1887
Volume 32, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0213-2028
  • E-ISSN: 2254-6774
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Since the 1970s, findings from Morpheme Order Studies (MOS) have suggested that the emergence of morphemes follows a predictable order in L2 English. In this paper we show how the tools and practices in Learner Corpus Research (LCR) offer a richer descriptive basis, which is achieved with Interlanguage Annotation (ILA), a manual, fined-grained, purpose-oriented type of annotation. Additionally, we use a standardised placement test, since proficiency level has been overlooked in most previous MOS. Both of these practices provide a more detailed description of morpheme accuracy order across different levels. We analyse four proficiency levels (A1-B2) in a subcorpus of L1 Spanish-L2 English secondary-school learners from the CORpus of English as a Foreign Language (COREFL). Our results partially confirm findings from previous MOS, but also reveal key findings that had gone previously unnoticed regarding the role of proficiency level and the subtype of errors, which are relevant factors for SLA research.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/resla.17019.loz
2019-07-24
2019-12-08
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bailey, N. , Madden, C. , & Krashen, S. D.
    (1974) Is there a ‘natural sequence’ in adult second language learning?Language Learning, 24(2), 235–243. 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1974.tb00505.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1974.tb00505.x [Google Scholar]
  2. Birdsong, D. , & Flege, J. E.
    (2001) Regular-irregular dissociations in L2 acquisition of English morphology. Proceedings of the 25th annual Boston University conference on language development (pp.123–132). Boston, MA: Cascadilla Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Cambridge University Press
    Cambridge University Press (2010) English unlimited placement test. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Council of Europe
    Council of Europe (2001) Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Cook, V.
    (1993) Linguistics and Second Language Acquisition. London: Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑1‑349‑22853‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-22853-9 [Google Scholar]
  6. Díaz Negrillo, A.
    (2009) EARS: A user’s manual. Munich: Lincom.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Díaz-Negrillo, A. , & Fernández-Domínguez, J.
    (2006) Error tagging systems for learner corpora. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada, 19, 83–102.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Dulay, H. , & Burt, M.
    (1973) Should we teach children syntax?Language Learning, 23(2), 245–258. 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1973.tb00659.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1973.tb00659.x [Google Scholar]
  9. (1974) Natural sequences in child second language acquisition. Language Learning, 24(1), 37–53. 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1974.tb00234.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1974.tb00234.x [Google Scholar]
  10. Dulay, H. , Burt, M. , & Krashen, S. D.
    (1982) Language two. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Ellis, R.
    (2008) The study of Second Language Acquisition (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. (2015) Researching acquisition sequences: Idealization and de-idealization in SLA. Language Learning, 65(1), 181–209. doi:  10.1111/lang.12089
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12089 [Google Scholar]
  13. Ellis, R. , & Barkhuizen, G. P.
    (2005) Analyzing learner language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. García Mayo, M. P., & Hawkins, R.
    (Eds.) (2009) Second Language Acquisition of articles. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/lald.49
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.49 [Google Scholar]
  15. Gass, S. M. , Behney, J. , & Plonsky, L.
    (2013) Second Language Acquisition: An introductory course (4th ed.). New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203137093
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203137093 [Google Scholar]
  16. Granger, S.
    (1996) From CA to CIA and back: An integrated approach to computerized bilingual and learner corpora. En K. Aijmer, B. Altenberg, & M. Johansson (Eds.), Languages in Contrast: Text-based cross-linguistic studies (pp.37–51). Lund: Lund University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Granger, S.
    (2008) Learner corpora. In A. Lüdeling & M. Kytö (Eds.), Corpus linguistics: An international handbook (pp.259–275). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. (2009) The contribution of learner corpora to second language acquisition and foreign language teaching. In K. Aijmer (Ed.), Corpora and language teaching (pp.13–32). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.33.04gra
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.33.04gra [Google Scholar]
  19. Granger, S.
    (2015) Contrastive interlanguage analysis: A reappraisal. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research, 1(1), 7–24. 10.1075/ijlcr.1.1.01gra
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijlcr.1.1.01gra [Google Scholar]
  20. Granger, S. , Dagneaux, E. , Meunier, F. , & Paquot, M.
    (2009) The international corpus of learner English. Version 2. Handbook and CD-ROM. Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses universitaires de Louvain.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Granger, S. , Gilquin, G. , & Meunier, F.
    (Eds.) (2015) The Cambridge handbook of learner corpus research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139649414
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139649414 [Google Scholar]
  22. Goldschneider, J. M. , & DeKeyser, R. M.
    (2001) Explaining the ‘natural order of L2 morpheme acquisition’ in English: A meta-analysis of multiple determinants. Language Learning, 51(1), 1–50. 10.1111/1467‑9922.00147
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00147 [Google Scholar]
  23. Hawkins, R.
    (2001) Second language syntax: A generative introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Hawkins, R. , & Lozano, C.
    (2006) Second Language Acquisition of phonology, morphology and syntax. In K. Brown (Ed.), The encyclopedia of language and Linguistics (2nd Edition) (pp.67–74). Oxford: Elsevier. 10.1016/B0‑08‑044854‑2/00634‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/00634-9 [Google Scholar]
  25. Hulstijn, J. H. , Ellis, R. , & Eskildsen, S. W.
    (2015) Orders and sequences in the acquisition of L2 morphosyntax, 40 years on: An introduction to the special issue. Language Learning, 65(1), 1–5. doi:  10.1111/lang.12097
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12097 [Google Scholar]
  26. Izumi, E. , & Isahara, H.
    (2005) Investigation into language learners’ acquisition order based on an error analysis of a learner corpus. In L. Anthony , S. Fujita & Y. Harada (Eds.), Proceedings of IWLeL 2004 (pp.63–71). Tokyo: Waseda University.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Krashen, S.
    (1977) The monitor model for adult second language performance. In M. Burt , H. Dulay & M. Finocchiaro (Eds.), Viewpoints on English as a second language (pp.152–161). New York: Regents Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Kwon, E.-Y.
    (2005) The ‘Natural Order’ of morpheme acquisition: A historical survey and discussion of three putative determinants. Columbia University Working Papers in TESL & Applied Linguistics, 5(1), 1–21.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Loewen, S. , & Reinders, H.
    (2011) Key concepts in Second Language Acquisition. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑0‑230‑34627‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-34627-7 [Google Scholar]
  30. Lozano, C.
    (2009) Selective deficits at the syntax-discourse interface: Evidence from the CEDEL2 corpus. In Y.-I. Leung , N. Snape & M. Sharwood-Smith (Eds.), Representational deficits in Second Language Acquisition (pp.127–166). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi:  10.1075/lald.47.09loz
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.47.09loz [Google Scholar]
  31. (2016) Pragmatic principles in anaphora resolution at the syntax-discourse interface: advanced English learners of Spanish in the CEDEL2 corpus. In M. Alonso Ramos (Ed.), Spanish learner corpus research: Current trends and future perspectives (pp.235–265). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi:  10.1075/scl.78.09loz
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.78.09loz [Google Scholar]
  32. Lozano, C.
    (forthcoming). Formal and generative approaches. InN. Tracy-Ventura & M. Paquot Eds. The Routledge handbook of Second Language Acquisition and corpora. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Lozano, C. , & Mendikoetxea, A.
    (2013) Learner corpora and second language acquisition: the design and collection of CEDEL2. In A. Díaz-Negrillo , N. Ballier & P. Thompson (Eds.), Automatic treatment and analysis of learner corpus data (pp.65–100). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi:  10.1075/scl.59.06loz
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.59.06loz [Google Scholar]
  34. Lozano, C. , Díaz-Negrillo, A. , & Callies, M.
    (forthcoming). Designing and compiling a learner corpus of written and spoken narratives: COREFL. In C. Bongartz & J. Torregrossa Eds. What’s in a narrative? Variation in story-telling at the interface between language and literacy. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Luk, Z. P. , & Shirai, Y.
    (2009) Is the acquisition order or grammatical morphemes impervious to L1 knowledge? Evidence from the acquisition of plural -s, articles, and possessive ’s. Language Learning, 59(4), 721–754. 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2009.00524.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00524.x [Google Scholar]
  36. Makino, T.
    (1980) The acquisition order of English morphemes by Japanese secondary school students. Journal of Hokkaido University of Education, 30, 101–148.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Marcus, G. F. , Pinker, S. , Ullman, M. , Hollander, M. , Rosen, R. J. , & Xu, F.
    (1992) Overregularization in language acquisition. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 57(4), 1–178. 10.2307/1166115
    https://doi.org/10.2307/1166115 [Google Scholar]
  38. Mayer, M.
    (1969) Frog, where are you?New York: Dial Books for Young Readers.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Mitchell, R., Domínguez, L., Arche, M., Myles, F., & Marsden, E.
    (2008) SPLLOC: A new database for Spanish second language acquisition research. En L. Roberts, F. Myles, & A. David (Eds.), EUROSLA Yearbook 8 (pp.287–304). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  40. Muñoz, C.
    (2006) Accuracy orders, rate of learning and age in morphological acquisition. In C. Muñoz (Ed.), Age and the rate of foreign language learning (pp.107–126). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781853598937‑007
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781853598937-007 [Google Scholar]
  41. Murakami, A.
    (2013a) Cross-linguistic influence on the accuracy order of L2 English grammatical morphemes. In S. Granger , G. Gilquin , & F. Meunier (Eds.), Twenty years of learner corpus research: Looking back, moving ahead (pp.325–334). Louvain: Presses universitaires de Louvain.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. (2013b) Individual variation and the role of L1 in the L2 development of English grammatical morphemes: Insights from learner corpora. Unpublished PhD dissertation: University of Cambridge.
  43. Murakami, A. , & Alexopoulou, T.
    (2016) L1 influence on the acquisition order of English grammatical morphemes. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38(3), 365–401. 10.1017/S0272263115000352
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263115000352 [Google Scholar]
  44. Murphy, V. A.
    (2004) Dissociable systems in second language inflectional morphology. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26(3), 433–459. 10.1017/S0272263104263033
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263104263033 [Google Scholar]
  45. Myles, F.
    (2015) Second language acquisition theory and learner corpus research. In S. Granger , G. Gilquin & F. Meunier (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of learner corpus research (pp.309–332). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139649414.014
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139649414.014 [Google Scholar]
  46. Nesselhauf, N.
    (2004) Learner corpora and their potential in language teaching. In J. Sinclair (Ed.), How to use corpora in language teaching (pp.125–152). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.12.11nes
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.12.11nes [Google Scholar]
  47. O’Donnell, M.
    (2009) The UAM Corpus Tool: Software for corpus annotation and exploration. In C. M. Bretones , J. E. Fernández Sánchez , J. R. Íbañez Íbañez , M. E. García Sánchez , M. E. Cortés de los Ríos , S. Salaberri Ramiro , M. S. Cruz Martínez , N. Perdú Honeyman & B. Cantizano Márquez (Eds.), Applied Linguistics now: Understanding language and mind/la Lingüística Aplicada actual: comprendiendo el lenguaje y la mente (pp.1433–1447). Almería: Universidad de Almería.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Pérez-Paredes, P. , & Sánchez-Tornel, M.
    (2015) A multidimensional analysis of learner language during story reconstruction in interviews. In M. Callies & S. Götz (Eds.), Learner corpora in language testing and assessment (pp.141–162). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Pica, T.
    (1983) Adult acquisition of English as a second language under different conditions of exposure. Language Learning, 33, 465–497. 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1983.tb00945.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1983.tb00945.x [Google Scholar]
  50. (1984) Methods of morpheme quantification: Their effect on the interpretation of second language data. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 6, 69–78. 10.1017/S0272263100000309
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100000309 [Google Scholar]
  51. Pienemann, M.
    (1998) Language processing and second language development. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sibil.15
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.15 [Google Scholar]
  52. Plag, I.
    (2000) Irregular past tense formation in English interlanguage. In I. Plag & K. P. Schneider (Eds.), Language use, language acquisition and language history: (Mostly) empirical studies in honour of Rüdiger Zimmermann (pp.134–149). Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Porte, G.
    (Ed.) (2012) Replication research in Applied Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Rodríguez Prieto, J. P.
    (2009) Acquisitional patterns of the Spanish copular verbs ‘ser’ and ‘estar’: Data from L2 beginning learners in favor of the declarative/procedural model. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada, 22, 307–325.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Sinclair, J.
    (2005) How to build a corpus. In M. Wynne (Ed.), Developing linguistic corpora: A guide to good practice (pp.79–83). Oxford: Oxbow books.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Tarone, E. , & Swierzbin, B.
    (2009) Exploring learner language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Tono, Y.
    (2000) A computer learner corpus based analysis of the acquisition order of English grammatical morphemes. In L. Burnard & T. McEnery (Eds.), Rethinking language pedagogy from a corpus perspective (pp.123–132). London: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Tracy-Ventura, N. , & Myles, F.
    (2015) The importance of task variability in the design of learner corpora for SLA research. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research, 1(1), 58–95. 10.1075/ijlcr.1.1.03tra
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijlcr.1.1.03tra [Google Scholar]
  59. Ullman, M.
    (2005) A cognitive neuroscience perspective on second language acquisition: The declarative/procedural model. In C. Sanz (Ed.), Adult Second Language Acquisition: Methods, theory, and practice (pp.141–178). Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Van Patten, B. , & Benati, A. G.
    (2010) Key terms in Second Language Acquisition. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Wei, L.
    (2003) An implicational Hierarchy of Morpheme Acquisition Order in second language learning. ITL Review of Applied Linguistics, 139/140, 77–100. 10.2143/ITL.139.0.2003199
    https://doi.org/10.2143/ITL.139.0.2003199 [Google Scholar]
  62. White, L.
    (2003) Second Language Acquisition and Universal Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511815065
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815065 [Google Scholar]
  63. Zobl, H.
    (1998) Representational changes: From listed representations to independent representations of verbal affixes. In M.-L. Beck (Ed.), Morphology and its interfaces in second language knowledge (pp.339–371). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/lald.19.14zob
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.19.14zob [Google Scholar]
  64. Zobl, H. , & Liceras, J.
    (1994) Functional categories and acquisition orders. Language Learning, 44(1), 159–180. 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1994.tb01452.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1994.tb01452.x [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/resla.17019.loz
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/resla.17019.loz
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error