1887
Volume 31, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0213-2028
  • E-ISSN: 2254-6774
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This study examines the effect of explicit phonological instruction on the acquisition of variable /s/ voicing in Spanish by advanced Hungarian learners. Hungarian and Spanish have very similar, yet not identical, voicing assimilation (VA) systems; the most important difference lies in the pre-sonorant context as sonorant consonants trigger voicing assimilation in Spanish but not in Hungarian. Data were collected in acoustic experiments from 7 native speakers of Northern Peninsular Spanish and 12 Hungarian university students who were advanced learners of Spanish. The latter group was tested twice: before and after a three-month course. Our data reveal that this amount of instruction is not enough for L2 speakers to overcome their first language VA system, which might be attributed, in part, to the variable allophonic nature of the process and the similarity between the two languages’ VA systems.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/resla.17016.bar
2018-08-27
2019-10-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Archibald, J., & Young-Scholten, M.
    (2003) The second language segment revisited. Second Language Research, 19, 163–7.10.1191/0267658303sr220oa
    https://doi.org/10.1191/0267658303sr220oa [Google Scholar]
  2. Bárkányi, Z.
    (2014) Reflexiones sobre la asimilación de sonoridad de la /s/. InZ. Fábián, I. Szijj, I. Szilágyi, & B. Déri (Eds.), Köszöntő kötet Giampaolo Salvi 60. születésnapjára. Saggi di linguistica neolatina per i 60 anni di Giampaolo Salvi (pp.25–36). Budapest: Eötvös Loránd Tudományegyetem.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bárkányi, Z., & G. Kiss, Z.
    (2015) Why do sonorants not voice in Hungarian? And why do they voice in Slovak?InK. É. Kiss, B. Surányi & É. Dékány (Eds.), Approaches to Hungarian, 14 (pp.65–94). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/atoh.14.03bar
    https://doi.org/10.1075/atoh.14.03bar [Google Scholar]
  4. (forthcoming). Neutralisation and contrast preservation: Voicing assimilation in Hungarian three-consonant clusters. Linguistic Variation.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bárkányi, Z., & Mády, K.
    (2012, January) The perception of voicing in fricatives. Paper presented atthe 9th Old World Conference in Phonology, Berlin, Germany.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S.
    (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48.10.18637/jss.v067.i01
    https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01 [Google Scholar]
  7. Boersma, P., & Weenink, D.
    (2012) Praat: Doing phonetics by computer. (Version 5.3.12). Retrieved fromwww.praat.org/.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Campos-Astorkiza, R.
    (2012, May) Voicing assimilation as gestural blending. Paper presented atthe 20th Manchester Phonology Meeting, Manchester, UK.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. (2014) Sibilant voicing assimilation in Peninsular Spanish as gestural blending. InM. -H. Côte & E. Mathieu (Eds.), Variation within and across Romance Languages (pp.17–38). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. (2015) Segmental and prosodic conditionings on gradient voicing assimilation in Spanish. InR. Klassen, J. M. Liceras, & E. Valenzuela (Eds.), Hispanic Linguistics at the Crossroads: Theoretical Linguistics, Language Acquisition and Language Contact. Proceedings of the Hispanic Linguistics Symposium 2013 (pp.127–144). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/ihll.4.07cam
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.4.07cam [Google Scholar]
  11. Cebrian, J.
    (2000) Transferability and productivity of L1 rules in Catalan–English interlanguage. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 1–26.10.1017/S0272263100001017
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100001017 [Google Scholar]
  12. Davidson, L., & Wilson, C.
    (2016) Processing non-native consonant clusters in the classroom: Perception and production of phonetic detail. Second Language Research, 32(4), 471–502.10.1177/0267658316637899
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658316637899 [Google Scholar]
  13. Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J.
    (2009) Putting accent in its place: Rethinking obstacles to communication. Language Teaching, 42, 476–490.10.1017/S026144480800551X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S026144480800551X [Google Scholar]
  14. Derwing, T. M., Munro, M. J., & Wiebe, G.
    (1998) Evidence in favor of a broad framework for pronunciation instruction. Language Learning, 48(3), 393–410.10.1111/0023‑8333.00047
    https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00047 [Google Scholar]
  15. Díaz-Campos, M.
    (2014) Context of learning in the acquisition of Spanish second language phonology. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 249–273.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Draxler, C., & Jänsch, K.
    (2012) Speech recorder (version 2.2.1). Retrieved fromwww.bas.unimuenchen.de/Bas/software/speechrecorder/.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Elliot, A. R.
    (1995) Foreign language phonology: Field independence, attitude, and success of formal instruction in Spanish pronunciation. Modern Language Journal, 79, 530–542.10.1111/j.1540‑4781.1995.tb05456.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1995.tb05456.x [Google Scholar]
  18. (1997) On the teaching and acquisition of pronunciation within a communicative approach. Hispania, 80(1), 95–108.10.2307/345983
    https://doi.org/10.2307/345983 [Google Scholar]
  19. Face, T. L., & Menke, M. R.
    (2009) Acquisition of the Spanish voiced spirants by second language learners. InJ. Collentine, M. Garcia, B. Lafford, & F. Marcos Marin (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 11th Hispanic Linguistic Symposium. (pp.39–52). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Field, A., Miles, J., & Field, Z.
    (2012) Discovering statistics using R. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Flege, J. E.
    (1991) Age of learning affects the authenticity of voice-onset time (VOT) in stop consonants produced in a second language. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 89(1), 395–411.10.1121/1.400473
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.400473 [Google Scholar]
  22. García, A.
    (2013) Allophonic variation in h Spanish sibilant fricatives. PhD dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.
  23. Gatbonton, E., & Trofimovich, P.
    (2008) The ethnic group affiliation and L2 proficiency link: Empirical evidence. Language Awareness, 17, 229–249.10.2167/la464.0
    https://doi.org/10.2167/la464.0 [Google Scholar]
  24. Gráczi, T. E.
    (2010) A spiránsok zöngésségi oppozíciójának néhány jellemzője [Some characteristics of the voicing contrast of fricatives]. Beszédkutatás 2010 (pp.42–56). Budapest: Nyelvtudományi Intézet.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. González López, V., & Counselman, D.
    (2013) L2 Acquisition and category formation of Spanish voiceless stops by monolingual English novice learners. InJ. Cabrelli Amaro et al. (Eds.), Selected Proceedings of the 16th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium (pp.118–127). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Hammond, R. M.
    (2001) The sounds of Spanish. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Harris, J.
    (1994) English sound structure. Cambridge, MA & Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Hualde, J.
    (2005) The sounds of Spanish. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Isaacs, T.
    (2014) Assessing pronunciation. InA. J. Kunnan (Ed.), The companion to language assessment (Vol.1, pp.140–155). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Jansen, W.
    (2004) Laryngeal contrast and phonetic voicing: A laboratory phonology approach to English, Hungarian, and Dutch. PhD dissertation, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen.
  31. Jenkins, J.
    (2000) The phonology of English as an international language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Kissling, E. M.
    (2013) Is explicit phonetics instruction beneficial for FL learners?Latin American, Latino and Iberian Studies Faculty Publications, 8, 1–67.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Bojesen-Christensen, R. H.
    (2016) lmerTest: Tests in linear mixed effects models. R package (version 2.0–32). Retrieved fromCRAN.R-project.org/package=lmerTest
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Lafford, B., & Salaberry, R.
    (2003) (Eds.), Studies in Spanish second language acquisition: State of the science. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Lewis, A.
    (2001) Weakening of intervocalic /p, t, k/ in two Spanish dialects: Toward the quantification of lenition processes. PhD dissertation. Urbana-Champaign, IL: University of Illinois.
  36. Lord, G.
    2005 (How) Can we teach foreign language pronunciation? On the effects of a Spanish phonetics course. Hispania, 88(3), 557–567.10.2307/20063159
    https://doi.org/10.2307/20063159 [Google Scholar]
  37. Moulton, W.
    (1962) Toward a classification of pronunciation errors. Modern Language Journal, 46, 101–109.10.1111/j.1540‑4781.1962.tb01773.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1962.tb01773.x [Google Scholar]
  38. Odlin, T.
    (1989) Language transfer: Crosslinguistic influence in language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139524537
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524537 [Google Scholar]
  39. Ohala, J. J.
    (1983) The origin of sound patterns in vocal tract constraints. InP. F. MacNeilage (Ed.), The production of speech (pp.189–216). New York: Springer-Verlag.10.1007/978‑1‑4613‑8202‑7_9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-8202-7_9 [Google Scholar]
  40. Quilis, A.
    (1993) Tratado de fonética y fonología españolas. Madrid: Gredos, Biblioteca Románica.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. R Development Core Team
    R Development Core Team (2008) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria. Retrieved fromwww.R-project.org.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Recasens, D., & Mira, M.
    (2012) Voicing assimilation in Catalan two-consonant clusters. Journal of Phonetics, 40(5), 639–654.10.1016/j.wocn.2012.06.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2012.06.001 [Google Scholar]
  43. Romero, J.
    (1999) The effect of voicing assimilation on gestural coordination. International Congress of Phonetic Sciences 99, San Francisco, 1793–1796.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Saito, K.
    (2011) Examining the role of explicit phonetic instruction in native-like and comprehensible pronunciation development: An instructed SLA approach to L2 phonology. Language Awareness, 20, 45–59.10.1080/09658416.2010.540326
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2010.540326 [Google Scholar]
  45. Schmidt, L. B.
    (2014) Contextual variation in L2 Spanish: Voicing assimilation in advanced learner speech. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 7(1), 79–113.10.1515/shll‑2014‑1159
    https://doi.org/10.1515/shll-2014-1159 [Google Scholar]
  46. Schmidt, L. B., & Willis, E. W.
    (2011) Systematic investigation of voicing assimilation of Spanish /s/ in Mexico City. InS. M. Alvord (Ed.), Selected proceedings of the 5th conference on Laboratory Approaches to Romance Phonology (pp.1–20). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Schwegler, A., Kempff, J., & Ameal-Guerra, A.
    (2010) Fonética y fonología españolas. 4th edition. Hoboken, N. J.: Wiley.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Simon, E.
    (2010) Phonological transfer of voicing and devoicing rules. Evidence from L1 Dutch and L2 English conversational speech. Language Sciences, 32, 63–86.10.1016/j.langsci.2008.10.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2008.10.001 [Google Scholar]
  49. Siptár, P., & Törkenczy, M.
    (2000) The Phonology of Hungarian. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Skranitzl, R., & Šturm, P.
    (2017) Voicing assimilation in Czech and Slovak speakers of English: Interactions of segmental context, language and strength of foreign accent. Language and Speech, 60, 427–453.10.1177/0023830916654509
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830916654509 [Google Scholar]
  51. Strycharczuk, P.
    (2012) Phonetics–phonology interactions in pre-sonorant voicing. PhD dissertation, University of Manchester.
  52. Suomi, K.
    (1980) Voicing in English and Finnish stops. A typological comparison with an IL study of the two languages in contrast. PhD dissertation. Publications of the Department of Finnish and General Linguistics, 10, University of Turku: Turku.
  53. Thomson, R. I., & Derwing, T. M.
    (2015) The effectiveness of L2 pronunciation instruction: A narrative review. Applied Linguistics, 36(3), 326–344.10.1093/applin/amu076
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amu076 [Google Scholar]
  54. Torreira, F., & Ernestus, M.
    (2012) Weakening of intervocalic /s/ in the Nijmegen Corpus of Casual Spanish. Phonetica, 69, 124–148.10.1159/000343635
    https://doi.org/10.1159/000343635 [Google Scholar]
  55. Trujillo, R.
    (1980) Sonorización de sordas en Canarias. Anuario de Letras Lingüística y Filología, 18, 247–267.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. University of Iowa
    University of Iowa. Fonética: Los sonidos del español. Accessed atsoundsofspeech.uiowa.edu/spanish/spanish.html
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Vago, R.
    (1980) The sound pattern of Hungarian. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Wells, J. C.
    (2000) Longman pronunciation dictionary. Harlow: Longman/Pearson Education.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. White, L., & Mattys, S. L.
    (2007) Calibrating rhythm: first language and second language studies. Journal of Phonetics, 35(4), 501–522.10.1016/j.wocn.2007.02.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2007.02.003 [Google Scholar]
  60. Zsigri, Gy.
    (1994) Magyar mássalhangzószabályok. [Rules for Hungarian consonants]. PhD dissertation, József Attila University, Szeged. (Published by JATEPress, Szeged 2006.).
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/resla.17016.bar
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/resla.17016.bar
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error