & Littlemore, J
    (2015) How basic is “understanding is seeing” when reasoning about knowledge?: Asymmetric uses of sight metaphors in office hours consultations in English as academic lingua franca. Metaphor and Symbol, 30(3), 184–217. doi: 10.1080/10926488.2015.1049507
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2015.1049507 [Google Scholar]
  25. MacArthur, F. , & Littlemore, J
    (2011) On the repetition of words with the potential for metaphoric extension in conversations between native and non-native speakers of English. Metaphor and the Social World, 1(2), 210–238.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Macmillan English dictionary for advanced learners. (2nd edition) (2007) Oxford: Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Pragglejaz Group
    (2007) MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 22(1), 1–39. doi: 10.1080/10926480709336752
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10926480709336752 [Google Scholar]
  28. Steen, G.J.
    (2011a) From three dimensions to five steps: The value of deliberate metaphor. metaphorik. de, 21, 83–110.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. (2011b) What does ‘really deliberate’ really mean? More thoughts on metaphor and consciousness. Metaphor and the Social World, 1(1), 53–56. doi: 10.1075/msw.1.1.04ste
    https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.1.1.04ste [Google Scholar]
  30. Steen, G.J. , Dorst, A.G. , Herrmann, B. , & Kaal, A.A.
    (2010) A method for linguistic metaphor identification: From MIP to MIPVU. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/celcr.14
    https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.14 [Google Scholar]
  31. Steen, G.J. , Dorst, A.G. , Herrmann, J.B. , Kaal, A.A. , & Krennmayr, T
    (2010) Metaphor in usage. Cognitive Linguistics, 21(4), 765–796. doi: 10.1515/cogl.2010.024
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2010.024 [Google Scholar]
  32. Tannen, D
    (2007) Talking voices: Repetition, dialogue, and imagery in conversational discourse (2nd edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511618987
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511618987 [Google Scholar]
  33. VOICE
    (2013) The Vienna-Oxford international corpus of English(version 2.0 online). Director: B. Seidlhofer. Researchers: A. Breiteneder, T. Klimpfinger, S. Majewski, R. Osimk-Teasdale, M.L. Pitzl, & M. Radeka. voice.univie.ac.at (24/10/2014).
    [Google Scholar]
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error