1887
Volume 34, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0213-2028
  • E-ISSN: 2254-6774
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Resumen

Las canciones son un área de especial interés para el estudio de las ideologías de género. La música no es sexista, pero sus letras sí pueden presentar contenidos que resultan problemáticos desde la perspectiva de género. El objetivo de este trabajo es realizar un análisis crítico del discurso feminista de la canción (2013) interpretada por R. Thicke, haciendo especial hincapié en el estudio de las metáforas conceptuales tal y como se manifiestan en su estructura lingüística. Se trata de una canción que ha cosechado un innegable éxito a nivel social, pero que también ha sido objeto de controversia y críticas negativas. El análisis llevado a cabo nos ha permitido mostrar cómo esta canción transmite valores que pueden contribuir a consolidar y perpetuar ideologías que promueven la desigualdad entre hombres y mujeres y el sexismo.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/resla.18035.lop
2021-07-22
2021-10-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Azpiazu Carballo, J.
    (2014) Análisis crítico del discurso con perspectiva feminista. EnI. Mendia Azkue, M. Luxán, M. Legarreta, G. Guzmán, I. Zirion y J. Azpiazu Carballo (Eds.), Otras formas de (re)conocer: Reflexiones, herramientas y aplicaciones desde la investigación feminista. Donostia-San Sebastián: Hegoa. Disponible enpublicaciones.hegoa.ehu.es/publications/329 (fecha de última consulta15/03/2019)
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Beneke, T.
    (1982) Men on rape. New York: St Martin’s Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bengoechea, M., y Morales, M.
    (2000) Mosaicos y taraceas. EnM. Bengoechea y M. Morales (Eds.), Mosaicos y taraceas: Deconstrucción feminista de los discursos del género (pp.11–19). Madrid: Nuevo Siglo.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Benokraitis, N. V., y Feagin, J. R.
    (1986) Modern sexism. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. (1995) Modern sexism (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bieneck, S., y Krahe, B.
    (2010) Blaming the victim and exonerating the perpetrator in cases of rape and robbery: Is there a double standard?. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26(9), 1785–97. 10.1177/0886260510372945
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260510372945 [Google Scholar]
  7. Brownmiller, S.
    (1975) Against our will: Men, women, and rape. New York: Fawcett Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Buchwald, E., Fletcher, P. R., y Roth, M.
    (2005) Transforming a rape culture (revised edition). Minneapolis: Milkweed Editions.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Burton, D.
    (1982) Through glass darkly: Through dark glasses: On stylistics and political commitment –Via a study of a passage from Sylvia Plath’s The Bell Jar. EnJ. J. Weber (Ed.) (1996), The stylistics reader: From Roman Jakobson to the present (pp.224–240). London: Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Caldas-Coulthard, C. R., y Coulthard, M.
    (Eds.) (1996) Texts and practices: Readings in critical discourse analysis. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Charteris-Black, J.
    (2004) Corpus approaches to critical metaphor analysis. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230000612
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230000612 [Google Scholar]
  12. (2006) Britain as a container: Immigration metaphors in the 2005 election campaign. Discourse and Society, 17(5), 563–581. 10.1177/0957926506066345
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926506066345 [Google Scholar]
  13. Clark, K.
    (1992) The Linguistics of blame: Representations of women in The Sun’s reporting of crimes of sexual violence. EnM. Toolan (Ed.), Language, text and context (pp.208–224). London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Crespo-Fernández, E.
    (2015) Sex in language. Euphemistic and dysphemistic metaphors in Internet forums. London: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Csábi, S.
    (1999) The conceptualization of lust in English: The cognitive linguistic analysis of the linguistic expressions of lust in romance novels and pornographic magazines. SB, 1(4), 29–49.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. De la Concha, A.
    (2010) (Coor.). El sustrato cultural de la violencia de género. Madrid: Síntesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Fairclough, N.
    (1989) Language and power. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. (2003) Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. Routledge: London. 10.4324/9780203697078
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203697078 [Google Scholar]
  19. (2018) CDA as dialectical reasoning. EnJ. Flowerdew y J. Richardson (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of critical discourse studies (Routledge handbooks in applied linguistics) (pp.45–62). London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Fairclough, N., y Wodak, R.
    (1997) Critical discourse analysis. EnT. A. van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse as social interaction (pp.258–285). London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Fetterley, J.
    (1978) The resisting reader: A feminist approach to American fiction. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Fowler, R., Hodge, R., Kress, G., y Trew, T.
    (1979) Language and control. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Fowler, R.
    (1991) Critical linguistics. EnK. Malmkjaer (Ed.), The linguistics encyclopedia (pp.89–93). London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. (1996) On critical linguistics. EnC. R. Caldas-Coulthard y M. Coulthard (Eds.), Texts and practices: Readings in critical discourse analysis (pp.3–15). London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Flowerdew, J., y Richardson, J.
    (Eds.) (2018) The Routledge handbook of critical discourse studies (Routledge handbooks in applied linguistics). London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Fox, K. A., y Cook, C. L.
    (2011) Is knowledge power? The effects of a victimology course on victim blaming. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26, 3407–3427. doi:  10.1177/0886260511403752
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260511403752 [Google Scholar]
  27. Gibbs, R.
    (1994) The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language and understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Grynbaum, M. M.
    (2007) It’s a female dog, or worse. Or endearing. and Illegal?Extraído dewww.nytimes.com/2007/08/07/nyregion/07bword.html (fecha de última consulta19/02/2018).
  29. Goatly, A.
    (2007) Washing the brain: Metaphor and hidden ideology. Amsterdam: John Benjamin. 10.1075/dapsac.23
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.23 [Google Scholar]
  30. (2008) Explorations in stylistics. London: Equinox Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Halliday, M. A. K.
    (1978) Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. London: Edward Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Hines, C.
    (1996) She-wolves, tigresses, and morphosemantics. EnN. Warner (Eds.), Gender and belief systems. Proceedings of the fourth Berkeley Women and Language Conference (pp.303–311). Berkeley, Calif.: Berkeley Women and Language Group, University of California.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. (1999) Foxy chicks and Playboy bunnies: A case study in metaphorical lexicalization. EnM. K. Hiraga (Eds.), Cultural, typological and psychological perspectives on cognitive linguistics (pp.9–23). Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.152.04hin
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.152.04hin [Google Scholar]
  34. Hiraga, M. K.
    (1991) Metaphors Japanese women live by. EnA. Pauwels y J. Winter (Eds.), Working Papers on Language, gender and sexism (pp.38–57). Croningen: AILA Commission on Language and Gender.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Huynh, L.
    (2013) In the news: Robin Thicke’s rape song, Tennessee legislation, and my continued obsession with Sheryl Sandberg. Extraído defeministinla.blogspot.com.es/2013/04/in-news-robin-thickes-rape-song.html (fecha de última consulta27/02/2018)
  36. Howard, J.
    (2013) Single review: Robin Thicke’s ‘Blurred Lines’ successfully samples classic beats for layered product. The Michigan Daily. Extraído dehttps://www.michigandaily.com/arts/04single-review-robin-thickes-blurred-lines-successfully-samples-classic-beats-produce-layered-pr04 (fecha de última consulta20/04/2018).
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Jeffries, L.
    (2010) Critical stylistics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑1‑137‑04516‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-04516-4 [Google Scholar]
  38. Kövecses, Z.
    (2002) Metaphor: A practical introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. (2003) Metaphor and emotion: Language, culture, and body in human feeling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Kress, G., y Hodge, R.
    (1979) Language as ideology. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Lakoff, G., y Johnson, M.
    (1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. (1987) The metaphorical logic of rape. Metaphor and symbolic activity, 2(1), 73–79. 10.1207/s15327868ms0201_5
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms0201_5 [Google Scholar]
  43. Lakoff, G.
    (1987) Women, fire and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago y London: The University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  44. Lakoff, G., y Turner, M.
    (1989) More than cool reason: A field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226470986.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226470986.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  45. Lazar, M. M.
    (Ed.) (2005) Feminist critical discourse analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230599901
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230599901 [Google Scholar]
  46. (2007) Feminist critical discourse analysis: Articulating a feminist discourse praxis. Critical Discourse Studies, 4(2), 14–164. 10.1080/17405900701464816
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405900701464816 [Google Scholar]
  47. (2017) Feminist critical discourse analysis: Relevance for current gender and language research. EnS. Ehrlich, M. Meyerhoff, y J. Holmes (Eds.), The handbook of language, gender, and sexuality (pp.180–201). Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. López Maestre, M. D.
    (2009) Immigration and conceptual metaphors: A critical approach to ideological representation. EnR. Gómez Morón, M. Padilla Cruz, L. Fernández Amaya, M. de la O. Hernández López (Eds.), Pragmatics applied to language teaching and learning (pp.60–87). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. (2013) Narrative and ideologies of violence against women: The legend of the Black Lagoon. Language and Literature, 22(4), 299–313. 10.1177/0963947013497875
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947013497875 [Google Scholar]
  50. (2015) ‘Man the Hunter’: a critical reading of hunt-based conceptual metaphors of love and sexual desire. Journal of Literary Semantics, 44(2), 89–113. 10.1515/jls‑2015‑0009
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jls-2015-0009 [Google Scholar]
  51. López Rodríguez, I.
    (2009) Of women, bitches, chickens and vixens: Animal metaphors for women in English and Spanish. Revista de Estudios Culturales de la Universitat Jaume I / Cultural Studies Journal of Universitat Jaume I, VII, 77–100.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Martínez, C., Paterna, C., Roux, P., y Falomir, J. M.
    (2010) Predicting gender awareness: the relevance of neo-sexism. Journal of Gender Studies, 19(1),1–12. 10.1080/09589230903057142
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09589230903057142 [Google Scholar]
  53. Mills, S.
    (1993) Close encounters of a feminist kind: Transitivity and pop lyrics. EnK. Wales (Ed.), Feminist linguistics in literary criticism (pp.137–156). Cambridge: D. S. Brewer.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. (1995) Feminist stylistics. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. (2008) Language and sexism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Mills, S., y Mullany, L.
    (2011) Language, gender and feminism: Theory, methodology and practice. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203814666
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203814666 [Google Scholar]
  57. Mills, S.
    (2012) Gender matters: Feminist linguistic analysis. London: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Pardes, A.
    (2014) The evolution of the bitch. Extraído dehttps://www.vice.com/en_us/article/ppmx3m/the-evolution-of-the-bitch-905 (fecha de última consulta08/05/2018)
  59. Payne, C.
    (2013) RyB Single review: ‘Blurred Lines’ Robin Thicke. Billboard. Extraído dehttps://www.billboard.com/biz/articles/news/1558928/rb-single-review-blurred-lines-robin-thicke (fecha de última consulta29/04/2018)
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Romano, T.
    (2013) Blurred Lines, Robin Thicke’s summer anthem, is kind of rapey. Extraído dehttps://www.thedailybeast.com/blurred-lines-robin-thickes-summer-anthem-is-kind-of-rapey (fecha de última consulta27/02/2018).
  61. Simpson, P.
    (1993) Language, ideology and point of view. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203312612
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203312612 [Google Scholar]
  62. (2004) Stylistics: A resource book for students. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203496589
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203496589 [Google Scholar]
  63. Swim, J. K., y Cohen, L. L.
    (1997) Overt, covert, and subtle sexism. A comparison between the attitudes toward women and modern sexism scales. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21(1), 103–118. 10.1111/j.1471‑6402.1997.tb00103.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00103.x [Google Scholar]
  64. Swim, J. K., y Campbell, B.
    (2001) Sexism: Attitudes, beliefs, and behaviours. EnR. Brown y S. Gaertner (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology: Intergroup relations (pp.218–237). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Toolan, M.
    (2001 2nd edition). Narrative: A critical linguistic introduction. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Tougas, F., Brown, R., Beaton, A. M., y Joly, S.
    (1995) Neosexism: plus ça change, plus c’est pareil. Personality and social psychology bulletin, 21(3), 842–849. 10.1177/0146167295218007
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167295218007 [Google Scholar]
  67. Van Dijk, T. A.
    (1994) Editorial: Discourse analysis as social analysis. Discourse and society, 5(2), 163–164. 10.1177/0957926594005002001
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926594005002001 [Google Scholar]
  68. (2016) Análisis crítico del discurso. Revista austral de Ciencias Sociales, 30, 203–222. 10.4206/rev.austral.cienc.soc.2016.n30‑10
    https://doi.org/10.4206/rev.austral.cienc.soc.2016.n30-10 [Google Scholar]
  69. (2018) Socio-cognitive discourse studies. EnJ. Flowerdew y J. E. Richardson (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of critical discourse studies (Routledge handbooks in applied linguistics) (pp.63–86). London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Wareign, S.
    (1993) And then he kissed her: The reclamation of female characters to submissive roles in contemporary fiction. EnK. Wales (Ed.), Feminist linguistics in literary criticism (pp.117–136). Cambridge: DS Brewer.
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Weber, J. J.
    (Ed.) (1996) The stylistics reader: From Roman Jakobson to the present. London: Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Wodak, R., y Chilton, P.
    (Eds.) (2007) A new agenda in (critical) discourse analysis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/dapsac.13
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.13 [Google Scholar]
  73. Wodak, R., y Meyer, M.
    (Eds.) (2016a) Methods of critical discourse analysis (3rd ed). London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  74. (2016b) Methods of critical discourse analysis: History, agenda, theory and methodology. EnR. Wodak y M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp.1–23). London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  75. Weiss, G., y Wodak, R.
    (2003) Critical discourse analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/resla.18035.lop
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error