1887
Volume 31, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0213-2028
  • E-ISSN: 2254-6774
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This study investigated a learner-based approach of applying online reading to improve learner autonomy and lexical knowledge. Learner autonomy was operationalized as learners’ self-initiation and self-regulation. A total of 90 students at a Chinese university were divided equally into three groups. Participants in the Experimental Group One (EG1) read online after receiving a package of nine hourly sessions in metacognitive strategy training. Participants in the Experimental Group Two (EG2) read online without receiving any strategy training. Participants in the Control Group (CG) only read printed versions of the target materials. Students in the EG1 outperformed those in the other two groups in terms of their ability to plan, monitor, and evaluate reading. Planning became the most exercised skill, followed by evaluating and monitoring. A significant difference between EG2 and CG with respect to their abilities was not detected. Students in the EG1 also improved the most in lexical knowledge, and although students in the EG2 showed higher lexical knowledge scores than those in the CG, the difference was not significant. In addition, improvements in lexical knowledge were maintained best by EG1 on a delayed test. Overall, this study suggests that providing students with metacognitive strategy training for online reading is an effective approach.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/resla.15071.ten
2018-08-27
2019-08-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Afflerbach, P., & Cho, B. -Y.
    (2009) Identifying and describing constructively responsive comprehension strategies in new and traditional forms of reading. InS. E. Israel & G. G. Duffy (Eds.), Handbook of research on reading comprehension (pp.69–90). London, UK: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Allwright, D., & Hanks, J.
    (2009) The developing language learner. An introduction to exploratory practice. London: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230233690
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230233690 [Google Scholar]
  3. Baumeister, R. F., Schmeichel, B. J., & Vohs, K. D.
    (2007) Self-regulation and the executive function: The self as controlling agent. InA. W. Kruglanski & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (2nd ed., pp.516–539). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Beck, I. L., & McKeown, M. G.
    (1985) Teaching vocabulary: Making the instruction fit the goal. Educational Perspectives23, 11–15.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Benson, P.
    (2001) Teaching and researching autonomy in language learning. London: Pearson Education.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. (2007) Autonomy in language teaching and learning (State-of-the-Art article). Language Teaching40, 21–40.10.1017/S0261444806003958
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444806003958 [Google Scholar]
  7. Blair, C., & Ursache, A.
    (2011) A bidirectional model of executive functions and self-regulation. InK. D. Vohs & R. F. Baumeister (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and applications (2nd ed., pp.300–320). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Butler, D. L.
    (2002) Individualizing instruction in self-regulated learning. Theory into Practice, 41(2), 81–92.10.1207/s15430421tip4102_4
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_4 [Google Scholar]
  9. Castek, J., Coiro, J., Hartman, D. K., Henry, L. A., Leu, D. J., & Zawilinski, L.
    (2007) Thinking about our future as researchers: New literacies, new challenges and new opportunities. InM. B. Sampson, S. Szabo, F. Falk-Ross, M. M. Foote & P. E. Linder (Eds.), Multiple literacies in the 21st century: The twenty-eighth yearbook of the College Reading Association (pp.31–50). Logan, UT: College Reading Association.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Chamot, A. U.
    (2005) The Cognitive Academic Language Learning Approach (CALLA): An update. InP. Richard-Amato & M. Snow (Eds.), Academic Success for English Language Learners (pp.87–101). White Plains, NY: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Chamot, A. U., Barnhardt, S., El-Dinary, P. B., & Robbins, J.
    (Eds.) (1999) The learning strategies handbook. New York: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Chan, V., Spratt, M., & Humphreys, G.
    (2002) Autonomous language learning: Hong Kong tertiary students. Teaching in Higher Education16, 1–18.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Chun, D.
    (2011) CALL technologies for L2 reading post web. InN. Arnold & L. Ducate (Eds.), Present and future promises of CALL: From theory and research to new directions in language teaching (pp.131–170). San Marcos, TX: CALICO.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Cobb, T.
    (2000) The compleat lexical tutor [Website]. RetrievedJuly 15th, 2014fromwww.lextutor.ca.
  15. Coiro, J.
    (2011) Predicting reading comprehension on the Internet: Contributions of offline skills, online reading skills, and prior knowledge. Journal of Literacy Research, 43(4), 352–392.10.1177/1086296X11421979
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X11421979 [Google Scholar]
  16. Coiro, J., & Dobler, E.
    (2007) Exploring the online reading comprehension strategies used by sixth-grade skilled readers to search for and locate information on the Internet. Reading Research Quarterly, 42(2), 214–257.10.1598/RRQ.42.2.2
    https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.42.2.2 [Google Scholar]
  17. Cubillo, M. C. C.
    (2002) Dictionary use and dictionary needs of ESP students: An experimental approach. International Journal of Lexicography, 15(3), 206–228.10.1093/ijl/15.3.206
    https://doi.org/10.1093/ijl/15.3.206 [Google Scholar]
  18. Dam, L., & Legenhausen, L.
    (1996) The acquisition of vocabulary in an autonomous learning environment-the first months of beginning English. InR. Pemberton, E. S. L. Li, W. W. F. Or, & H. D. Pierson (Eds.), Taking control: Autonomy in language learning (pp.265–280). Hong Kong, China: Hong Kong University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M.
    (1995) Human autonomy: The basis for true self-esteem. InM. H. Kernis (Ed.), Efficacy, agency, and self-esteem (pp.31–49). New York, NY: Plenum.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Dörnyei, Z., & Chan, L.
    (2013) Motivation and vision: An analysis of future L2 self images, sensory styles, and imagery capacity across two target languages. Language Learning, 63(3), 437–462.10.1111/lang.12005
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12005 [Google Scholar]
  21. Driscoll, M.
    (2004) Psychology of Learning for Instruction (3rd edition). London: Pearson.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Eteläpelto, A., Vähäsantanen, K., Hökkä, P., & Paloniemi, S.
    (2014) Identity and agency in professional learning. InS. Billett, C. Harteis & H. Gruber (Eds.), International Handbook of Research in Professional and Practice-based Learning (pp.645–672). Netherlands: Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Flavell, J. H.
    (1979) Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist34, 906–911.10.1037/0003‑066X.34.10.906
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906 [Google Scholar]
  24. Folse, K.
    (2006) The effect of type of written exercise on L2 vocabulary retention. TESOL Quarterly40, 273–93.10.2307/40264523
    https://doi.org/10.2307/40264523 [Google Scholar]
  25. Gardner, D.
    (Ed.) (2006) Learner autonomy 10: Integration and support. Dublin: Authentik.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Goh, C., & Taib, Y.
    (2006) Metacognitive instruction in listening for young learners. ELT Journal, 63(3), 222–232.10.1093/elt/ccl002
    https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccl002 [Google Scholar]
  27. Gu, Y.
    (2007) Strategy-based instruction. InT. Yashima & T. Nabei (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Symposium on English Education in Japan: Exploring New Frontiers (pp.21–38). Osaka: Yubunsha.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Hacker, D., Dunlosky, J., & Graesser, A.
    (Eds.) (1998) Metacognition in educational theory and practice. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Hu, C. F.
    (2012) Fast-mapping and deliberate word-learning by EFL children. Modern Language Journal, 96(3), 439–453.10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2012.01357.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2012.01357.x [Google Scholar]
  30. Huang, J.
    (2006) Learner resistance in metacognition training? An exploration of mismatches between learner and teacher agendas. Language Teaching Research10, 95–117.10.1177/136216880601000107
    https://doi.org/10.1177/136216880601000107 [Google Scholar]
  31. (2013) Autonomy, agency and identity in foreign language learning and teaching. Bern: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Konishi, M.
    (2003) Strategies for reading hypertext by Japanese ESL learners. The Reading Matrix, 3(3), 97–119
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Kumaravadivelu, B.
    (2003) Beyond methods: Macro strategies for language teaching. New Haven: Yale University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Larkin, S.
    (2009) Socially mediated metacognition and learning to write. Thinking Skills & Creativity, 4(3), 149–159.10.1016/j.tsc.2009.09.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2009.09.003 [Google Scholar]
  35. Laufer, B., & Rozovski-Roitblat, B.
    (2011) Incidental vocabulary acquisition: The effects of task type, word occurrence and their combination. Language Teaching Research, 15(4), 391–411.10.1177/1362168811412019
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168811412019 [Google Scholar]
  36. Leu, D. J., Zawilinski, L., Castek, J., Banerjee, M., Housand, B., Liu, Y., & O’Neil, M.
    (2007) What is new about the new literacies of online reading comprehension?InA. Berger, L. Rush & J. Eakle (Eds.), Secondary school reading and writing: What research reveals for classroom practices (pp.37–68). Chicago, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Lin, H., & Chen, T.
    (2007) Reading authentic EFL text using visualization and advance organizers in a multimedia learning environment. Language Learning & Technology, 11(3), 83–106.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Lubliner, S., & Smetana, L.
    (2005) The effects of comprehensive vocabulary instruction on Title I students’ metacognitive word-learning skills and reading comprehension. Journal of Literacy Research, 37(2), 163–200.10.1207/s15548430jlr3702_3
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15548430jlr3702_3 [Google Scholar]
  39. McCandliss, B., Beck, I. L., Sandak, R., & Perfetti, C.
    (2003) Focusing attention on decoding for children with poor reading skills: Design and preliminary tests of the word building intervention. Scientific studies of reading7, 75–104.10.1207/S1532799XSSR0701_05
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532799XSSR0701_05 [Google Scholar]
  40. McGarry, D.
    (1995) The role of authentic texts (Vol.4). Dublin: Authentik.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Nakata, T.
    (2008) English vocabulary learning with word lists, word cards and computers: Implications from cognitive psychology research for optimal spaced learning. ReCALL20, 3–20.10.1017/S0958344008000219
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344008000219 [Google Scholar]
  42. Nassaji, H., & Tian, J.
    (2010) Collaborative and individual output tasks and their effects on learning English phrasal verbs. Language Teaching Research, 14(4), 397–419.10.1177/1362168810375364
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168810375364 [Google Scholar]
  43. Nation, I. S. P.
    (2011) Learning and Teaching Vocabulary: Collected Writings. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. (2013) Learning vocabulary in another language (2nd edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139858656
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139858656 [Google Scholar]
  45. Natri, T.
    (2007) Active learnership in continuous self- and peer-evaluation. InA. Barfield & S. H. Brown (Eds.), Reconstructing autonomy in language education: Inquiry and innovation (pp.108–120). London: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230596443_9
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230596443_9 [Google Scholar]
  46. Nguyen, L. T. C.
    (2009) Learner autonomy and EFL learning at the tertiary level in Vietnam. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Victoria University of Wellington, Victoria, New Zealand.
  47. Nguyen, L. T. C., & Gu, Y. Q.
    (2013) Strategy-based instruction: A learner-focused approach to developing learner autonomy. Language Teaching Research17, 9–30.10.1177/1362168812457528
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168812457528 [Google Scholar]
  48. Nix, M.
    (2003) Writing autonomy; or ‘It’s the content, stupid!’InA. Barfield & M. Nix (Eds.), Autonomy you ask! (pp.197–212). Tokyo: Learner Development Special Interest Group of the Japan Association for Language Teaching.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. O’Malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U.
    (1990) Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139524490
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524490 [Google Scholar]
  50. Paribakht, S., & Wesche, M.
    (1996) Enhancing vocabulary acquisition through reading: A hierarchy of text-related exercise types. The Canadian Modern Language Review52, 155–78.10.3138/cmlr.52.2.155
    https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.52.2.155 [Google Scholar]
  51. Park, H. -R., & Kim, D.
    (2011) Reading-strategy use by English as a second language learners in online reading tasks. Computers & Education57, 2156–2166.10.1016/j.compedu.2011.05.014
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.05.014 [Google Scholar]
  52. Park, J., Yang, J., & Hsieh, Y. C.
    (2014) University level second language readers’ online reading and comprehension strategies. Language Learning & Technology, 18(3), 148–172.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Pino-Silva, J.
    (1993) Untutored vocabulary acquisition and second language reading ability. Reading in a Foreign Language, 9(2), 845–857.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Rubin, J., Chamot, A. U., Harris, V., & Anderson, N. J.
    (2007) Intervening in the use of strategies. InA. D. Cohen & E. Macaro (Eds.), Language learner strategies: 30 years of research and practice (pp.141–160). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Rubin, J., & McCoy, P.
    (2008) Tasks and good language learners. InC. Griffiths (Ed.), Lessons from good language learners (pp.294–305). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511497667.026
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511497667.026 [Google Scholar]
  56. Schmitt, N.
    (2008) Review article: Instructed second language vocabulary learning. Language Teaching Research, 12(3), 329–363.10.1177/1362168808089921
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168808089921 [Google Scholar]
  57. Sert, N.
    (2006) EFL student teachers’ learning autonomy. The Asian EFL Journal Quarterly8, 180–201.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Shanbei Reading
    Shanbei Reading (2014) A program for online reading. RetrievedJuly 25th, 2014fromapps.wandoujia.com/apps/com.shanbay.reader
  59. Teng, F.
    (2014a) Incidental vocabulary learning by assessing frequency of word occurrence in a Graded Reader: Love or money. LEARN Journal, 7(2), 36–50.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. (2014b) Research into practice: Strategies for teaching and learning vocabulary. Beyond Words, 2(2), 41–57.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. (2015a) Assessing learner autonomy and EFL vocabulary acquisition: A case study. Beyond Words3, 78–99.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. (2015b) Extensive reading plus explicit vocabulary exercises: Is it better than extensive reading-only?Malaysian Journal of ELT Research, 11(2), 82–101.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. (2016) Immediate and delayed effects of embedded metacognitive instruction on Chinese EFL students’ English writing and regulation of cognition. Thinking Skills & Creativity, 22, 289–302. doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2016.06.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2016.06.005 [Google Scholar]
  64. (2018) Autonomy, agency, and identity in teaching and learning English as a foreign language. Singapore: Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Teng, F., & He, F.
    (2015) Towards effective reading instruction for Chinese EFL students: Perceptions and practices of lexical inferencing. The English Teacher, 44(2), 56–73.
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Van Zealand, H., & Schmitt, N.
    (2013) Incidental vocabulary acquisition through L2 listening: A dimensions approach. System, 41(3), 609–624.10.1016/j.system.2013.07.012
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.07.012 [Google Scholar]
  67. Wells, J. C., & Narkon, D. E.
    (2011) Motivate students to engage in word study using vocabulary games. Intervention in School and Clinic47, 45–49.10.1177/1053451211407493
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451211407493 [Google Scholar]
  68. Wenden, A. L.
    (2002) Learner development in language learning. Applied Linguistics, 23(1), 32–55.10.1093/applin/23.1.32
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/23.1.32 [Google Scholar]
  69. Wesche, M., & Paribakht, T. S.
    (1996) Assessing L2 vocabulary knowledge: Depth versus breadth. The Canadian Modern Language Review53, 13–40.10.3138/cmlr.53.1.13
    https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.53.1.13 [Google Scholar]
  70. White, C.
    (1995) Autonomy and strategy use in distance foreign language learning: Research findings. System23, 207–221.10.1016/0346‑251X(95)00009‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0346-251X(95)00009-9 [Google Scholar]
  71. Zhang, L. M., & Aryadoust, V., & Zhang, L. J.
    (2014) Development and validation of the Test Takers’ Metacognitive Awareness Reading Questionnaire (TMARQ). The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher23, 37–51.10.1007/s40299‑013‑0083‑z
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-013-0083-z [Google Scholar]
  72. Zheng, Y., & Cheng, L. Y.
    (2008) Test review: College English Test (CET) in China. Language Testing25, 417.
    [Google Scholar]
  73. Zimmerman, B. J.
    (2002) Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(2), 64–71.10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/resla.15071.ten
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/resla.15071.ten
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error