1887
Volume 37, Issue 2
  • ISSN 0213-2028
  • E-ISSN: 2254-6774
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

English reflexive anaphora in cases of VP-ellipsis may allow for strict and sloppy readings. A few L2 studies (Epoge, 2012; Park, 2016; Ying, 2005) have focused on determining the role that L2 proficiency may exert on learners’ choices in bare, referential, and non-referential contexts. This paper provides data from 104 Spanish learners of English (A2, B1, and B2 levels) and 32 native speakers of English. Results showed that participants tended to interpret reflexives sloppily in bare and non-referential contexts, whereas strict readings prevailed in referential ones. There existed significant differences in the interpretation of learners versus native speakers, whilst the differences among the three learner groups were not so marked. However, the least proficient group differed most from native speakers. Findings partially confirm previous research and discrepancies may be tentatively ascribed to extraneous variables (e.g., the learners’ L1, the range of the proficiency levels, or the characteristics of the control groups).

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/resla.21054.gal
2024-03-11
2024-10-06
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aelbrecht, L.
    (2009) You Have the Right to Remain Silent. The Syntactic Licensing of Ellipsis [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Catholic University of Brussels. https://lirias.kuleuven.be/retrieve/394416
  2. (2010) The syntactic licensing of ellipsis. John Benjamins. 10.1075/la.149
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.149 [Google Scholar]
  3. Al-Kafri, A.
    (2013) Interpretation of English Reflexives by Child and Adult L2 Learners [Doctoral dissertation, Newcastle University]. CORE. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/153777715.pdf
  4. Al-Thubaiti, K. A.
    (2018) Selective vulnerability in very advanced L2 grammars: evidence from VPE constraints. Second Language Research, 1–28. 10.1177/0267658317751577
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658317751577 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bennett, S.
    (1994) Interpretation of English reflexives by adolescent speakers of Serbo-Croatian. Second Language Research, 10(2), 125–156. 10.1177/026765839401000202
    https://doi.org/10.1177/026765839401000202 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bouchard, D.
    (1984) On the content of empty categories. Foris.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Chomsky, N.
    (1981) Lectures on Government and Binding. Foris Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Contemori, C., Asiri, O., & Perea Irigoyen, E. D.
    (2019) Anaphora resolution in L2 English: An analysis of discourse complexity and cross-linguistic interference. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 1–28. 10.1017/S0272263119000111
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263119000111 [Google Scholar]
  9. Crain, S., & Thornton, R.
    (1998) The truth value judgment task: Fundamentals of design. University of Maryland working papers in linguistics, 61, 61–70.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Dalrymple, M.
    (2005) Against reconstruction in ellipsis. InR. Elugardo & R. J. Stainton (Eds.), Ellipsis and nonsentential speech. Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy, vol.811 (pp. 31–55). Springer. 10.1007/1‑4020‑2301‑4_2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2301-4_2 [Google Scholar]
  11. Dalrymple, M., Shieber, S. M., & Pereira, F. C.
    (1991) Ellipsis and higher-order unification. Linguistics and philosophy, 14(4), 399–452. 10.1007/BF00630923
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00630923 [Google Scholar]
  12. Dong, Y., Wen, Y., Zeng, X., & Ji, Y.
    (2015) Exploring the cause of English pronoun gender errors by Chinese learners of English: Evidence from the self-paced reading paradigm. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 44(6), 733–747. 10.1007/s10936‑014‑9314‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-014-9314-6 [Google Scholar]
  13. Duffield, N. G., & Matsuo, A.
    (2009) Native speakers’ versus L2 learners’ sensitivity to parallelism. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 311, 93–123. 10.1017/S0272263109090044
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263109090044 [Google Scholar]
  14. Epoge, N. K.
    (2012) Reflexive anaphora in VP-elliptical sentences of ESL learners in Cameroon. Syllabus Review, 3(1), 257–279.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Fiengo, R., & May, R.
    (1994) Indices and identity. MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Frazier, L., & Clifton, C.
    (2006) Ellipsis and discourse coherence. Linguistics and Philosophy, 29(3), 315–46. 10.1007/s10988‑006‑0002‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-006-0002-3 [Google Scholar]
  17. Gandón-Chapela, E., & Gallardo-del-Puerto, F.
    (2019) Verb phrase ellipsis and reflexive anaphora resolution in second language acquisition: A study of Spanish learners of English. Miscelánea: A Journal of English and American Studies, 591, 71–94. 10.26754/ojs_misc/mj.20196340
    https://doi.org/10.26754/ojs_misc/mj.20196340 [Google Scholar]
  18. Hankamer, J., & Sag, I. A.
    (1976) Deep and surface anaphora. Linguistic Inquiry, 71, 391–428.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Hestvik, A.
    (1995) Reflexives and ellipsis. Natural Language Semantics, 31, 211–237. 10.1007/BF01249838
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01249838 [Google Scholar]
  20. Hirakawa, M.
    (1990) A study of the L2 acquisition of English reflexives. Second Language Research, 6(1), 60–85.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Hwang, H.
    (2020) A contrast between VP-Ellipsis and Gapping in English: L1 acquisition, L2 acquisition, and L2 processing. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa]. Scholar Space. https://scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu/handle/10125/69071
  22. Johnson, K.
    (2001) What VP ellipsis can do, and what it can’t, but not why. InM. Baltin & C. Collins (Eds.), The handbook of contemporary syntactic theory (pp. 439–79). Blackwell Publishers. 10.1002/9780470756416.ch14
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756416.ch14 [Google Scholar]
  23. Kehler, A.
    (2000) Coherence and the resolution of ellipsis. Linguistics and Philosophy, 231, 533–575. 10.1023/A:1005677819813
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005677819813 [Google Scholar]
  24. Kim, J.
    (2015) Korean L2 Learners’ comprehension of VP-ellipsis and one-substitution in English. Enekwahakyenkwu [The Journal of Linguistics Science], 751, 107–128.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Kim, C. S., & Runner, J.
    (2009) Strict identity, coherence, and parallelism in VP ellipsis. InE. Cormany, S. Ito, & D. Lutz (Eds.), Semantics and Linguistic Theory. Proceedings of the 19th Semantics and Linguistic Theory Conference (pp. 275–287). 10.3765/salt.v19i0.2535
    https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v19i0.2535 [Google Scholar]
  26. Kitagawa, Y.
    (1991) Copying identity. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 91, 497–536. 10.1007/BF00135356
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00135356 [Google Scholar]
  27. Lee, D., & Schachter, J.
    (1997) Sensitive period effects in Binding Theory. Language Acquisition, 6(4), 333–362. 10.1207/s15327817la0604_3
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327817la0604_3 [Google Scholar]
  28. Lozano, C.
    (2021) Anaphora Resolution in Second Language Acquisition. InM. Aronoff (Ed.), Oxford Bibliographies in Linguistics. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/obo/9780199772810‑0268
    https://doi.org/10.1093/obo/9780199772810-0268 [Google Scholar]
  29. MacLaughlin, D.
    (1998) The acquisition of the morphosyntax of English reflexives by non-native speakers. InM. L. Beck (Ed.), Morphology and its interfaces in second language knowledge (pp.195–226). John Benjamins. 10.1075/lald.19.09mac
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.19.09mac [Google Scholar]
  30. Matsuo, A., & Duffield, N.
    (2001) VP-ellipsis and anaphora in child language acquisition. Language Acquisition, 91, 301–327. 10.1207/S15327817LA0904_02
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327817LA0904_02 [Google Scholar]
  31. McKillen, A.
    (2016) On the interpretation of reflexive pronouns. [Doctoral dissertation, McGill University]. Library and Archives Canada. https://www.bac-lac.gc.ca/eng/services/theses/Pages/item.aspx?idNumber=953107291
  32. Ong, M., & Brasoveanu, A.
    (2014) Strict and sloppy reflexives in VP-ellipsis. InC. Piñón (Ed.), Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics101 (pp. 251–268). www.cssp.cnrs.fr/eiss10/
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Park, E.
    (2016) Korean English learners’ interpretation of reflexive anaphora in VP-ellipsis. Journal of Language Sciences, 23(3), 111–135. 10.14384/kals.2016.23.3.111
    https://doi.org/10.14384/kals.2016.23.3.111 [Google Scholar]
  34. Postman, W. A., Foley, C., Pactovis, J., Rothenstein, B., Kaye, M., Lowe, D., & Lust, B.
    (1997) Children’s knowledge of verbal inflection and LF raising: New evidence from elicited production of VP ellipsis structures. InS. Somashekar, K. Yamakoshi, M. Blume, & C. Foley (Eds.), Cornell working papers in linguistics: Papers on language acquisition151 (pp. 39–64). Cornell Linguistics Circle.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Roeper, T.
    (2018) Ellipsis and acquisition. InJ. van Craenenbroeck & T. Temmerman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of ellipsis (pp. 276–313). Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198712398.013.12
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198712398.013.12 [Google Scholar]
  36. Ross, J. R.
    (1967) Constraints on variables in syntax. [Doctoral dissertation, MIT]. MIT Libraries. https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/15166
  37. Sag, I. A.
    (1976) Deletion and Logical Form [Doctoral dissertation, MIT]. MIT Libraries. https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/16401
  38. Scuitti, S.
    (2020) The acquisition of clitic pronouns in complex infinitival clauses by German-speaking learners of Italian as an L3: The role of proficiency in target and background language(s). InC. Bardel & L. Sánchez (Eds.), Third language acquisition: Age, proficiency and multilingualism (pp. 111–144). Language Science Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Sorace, A., & Filiaci, F.
    (2006) Anaphora Resolution in Near-native Speakers of Italian. Second Language Research22(3), 339–368.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Thornton, R., & Wexler, K.
    (1999) Principle B, VP ellipsis, and interpretation in child grammar. MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/5550.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/5550.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  41. Williams, E.
    (1977) Discourse and Logical Form. Linguistic Inquiry, 8(1), 101–39.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Xiao, F.
    (2015) Proficiency effect on L2 pragmatic competence. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 5(4), 557–581. 10.14746/sllt.2015.5.4.3
    https://doi.org/10.14746/sllt.2015.5.4.3 [Google Scholar]
  43. Ying, H. G.
    (2005) Second language learners’ reading of reflexive anaphora in VP-ellipsis: A Relevance Theory perspective. Language Sciences, 271, 551–570. 10.1016/j.langsci.2005.02.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2005.02.003 [Google Scholar]
  44. Yip, V., & Tang, G.
    (1998) Acquisition of English reflexive binding by Cantonese learners: Testing the Positive Transfer Hypothesis. InM. L. Beck (Ed.), Morphology and its interfaces in second language knowledge (pp.165–193). John Benjamins. 10.1075/lald.19.08yip
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.19.08yip [Google Scholar]
  45. Yoshida, M.
    (2008) Think-Aloud Protocols and Type of Reading Task: The Issue of Reactivity in L2 Reading Research. InM. Bowles, R. Foote, S. Perpiñán, & R. Bhatt (Eds.), Selected Proceedings of the 2007 Second Language Research Forum (pp. 199–209). Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/resla.21054.gal
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/resla.21054.gal
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error