1887
Volume 32, Issue 2
  • ISSN 0213-2028
  • E-ISSN: 2254-6774
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Although feedback is a well-established and widespread technique in L1 and L2 writing, little is known about written feedback practices in Spanish heritage language (SHL) classrooms. This study examines how written feedback is used in SHL courses across the United States. Professors, instructors, graduate teaching assistants, program directors, and students who had taught, directed, or taken an SHL course completed online questionnaires about instructional practices and their perceptions of the feedback provided on writing assignments. Both instructors and students reported that written comments, correction codes, circles/underlines, and correct forms were frequently provided. Instructors indicated the most challenges when providing feedback on organization, grammar, and orthography. Nevertheless, students reported that every kind of feedback that they received was useful and comprehensible. Although further exploration of writing in the SHL classroom is needed to more concretely delineate best practices, the current findings suggest that several effective feedback practices are already in place.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/resla.18018.mik
2019-11-05
2020-10-31
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Beaudrie, S. M.
    (2011) Spanish heritage language programs: A snapshot of current programs in the Southwestern United States. Foreign Language Annals, 44, 321–337. 10.1111/j.1944‑9720.2011.01137.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2011.01137.x [Google Scholar]
  2. (2012) A corpus-based study on the misspellings of Spanish heritage learners and their implications for teaching. Linguistics and Education, 23, 135–144. 10.1016/j.linged.2011.09.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2011.09.001 [Google Scholar]
  3. (2015) Instructional Effectiveness in the SHL Classroom: Comparing Teacher and Student Perceptions. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 14(3), 274–297. 10.1177/1538192715575372
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1538192715575372 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bitchener, J.
    (2008) Evidence in support of written corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17, 102–118. 10.1016/j.jslw.2007.11.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.11.004 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bitchener, J., & Knoch, U.
    (2010) The contribution of written corrective feedback to language development: A ten month investigation. Applied Linguistics, 31, 193–214. 10.1093/applin/amp016
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp016 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bowles, M. A.
    (2011) Exploring the role of modality: L2-heritage learner interactions in the Spanish language classroom. Heritage Language Journal, 8, 30–65.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Carreira, M., & Kagan, O.
    (2011) The results of the national heritage language survey: Implications for teaching, curriculum design, and professional development. Foreign Language Annals, 44, 40–64. 10.1111/j.1944‑9720.2010.01118.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2010.01118.x [Google Scholar]
  8. Chandler, J.
    (2003) The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12, 267–296. 10.1016/S1060‑3743(03)00038‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(03)00038-9 [Google Scholar]
  9. Colombi, M. C.
    (1997) Perfil del discurso escrito en textos de hispanohablantes: Teoría y práctica. InM. C. Colombi & F. X. Alarcón (Eds.), La enseñanza del español para hispanohablantes: Praxis y teoría (pp.296–309). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Conrad, S. M., & Goldstein, L. M.
    (1999) ESL student revision after teacher-written comments: Text, context, and individuals. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8, 147–179. 10.1016/S1060‑3743(99)80126‑X
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(99)80126-X [Google Scholar]
  11. Ducar, C. M.
    (2008) Student voices: The missing link in the Spanish heritage language debate. Foreign Language Annals, 41(3), 415–433. 10.1111/j.1944‑9720.2008.tb03305.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2008.tb03305.x [Google Scholar]
  12. Ducate, L., & Arnold, D.
    (2012) Computer-mediated feedback: Effectiveness and students perceptions of screen-casting software vs the comment function. InG. Kessler, A. Oskoz, & I. Elola (Eds.), Technology across writing contexts and tasks (pp.31–55). CALICO Monograph Series Volume 10, San Marcos: Texas.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Elola, I.
    (2005) The complexity of revision in an intermediate-level Spanish language classroom and the creation of a foreign language revision model (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Iowa, Iowa City (IA).
  14. (2017) Writing in Spanish as a foreign and heritage language: Past, present, and future. Hispania, Celebrating 100 Years of Hispania, 119–124.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Elola, I., & Mikulski, A. M.
    (2013) Revisions in real time: Spanish heritage language learners’ writing processes in English and Spanish. Foreign Language Annals, 46, 646–660. 10.1111/flan.12053
    https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12053 [Google Scholar]
  16. (2016) Similar and/or different writing processes? A study of Spanish foreign language and heritage language learners. Hispania, 99, 87–102. 10.1353/hpn.2016.0000
    https://doi.org/10.1353/hpn.2016.0000 [Google Scholar]
  17. Elola, I., Mikulski, A. M., & Buckner, T.
    (2017) The impact of direct and indirect feedback on the development of Spanish aspect. Journal of Spanish Language Teaching, 3, 1–14.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Elola, I., & Oskoz, A.
    (2016) Supporting second language writing using multimodal feedback. Foreign Language Annals, 49(1), 58–74. 10.1111/flan.12183
    https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12183 [Google Scholar]
  19. (2017) Writing with 21st century social tools in the L2 classroom: New literacies, genres, and writing practices. Journal of Second Language Writing, 36, 52–63. 10.1016/j.jslw.2017.04.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2017.04.002 [Google Scholar]
  20. Ellis, R., Sheen, Y., Murakami, M., & Takashima, H.
    (2008) The effects of focused and unfocused written corrective feedback in an English as a foreign language context. System36(3), 353–71. 10.1016/j.system.2008.02.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2008.02.001 [Google Scholar]
  21. Fairclough, M., & Belpoliti, F.
    (2016) Emerging literacy in Spanish among Hispanic heritage language university students in the USA: a pilot study. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 19, 185–201. 10.1080/13670050.2015.1037718
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2015.1037718 [Google Scholar]
  22. Farrokhi, F., & Sattarpour, S.
    (2012) The effects of direct written corrective feedback on improvement of grammatical accuracy of high-proficient L2 learners. World Journal of Education, 2, 49–57. 10.5430/wje.v2n2p49
    https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v2n2p49 [Google Scholar]
  23. Ferris, D. R.
    (2011) Treatment of error in second language student writing. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. 10.3998/mpub.2173290
    https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.2173290 [Google Scholar]
  24. Ferris, D. R., Liu, H., Sinha, A., & Senna, M.
    (2013) Written corrective feedback for individual L2 writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22, 307–329. 10.1016/j.jslw.2012.09.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2012.09.009 [Google Scholar]
  25. Ferris, D. R., & Roberts, B.
    (2001) Error feedback in L2 writing classes: How explicit does it need to be?Journal of Second Language Writing, 10(3), 161–184. 10.1016/S1060‑3743(01)00039‑X
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(01)00039-X [Google Scholar]
  26. García, O., & Wei, L.
    (2014) Translanguaging: Language, bilingualism and education. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781137385765
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137385765 [Google Scholar]
  27. Goldstein, L. M.
    (2016) Making use of teacher written feedback. InR. M. Manchón & P. K. Matsuda (Eds.), Handbook of second and foreign language writing (pp.407–430). Boston, MA: Walter de Gruyter Inc.. 10.1515/9781614511335‑022
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614511335-022 [Google Scholar]
  28. Hedgcock, J. S., & Lefkowitz, N.
    (2011) Exploring the learning potential of writing development in heritage language education. InR. M. Manchón (Ed.), Learning to write and writing to learn in an additional language (pp.209–233). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.31.14hed
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.31.14hed [Google Scholar]
  29. Henshaw, F.
    (2013) Learning opportunities and outcomes of L2-L2 and L2-HL learner interaction during a collaborative writing task (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, IL.
  30. Leeman, J.
    (2005) Engaging critical pedagogy: Spanish for native speakers. Foreign Language Annals, 38(1), 35–45. 10.1111/j.1944‑9720.2005.tb02451.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2005.tb02451.x [Google Scholar]
  31. Martínez, G.
    (2003) Classroom based dialect awareness in heritage language instruction: A critical applied linguistic approach. Heritage Language Journal, 1(1), 1–14.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Martinez, G. A.
    (2005) Genres and genre chains: Post-process perspectives on heritage language writing in a south Texas setting. Southwest Journal of Linguistics, 24(1–2), 79–91.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Martínez, G. A.
    (2007) Writing back and forth: The interplay of form and situation in heritage language composition. Language Teaching Research, 11, 31–41. 10.1177/1362168806072454
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168806072454 [Google Scholar]
  34. Montaño-Harmon, M. R.
    (1991) Discourse features of written Mexican Spanish: Current research in contrastive rhetoric and its implications. Hispania, 74, 417–425. 10.2307/344852
    https://doi.org/10.2307/344852 [Google Scholar]
  35. Nichols, P., & Colon, M.
    (2000) Spanish literacy and the academic success of Latino high school students: Codeswitching as a classroom resource. Foreign Language Annals, 33, 498–511. 10.1111/j.1944‑9720.2000.tb01994.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2000.tb01994.x [Google Scholar]
  36. Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L.
    (2012) The value and practice of research synthesis for language learning and teaching. InJ. M. Norris & L. Ortega (Eds.), Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching (pp.3–52). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. O’Donnell, M. E.
    (2007) Policies and practices in foreign language writing at the college level: Survey results and implications. Foreign Language Annals, 40, 650–671. 10.1111/j.1944‑9720.2007.tb02886.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2007.tb02886.x [Google Scholar]
  38. Ortega, L.
    (2012) Epilogue: Exploring L2 Writing-SLA interfaces. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21, 404–415. 10.1016/j.jslw.2012.09.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2012.09.002 [Google Scholar]
  39. Parra, M. L., Otero, A., Flores, R., & Lavallée, M.
    (2018) Designing comprehensive curriculum for advanced Spanish heritage learners: Contributions from the multiliteracies framework. InG. C. Zapata & M. Lacorte (Eds.), Multiliteracies pedagogy and language learning (pp.27–66). Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑63103‑5_2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63103-5_2 [Google Scholar]
  40. Polio, C.
    (2012) The relevance of second language acquisition theory to the written error correction debate. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21, 375–389. 10.1016/j.jslw.2012.09.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2012.09.004 [Google Scholar]
  41. Potowski, K.
    (2007) Language and identity in a dual immersion school. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781853599453
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781853599453 [Google Scholar]
  42. Potowski, K., & Carreira, M.
    (2004) Towards teacher development and national standards for Spanish as a heritage language. Foreign Language Annals, 37, 421–431. 10.1111/j.1944‑9720.2004.tb02700.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2004.tb02700.x [Google Scholar]
  43. Roca, A.
    (2016) Foreword. InM. Fairclough and S. M. Beaudrie (Eds.), Innovative strategies for heritage language teaching (pp.xi–xiv). Washington D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Samaniego, M., & Warner, C.
    (2016) Designing meaning in inherited languages: A multiliteracies approach to HL instruction. InM. Fairclough & S. Beaudrie (Eds.), Innovative strategies for heritage language teaching (pp.191–214). Washington D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Samburskiy, D., & Quah, J.
    (2014) Corrective feedback in asynchronous online interaction: Developing novice online language instructors. CALICO Journal, 31(2), 158–178. 10.11139/cj.31.2.158‑178
    https://doi.org/10.11139/cj.31.2.158-178 [Google Scholar]
  46. Sauro, S.
    (2009) Computer-mediated corrective feedback and the development of L2 grammar. Language Learning & Technology, 13(1), 96–120.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Schwartz, A. M.
    (2003) Heritage Spanish speakers’ writing strategies. InA. M. Schwartz (Ed.), Mi lengua: Spanish as a heritage language in the United States: Research and practice, (pp.235–257). Washington D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. (2005) Exploring differences and similarities in the writing strategies used by students in SNS courses. InL. A. Ortiz López and M. Lacorte (Eds.), Contactos y contextos lingüísticos: El español en los Estados Unidos y en contacto con otras lenguas, (pp.323–333). Madrid: Lingüística Iberoamericana.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Spicer-Escalante, M.
    (2005) Writing in two languages/living in two worlds: A rhetorical analysis of Mexican-American written discourse. InM. Farr (Ed.), Latino language and literacy in ethnolinguistic Chicago (pp.217–244). New York, NY: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Teschner, R. V.
    (1981) Spanish for native speakers: Evaluating twenty-five Chicano compositions in a first-year course. InG. Valdés, A. G. Lozano, & R. García-Moya (Eds.) Teaching Spanish to the Hispanic bilingual: Issues, aims, and methods (pp.115–139). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Truscott, J.
    (1996) The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes. Language Learning, 46, 327–369. 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1996.tb01238.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1996.tb01238.x [Google Scholar]
  52. Truscott, J., & Hsu, A. Y. P.
    (2008) Error correction, revision, and learning. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17, 292–305. 10.1016/j.jslw.2008.05.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2008.05.003 [Google Scholar]
  53. Valdés, G.
    (1997) The teaching of Spanish to bilingual Spanish-speaking students: Outstanding issues and unanswered questions. InM. C. Colombi & F. X. Alarcón (Eds.), La enseñanza del español a hispanohablantes (pp.8–44). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Valdés, G., González, S. V., García, D. L., & Márquez, P.
    (2003) Language ideology: The case of Spanish in departments of foreign languages. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 34(1), 3–26. 10.1525/aeq.2003.34.1.3
    https://doi.org/10.1525/aeq.2003.34.1.3 [Google Scholar]
  55. Valentín-Rivera, L. E.
    (2015) Collaborative narratives between Spanish heritage and foreign language learners: Understanding aspect selection through two types of corrective feedback (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Texas Tech University, Lubbock (TX).
  56. Vinagre, M., & Muñoz, B.
    (2011) Computer-mediated corrective feedback and language accuracy in telecollaborative exchanges. Language Learning & Technology, 15(1), 72–103.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Williams, J.
    (2012) The potential role(s) of writing in second language development. Journal of Second Language Writing21(4), 321–331. 10.1016/j.jslw.2012.09.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2012.09.007 [Google Scholar]
  58. Yanguas, I., & Lado, B.
    (2012) Is thinking aloud reactive when writing in the heritage language?Foreign Language Annals, 45, 380–399. 10.1111/j.1944‑9720.2012.01198.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2012.01198.x [Google Scholar]
  59. Zapata, G. C.
    (2018) A match made in heaven: An introduction to Learning by Design and its role in heritage language education. InG. C. Zapata & M. Lacorte (Eds.), Multiliteracies pedagogy and language learning (pp.1–26). Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑63103‑5_1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63103-5_1 [Google Scholar]
  60. Zapata, G. C., & Lacorte, M.
    (2018) Multiliteracies pedagogy and language learning. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑63103‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63103-5 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/resla.18018.mik
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/resla.18018.mik
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error