Percepción del lenguaje político en Twitter

References

1. Applee Tree Communications
   Applee Tree Communications (2011) “Twitteroscopio #0.2: edición especial elecciones generales 2011”. Applee Tree Communications. Disponible en: www.appletreecommunications.com/es/social-media-lab. Última consulta: 06/03/2015.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bruns, A., & Burgess, J.
   (2011) #ausvotes: “How Twitter covered the 2010 Australian federal election”. Communication, Politics & Culture, 44(2), 37–56.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bruns, A., & Stieglitz, S.
   (2012) Quantitative approaches to comparing communication patterns on Twitter. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 30(3–4).
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bradley, M. M., Greenwald, M. K., Petry, M. C., & Lang, P. J.
   (1992) Remembering pictures: Pleasure and arousal in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 18(2), 379–390.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Christensen, C.
   (2011) Twitter revolutions? Addressing social media and dissent. Communication Review, 14(3), 155–157.10.1080/10714421.2011.597235
   https://doi.org/10.1080/10714421.2011.597235 [Google Scholar]
6. Christianson, Sven-Åke; Elizabeth, F., & Loftus, E.
   (1990) Some characteristics of people’s traumatic memories. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society. September 1990, Volume28, Issue3, pp195–198.10.3758/BF03334001
   https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03334001 [Google Scholar]
7. Christianson, S. A.
   (1992) Emotional stress and eyewitness memory: A critical review. Psychological Bulletin, 112(2), 284–309.10.1037/0033‑2909.112.2.284
   https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.2.284 [Google Scholar]
8. Conover, M. D., Ratkiewicz, J., Francisco, M., Gonalves, B., Flammini, A., & Menczer, F.
   (2011) Political polarization on Twitter. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. AAAI Press.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Deller, R.
   (2011) Twittering on: Audience research and participation using Twitter. Participations, 8(1). Disponible enwww.participations.org/Volume%208/Issue%201/deller.htm
   [Google Scholar]
10. Escandell Vidal, M. Victoria
    (2011) Verum focus y prosodia: cuando la duración (sí que) importa”. Proyecto Semántica Procedimental y Contenido Explícito II (SPYCE II). Disponible enportal.uned.es, 22/05/2015,
    [Google Scholar]
11. Hamann, S. B.
    (2001) Cognitive and neural mechanisms of emotional memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5(9), 394–400.10.1016/S1364‑6613(00)01707‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01707-1 [Google Scholar]
12. Lindquist, K. A., Satpute, A. B., & Gendron, M.
    (2015) Does language do more than communicate emotion?Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24, 99–108.10.1177/0963721414553440
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721414553440 [Google Scholar]
13. López García, A.
    (1985) Introducción a la gramática liminar. Boletín de la Academia Puertorriqueña de la Lengua Española 1985, 77–97.
    [Google Scholar]
14. López García, A.
    (1994) Categorías y funciones en la percepción de la oración. EnF. Hernández Paricio (Ed.), Perspectivas sobre la oración (185–204). Universidad de Zaragoza.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Lupyan, G., & Ward, E. J.
    (2013) Language can boost otherwise unseen objects into visual awareness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 110, 14196–14201.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Mancera Rueda, A. & Pano Alamán, A.
    (2013) Nuevas dinámicas discursivas en la comunicación Política en Twitter, enCírculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación. Universidad de Sevilla y Università di Bologna, 56, 53–80.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Peregrino, S. F., Tomás, D., & Llopis, F.
    (2013) Una aproximación basada en corpus para la detección del foco geográfico en el texto. A corpus-based approach to geographical focus detection in text. Procesamiento del Lenguaje Natural. Vol.50, 69–76.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Schacter, D. L.
    (1996) Searching for memory: The brain, the mind, and the past. New York: Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Sperber, D. & Wilson, D.
    (1986a) Relevance: communication and cognition. Oxford: Blackwell. (Second edition 1995)
    [Google Scholar]
20. Sperber, D. & Wilson, D.
    (1995) Postface to the second edition of Relevance: communication and cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Silvey, C., Kirby, S., & Smith, K.
    (2015) Word meanings evolve to selectively preserve distinctions on salient dimensions. Cognitive Science, 39, 212–226. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12150
    https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12150 [Google Scholar]
22. Tumasjan, A., Sprenger, T., Sandner, P., & Welpe, L.
    (2010) Predicting elections with Twitter: What 140 characters reveal about political sentiment. Proceedings of the Fourth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Tumasjan, A., Sprenger, T., Sandner, P., & Welpe, L.
    (2011) Election forecasts with Twitter: How 140 characters reflect the political landscape. Social Science Computer Review, 29(4), 402–418.10.1177/0894439310386557
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439310386557 [Google Scholar]
24. Twitter, Inc. Company (s.f.)
    Twitter, Inc. Company (s.f.). Disponible enhttps://about.twitter.com/company
25. Van Dijk, Teun A.
    (2009) Relevance assignment in discourse comprehension. Discourse processes, Vol.2, Issue2 1979 Edición digital, consultada el27/05/2015www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01638537909544458
    [Google Scholar]
26. Yardi, S., & Boyd, D.
    (2010) Dynamic debates: An analysis of group polarization over time on twitter. Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society, 20, 1–8.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Zhang, M. y Ye, X.
    (2008) A generation model to unify topic relevance and lexicon-based sentiment for opinion retrieval. ACM SIGIR 2008, 411–418
    [Google Scholar]
28. Zubizarreta, M.ª L.
    (1999) Las funciones informativas: tema y foco. EnI. Bosque, I. y V. Demonte, V. (Dirs.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española (capítulo 64). Madrid: Espasa-Calpe.
    [Google Scholar]