Applying Cognitive Linguistics
  • ISSN 1877-9751
  • E-ISSN: 1877-976X
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes


This paper analyses the interpretation of boundary-crossing events in second language acquisition (SLA) to determine whether L2 learners are able to select the target-like option for the interpretation of motion events or whether, on the contrary, their choice reflects cross-linguistic influence (CLI) of their L1. The two groups participating in the study – thirty Spanish learners of L2 English and sixteen English first language (L1) speakers – were subjected to an experiment involving an interpretation task with L2 boundary-crossing events pictures. Findings indicate that Spanish L2 learners selected three possible constructions (manner verb + path satellite, path in verb + manner in satellite and a combination of both) in clear contrast to English L1 speakers who only selected one construction (manner verb + path satellite). CLI has also been found to regulate the type of boundary-crossing event selected, primarily in cases of motion INTO a bounded space in the horizontal axis.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Andersen, R
    (1983) Transfer to somewhere. In S. Gass , & L. Selinker (Eds.), Language transfer in language Learning (pp.177–201). Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Aske, J
    (1989) Path predicates in English and Spanish: A closer look. In K. Hall , M. Meacham , & R. Shapiro (Eds.), Proceedings of the fifteenth annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (pp.1–14). Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Athanasopoulos, P. , & Bylund, M
    (2013) The ‘thinking’ in thinking for speaking. Language, Interaction and Acquisition, 4(1), 91–100. doi: 10.1075/lia.4.1.05ath
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lia.4.1.05ath [Google Scholar]
  4. Athanasopoulos, P. , Damjanovic, L. , Burnand, J. , & Bylund, E
    (2015) Learning to think in a second language: Effects of proficiency and length of exposure in English learners of German. Modern Language Journal, 99(Supplement 2015), 138–153. doi: 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2015.12183.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2015.12183.x [Google Scholar]
  5. Berman, R.A. , & Slobin, D.I.
    (1994) Relating events in narrative: A cross-linguistic developmental sStudy. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Brown, A. , & Gullberg, M
    (2010) Changes in encoding of PATH of motion in a first language during acquisition of a second language. Cognitive Linguistics, 21, 263–286. doi: 10.1515/COGL.2010.010
    https://doi.org/10.1515/COGL.2010.010 [Google Scholar]
  7. (2011) Bidirectional cross-linguistic influence in event conceptualization? Expressions of path among Japanese learners of English. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 14, 79–94. doi: 10.1017/S1366728910000064
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728910000064 [Google Scholar]
  8. (2012) Multicompetence and native speaker variation in clausal packaging in Japanese. Second Language Research, 28, 415–442. doi: 10.1177/0267658312455822
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658312455822 [Google Scholar]
  9. Bylund, E
    (2009) Effects of age of L2 acquisition on L1 event conceptualization patterns. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 12, 305–322. doi: 10.1017/S1366728909990137
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728909990137 [Google Scholar]
  10. Bylund, E. , & Athanasopolous, P
    (2015) Televised Whorf: Cognitive restructuring in advanced foreign language learners as a function of audiovisual media exposure. The Modern Language Journal, 99, 1–13. doi: 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2015.12175.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2015.12175.x [Google Scholar]
  11. Bylund, E. , & Jarvis, S
    (2011) L2 effects on L1 event conceptualization. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 14, 47–59. doi: 10.1017/S1366728910000180
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728910000180 [Google Scholar]
  12. Cadierno, T
    (2004) Expressing motion events in a second language: A cognitive typological perspective. In M. Achard & S. Niemeier (Eds.), Cognitive Linguistics, second language acquisition and foreign language teaching (pp.13–49). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110199857.13
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110199857.13 [Google Scholar]
  13. (2008) Learning to talk about motion in a foreign language. In P. Robinson & N.C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp.239–275). New York/London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. (2010) Motion in Danish as a second language: Does the learner’s L1 make a difference?In Z. Han & T. Cadierno (Eds.), Linguistic relativity in SLA: Thinking for speaking (pp.1–33). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Cadierno, T. , & Lund, K
    (2004) Cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition: Motion events in a typological framework. In B. van Patten , J. Williams , S. Rott , & M. Overstreet (Eds.), Form-meaning connections in second language acquisition (pp.139–154). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Cadierno, T. , & Ruiz, L
    (2006) Motion events in Spanish L2 Acquisition. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 4, 183–216. doi: 10.1075/arcl.4.08cad
    https://doi.org/10.1075/arcl.4.08cad [Google Scholar]
  17. Daller, M.H. , Treffers-Daller, J. , & Furman, R
    (2010) Transfer of conceptualization patterns in bilinguals: The construal of motion events in Turkish and German. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 14, 95–119. doi: 10.1017/S1366728910000106
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728910000106 [Google Scholar]
  18. Filipović, L
    (2011) Speaking and remembering in one or two languages: Bilingual vs. monolingual lexicalization and memory for motion event. International Journal of Bilingualism, 15, 466–485. doi: 10.1177/1367006911403062
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006911403062 [Google Scholar]
  19. Flecken, M. , Carroll, M. , Weimar, K. , & von Stutterheim, C
    (2015) Driving along the road or heading for the village?: Conceptual differences underlying motion event encoding in French, German, and French–German L2 users. Modern Language Journal, 99(Supplement 2015), 100–122. doi: 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2015.12181.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2015.12181.x [Google Scholar]
  20. Gennari, S. , Sloman, S.A. , Malt, B.C. & Fitch, W.T.
    (2002) Motion events in language and cognition. Cognition, 83, 49–79. doi: 10.1016/S0010‑0277(01)00166‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(01)00166-4 [Google Scholar]
  21. Gullberg, M. , & Indefrey, P
    (2003) Language background questionnaire: The dynamics of multilingual processing. Nijmegen. Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics. www.mpi.nl/reseach/projects/Multilingualism/questionnaire.pdf.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Hendriks, H. , & Hickmann, M
    (2015) Finding one’s path into another language: On the expression of boundary-crossing by English learners of French. The Modern Language Journal, 99, 14–31. doi: 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2015.12176.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2015.12176.x [Google Scholar]
  23. Hijazo-Gascón, A
    (2011) La expresión de eventos de movimiento y su adquisición en segundas lenguas [The expression of motion events and its acquisition in a second language] (Unpublished PhD dissertation). Universidad de Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.
  24. Levinson, S.C.
    (2003) Space in language and cognition: Explorations in cognitive diversity. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511613609
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613609 [Google Scholar]
  25. Lucy, J
    (1992) Grammatical categories and cognition: A case study of the linguistic relativity hypothesis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511620713
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620713 [Google Scholar]
  26. (1996) The scope of linguistic relativity: An analysis and review of empirical research. In J.J. Gumperz & S.C. Levinson (Eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity (pp.37–69). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Naigles, L. , Eisenberg, A. , Kako, E. , Highter, M. , & McGraw, N
    (1998) Speaking of motion: Verb use by English and Spanish speakers. Language and Cognitive Processes, 13, 521–549. doi: 10.1080/016909698386429
    https://doi.org/10.1080/016909698386429 [Google Scholar]
  28. Navarro, S. , & Nicoladis, E
    (2005) Describing motion events in adult L2 Spanish narratives. In D. Eddington (Ed.), Selected proceedings of the 6th conference on the acquisition of Spanish and Portuguese as first and second languages (pp.102–107). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceeding Project.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Özçaliskan, S
    (2003) Doors, fences and thresholds: The (im)possibilities of crossing a boundary in English and Turkish. Paper presented atthe 8th International Cognitive Linguistics Conference , Logroño, Spain.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. (2004) Encoding the manner, path and ground components of a metaphorical motion event. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 2, 73–102. doi: 10.1075/arcl.2.03ozc
    https://doi.org/10.1075/arcl.2.03ozc [Google Scholar]
  31. (2015) Ways of crossing a spatial boundary in typologically distinct languages. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36, 485–508. doi: 10.1017/S0142716413000325
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716413000325 [Google Scholar]
  32. Pavlenko, A. , & Volynsky, M
    (2015) Motion encoding in Russian and English: Moving beyond Talmy’s typology. The Modern Language Journal, 99, 32–48. doi: 10.1111/modl.12177
    https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12177 [Google Scholar]
  33. Robinson, P. , & Ellis, N
    (Eds.) (2008) A handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Slobin, D.I.
    (1996a) From “thought and language” to “thinking for speaking”. In J. Gumperz & S. Levinson (Eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity: Studies in the social and cultural foundations of language, vol. 1 (pp.70–96). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. (1996b) Two ways to travel: Verbs of motion in English and Spanish. In M. Shibatani & S.A. Thompson (Eds.), Grammatical constructions: Their form and meaning (pp. 195–219). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. (2000) Verbalized events: A dynamic approach to linguistic relativity and determinism. In S. Neimeier & R. Dirven (Eds.), Evidence for linguistic relativity (pp.107–138). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1075/cilt.198.10slo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.198.10slo [Google Scholar]
  37. (2004) The many ways to search for a frog: Linguistic typology and the expression of motion events. In S. Strömqvist & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Relating events in narrative: Typological and contextual perspectives (pp.219–257). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. (2006) What makes manner of motion salient: Explorations in linguistic typology, discourse and cognition. In M. Hickmann & S. Robert (Eds.), Space in languages: Linguistic systems and cognitive categories (pp.59–81). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/tsl.66.05slo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.66.05slo [Google Scholar]
  39. Slobin, D.I. , & Hoiting, N
    (1994) Reference to movement in spoken and signed languages: Typological considerations. Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society , 20, 487–505.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Stam, G
    (1998) Changes in patterns of thinking about motion with L2 acquisition. In S. Santi , I. Guaïtella , C. Cavé , & G. Konopczynski (Eds.), Oralité et gestualité: Communication multimodale, interaction (pp.615–619). Paris: L’Harmattan.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. (2010) Can a L2 speaker’s patterns of thinking for speaking change?In Z. Han & T. Cadierno (Eds.), Linguistic relativity in SLA: Thinking for speaking (pp.59–83). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. (2015) Changes in thinking for speaking: A longitudinal case study. The Modern Language Journal,99(S1), 83–99. doi: 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2015.12180.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2015.12180.x [Google Scholar]
  43. Talmy, L
    (1985) Lexicalisation patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language typology and lexical descriptions. Vol 3: Grammatical categories and the lexicon (pp.36–149). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. (1991) Path to realization: A typology of event conflation. Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society , 17, 480–519.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. (2000) Toward a cognitive semantics. Vol. II: Typology and process in concept structuring. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Tomczak, E. , & Ewert, A
    (2015) Real and fictive motion processing in Polish L2 users of English and monolinguals: Evidence for different conceptual representations. The Modern Language Journal, 99(Supplement 2015), 49–65. doi: 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2015.12178.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2015.12178.x [Google Scholar]
  47. UCLES
    (2001) Quick Oxford placement test.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Vendler, Z
    (1957) Verb and times. The Philosophical Review, 2, 143–160. doi: 10.2307/2182371
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2182371 [Google Scholar]
  49. Vulchanova, M.D. , Martínez, L. , Eshuis, R. , & Listhaug, K
    (2012) No evidence of L1 path encoding strategies in the L2 in advanced Bulgarian speakers of Norwegian. Spatial Cognition and Computation: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12, 275–304. doi: 10.1080/13875868.2012.658931
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13875868.2012.658931 [Google Scholar]
  50. Whorf, B
    (1940/1956) Language, thought and reality. In J. Carroll (Ed.), Selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf (pp.1–282). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Wu, S.L.
    (2011) Learning to express motion events in an L2: The case of Chinese directional complements. Language Learning, 61, 414–454. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2010.00614.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00614.x [Google Scholar]
  52. Zlatev, J. , & Yanklang, P
    (2004) A third way to travel: The place of Thai and serial verb languages in motion event typology. In S. Strömqvist & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Relating events in narrative: Typological and contextual perspectives. (pp.159–190). Hillsdale, N.H., Lawrence Erlbaum
    [Google Scholar]
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error