1887
Volume 15, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1877-9751
  • E-ISSN: 1877-976X
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Causative meaning including, but not limited to, causation, prevention, and enabling is realized in language use through force construal. Force is explored in this article through consideration of narratives on Tourette Syndrome, a disorder that is largely characterized by its constitutive actions (vocal and motor tics). To account for force construal, the article proposes a merger of a vector model for the description of force in language and cognition and a lexical semantic model of ontologies and construals. Force is accounted for in terms of a number of configurations ( and that are realized through construal operations. This merger of explanatory models allows nuanced and flexible description of forceful meaning in actual language use.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/rcl.15.1.07har
2017-08-18
2019-12-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Buckser, A.
    (2006) The empty gesture: Tourette Syndrome and the semantic dimension of illness. Anthropology, 45(4), 255–274.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. (2008) Before your very eyes: Illness, agency, and the management of Tourette Syndrome. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 22(2), 167–192. doi: 10.1111/j.1548‑1387.2008.00013.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1387.2008.00013.x [Google Scholar]
  3. Chilton, P.
    (2010) From mind to grammar: Coordinate systems, prepositions, constructions. In V. Evans & P. Chilton (Eds.), Language, cognition and space: The state of the art and new directions (pp.499–514). London: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. (2014) Language, space and mind: The conceptual geometry of linguistic meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511845703
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511845703 [Google Scholar]
  5. Croft, W. , & Cruse, D. A.
    (2004) Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511803864
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803864 [Google Scholar]
  6. Evans, V. , & Chilton, P.
    (Eds.) (2010) Language, cognition, and space: The state of the art and new directions. London: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Fauconnier, G. , & Turner, M.
    (2002) The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic books.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Gentner, D. , & Smith, L. A.
    (2013) Analogical learning and reasoning. In D. Reisberg (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of Cognitive Psychology (pp.668–681). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Goldberg, A. (2010) Verbs, construction and semantic frames. In M. Rappaport Hovav , E. Doron , & I. Sichel (Eds.), Syntax, lexical semantics, and event structure (pp.39–58). Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199544325.003.0003
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199544325.003.0003 [Google Scholar]
  10. Gärdenfors, P.
    (2014) The geometry of meaning: Semantics based on conceptual spaces. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Harvey, K. , & Koteyko, N.
    (2013) Exploring health communication: Language in action. London/New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Hofstadter, D. R.
    (2001) Epilogue: Analogy as the core of cognition. In D. Gentner , K. J. Holyoak , & B. N. Kokinov (Eds.), The analogical mind: Perspectives from cognitive science (pp.1–19). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Hofstadter, D. R. , & Sander, E.
    (2013) Surfaces and essences: Analogy as the fuel and fire of cognition. New York, NY: Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Johnson, M.
    (1987) The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Kilgariff, A. , Baisa, V. , Bušta, J. , Kovář, V. , Michelfeit, J. , Rychlý, P. , & Suchomel, V.
    (2014) The Sketch Engine: Ten years on. Lexicography ASIALEX, 1, 7–36. (www.sketchengine.co.uk)
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Kövecses, Z.
    (2000) Metaphor and emotion: Language, culture, and body in human feeling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Lakoff, G.
    (1987) Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: Chicago University Press. doi: 10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  18. Lakoff, G. , & Johnson, M.
    (1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Langacker, R. W.
    (1987) Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Volume 1: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. (2008) Cognitive Grammar: Aa basic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  21. Leckman, J. F.
    (2002) Tourette’s syndrome. The Lancet, 360, 1577–86. doi: 10.1016/S0140‑6736(02)11526‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11526-1 [Google Scholar]
  22. O’Connor, K. P. , Janelle, C. , Coutu, M. F. , Rouleau, A. , Lessard, M. J. , Kirouac, C. , Marchand, A. , Dupuis, G. , Turgeon, L. , & Bélanger, M. P.
    (2009) ‘I’m cured but …’: Perceptions of illness following treatment. Journal of Health Psychology, 14(2), 278–287. doi: 10.1177/1359105308100212
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105308100212 [Google Scholar]
  23. Paradis, C.
    (2005) Ontologies and construals in lexical semantics. Axiomathes, 15, 541–573. doi: 10.1007/s10516‑004‑7680‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10516-004-7680-7 [Google Scholar]
  24. (2008) Configurations, construals and change: Expressions of degree . English Language and Linguistics, 12(2), 317–343. doi: 10.1017/S1360674308002645
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674308002645 [Google Scholar]
  25. Paradis, C. , & Willners, C.
    (2011) Antonymy: From convention to meaning-making. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 9(2), 367–391. doi: 10.1075/rcl.9.2.02par
    https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.9.2.02par [Google Scholar]
  26. Singer, H. S.
    (2005) Tourette’s syndrome: From behaviour to biology. The Lancet Neurology, 4, 149–59. doi: 10.1016/S1474‑4422(05)70018‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(05)70018-1 [Google Scholar]
  27. Soares da Silva, A.
    (2007) Verbs of letting: Some cognitive and historical aspects. In N. Delbecque & B. Cornille (Eds.), On interpreting construction schemas: From action and motion to transitivity and causality (pp.171–200). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Stukker, N. , Sanders, T. , & Verhagen, A.
    (2008) Causality in verbs and in discourse connectives: Converging evidence of cross-level parallels in Dutch linguistic categorization. Journal of Pragmatics, 40, 1296–1322. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2007.10.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2007.10.005 [Google Scholar]
  29. Sweetser, E.
    (1990) From etymology to pragmatics: Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511620904
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620904 [Google Scholar]
  30. Talmy, L.
    (1988) Force dynamics in language and cognition. Cognitive Science, 12, 49–100. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog1201_2
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1201_2 [Google Scholar]
  31. Talmy, L. (2000) Toward a Cognitive Semantics. Volume I: Concept structuring systems. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Verhagen, A.
    (2005) Constructions of intersubjectivity: Discourse, syntax, and cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. (2012) Construal and stylistics: Within a language, across contexts, across languages. Stylistics across disciplines: Conference proceedings. CD-ROM. Leiden.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Verhagen, A. , & Kemmer, S.
    (1997) Interaction and causation: Causative constructions in modern Standard Dutch. Journal of Pragmatics, 27, 611–82. doi: 10.1016/S0378‑2166(96)00003‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(96)00003-3 [Google Scholar]
  35. Winter, S. , & Gärdenfors, P.
    (1995) Linguistic modality as expressions of social power. Nordic Journal of Linguistics, 18, 137–166. doi: 10.1017/S0332586500000147
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0332586500000147 [Google Scholar]
  36. Wolff, P.
    (2007) Representing causation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 82–111. doi: 10.1037/0096‑3445.136.1.82
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.136.1.82 [Google Scholar]
  37. (2012) Representing verbs with force vectors. Theoretical linguistics, 38(3/4), 237–248.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Wolff, P. , & Song, G.
    (2003) Models of causation and the semantics of causal verbs. Cognitive Psychology, 47, 276–332. doi: 10.1016/S0010‑0285(03)00036‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0285(03)00036-7 [Google Scholar]
  39. Wolff, P. , Song, G. , & Driscoll, D.
    (2002) Models of causation and causal verbs. In M. Andronis , C. Ball , H. Elston , & S. Neuval (Eds.), Papers from the 37th meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society, Main session, vol.1 (pp.607–622). Chicago: Chicago Linguistics Society.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Wolff, P. , & Zettergren, M.
    (2002) A vector model of causal meaning. In W. D. Gray & C. D. Schunn (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp.944–949). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Zwarts, J.
    (2005) Prepositional aspect and the algebra of paths. Linguistics and Philosophy, 28, 739–779. doi: 10.1007/s10988‑005‑2466‑y
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-005-2466-y [Google Scholar]
  42. (2010) Forceful prepositions. In V. Evans & P. Chilton (Eds.), Language, cognition, and space: The state of the art and new directions (pp.193–214). London: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/rcl.15.1.07har
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/rcl.15.1.07har
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): causation , causative configurations , force construal , Tourette Syndrome and vectors
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error