1887
image of Task-modality effects on young learners’ language-related episodes in collaborative dialogue
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

In adult learners’ collaborative dialogue, oral+written tasks have been found to promote a greater incidence and resolution of language-related episodes and to demand higher levels of accuracy than oral tasks thanks to the extra time learners have to reflect on their written outcome. No previous studies have tested whether asking learners to attend to accuracy in both modalities would yield similar results. The present study with 23 dyads of young English learners supports the superiority of the oral+written modality in the promotion of learning opportunities, even if learners are encouraged to focus on form in the oral modality, a result reinforced by the incorporation of target-like resolved episodes in the written product. However, the intragroup analysis reveals that young learners focus on meaning in equal terms, present low rates of target-likeness, and do not elaborate their resolutions, all of which can be ascribed to their younger age and developing metalinguistic awareness.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/resla.20020.gal
2022-09-12
2022-09-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Adams, R.
    (2003) L2 output, reformulation, and noticing: Implication for IL development. Language Teaching Research, 7, 347–376. 10.1191/1362168803LR127OA
    https://doi.org/10.1191/1362168803LR127OA [Google Scholar]
  2. (2006) L2 tasks and orientation to form: A role for modality?ITL International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 152, 7–34. 10.2143/ITL.152.0.2017861
    https://doi.org/10.2143/ITL.152.0.2017861 [Google Scholar]
  3. Adams, R., & Ross-Feldman, L.
    (2008) Does writing influence learner attention to form?InD. Belcher & A. Hirvela (Eds.), The oral-literate connection. Perspectives on L2 speaking, writing, and other media interactions (pp.243–265). The University of Michigan Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Al Khalil, M. K.
    (2016) Insights from measurement of task-related motivation. InA. Mackey & E. Marsden (Eds.), Advancing methodology and practice: The IRIS repository of instruments for research into second languages (pp.243–262). Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Alegría de la Colina, A., & García Mayo, M. P.
    (2007) Attention to form across collaborative tasks by low proficiency learners in an EFL setting. InM. P. García Mayo (Ed.), Investigating tasks in formal language learning (pp.1–116). Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Azkarai, A., & García Mayo, M. P.
    (2015) Task modality and L1 use in EFL oral interaction. Language Teaching Research, 19, 550–571. 10.1177/1362168814541717
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168814541717 [Google Scholar]
  7. Basterrechea, M., & García Mayo, M. P.
    (2013) Language-related episodes during collaborative tasks: A comparison of CLIL and EFL learners. InK. McDonough & A. Mackey (Eds.), Interaction in diverse educational settings (pp.25–43). John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.34.05ch2
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.34.05ch2 [Google Scholar]
  8. Bouffard, L. A., & Sarkar, M.
    (2008) Training 8-year old French immersion students in metalinguistic analysis. An innovation in form- focused pedagogy. Language Awareness, 17, 3–24. 10.2167/la424.0
    https://doi.org/10.2167/la424.0 [Google Scholar]
  9. Brooks, L., & Swain, M.
    (2009) Languaging in collaborative writing: Creation of and response to expertise. InA. Mackey & C. Polio (Eds.), Multiple perspectives on interaction (pp.58–89). Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Calzada, A., & García Mayo, M. P.
    (2020) Child EFL learners’ attitudes towards a collaborative writing task: An exploratory study. Language Teaching for Young Learners, 2(1), 52–72. 10.1075/ltyl.19008.cal
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ltyl.19008.cal [Google Scholar]
  11. Cenoz, J., & Valencia, J.
    (1994) Additive trilingualism: Evidence from the Basque country. Applied Psycholinguistics, 15, 195–207. 10.1017/S0142716400005324
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716400005324 [Google Scholar]
  12. Chen, W., & Yu, S.
    (2019) A longitudinal case study of changes in students’ attitudes, participation, and learning in collaborative writing. System, 82, 83–96. 10.1016/j.system.2019.03.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.03.005 [Google Scholar]
  13. Donato, R.
    (1994) Collective scaffolding in second language learning. InJ. P. Lantolf & G. Appel (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research (pp.33–56). Ablex.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Dörnyei, Z., & Kormos, J.
    (2000) The role of individual and social variables in oral task performance. Language Teaching Research, 4, 275–300. 10.1177/136216880000400305
    https://doi.org/10.1177/136216880000400305 [Google Scholar]
  15. Ellis, R.
    (2003) Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Fernández Dobao, A., & Blum, A.
    (2013) Collaborative writing in pairs and small groups: Learners’ attitudes and perceptions. System, 41(2), 365–378. 10.1016/j.system.2013.02.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.02.002 [Google Scholar]
  17. García Mayo, M. P., & Azkarai, A.
    (2016) EFL task-based interaction: Does task modality impact on language-related episodes?InM. Sato, & S. Ballinger (Eds.), Peer Interaction and second language learning: Research agenda and pedagogical potential (pp.241–266). John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.45.10gar
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.45.10gar [Google Scholar]
  18. García Mayo, M. P., & Hidalgo Gordo, M. A.
    (2017) L1 Use among young EFL mainstream and CLIL learners in task-supported interaction. System, 67, 132–145. 10.1016/j.system.2017.05.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2017.05.004 [Google Scholar]
  19. García Mayo, M. P. & Imaz Agirre, A.
    (2019) Task modality and pair formation method: their impact on patterns of interaction and LREs among EFL primary school children. System, 80, 165–175. 10.1016/j.system.2018.11.011
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2018.11.011 [Google Scholar]
  20. Gass, S., Behney, J., & Plonsky, L.
    (2013) Second Language Acquisition: An Introductory Course (4th ed.). New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203137093
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203137093 [Google Scholar]
  21. Grabowski, J.
    (2007) The writing superiority effect in the verbal recall of knowledge: Sources and determinants. InG. Rijlaarsdam (Series Ed.) & Torrance, M., van Waes, L., & Galbraith, D. (Volume Eds.), Writing and cognition: Research and applications (Studies in Writing) (pp.165–179). Elsevier. 10.1108/S1572‑6304(2007)0000020012
    https://doi.org/10.1108/S1572-6304(2007)0000020012 [Google Scholar]
  22. Granfeldt, J.
    (2007) Speaking and writing in L2 French: Exploring effects on fluency, accuracy and complexity. InS. Van Daele, A. Housen, F. Kuiken, M. Pierrard, & I. Vedder (Eds.), Complexity, accuracy and fluency in second language use, learning and teaching (pp.87–98). KVAB.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. House, S., & Scott, K.
    (2009) Sparks 1. Richmond.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Julkunen, K.
    (2001) Situation- and task-specific motivation in foreign language learning. InZ. Dörnyei & R. Schmidt (Eds.), Motivation and second language acquisition (pp.29–42). University of Hawaii Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Kim, Y.
    (2008) The contribution of collaborative and individual tasks to the acquisition of L2 vocabulary. Modern Language Journal, 92, 114–30. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2008.00690.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2008.00690.x [Google Scholar]
  26. Kim, Y., & McDonough, K.
    (2008) The effect of interlocutor proficiency on the collaborative dialogue between Korean as a second language learners. Language Teaching Research, 12(2), 211–234. 10.1177/1362168807086288
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168807086288 [Google Scholar]
  27. Kopinska, M., & Azkarai, A.
    (2020) Exploring young EFL learners’ motivation: Individual vs. pair work on dictogloss tasks. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 10(3), 607–630. 10.14746/ssllt.2020.10.3.10
    https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2020.10.3.10 [Google Scholar]
  28. Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I.
    (2012) Speaking and writing tasks and their effects on second language performance. InS. M. Gass & A. Mackey (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition (pp.364–377). Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Lasito & Storch, N.
    (2013) Comparing pair and small group interactions on oral tasks. RELC Journal, 44, 361–375. 10.1177/0033688213500557
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688213500557 [Google Scholar]
  30. Leeser, M. J.
    (2004) Learner proficiency and focus on form during collaborative dialogue. Language Teaching Research, 8(1), 55–81. 10.1191/1362168804lr134oa
    https://doi.org/10.1191/1362168804lr134oa [Google Scholar]
  31. Lin, O. P., & Maarof, N.
    (2013) Collaborative writing in summary writing: Student perceptions and problems. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 90, 599–606. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.07.131
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.07.131 [Google Scholar]
  32. Lyster, R.
    (2001) Negotiation of form, recasts, and explicit correction in relation to error types and learner repair in immersion classrooms. Language Learning, 15 (Suppl. 1), 265–301. 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.2001.tb00019.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.2001.tb00019.x [Google Scholar]
  33. Mackey, A. & Gass, S.
    (2005) Second language research: Methodology and design. Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. MacWhinney, B.
    (2000) The CHILDES Project: Tools for Analyzing Talk (third edition). Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Muñoz, C.
    (2017a) Tracing trajectories of young learners: Ten years of school English learning. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 37, 168–184. 10.1017/S0267190517000095
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190517000095 [Google Scholar]
  36. (2017b) The development of language awareness at the transition from primary to secondary school. InM. P. García Mayo (Ed.), Learning Foreign Languages in Primary School. Research Insights (pp.49–68). Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781783098118‑005
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783098118-005 [Google Scholar]
  37. Niu, R.
    (2009) Effect of task-inherent production modes on EFL learners’ focus on form. Language Awareness, 18(3–4), 384–402. 10.1080/09658410903197256
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09658410903197256 [Google Scholar]
  38. Oliver, R.
    (1998) Negotiation of meaning in child interactions. The relationship between conversational interaction and second language acquisition. The Modern Language Journal, 82, 372–386. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.1998.tb01215.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb01215.x [Google Scholar]
  39. (2009) How young is too young? Investigating negotiation of meaning and corrective feedback in children aged five to seven years. InA. Mackey & C. Polio (Eds.), Multiple Perspectives on Interaction: Second Language Interaction Research in Honour of Sue M. Gass (pp.135–156). Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Oliver, R., & Azkarai, A.
    (2017) Review of child second language acquisition (SLA): Examining theories and research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 37, 62–76. 10.1017/S0267190517000058
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190517000058 [Google Scholar]
  41. Payant, C., & Kim, Y. J.
    (2019) Impact of task modality on collaborative dialogue among plurilingual learners: A classroom-based study. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 22(5), 614–627. 10.1080/13670050.2017.1292999
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2017.1292999 [Google Scholar]
  42. Payant, C., & Reagan, D.
    (2018) Manipulating task implementation variables with incipient Spanish language learners: A classroom-based study. Language Teaching Research, 2(22), 169–188. 10.1177/1362168816669742
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168816669742 [Google Scholar]
  43. Philp, J., Walter, S., & Basturkmen, H.
    (2010) Peer interaction in the foreign language classroom: what factors foster a focus on form?Language Awareness, 19(4), 261–279. 10.1080/09658416.2010.516831
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2010.516831 [Google Scholar]
  44. Poupore, G.
    (2013) Task motivation in process: A complex systems perspective. Canadian Modern Language Review, 69(1), 91–116. 10.3138/cmlr.1139
    https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.1139 [Google Scholar]
  45. Shak, J.
    (2006) Children using dictogloss to focus on form. Reflections on English Language Teaching, 5(2), 47–62.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Shak, J., & Gardner, S.
    (2008) Young learner perspectives on four focus-on-form tasks. Language Teaching Research, 12(3), 387–408. 10.1177/1362168808089923
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168808089923 [Google Scholar]
  47. Storch, N.
    (1998) Comparing second language learners’ attention to form across tasks. Language Awareness, 7(4), 176–191. 10.1080/09658419808667108
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09658419808667108 [Google Scholar]
  48. (2001) How collaborative is pair work? ESL tertiary students composing in pairs. Language Teaching Research, 5, 29–53. 10.1177/136216880100500103
    https://doi.org/10.1177/136216880100500103 [Google Scholar]
  49. Storch, N., & Aldosari, A.
    (2010) Learners’ use of first language (Arabic) in pair work in an EFL class. Language Teaching Research, 14, 355–375. 10.1177/1362168810375362
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168810375362 [Google Scholar]
  50. Swain, M.
    (1998) Focus on form through conscious reflection. InC. Doughty, & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp.64–81). Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Swain, M., & Lapkin, S.
    (1998) Interaction and second language learning: Two adolescent French immersion students working together. Modern Language Journal, 82, 320–37. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.1998.tb01209.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb01209.x [Google Scholar]
  52. (2001) Focus on form through collaborative dialogue: Exploring task effects. InM. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing (pp.99–118). Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. (2002) Talking it through: Two French immersion learners’ response to reformulation. International Journal of Educational Research, 37, 285–304. 10.1016/S0883‑0355(03)00006‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(03)00006-5 [Google Scholar]
  54. Swain, M., & Y. Watanabe
    (2013) Languaging: collaborative dialogue as a source of second language learning. InC. Chapelle (Ed.), The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics (pp.3218–3225). Wiley-Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Tellier, A., & Roehr-Brackin, K.
    (2017) Raising children’s metalinguistic awareness to enhance classroom second language learning. InM. P. García Mayo (Ed.), Learning foreign languages in primary school: Research insights (pp.22–48). Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781783098118‑004
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783098118-004 [Google Scholar]
  56. UCLES
    UCLES (2014) Key English test for schools. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Watanabe, Y., & Swain, M.
    (2007) Effects of proficiency differences and patterns of pair interaction on second language learning: Collaborative dialogue between adult ESL learners. Language Teaching Research, 11, 121–42. 10.1177/136216880607074599
    https://doi.org/10.1177/136216880607074599 [Google Scholar]
  58. Williams, J.
    (2001) The Effectiveness of Spontaneous Attention to form. System, 29(3), 325–340. 10.1016/S0346‑251X(01)00022‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(01)00022-7 [Google Scholar]
  59. Wolff, D.
    (2000) Some reflections on the importance of writing in foreign language learning. InI. Play, & K. P. Schneider (Eds.), Language use, language acquisition and language history (pp.213–226). WVT Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/resla.20020.gal
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/resla.20020.gal
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error