Volume 30, Issue 2
  • ISSN 0213-2028
  • E-ISSN: 2254-6774
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes
Preview this article:


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Béjoint, H.
    (2010) The lexicography of English: From origins to present. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Cowie, A. P.
    (1999) English dictionaries for foreign learners: A history. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. de Schryver, G. M.
    (2003) Lexicographers’ dreams in the electronic-dictionary age. International Journal of Lexicography, 16(2), 143–199. doi: 10.1093/ijl/16.2.143
    https://doi.org/10.1093/ijl/16.2.143 [Google Scholar]
  4. Fillmore, C. J.
    (1982) Frame semantics. InThe Linguistic Society of Korea (Ed.), Linguistics in the morning calm (pp.111–137). Seoul: Hanshin Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. (2003) Double-decker definitions: The role of frames in meaning explanation. Sign Language Studies, 3(3), 263–295. doi: 10.1353/sls.2003.0008
    https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.2003.0008 [Google Scholar]
  6. Geeraerts, D.
    (1990) The lexicographic treatment of prototypical polysemy. In S. L. Tsohatzidis (Ed.), Meanings and prototypes: Studies in linguistic categorization (pp.195–210). London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Johnson-Laird, P. N. , & Oatley, K.
    (1989) The language of emotions: an analysis of a semantic field. Cognition and Emotion, 3(2), 81–123. doi: 10.1080/02699938908408075
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02699938908408075 [Google Scholar]
  8. Kövecses, Z.
    (2000) Metaphor and emotion: Language, culture and body in human feeling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Kövecses, Z. , & Csábi, S.
    (2014) Lexicography and cognitive linguistics. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada, 27(1), 118–139. doi: 10.1075/resla.27.1.05kov
    https://doi.org/10.1075/resla.27.1.05kov [Google Scholar]
  10. Lakoff, G.
    (1993) The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp.201–251). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139173865.013
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173865.013 [Google Scholar]
  11. Lakoff, G. , & Johnson, M.
    (1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Langacker, R. W.
    (1987) Foundations of Cognitive Grammar: Theoretical prerequisites. Vol.1. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Rosch, E.
    (1975) Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104(3), 192–233. doi: 10.1037/0096‑3445.104.3.192
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.104.3.192 [Google Scholar]
  14. Rundell, M.
    (2012) ‘It works in practice but will it work in theory?’: The uneasy relationship between lexicography and matters theoretical. In R. V. Fjeld & J. M. Torjusen (Eds.), Proceedings of the 15th Euralex international congress, EURALEX 2012 (pp.47–92). Oslo: University of Oslo. Accessed online atwww.euralex.org/elx_proceedings/Euralex2012/pp47-92%20Rundell.pdf.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Tyler, A. , & Evans, V.
    (2003) The semantics of English prepositions: Spatial scenes, embodied meaning and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511486517
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486517 [Google Scholar]
  16. Wierzbicka, A.
    (1992) Defining emotion concepts. Cognitive Science, 16, 539–581. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog1604_4
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1604_4 [Google Scholar]
  17. Xu, H.
    (2015) Treatment of the preposition to in English learnerʼs dictionaries: A cognitive approach. International Journal of Lexicography, 28(2), 207–231. doi: 10.1093/ijl/ecv005
    https://doi.org/10.1093/ijl/ecv005 [Google Scholar]
  • Article Type: Book Review
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error