Introduction

References

1. Aikhenvald, A.
   (2012) The essence of mirativity. Linguistic Typology, 16(3), 435–486. doi: 10.1515/lity‑2012‑0017
   https://doi.org/10.1515/lity-2012-0017 [Google Scholar]
2. Aleksova, K.
   (2003) Admirativăt v săvremennija bălgarski ezik. Sofia: SemaPS.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Behre, F.
   (1955)  Meditative-polemic should in Modern English that-clauses . Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.
4. Celle, A. , Jugnet, A. , Lansari, L. , & L'Hôte, E.
   (2017) Expressing and describing surprise. In A. Celle & L. Lansari (Eds.) Expressing and describing surprise (pp.215–244). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/bct.92.09cel
   https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.92.09cel [Google Scholar]
5. DeLancey, S.
   (1997) Mirativity: The grammatical marking of unexpected information. Linguistic Typology, 1, 33–52. doi: 10.1515/lity.1997.1.1.33
   https://doi.org/10.1515/lity.1997.1.1.33 [Google Scholar]
6. Diewald, G. , & Smirnova, E.
   (Eds.) (2010) Linguistic realization of evidentiality in European languages. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110223972
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110223972 [Google Scholar]
7. Hill, N. W.
   (2012) “Mirativity” does not exist: ḥdug in “Lhasa” Tibetan and other suspects. Linguistic Typology, 16(3), 389–433. doi: 10.1515/lity‑2012‑0016
   https://doi.org/10.1515/lity-2012-0016 [Google Scholar]
8. Lazard, G.
   (1999) Mirativity, evidentiality, mediativity, or other?Linguistic Typology, 3(1), 91–109. doi: 10.1515/lity.1999.3.1.91
   https://doi.org/10.1515/lity.1999.3.1.91 [Google Scholar]