1887
Volume 37, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0213-2028
  • E-ISSN: 2254-6774
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Categorization and identification of typical exemplars within semantic categories is a universal skill of human cognition which is involved in language development. However, cultural, and experiential aspects might influence typicality effects. This paper examines the role of native language and culture on that categorization process and on typicality effects. Towards that objective, we had Spanish native speakers and Spanish FL learners whose mother tongue is Greek complete a category generation word association task. Data were analyzed within a network and graph theory framework as the best fitting for this type of data, bearing in mind previous descriptions of semantic memory. Results showed how, indeed, native speakers and learners of varying proficiency levels differ in their availability and production of typical exemplars, especially in slot-filler categories versus taxonomic categories. Lexical access during category generation might be determined by native language and culture. Additionally, natives’ mental lexicon seems to feature denser connections responsible for more efficient access.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/resla.21038.agu
2023-12-11
2025-04-27
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aitchison, J.
    (1992) Good birds, better birds and amazing birds: The development of prototypes. In: P. J. L. Arnaud, & H. Béjoint (eds.), Vocabulary and Applied Linguistics. Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑1‑349‑12396‑4_7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-12396-4_7 [Google Scholar]
  2. (1994) Words in the mind: An introduction to the mental lexicon. Basil Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Ameel, E., Storms, G., Malt, B. C., & Sloman, S. A.
    (2005) How bilinguals solve the naming problem. Journal of Memory and Language, 531, 60–80. 10.1016/j.jml.2005.02.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2005.02.004 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bartol Hernández, J. A.
    (2006) La disponibilidad léxica. Revista Española de Lingüística, 361, 379–396.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Beckage, N. M., & Colunga, E.
    (2016) Language networks as models of cognition: Understanding cognition through language. In: A. Mehler, A. Lücking, S. Banisch, P. Blanchard, & B. Job (eds), Towards a theoretical framework for analyzing complex linguistic networks. Understanding complex systems (pp.3–28). Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑662‑47238‑5_1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-47238-5_1 [Google Scholar]
  6. Carcedo González, A.
    (2000) La lengua como manifestación de otredad cultural (o convergencia intercultural), Espéculo: Universidad Complutense de Madrid. https://pendientedemigracion.ucm.es/info/especulo/ele/carcedo.html
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Collins, A. M., & Loftus, E. F.
    (1975) A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82(6), 407–428. 10.1037/0033‑295X.82.6.407
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.82.6.407 [Google Scholar]
  8. Collins, A. M., & Quillian, M. R.
    (1969) Retrieval time from semantic memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 8(2), 240–248. 10.1016/S0022‑5371(69)80069‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(69)80069-1 [Google Scholar]
  9. (1970) Does category size affect categorization time?Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 9(4), 432–438. 10.1016/S0022‑5371(70)80084‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(70)80084-6 [Google Scholar]
  10. Cremer, M., Dingshoff, D., De Beer, M., & Schoonen, R.
    (2010) Do word associations assess word knowledge? A comparison of L1 and L2, child and adult word associations. International Journal of Bilingualism, 15(2), 87–204.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Cuenca, M. J., & Hilferty, J.
    (1999) Introducción a la lingüística cognitiva. Ariel.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. De Deyne, S., Kenett, Y. N., Anaki, D., Faust, M., & Navarro, D.
    (2017) Large-scale network representations of semantics in the mental lexicon. In: M. N. Jones (ed.), Frontiers of cognitive psychology. Big data in cognitive science (pp.174–202). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Dubois, D.
    (1991) Sémantique et Cognition. CNRS.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Echeverría, M. S., Urzúa, P., & Figueroa, I.
    (2005) Dispogen II. Programa computacional para el análisis de la disponibilidad léxica. Universidad de Concepción.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Echeverría, M. S., Vargas, R., Urzúa, P., & Ferreira, R.
    (2008) DispoGrafo: una nueva herramienta computacional para el análisis de relaciones semánticas en el léxico disponible. Revista de Lingüística Teórica y Aplicada, 46(1), 81–91. 10.4067/S0718‑48832008000100005
    https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-48832008000100005 [Google Scholar]
  16. Ecke, P., & Hall, C. J.
    (2014) The parasitic model of L2 and L3 vocabulary: Evidence from naturalistic and experimental studies. Fórum Lingüístico, 11(3), 360–372. 10.5007/1984‑8412.2014v11n3p360
    https://doi.org/10.5007/1984-8412.2014v11n3p360 [Google Scholar]
  17. Ferreira, R. A., & Echeverría, M. S.
    (2010) Redes semánticas en el léxico disponible de inglés L1 e inglés LE. Onomázein, 211, 133–153. 10.7764/onomazein.21.05
    https://doi.org/10.7764/onomazein.21.05 [Google Scholar]
  18. Fitzpatrick, T.
    (2007) Word association patterns: Unpacking the assumptions. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 17(3), 319–331. 10.1111/j.1473‑4192.2007.00172.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2007.00172.x [Google Scholar]
  19. Galloso Camacho, M. V.
    (2002) El léxico de los estudiantes preuniversitarios en el distrito universitario de Salamanca, Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Gollan, T. H., Montoya, R. I., Fennema-Notestine, C., & Morris, S. K.
    (2005) Bilingualism affects picture naming but not picture classification. Memory & Cognition, 331, 1220–1234. 10.3758/BF03193224
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193224 [Google Scholar]
  21. Goñi, J., Arrondo, G., Sepulcre, J., Martincorena, I., Vélez de Mendizábal, N., Corominas-Murtra, B., Bejarano, B., Ardanza-Trevijano, S., Peraita, H., Wall, D. P., & Villoslada, P.
    (2010a) The semantic organization of the animal category: Evidence from semantic verbal fluency and network theory. Cognitive Processing, 12(2), 183–196. 10.1007/s10339‑010‑0372‑x
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-010-0372-x [Google Scholar]
  22. Goñi, J., Martincorena, I., Corominas-Murtra, B., Arrondo, G., Ardanza-Trevijano, S. & Villoslada, P.
    (2010b) Switcher-random-walks: A cognitive-inspired mechanism for network exploration. International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos, 20(3), 913–922. 10.1142/S0218127410026204
    https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218127410026204 [Google Scholar]
  23. Gozalo, P. & Martin, M.
    (2008) Pruebas de nivel ELE. Modelos de examen para determinar el nivel de nuevos estudiantes. Madrid: SGEL.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Gudmundson, A.
    (2020) The mental lexicon of multilingual adult learners of Italian L3: A study of word association behavior and cross-lingual semantic priming. In: C. Bardel, & L. Sánchez (eds.), Third language acquisition: Age, proficiency and multilingualism (pp.67–109). Language Science Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Izquierdo Gil, M. C.
    (2004) La selección del léxico en la enseñanza del español como lengua extranjera. Su aplicación en el nivel elemental en estudiantes francófonos. Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Valencia.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Jing, L.
    (2012) El estudio de disponibilidad léxica de los estudiantes chinos de español como lengua extranjera. MARCOELE, 141, 1–14.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Karuza, E. A., Thompson-Schill, S. L., & Bassett, D. S.
    (2016) Local patterns to global architectures: Influences of network topology on human learning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(8), 629–640. 10.1016/j.tics.2016.06.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2016.06.003 [Google Scholar]
  28. Kleiber, G.
    (1995) La semántica de los prototipos. Categoría y sentido léxico. Visor.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Kövecses, Z.
    (2006) Language, mind and culture: A practical introduction, Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Kroll, J. F., Stewart, E.
    (1994) Category interference in translation and picture naming: Evidence for asymmetric connections between bilingual memory representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 331, 149–174. 10.1006/jmla.1994.1008
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1994.1008 [Google Scholar]
  31. Lakoff, G.
    (1987) Women, fire, and dangerous things. University Of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  32. Libben, G.
    (2011) The Mental Lexicon. Words in the mind, words in the brain [online]. Available: www.mental.lexicon.ling.ualberta.ca/project.html
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Lin, P.-J., Schwanenflugel, P. J., & Wisenbaker, J. M.
    (1990) Category typicality, cultural familiarity, and the development of category knowledge. Developmental Psychology, 261, 805–813. 10.1037/0012‑1649.26.5.805
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.26.5.805 [Google Scholar]
  34. López González, A. M.
    (2010) La evaluación del desarrollo de la competencia léxica en L2 por medio de la disponibilidad léxica. redELE: Revista Electrónica de Didáctica ELE, 181.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Malt, B. C., Gennari, S., Imai, M.
    (2010) Lexicalization patterns and the world-to-words mapping. In: B. C. Malt, & P. Wolff (eds.), Words and the mind: How words capture human experience (pp.29–57). Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195311129.003.0003
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195311129.003.0003 [Google Scholar]
  36. Malt, B. C., Sloman, S. A., Gennari, S., Shi, M., & Wang, Y.
    (1999) Knowing versus naming: Similarity and the linguistic categorization of artifacts. Journal of Memory and Language, 401, 230–262. 10.1006/jmla.1998.2593
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1998.2593 [Google Scholar]
  37. Meara, P.
    (1982) Word associations in a foreign language: A Report on the Birkbeck Vocabulary Project. Nottingham Linguistic Circular, 11(2), 29–37.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Meara, P. M.
    (2009) Connected words: Word associations and second language vocabulary acquisition. John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.24
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.24 [Google Scholar]
  39. Núñez Romero, L.
    (2008) Presencia de elementos culturales en el léxico disponible en E/LE de una muestra de estudiantes arabófonos. In: J. Villatoro (ed.), Actas del Segundo Congreso Virtual sobre E/LE. La red como espacio de colaboración, vol.I1, 267–279.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Palapanidi, K.
    (2019) Manifestaciones de “clusters” y “switches” en el léxico disponible de aprendices griegos de ELE en diferentes niveles lingüísticos. MarcoEle, 281.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Peppard, J.
    2007Exploring the relationship between word-association and learners’ lexical development. University of Birmingham.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Precosky, K.
    (2011) Exploring the mental lexicon using word association tests: How do native and non-native speakers of English arrange words in the mind? (unpublished PhD thesis). University of Birmingham.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Pranoto, B. E., & Afrilita, L. K.
    (2018) The organization of words in mental lexicon: Evidence from word association test. TEKNOSASTIK, 16(1), 26–33. 10.33365/ts.v16i1.130
    https://doi.org/10.33365/ts.v16i1.130 [Google Scholar]
  44. Rosch, E.
    (1978) Principles of categorization. In: E. Rosch, & B. B. Lloyd (eds.), Cognition and categorization (pp.27–48). Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Roux, P. W.
    (2013) Words in the mind: Exploring the relationship between word association and lexical development. Polyglossia, 241, 80–91.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Salcedo, P. & del Valle, M.
    (2013) Disponibilidad Léxica Matemática en Estudiantes de Enseñanza Media de Concepción, Chile, Atenas, (online), 1(21), 1–16. Available: https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=478048957001
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Sánchez-Saus Laserna, M.
    (2016) Léxico disponible de los estudiantes de español como lengua extranjera en las universidades andaluzas. Universidad de Sevilla.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Schwanenflugel, P. J., & Rey, M.
    (1986) The relationship between category typicality and concept familiarity: Evidence from Spanish- and English-speaking monolinguals. Memory & Cognition, 141, 150–163. 10.3758/BF03198375
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198375 [Google Scholar]
  49. Séguin, M.
    (2015) Exploration of the relationship between word-association and learners’ lexical development with a focus on American L1 and Croatian L2 speakers. ExELL (Explorations in English Language and Linguistics), 3(2), 80–101. 10.1515/exell‑2017‑0003
    https://doi.org/10.1515/exell-2017-0003 [Google Scholar]
  50. Shivabasappa, P., Peña, E. D., & Bedore, L. M.
    (2017) Typicality effect and category structure in Spanish–English bilingual children and adults. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 60(6), 1577–1589. 10.1044/2016_JSLHR‑L‑15‑0377
    https://doi.org/10.1044/2016_JSLHR-L-15-0377 [Google Scholar]
  51. Šifrar Kalan, M.
    (2014) Disponibilidad léxica en diferentes niveles de español/lengua extranjera. Studia Romanica Posnaniensia, 41(1), 63–85. 10.14746/strop.2014.411.005
    https://doi.org/10.14746/strop.2014.411.005 [Google Scholar]
  52. (2017) La universalidad de los prototipos semánticos en el léxico disponible de español. VERBA HISPANICAXXIV1, 147–165.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Stamer, M. K., & Vitevitch, M. S.
    (2012) Phonological similarity influences word learning in adults learning Spanish as a foreign language. Bilingualism and Cognition, 15(2), 490–502. 10.1017/S1366728911000216
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728911000216 [Google Scholar]
  54. Troyer, A. K., Moscovitch, M., & Winocur, G.
    (1997) Clustering and switching as two components of verbal fluency: evidence from younger and older healthy adults. Neuropsychology, 11(1),138–146. 10.1037/0894‑4105.11.1.138
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0894-4105.11.1.138 [Google Scholar]
  55. Vitevich, M.
    (2008) What can graph theory tell us about word learning and lexical retrieval?Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 511, 408–422. 10.1044/1092‑4388(2008/030)
    https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2008/030) [Google Scholar]
  56. Wierzbicka, A.
    (1992) Semantics, culture and cognition: Universal human concepts in culture-specific configurations. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780195073256.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195073256.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  57. Wolter, B.
    (2001) Comparing the L1 and the L2 mental lexicon: A depth of individual word knowledge model. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23(1), 41–69. 10.1017/S0272263101001024
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263101001024 [Google Scholar]
  58. (2002) Assessing proficiency through word associations: Is there still hope?System, 30(3), 315–329. 10.1016/S0346‑251X(02)00017‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(02)00017-9 [Google Scholar]
  59. Zareva, A.
    (2007) Structure of the second language mental lexicon: How does it compare to native speakers’ lexical organization?Second Language Research, 23(2), 123–153. 10.1177/0267658307076543
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658307076543 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/resla.21038.agu
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/resla.21038.agu
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error