Rhetorical strategies in PhD conclusions of computer science

References

1. Asunción, T. Z. S. & Querol, M. B.
   (2013) Rhetorical moves in the introductions of masters’ theses. Graduate Research Journal, 6(1–2), 65–85.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Badley, G.
   (2009) Academic writing as shaping and reshaping. Teaching in Higher Education, 14(2), 209–219. 10.1080/13562510902757294
   https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510902757294 [Google Scholar]
3. Basturkmen, H.
   (2009) Commenting on results in published research articles and masters dissertations in Language Teaching. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 8, 241–251. 10.1016/j.jeap.2009.07.001
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2009.07.001 [Google Scholar]
4. Basturkmen, H.
   (2012) A genre-based investigation of discussion sections of research articles in dentistry and disciplinary variation. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11(2), 134–144. 10.1016/j.jeap.2011.10.004
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2011.10.004 [Google Scholar]
5. Bhatia, V. K.
   (2004) Worlds of written discourse. London: Continuum.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Bitchener, J. & Basturkmen, H.
   (2006) Perceptions of the difficulties of postgraduate L2 thesis students writing the discussion section. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5, 4–18. 10.1016/j.jeap.2005.10.002
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2005.10.002 [Google Scholar]
7. Bunton, D.
   (2002) Generic moves in PhD thesis introductions. In J. Flowerdew (Ed.), Academic discourse (pp.57–75). London: Longman.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Bunton, D.
   (2005) The structure of PhD conclusion chapters. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 4, 207–224. 10.1016/j.jeap.2005.03.004
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2005.03.004 [Google Scholar]
9. Cotos, E.
   (2014) Genre-based automated writing evaluation for L2 research writing: from design to evaluation and enhancement. New York: Palgrave McMillan. 10.1057/9781137333377
   https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137333377 [Google Scholar]
10. Cumming, A. , Lai, C. & Cho, H.
    (2016) Students’ writing from sources for academic purposes: A synthesis of recent research. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 23, 47–58. 10.1016/j.jeap.2016.06.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2016.06.002 [Google Scholar]
11. Dewey, J.
    (1997) (1910) How we think. Mineola, New York: Dover Publications Inc. (originally published in 1910 byDC Heath and Co, Publishers: Boston).
    [Google Scholar]
12. Dudley-Evans, T.
    (1986) Genre analysis: an investigation of the introduction and discussion sections of MSc dissertations. In M. Coulthard (Ed.), Talking about text. Discourse analysis monographs13 (pp.219–228). English Language Research: University of Birmingham.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Geng, Y. & Warton, S.
    (2016) Evaluative language in discussion sections of doctoral theses: Similarities and differences between L1 Chinese and L1 English writers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 22, 80–91. 10.1016/j.jeap.2016.01.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2016.01.001 [Google Scholar]
14. Holmes, R.
    (1997) Genre analysis and the social sciences: An investigation of the structure of research article discussion sections in three disciplines. English for Specific Purposes, 16(4), 321–337. 10.1016/S0889‑4906(96)00038‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(96)00038-5 [Google Scholar]
15. Holmes, R.
    (2001) Variation and text structure: The discussion section in economics research articles. ITL Review of Applied Linguistics, 131–132, 107–135. 10.1075/itl.131‑132.06hol
    https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.131-132.06hol [Google Scholar]
16. Johns, A. M.
    (2001) An interdisciplinary, interinstitutional learning communities program: Student involvement and student success. In I. Leki (Ed.), Academic writing programs: Case studies in TESOL practice (pp.61–72). Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Johns, A. M.
    (2002) Destabilizing and enriching novice students’ genre theories. In A. M. Johns (Ed.), Genre in the classroom: Multiple perspectives (pp.237–348). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Johns, A. M. & Swales, J. M.
    (2002) Literacy and disciplinary practices: Opening and closing perspectives. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 1, 13–28. 10.1016/S1475‑1585(02)00003‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S1475-1585(02)00003-6 [Google Scholar]
19. Kuteeva, M. & Negretti, R.
    (2016) Graduate students’ genre knowledge and perceived disciplinary practices: Creating a research space across disciplines. English for Specific Purposes, 41, 36–49. 10.1016/j.esp.2015.08.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2015.08.004 [Google Scholar]
20. Kwan, B.
    (2006) The schematic structure of literature reviews in doctoral theses of applied linguistics. English for Specific Purposes, 25, 30–55. 10.1016/j.esp.2005.06.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2005.06.001 [Google Scholar]
21. Lewkowicz, J.
    (2009) Concluding your master’s level thesis. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses, 59, 63–72.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Lewkowicz, J.
    (2012) The challenges of writing a successful thesis conclusion. In R. Tang (Ed.), Academic writing in a second or foreign language (pp.107–125). London: Continuum International Publishing Group.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Lim, J. M. H.
    (2014) Formulating research questions in experimental doctoral dissertations on Applied Linguistics. English for Specific Purposes, 35, 66–88. 10.1016/j.esp.2014.02.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2014.02.003 [Google Scholar]
24. Lim, J. M. H. , Loi, C. K. & Hashim, A.
    (2014) Postulating hypotheses in experimental doctoral dissertations on Applied Linguistics: A qualitative investigation into rhetorical shifts and linguistic mechanisms. Ibérica, 27, 121–142.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Lim, J. M. H. , Loi, C. K. , Hashim, A. & Liu, M. S. M.
    (2015) Purpose statements in experimental doctoral dissertations submitted to U.S. universities: An inquiry into doctoral students’ communicative resources in language education. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 20, 69–89. 10.1016/j.jeap.2015.06.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2015.06.002 [Google Scholar]
26. Lindeberg, A.
    (1994) Rhetorical conventions in the discussion/conclusion sections of research articles in finance, management and marketing. In M. Brekke , O. Anderson , T. Dahl & J. Myking (Eds.), Applications and implications of current LSP research. Proceedings of the 9th European LSP symposium (pp.761–779). Bergen, Norway: Fagbokforlaget.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Paltridge, B.
    (2002) Thesis and dissertation writing: An examination of published advice and actual practice. English for Specific Purposes, 21, 125–143. 10.1016/S0889‑4906(00)00025‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(00)00025-9 [Google Scholar]
28. Paltridge, B. , Starfield, S. , Ravelli, L. J. & Tuckwell, K.
    (2012) Change and stability: Examining the macrostructures of doctoral theses in the visual and performing arts. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11, 332–344. 10.1016/j.jeap.2012.08.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2012.08.003 [Google Scholar]
29. Paltridge, B. & Woodrow, L.
    (2012) Thesis and dissertation writing: Moving beyond the text. In R. Tang (Ed.), Academic writing in a second or foreign language (pp.88–104). London: Continuum International Publishing Group.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Parkinson, J.
    (2011) The Discussion section as argument: The language used to prove knowledge claims. English for Specific Purposes, 30, 164–175. 10.1016/j.esp.2011.03.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2011.03.001 [Google Scholar]
31. Peacock, M.
    (2002) Communicative moves in the discussion section of research articles. System, 30, 479–497. 10.1016/S0346‑251X(02)00050‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(02)00050-7 [Google Scholar]
32. Peng, J.
    (1987) Organizational features in chemical engineering research articles. ELR Journal, 1, 79–116.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Posteguillo, S.
    (1999) The schematic structure of computer science research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 18(2), 139–160. 10.1016/S0889‑4906(98)00001‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(98)00001-5 [Google Scholar]
34. Ridley, D.
    (2012) (2008) The literature review. A step-by-step guide for students. Second edition. London: Sage Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Samraj, B.
    (2008) A discourse analysis of master’s theses across disciplines with a focus on introductions. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 7(1), 55–67. 10.1016/j.jeap.2008.02.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2008.02.005 [Google Scholar]
36. Soler-Monreal, C.
    (2015) Announcing one’s work in PhD theses in computer science: A comparison of Move 3 in literature reviews written in English L1, English L2 and Spanish L1. English for Specific Purposes, 40, 27–41. 10.1016/j.esp.2015.07.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2015.07.004 [Google Scholar]
37. Soler-Monreal, C.
    (2016) A move-step analysis of the concluding chapters in computer science PhD theses. Ibérica, 32(fall), 105–132.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Soler-Monreal, C. , Carbonell-Olivares, M. & Gil-Salom, L.
    (2011) A contrastive study of the rhetorical organisation of English and Spanish PhD thesis introductions. English for Specific Purposes, 30(1), 4–17. 10.1016/j.esp.2010.04.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2010.04.005 [Google Scholar]
39. Soler-Monreal, C. & Gil-Salom, L.
    (2010) Moves, steps and linguistic signals in RA Discussion sections. In W. Hahn & C. Vertan (Eds.), Fachsprachen in der Weltweiten Kommunikation / Specialised Language in Global Communication. Proceedings of the XVIth European Symposium on Language for Special Purposes LSP). Series Sprache in der Gesellschaft, Band 30 / Language in the Society, volume 30 (pp.519–528). Bern: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Swales, J. M.
    (2004) Research genres. Explorations and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139524827
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524827 [Google Scholar]
41. Swales, J. M. & Feak, C. B.
    (2000) English in today’s research world: A writing guide. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press. 10.3998/mpub.9059
    https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.9059 [Google Scholar]
42. Yang, R. & Allison, D.
    (2003) Research articles in applied linguistics: Moving from results to conclusions. English for Specific Purposes, 22, 365–385. 10.1016/S0889‑4906(02)00026‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(02)00026-1 [Google Scholar]
43. Yayli, D.
    (2011) From genre-awareness to cross-genre awareness: A study in an EFL context. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 10, 121–129. 10.1016/j.jeap.2011.02.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2011.02.001 [Google Scholar]