Problematizing mirativity

References

1. Aikhenvald, A. Y.
   (2004) Evidentiality. New York: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Aikhenvald, A. Y.
   (2012) The essence of mirativity. Linguistic Typology, 16(3), 435–486. doi: 10.1515/lity‑2012‑0017
   https://doi.org/10.1515/lity-2012-0017 [Google Scholar]
3. Aksu-Koç, A. , & Slobin, D.
   (1986) A psychological account of the development and use of evidentials in Turkish. In W. Chafe & J. Nichols (Eds.), Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology (pp.159–167). Norwood, N J: Ablex.
   [Google Scholar]
4. AnderBois, S.
   (2016) Illocutionary mirativity: The case of yucatec maya bakáan . In B. Thuy & I. Rudmila-Rodica (Eds.), Proceedings of SULA 9: Semantics of Under-Represented Languages in the Americas. Amherst, MA: GLSA Publications.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bochnak, M. R. , & Matthewson, L.
   (2015) Methodologies in semantic fieldwork. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190212339.001.0001
   https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190212339.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
6. Brown, J.
   (2010) Gitksan phonotactics. Munich: LINCOM Europa.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Celle, A. , & Lansari, L.
   (2014) ‘I’m surprised’/‘Are you surprised?’: Surprise as an argumentation tool in verbal interaction. In I. Novakova , P. Blumenthal , & D. Siepmann (Eds.), Les émotions dans le discours/Emotions in discourse (pp.267–279). Bern: Peter Lang.
   [Google Scholar]
8. DeLancey, S.
   (1992) The historical status of the conjunct/disjunct pattern in Tibeto-Burman. Acta Linguistica Havniensia, 25, 39–62. doi: 10.1080/03740463.1992.10412277
   https://doi.org/10.1080/03740463.1992.10412277 [Google Scholar]
9. DeLancey, S.
   (1997) Mirativity: The grammatical marking of unexpected information. Linguistic Typology, 1, 33–52. doi: 10.1515/lity.1997.1.1.33
   https://doi.org/10.1515/lity.1997.1.1.33 [Google Scholar]
10. DeLancey, S.
    (2001) The mirative and evidentiality. Journal of Pragmatics, 33, 369–382. doi: 10.1016/S0378‑2166(01)80001‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(01)80001-1 [Google Scholar]
11. DeLancey, S.
    (2012) Still mirative after all these years. Linguistic Typology, 16(3), 529–564.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Dickinson, C.
    (2000) Mirativity in Tsafiki. Studies in Language, 24, 379–422. doi: 10.1075/sl.24.2.06dic
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.24.2.06dic [Google Scholar]
13. Faller, M.
    (2002) Semantics and pragmatics of evidentials in Cuzco Quechua. Doctoral Dissertation, Stanford.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Grunow-Hårsta, K.
    (2007) Evidentiality and mirativity in Magar. Linguistics of the Tibeto- Burman Area, 30, 151–194.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Hill, N.
    (2012) “Mirativity” does not exist: hdug in “Lhasa” Tibetan and other suspects. ˙Linguistic Typology, 16(3), 389–434.
    [Google Scholar]
16. LaPolla, R.
    (2003) Evidentiality in Qiang. In A. Y. Aikhenvald & R. M. W. Dixon (Eds.), Studies in evidentiality (pp.63–78). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/tsl.54.06lap
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.54.06lap [Google Scholar]
17. Matthewson, L.
    (2004) On the methodology of semantic fieldwork. International Journal of American Linguistics, 70, 369–415. doi: 10.1086/429207
    https://doi.org/10.1086/429207 [Google Scholar]
18. Meyer, W. U. , & Niepel, M.
    (1994) Surprise. In V. S. Ramachandran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior, volume3 (pp.353–358). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Meyer, W. U. , Reisenzein, R. , & Schützwohl, A.
    (1997) Toward a process analysis of emotions: The case of surprise. Motivation and Emotion, 21, 251–274. doi: 10.1023/A:1024422330338
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024422330338 [Google Scholar]
20. Molochieva, Z.
    (2007) Category of evidentiality and mirativity in Chechen. Handout for a talk given at the Conference on Languages of the Caucasus , MPI-EVA, December9–12 2007.
21. Peterson, T.
    (2010) Epistemic modality and evidentiality in Gitksan at the semantics- pragmatics interface. Doctoral Dissertation, University of British Columbia.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Peterson, T.
    (2015) The semantics of grammatical evidentiality and the unprepared mind. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 13(2), 314–352. doi: 10.1075/rcl.13.2.03pet
    https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.13.2.03pet [Google Scholar]
23. Peterson, T.
    (2016) Mirativity as surprise: Evidentiality, information, and deixis. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 45, 1327–1357. doi: 10.1007/s10936‑015‑9408‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-015-9408-9 [Google Scholar]
24. Peterson, T.
    (2018) Evidentiality and epistemic modality in Gitksan. In A. Aikhenvald (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Potts, C.
    (2005) The logic of conventional implicatures. pp.463–489Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Reisenzein, R.
    (2000) The subjective experience of surprise. In H. Bless & J. Forgas (Ed.), The message within: The role of subjective experience in social cognition and behavior (pp.262–279). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Rett, J. , & Murray, S. E.
    (2013) A semantic account of mirative evidentials. In T. Snider (Ed.), Proceedings from Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) XXIII (pp.453–472). Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Rigsby, B.
    (1986) Gitksan grammar. Unpublished manuscript, University of Queensland, Australia.
29. Slobin, D. , & Aksu, A.
    (1982) Tense, aspect, and modality in the use of Turkish evidential. In P. J. Hopper (Ed.), Tense-aspect: Between semantics and pragmatics (pp.397–405). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/tsl.1.13slo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.1.13slo [Google Scholar]
30. Temürcü, C.
    (2007) A semantic framework for analyzing tense, aspect, and mood: An application to the ranges of polysemy of -xr, -dir, -iyor and -∅ in Turkish. Doctoral Dissertation, Universiteit Antwerpen.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Watters, D. E.
    (2002) A grammar of Kham. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511486883
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486883 [Google Scholar]
32. Wiklund, A. L.
    (2009) The syntax of surprise: Unexpected event readings in complex predication. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax, 84, 181–224.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Zúñiga, F.
    (2000) Mapudungun. Munich: Lincom Europa.
    [Google Scholar]