1887
Volume 34, Issue 2
  • ISSN 0213-2028
  • E-ISSN: 2254-6774
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

The aim of this article is to analyse the syntactic and semantic interclausal relations that hold with Old English verbs of inaction. These verbs are studied from the perspective of juncture-nexus relations and the semantic relations Phase, Psych-action and Causative. The results are compared on the grounds of the Interclausal Relations Hierarchy. The comparison of semantic content and syntactic expression evidences discrepancies between too weak juncture-nexus types, such as clausal subordination, and very close semantic relations, like Phase. Two main conclusions are drawn. Firstly, the Interclausal Relations Hierarchy allows us to describe the variation in the complementation of inaction verbs in Old English; and to make predictions on the diachronic axis, given that the loss of finite clause complementation and the change to infinitival complementation presented by Present-Day English verbs of inaction are fully predicted by the IRH. Secondly, semantic relations and nexus types remain stable throughout the change, whereas juncture levels change.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/resla.19040.oja
2021-12-15
2022-01-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Callaway, M.
    (1913) The Infinitive in Anglo-Saxon. Washington: The Carnegie Institution of Washington. 10.5962/bhl.title.166130
    https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.166130 [Google Scholar]
  2. Cortés Rodríguez, F. & Martín Díaz, M. A.
    (2003) The meaning-syntax interface of writing verbs: templates, constructions and linking rules within a lexical grammar of Old English verbal predicates. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses, 47, 13–35.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Cortés Rodríguez, F. & González Orta, M.
    (2006) Anglo-Saxon verbs of sound: Semantic Architecture, Lexical Representation and Constructions. Studia Anglica Poznaniensia, 42, 249–284.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Cortés Rodríguez, F. & Torres Medina, D.
    (2003) Old English verbs of running: linking semantic representation and morphosyntactic structure. Folia Linguistica Historica, XXIV(I), 153–174.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Denison, D.
    (1993) English Historical Syntax: Verbal Constructions. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Fischer, O.
    (1996) The status of to in Old English to-infinitives: A reply to Kageyama. Lingua, 99, 107–133. 10.1016/0024‑3841(96)00012‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(96)00012-5 [Google Scholar]
  7. Foley, W. & Van Valin, R.
    (1984) Functional Syntax and Universal Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. García Pacheco, C. L.
    (2013) Los verbos de sentimiento en inglés antiguo: Arquitectura léxica e interfaz semántica-gramática. PhD Dissertation. Universidad de La Laguna.
  9. García Pacheco, L. M.
    (2013) El dominio verbal de la existencia en anglosajón. Análisis semántico-sintáctico. PhD Dissertation. Universidad de La Laguna.
  10. González Orta, M.
    (2002) Linking syntax and semantics in Old English verbs of warning. Estudios Ingleses de la Universidad Complutense, 10, 157–182.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. (2003) The Old English verbs of smell perception and emission: Analysis of the interface of their semantic and syntactic representation. SELIM, 12, 33–48.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. (2004) Diccionario Sintáctico del Léxico Verbal del Inglés Antiguo: Verbos de Habla. Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de La Laguna.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. (2005) The interrelation of semantic structure and syntactic variation in Old English verb classes: Catalogue of syntactico-semantic constructions. Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses, 18, 111–128. 10.14198/raei.2005.18.05
    https://doi.org/10.14198/raei.2005.18.05 [Google Scholar]
  14. (2006) The resultative construction in Old English: Towards a semantic network of verb classes. Studia Neophilologica, 78, 123–137. 10.1080/00393270601022282
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00393270601022282 [Google Scholar]
  15. Kageyama, T.
    (1992) AGR in Old English to-infinitives. Lingua, 88, 91–128. 10.1016/0024‑3841(92)90052‑K
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(92)90052-K [Google Scholar]
  16. Los, B.
    (2005) The Rise of the To-Infinitive. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199274765.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199274765.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  17. Martín Arista, J.
    (2000a) Sintaxis medieval inglesa I: complementación, caso y sintaxis verbal. InI. de la Cruz Cabanillas and J. Martín Arista (Eds.), Lingüística histórica inglesa. Barcelona: Ariel. 224–312.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. (2000b) Sintaxis medieval inglesa II: funciones, construcciones y orden de constituyentes. InI. de la Cruz Cabanillas and J. Martín Arista (eds.) Lingüística histórica inglesa (pp.313–377). Barcelona: Ariel.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. (2012b) The Old English Prefix Ge-: A Panchronic Reappraisal. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 32(4), 411–433. 10.1080/07268602.2012.744264
    https://doi.org/10.1080/07268602.2012.744264 [Google Scholar]
  20. (2017) El paradigma derivativo del inglés antiguo. Onomazeín, 37, 144–169. 10.7764/onomazein.37.05
    https://doi.org/10.7764/onomazein.37.05 [Google Scholar]
  21. (2018) The Semantic Poles of Old English. Towards the 3D Representation of Complex Polysemy. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 33, 93–111. 10.1093/llc/fqx004
    https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqx004 [Google Scholar]
  22. (2019) Another Look at Old English Zero Derivation and Alternations ATLANTIS, 41/1, 163–182. 10.28914/Atlantis‑2019‑41.1.09
    https://doi.org/10.28914/Atlantis-2019-41.1.09 [Google Scholar]
  23. Molencki, R.
    (1991) Complementation in Old English. Katowice: Uniwersytet Slaski.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Ringe, D. & Taylor, A.
    (2014) The Development of Old English. A Linguistic History of English Volume II. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Van Gelderen, E.
    (1993) The rise of functional categories. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.9
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.9 [Google Scholar]
  26. Van Valin, R.
    (2005) Exploring the Syntax-Semantics Interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511610578
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610578 [Google Scholar]
  27. (2007a) Recent Developments in the Role and Reference Grammar Theory of Clause Linkage. Language and Linguistics, 8(1), 71–93.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. (2007b) The Role and Reference Grammar Analysis of Three-Place Predicates. Suvremena Lingvistika, 33.1(63), 31–64.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. (2012) Lexical Representation, Co-composition, and Linking Syntax and Semantics. InJ. Pustejovsky, P. Bouillon, H. Isahara, K. Kanzaki, & C. Lee (Eds.), Advances in Generative Lexicon Theory (pp.67–107). Dordrecht: Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. (2014) Some questions concerning accomplishments. Lecture delivered at the2014 Symposium on Verbs, Clauses and Constructions, held at the University of La Rioja.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Van Valin, R. & LaPolla, R.
    (1997) Syntax: Structure, meaning and function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139166799
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139166799 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/resla.19040.oja
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/resla.19040.oja
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error