1887
Volume 31, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0213-2028
  • E-ISSN: 2254-6774
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Students’ lack of interest and motivation in language learning has long been the focus of language scholars and researchers. In the Malaysian Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET) context, this concern has posed many practical challenges particularly to the foreign language teachers. This study proposes a teaching innovation adapted from the popular reality television program, The Amazing Race, to instill and promote interest in learning Spanish among the technical students. The study on the Adapted Version of The Amazing Race (AVOTAR) was conducted using a quantitative dominant mixed methods approach in a technical university where Spanish language is a compulsory subject. The quantitative findings show that AVOTAR improves learners’ linguistic performance especially in the areas of vocabulary and reading comprehension while the qualitative findings indicate that AVOTAR helps increase learners’ motivation. This may contribute useful insights to address the challenges and improve the curriculum and instruction of foreign languages.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/resla.15019.kho
2018-08-27
2019-10-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Anderman, E. M., & Midgley, C.
    (1997) Changes in achievement goal orientations, perceived academic competence, and grades across the transition to middle-level Schools. Contemporary Educational Psychology22, 269–298.10.1006/ceps.1996.0926
    https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1996.0926 [Google Scholar]
  2. Blake, B., & Pope, T.
    (2008) Developmental psychology: Incorporating Piaget’s and Vygotsky’s theories in classrooms. Journal of Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives in Education, 1(1), 59–67.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bley-Vroman, R.
    (1990) The logical problem of foreign language learning. Linguistic Analysis20, 3–49.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bresciani, M. J., Oakleaf, M., Kolkhorst, F., Nebeker, C., Barlow, J., Duncan, K., & Hickmott, J.
    (2009) Examining design and inter-rater reliability of a rubric measuring research quality across multiple disciplines. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 14(12). Retrieved frompareonline.net/pdf/v14n12.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bruner, J.
    (1985) Vygotsky: A historical and conceptual perspective. InJ. Wertsch (Ed.), Culture, communication, and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives (pp.21–34). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Cabrera Méndez, M. L.
    (2011) Diversidad en el aula [Diversity in the classroom]. Revista Digital Innovación y Experiencias Educativas, 41(87). Retrieved fromwww.csi-csif.es/andalucia/modules/mod_ense/revista/pdf/Numero_41/Lucia_Cabrera_1.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Cáceres Hernández, J. J.
    (2007) Conceptos básicos de estadística para ciencias sociales [Basic statistical concepts for social sciences]. Madrid: Delta Publicaciones.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Chamot, A. U.
    (2004) Issues in language learning strategy research and teaching. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 1(1), 14–26. Retrieved frome-flt.nus.edu.sg/v1n12004/chamot.htm
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Chen, I. J.
    (2005) Using games to promote communicative skills in language learning. The Internet TESL Journal, XI(2). Retrieved fromiteslj.org/Techniques/Chen-Games.html
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Clark, D.
    (2004) Testing programming skills with multiple choice questions. Informatics in Education, 3(2), 161–178.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Collins, K. M. T., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Jiao, Q. G.
    (2007) A mixed methods investigation of mixed methods sampling designs in social and health science research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(3), 267–294.10.1177/1558689807299526
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689807299526 [Google Scholar]
  12. Dörnyei, Z.
    (1998) Motivation in second and foreign language learning. Language Teaching, 31(3), 117–135. doi: 10.1017/S026144480001315X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S026144480001315X [Google Scholar]
  13. (2001) New themes and approaches in second language motivation research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics21, 43–59.10.1017/S0267190501000034
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190501000034 [Google Scholar]
  14. Economic and Social Research Council
    Economic and Social Research Council (2012) ESRC Framework for Research Ethics (FRE) 2010: Updated September 2012. Retrieved fromwww.esrc.ac.uk/_images/framework-for-research-ethics-09-12_tcm8-4586.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Farrokhi, F., & Mahmoudi-Hamidabad, A.
    (2012) Rethinking convenience sampling: Defining quality criteria. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(4), 784–792.10.4304/tpls.2.4.784‑792
    https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.2.4.784-792 [Google Scholar]
  16. Gabillon, Z.
    (2005) L2 leaner’s beliefs: An overview. Journal of Language and Learning, 3(2), 233–260.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Gardner, R. C.
    (2005, May) Integrative motivation and second language acquisition. Paper presented atthe Canadian Association of Applied Linguistics/Canadian Linguistics Association, London, Canada. Retrieved fromthe University of Western Ontariowebsite: publish.uwo.ca/~gardner/
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Gokhale, A. A.
    (1995) Collaborative learning enhances critical thinking. Journal of Technology Education, 7(1). Retrieved fromscholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/JTE/v7n1/gokhale.jte-v7n1.html10.21061/jte.v7i1.a.2
    https://doi.org/10.21061/jte.v7i1.a.2 [Google Scholar]
  19. Hooghe, M., Stolle, D., Mahéo, V. A., & Vissers, S.
    (2010) Why can’t a student be more like an average person? Sampling and attrition effects in social science field and laboratory experiments. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences, 628(1), 85–96.10.1177/0002716209351516
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716209351516 [Google Scholar]
  20. Johnson, R. B., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Turner, L. A.
    (2007) Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2), 112–133.10.1177/1558689806298224
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689806298224 [Google Scholar]
  21. Johnson, R. T., & Johnson, D. W.
    (1986) Action research: Cooperative learning in the science classroom. Science and Children, 24, 31–32.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. (1994) An overview of cooperative learning. InJ. S. Thousand, R. A. Villa & A. Nevin (Eds.), Creativity and Collaborative Learning: A Practical Guide to Empowering Students and Teachers (pp.31–44). Baltimore : P.H. Brookes Pub. Co.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Keller, J.
    (2000, February) How to integrate learner motivation planning into lesson planning: The ARCS model approach. Paper presented atthe VII Semanario, Santiago, Cuba. Retrieved fromapps.fischlerschool.nova.edu/toolbox/instructionalproducts/itde8005/weeklys/2000-Keller-ARCSLessonPlanning.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Khong, H. K. & Cheah, S. W.
    (2014, October) A teaching innovation to promote Spanish language learning. Paper presented atthe Colloquium of Education, Engineering & Technology (COLEET), Universiti Kuala Lumpur, Kedah, Malaysia.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Krashen, S. D.
    (1981) Second language acquisition and second language learning. Oxford: Pergamon Press Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. (1982) Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon Press Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Kvale, S.
    (1996) Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Liubinienė, V.
    (2009) Developing listening skills in CLIL. Kalbų Studijos, 15, 89–93.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Lobato Fraile, C.
    (2006) El estudio y trabajo autónomo del estudiante [The study and student’s autonomous work]. InM. De Miguel (Dir.), Métodos y Modalidades de enseñanza centradas en el desarrollo de competencias (pp.191–223). Madrid: Alianza Universidad.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P.
    (2002) Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. American Psychologist57, 705–717.10.1037/0003‑066X.57.9.705
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.57.9.705 [Google Scholar]
  31. (2006) New directions in goal-setting theory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15(5), 265–268.10.1111/j.1467‑8721.2006.00449.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2006.00449.x [Google Scholar]
  32. Lozano, G., & Ruiz Campillo, J. P.
    (1996) Criterios para el diseño y la evaluación de materiales comunicativos [Criteria for the design and evaluation of communicative materials]. Monográficos marcoELE9, 127–155.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Manga, A. M.
    (2006) El concepto del entorno en la enseñanza-aprendizaje del español como lengua extranjera [The concept of environment in teaching and learning of Spanish as a foreign language]. Tonos Digital12. Retrieved fromhttps://www.um.es/tonosdigital/znum12/secciones/Estudios%20P-Ensenanza-Aprendizaje.htm
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Martín Peris, E.
    (1998) Documentos reales y aprendizaje comunicativo en el aula [Real documents and communicative learning in the classroom]. HIZPIDE: euskalduntze-alfabetatzearen aldizkaria40, 43–56.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Martínez Vellón, S.
    (2006) El español en Malasia. InS. Martínez Vellón (Dir.), Barataria: Apuntes de la cultura española en Malasia Número 0 (pp.6–9). Kuala Lumpur: Uniprints Marketing Sdn Bhd.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Matos, L., & Lens, W.
    (2006) La teoría de orientación a la meta, estrategias de aprendizaje y rendimiento académico en estudiantes de secundaria de Lima [The goal orientation theory, learning strategies and academic performance of high school students in Lima]. Persona9, 11–30. Retrieved fromwww.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=147112814001
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Mead, J. A.
    (2006) Survivor and other reality T.V. gameshows: The uses and gratifications perspective on a reality sSub-genre (Master’s thesis). Retrieved fromMaster’s Theses UW-Whitewater website: minds.wisconsin.edu/handle/1793/6788
  38. Nava Olmos, A.
    (2009) Elementos a considerar en la motivación de personal en las bibliotecas [Things to consider in motivating librarians]. Retrieved fromUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de Méxicowebsite: www.filos.unam.mx/LICENCIATURA/bibliotecologia/textos-apoyo-docencia/nava-olmos-anastasia.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Nussbaum, M., Alvarez, C., McFarlane, A., Gomez, F., Claro, S., & Radovic, D.
    (2009) Technology as small group face-to-face collaborative scaffolding. Computers & Education, 52, 147–153.10.1016/j.compedu.2008.07.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.07.005 [Google Scholar]
  40. Oblinger, D. G.
    (2006) Games and learning. EDUCAUSE Quarterly, 29(3), 5–7. Retrieved fromnet.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/EQM0630.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Prabhu, N. S.
    (1990) There is no best method – Why?TESOL Quarterly, 24(2), 161–176.10.2307/3586897
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3586897 [Google Scholar]
  42. Radosevich, D. J., Allyn, M. R., & Yun, S.
    (2007) Goal orientation and goal setting: Predicting Performance by integrating four-factor goal orientation theory with goal setting processes. Seoul Journal of Business, 13(1), 21–47.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Riba, C., Torcal, M., & Morales, L.
    (2010) Estrategias para aumentar la tasa de respuesta y los resultados de la encuesta social europea en España [Strategies to increase the response rate and the results of European Social Survey in Spain]. Revista Internacional de Sociología, 68(3), 603–635. Retrieved fromrevintsociologia.revistas.csic.es/index.php/revintsociologia/article/viewArticle/346
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Saint-Mont, U.
    (2015) Randomization does not help much, comparability does. PloS one, 10(7), e0132102. Retrieved fromjournals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.013210210.1371/journal.pone.0132102
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132102 [Google Scholar]
  45. Subramaniam, P. R.
    (2009) Motivational effects of interest on student engagement and learning in physical erucation: A review. International Journal of Physical Education, 46(2), 11–19.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Teddlie, C., & Yu, F.
    (2007) Mixed methods sSampling: A typology with examples. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 77–100.10.1177/2345678906292430
    https://doi.org/10.1177/2345678906292430 [Google Scholar]
  47. Tomlinson, B., & Masuhara, H.
    (2009) Playing to learn: A review of physical games in second language acquisition. Simulation & Gaming, 40(5), 645–668.10.1177/1046878109339969
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878109339969 [Google Scholar]
  48. Turner, D. W., III
    (2010) Qualitative interview design: A practical guide for novice investigators. The Qualitative Report, 15(3), 754–760. Retrieved fromwww.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR15-3/qid.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Uzun, L.
    (2009) An evaluative checklist for computer games used for foreign language vocabulary learning and practice: VocaWord sample. Novitas-ROYAL, 3(1), 45–59.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Van Lier, L.
    (2004) The ecology and semiotics of language learning: A sociocultural perspective. Boston: Kluwer Academic.10.1007/1‑4020‑7912‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-7912-5 [Google Scholar]
  51. Vázquez López, M.
    (2009) Aplicaciones prácticas del enfoque por tareas [Practical applications of task-based approach]. Monográficos marcoELE9, 237–262. Retrieved frommarcoele.com/descargas/expolingua1996_vazquez.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Vygotsky, L.
    (1978) Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Wagaba, W.
    (2010) Foreign language teaching and learning: Challenges and opportunities at Makerere University. Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics PLUS40, 95–109. doi: 10.5842/40‑0‑7
    https://doi.org/10.5842/40-0-7 [Google Scholar]
  54. Wang, B.
    (2009) Motivation and language learning. Asian Social Science, 5(1), 98–100.10.5539/ass.v5n1p98
    https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v5n1p98 [Google Scholar]
  55. Wesely, P. M.
    (2012) Learner attitudes, perceptions, and beliefs in language learning. Foreign Language Annals, 45 (s1), s98–s117.10.1111/j.1944‑9720.2012.01181.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2012.01181.x [Google Scholar]
  56. Williams, M., & Burden, R.
    (1997) Psychology for language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Yeaton, W. H., & Sechrest, L.
    (1986) Use and misuse of no-difference findings in eliminating threats to validity. Evaluation Review, 10(6), 836–852.10.1177/0193841X8601000608
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841X8601000608 [Google Scholar]
  58. Zubairi, A. M., & Sarudin, I. H.
    (2009) Motivation to learn a foreign language in Malaysia. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 9(2), 73–87. Retrieved fromwww.ukm.my/ppbl/Gema/abstract%20for%20pp%2073_87.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/resla.15019.kho
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/resla.15019.kho
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error