1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics
  4. Online First Articles
  5. Online First Article
image of The effect of fluency training on interpreter trainees’ speech fluency, comprehensibility, and accentedness
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Fluency, comprehensibility, and accentedness are considered important parameters of interpreting quality but have rarely been studied systematically in training programs of interpreting. Therefore, the present study was set up to investigate the effect of fluency training on speech fluency, comprehensibility, and accentedness of interpreter trainees. Two groups of interpreter trainees at a university in Iran took part in the study, receiving the same amount of instruction and practice (12 hours over 4 weeks). The experimental group ( = 30) spent 33% of the time (i.e., 4 of the 12 hours in the training program) on dedicated fluency strategy training, encouraging the memorization, repetition, and retelling of audio and video materials. The remaining 67% was spent on training general speaking skills. The control group ( = 30) were only taught general speaking skills in the training program but received no dedicated fluency training. Systematic interviews were run to assess the interpreter trainees’ speech fluency, comprehensibility and accentedness, which were judged independently by three expert raters at three moments of testing, i.e., pretest, immediate posttest, and delayed posttest (one month later). The findings revealed that the fluency training significantly enhanced the interpreter trainees’ fluency, and to a lesser extent the students’ comprehensibility but had only a marginal effect on accentedness. The pedagogical implication would be that awareness training on speech fluency in EFL settings be included in interpreting training programs.

© 2024 John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/resla.22044.yen
2024-04-02
2025-01-17

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/resla.22044.yen
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abrahamsson, N. & Hyltenstam, K.
    (2009) Age of onset and nativelikeness in a second language: Listener perception versus linguistic scrutiny. Language Learning, (), –. 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2009.00507.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00507.x [Google Scholar]
  2. Ahmadian, M. J. & Tavakoli, M.
    (2011) The effects of simultaneous use of careful online planning and task repetition on accuracy, complexity, and fluency in EFL learners’ oral production. Language Teaching Research, (), –. 10.1177/1362168810383329
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168810383329 [Google Scholar]
  3. Anderson, J. R., Bothell, D., Byrne, M. D., Douglass, S., Lebiere, C. & Qin, Y.
    (2004) An integrated theory of the mind. Psychological Review, (), –. 10.1037/0033‑295X.111.4.1036
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.111.4.1036 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bosker, H. R., Pinget, A. F., Quené, H., Sanders, T. J. M. & de Jong, N. H.
    (2013) What makes speech sound fluent? The contributions of pauses, speed and repairs. Language Testing, (), –. 10.1177/0265532212455394
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532212455394 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bygate, M.
    (2001) Effects of task repetition on the structure and control of oral language. InP. S. M. Bygate & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing (pp.–). Pearson Longman. 10.1075/tblt.1.15eff
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.1.15eff [Google Scholar]
  6. (2018) Learning language through task repetition. John Benjamins. 10.1075/tblt.11
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.11 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bygate, M. & Samuda, V.
    (2005) Integrative planning through the use of task-repetition. InR. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp.–). John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.11.05byg
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.11.05byg [Google Scholar]
  8. Cargile, A. C., Maeda, E., Rodriguez, J. & Rich, M.
    (2010) “Oh, you speak English so well!”: US American listeners’ perceptions of “foreignness” among nonnative speakers. Journal of Asian American Studies, (), –. 10.1353/jaas.0.0062
     https://doi.org/10.1353/jaas.0.0062 [Google Scholar]
  9. Carlson, H. K. & McHenry, M. A.
    (2006) Effect of accent and dialect on employability. Journal of Employment Counseling, (), –. 10.1002/j.2161‑1920.2006.tb00008.x
     https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-1920.2006.tb00008.x [Google Scholar]
  10. Cohen, J.
    (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Cucchiarini, C., Strik, H. & Boves, L.
    (2002) Quantitative assessment of second language learners’ fluency: Comparisons between read and spontaneous speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, (), –. 10.1121/1.1471894
     https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1471894 [Google Scholar]
  12. de Jong, N.
    (2005) Can second language grammar be learned through listening? An experimental study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, (), –. 10.1017/S0272263105050114
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263105050114 [Google Scholar]
  13. de Jong, N. H., Groenhout, R., Schoonen, R. & Hulstijn, J. H.
    (2015) Second language fluency: Speaking style or proficiency? Correcting measures of second language fluency for first language behavior. Applied Psycholinguistics, (), –. 10.1017/S0142716413000210
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716413000210 [Google Scholar]
  14. de Jong, N. & Perfetti, C. A.
    (2011) Fluency training in the ESL classroom: An experimental study of fluency development and proceduralization. Language Learning, (), –. 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2010.00620.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00620.x [Google Scholar]
  15. Derwing, T. M. & Munro, M. J.
    (1997) Accent, intelligibility, and comprehensibility: Evidence from four L1s. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, (), –. 10.1017/S0272263197001010
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263197001010 [Google Scholar]
  16. (2005) Second language accent and pronunciation teaching: A research-based approach. TESOL Quarterly, (), –. 10.2307/3588486
     https://doi.org/10.2307/3588486 [Google Scholar]
  17. (2015) Pronunciation fundamentals: Evidence-based perspectives for L2 teaching and research (Language Learning & Language Teaching, Vol. 42). John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.42
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.42 [Google Scholar]
  18. Derwing, T., Rossiter, M., Munro, M. & Thomson, R.
    (2004) Second language fluency: Judgments on different tasks. Language Learning, (), –. 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2004.00282.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2004.00282.x [Google Scholar]
  19. Ekmekçi, E.
    (2016) Comparison of native and non-native English language teachers’ evaluation of EFL learners’ speaking skills: Conflicting or identical rating behaviour?English Language Teaching, (), –. 10.5539/elt.v9n5p98
     https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v9n5p98 [Google Scholar]
  20. Ferman, S., Olshtain, E., Schechtman, E. & Karni, A.
    (2009) The acquisition of a linguistic skill by adults: Procedural and declarative memory interact in the learning of an artificial morphological rule. Journal of Neurolinguistics, (), –. 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2008.12.002
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2008.12.002 [Google Scholar]
  21. Flege, J. E. & Bohn, O.-S.
    (2021) The revised speech learning model (SLM-r). InR. Wayland (Ed.), Second language speech learning: Theoretical and empirical progress (pp.–). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108886901.002
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108886901.002 [Google Scholar]
  22. Foster, P.
    (2020) Oral fluency in a second language: A research agenda for the next ten years. Language Teaching, (), –. 10.1017/S026144482000018X
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S026144482000018X [Google Scholar]
  23. Fukuta, J.
    (2016) Effects of task repetition on learners’ attention orientation in L2 oral production. Language Teaching Research, (), –. 10.1177/1362168815570142
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168815570142 [Google Scholar]
  24. Fulcher, G.
    (2003) Testing second language speaking. Longman/Pearson Education.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Hanzawa, K.
    (2021) Development of second language speech fluency in foreign language classrooms: A longitudinal study. Language Teaching Research, –. 10.1177/13621688211008693
     https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211008693 [Google Scholar]
  26. Hyltenstam, K.
    (2012) Critical period. InC. Chapelle (Ed.), Encyclopedia of applied linguistics. Wiley-Blackwell. 10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0285
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0285 [Google Scholar]
  27. Isaacs, T. & Thomson, R.
    (2013) Rater experience, rating scale length, and judgments of L2 pronunciation: Revisiting research conventions. Language Assessment Quarterly, (), –. 10.1080/15434303.2013.769545
     https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2013.769545 [Google Scholar]
  28. Iwashita, N., Brown, A., McNamara, T. & O’Hagan, S.
    (2008) Assessed levels of second language speaking proficiency: How distinct?Applied Linguistics, (), –. 10.1093/applin/amm017
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amm017 [Google Scholar]
  29. Kahng, J.
    (2014) Exploring utterance and cognitive fluency of L1 and L2 English speakers: Temporal measures and stimulated recall. Language Learning, (), –. 10.1111/lang.12084
     https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12084 [Google Scholar]
  30. Kang, O., Rubin, D. & Pickering, L.
    (2010) Suprasegmental measures of accentedness and judgments of language learner proficiency in oral English. Modern Language Journal, (), –. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2010.01091.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2010.01091.x [Google Scholar]
  31. Karmilloff-Smith, A.
    (1986) From meta-processes to conscious access: Evidence from children’s metalinguistic and repair data. Cognition, (), –. 10.1016/0010‑0277(86)90040‑5
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(86)90040-5 [Google Scholar]
  32. Koponen, M. & Riggenbach, H.
    (2000) Overview: Varying perspectives on fluency. InH. Riggenbach (Ed.), Perspectives on fluency (pp.–). University of Michigan Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Kormos, J.
    (2006) Speech production and second language acquisition. Lawrence Erlbaum. 10.4324/9780203763964
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203763964 [Google Scholar]
  34. Kormos, J. & Dénes, M.
    (2004) Exploring measures and perceptions of fluency in the speech of second language learners. System(), –. 10.1016/j.system.2004.01.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2004.01.001 [Google Scholar]
  35. Lambert, C., Kormos, J. & Minn, D.
    (2017) Task repetition and second language speech processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, (), –. 10.1017/S0272263116000085
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263116000085 [Google Scholar]
  36. Lennon, P.
    (1990) Investigating fluency in EFL: a quantitative approach. Language Learning, (), –. 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1990.tb00669.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1990.tb00669.x [Google Scholar]
  37. (2000) The lexical element in spoken second language fluency. InH. Riggenbach (Ed.), Perspectives on fluency (pp.–). University of Michigan Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Lindeman, S. & Subtirelu, N.
    (2013) Reliably biased: The role of listener expectation in the perception of second language speech. Language Learning, (), –. 10.1111/lang.12014
     https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12014 [Google Scholar]
  39. Munro, M. J., & Derwing, T. M.
    (1995) Foreign accent, comprehensibility, and intelligibility in the speech of second language learners. Language Learning, (), –. 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1995.tb00963.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1995.tb00963.x [Google Scholar]
  40. Nattinger, R. & DeCarrico, S.
    (1992) Lexical phrases and language teaching. Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Noor, S. N. F. M.
    (2017) The representation of social actors in the graduate employability issue: Online news and the government document. International Journal of Society, Culture & Language, (), –. www.ijscl.net/article_24930_6dda940def56999f718223eaa011c2ee.pdf
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Prefontaine, Y., Kormos, J. & Johnson, D. E.
    (2016) How do utterance measures predict raters’ perceptions of fluency in French as a second language?Language Testing, , –. 10.1177/0265532215579530
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532215579530 [Google Scholar]
  43. Reithofer, K.
    (2020) Intelligibility in English as a lingua franca – The interpreters’ perspective. Journal of English as a Lingua Franca, (), –. 10.1515/jelf‑2020‑2037
     https://doi.org/10.1515/jelf-2020-2037 [Google Scholar]
  44. Révész, A., Ekiert, M. & Torgersen, E. N.
    (2016) The effects of complexity, accuracy, and fluency on communicative adequacy in oral task performance. Applied Linguistics, (), –. 10.1093/applin/amu069
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amu069 [Google Scholar]
  45. Richards, O.
    (2016) English short stories for intermediate learners. Olly Richards Publishing.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Rose, H.
    (2020) Language variation and intelligibility [PowerPoint slides]. Canvas. https://canvas.ox.ac.uk/courses/26789
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Rossiter, M.
    (2009) Perceptions of L2 fluency by native and non-native speakers of English. Canadian Modern Language Review, (), –. 10.3138/cmlr.65.3.395
     https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.65.3.395 [Google Scholar]
  48. Saito, K.
    (2021) What characterizes comprehensible and native-like pronunciation among English-as-a-second-language speakers? Meta-analyses of phonological, rater, and instructional factors. TESOL Quarterly, (), –. 10.1002/tesq.3027
     https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3027 [Google Scholar]
  49. Saito, K., & Akiyama, Y.
    (2017) Linguistic correlates of comprehensibility in second language Japanese speech. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, (), –. 10.1075/jslp.3.2.02sai
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jslp.3.2.02sai [Google Scholar]
  50. Saito, K. & Plonsky, L.
    (2019) Effects of second language pronunciation teaching revisited: A proposed measurement framework and meta-analysis. Language Learning, (), –. 10.1111/lang.12345
     https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12345 [Google Scholar]
  51. Saito, K., Suzuki, S., & Oyama, T., & Akiyama, Y.
    (2020) How does longitudinal interaction differentially promote experienced vs. inexperienced learners’ L2 speech learning?Second Language Research, (), –. 10.1177/0267658319884981
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658319884981 [Google Scholar]
  52. Sawyer, D.
    (2004) Fundamental aspects of interpreter education. Curriculum and assessment. John Benjamins. 10.1075/btl.47
     https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.47 [Google Scholar]
  53. Schmidt, R.
    (1994) Deconstructing consciousness in search of useful definitions for applied linguistics. AILA Review, , –. https://nflrc.hawaii.edu/PDFs/SCHMIDT%20Deconstructing%20consciousness%20in%20search%20of%20useful%20definitions.pdf
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Segalowitz, N.
    (2010) Cognitive bases of second language fluency. Routledge. 10.4324/9780203851357
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203851357 [Google Scholar]
  55. Seifoori, Z. & Vahidi, V.
    (2012) The impact of fluency strategy training on Iranian EFL learners’ speech under online planning conditions, Language Awareness, (), –. 10.1080/09658416.2011.639894
     https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2011.639894 [Google Scholar]
  56. Setton, R. & Dawrant, A.
    (2016) Conference interpreting: A trainer’s guide. John Benjamins. 10.1075/btl.121
     https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.121 [Google Scholar]
  57. Skehan, P.
    (2009) Modelling second language performance: Integrating complexity, accuracy, fluency, and lexis. Applied Linguistics, (), –. 10.1093/applin/amp047
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp047 [Google Scholar]
  58. (2014) Limited attentional capacity, second language performance, and task-based pedagogy. InP. Skehan (Ed.), Processing perspectives on task performance (pp.–). John Benjamins. 10.1075/tblt.5.08ske
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.5.08ske [Google Scholar]
  59. (2015) Limited attention capacity and cognition: Two hypotheses regarding second language performance on tasks. InM. Bygate (Ed.), Domains and directions in the development of TBLT: A decade of plenaries from the international conference (pp.–). John Benjamins. 10.1075/tblt.8.05ske
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.8.05ske [Google Scholar]
  60. Skehan, P., & Foster, P.
    (1999) The influence of task structure and processing conditions on narrative retellings. Language Learning, (), –. 10.1111/1467‑9922.00071
     https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00071 [Google Scholar]
  61. Suzuki, Y.
    (2020) Optimizing fluency training for speaking skills transfer: Comparing the effects of blocked and interleaved task repetition. Language Learning, (), –. 10.1111/lang.12433
     https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12433 [Google Scholar]
  62. Tavakoli, P. & Hunter, A.-M.
    (2018) Is fluency being ‘neglected’ in the classroom? Teacher understanding of fluency and related classroom practices. Language Teaching Research, (), –. 10.1177/1362168817708462
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168817708462 [Google Scholar]
  63. Thai, C. & Boers, F.
    (2016) Repeating a monologue under increasing time pressure: Effects on fluency, complexity, and accuracy. TESOL Quarterly, (), –. 10.1002/tesq.232
     https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.232 [Google Scholar]
  64. Thomson, R. I.
    (2015) Fluency. InM. Reed & J. Levis (Eds.), The handbook of English pronunciation (pp.–). John Wiley & Sons. 10.1002/9781118346952.ch12
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118346952.ch12 [Google Scholar]
  65. Yenkimaleki, M.
    (2017) Effect of prosody awareness training on the quality of consecutive interpreting between English and Farsi. LOT. https://www.lotpublications.nl/Documents/459_fulletext.pdf
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Yenkimaleki, M. & van Heuven, V. J.
    (2016) Effect of explicit teaching of prosodic features on the development of listening comprehension by Farsi-English interpreter trainees: An experimental study. International Journal of English Language Teaching, (), –. 10.37745/ijelt.13/vol4no6pp.32‑41
     https://doi.org/10.37745/ijelt.13/vol4no6pp.32-41 [Google Scholar]
  67. (2018) The effect of teaching prosody teaching on interpreting performance: An experimental study of consecutive interpreting from English into Farsi. Perspectives: Studies in Translatology, (), –. 10.1080/0907676X.2017.1315824
     https://doi.org/10.1080/0907676X.2017.1315824 [Google Scholar]
  68. (2019) The relative contribution of computer assisted prosody training vs. instructor based prosody teaching in developing speaking skills by interpreter trainees: An experimental study. Speech Communication, , –. 10.1016/j.specom.2019.01.006
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2019.01.006 [Google Scholar]
  69. (2021) Effects of attention to segmental vs. suprasegmental features on the speech intelligibility and comprehensibility of the EFL learners targeting the perception or production-focused practice. System, , –. 10.1016/j.system.2021.102557
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102557 [Google Scholar]
  70. (2022) The efficacy of segmental/suprasegmental vs. holistic pronunciation instruction on the development of listening comprehension skills by EFL learners. The Language Learning Journal, (), –. 10.1080/09571736.2022.2073382
     https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2022.2073382 [Google Scholar]
  71. (2023) Effect of pedagogic intervention in enhancing speech fluency by EFL students: A longitudinal study. Language Teaching Research, –. 10.1177/13621688231205017
     https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688231205017 [Google Scholar]
  72. Yenkimaleki, M., van Heuven, V. J. & Hosseini, M.
    (2023) The effect of fluency strategy training on interpreter trainees’ speech fluency: Does content familiarity matter?Speech Communication, , –. 10.1016/j.specom.2022.11.002
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2022.11.002 [Google Scholar]
  73. Yu, W. & van Heuven, V. J.
    (2013) Effects of immediate repetition at different stages of consecutive interpreting training. An experimental study. InS. Aalberse & A. Auer (Eds.), Linguistics in the Netherlands 2013 (pp.–). John Benjamins. 10.1075/avt.30.15yu
     https://doi.org/10.1075/avt.30.15yu [Google Scholar]
  74. (2017) Predicting judged fluency of consecutive interpreting from acoustic measures: Potential for automatic assessment and pedagogy. Interpreting: International Journal of Research and Practice in Interpreting, (), –. 10.1075/intp.19.1.03yu
     https://doi.org/10.1075/intp.19.1.03yu [Google Scholar]
  75. (2021) Quantitative correlates as predictors of judged fluency in consecutive interpreting: Implications for automatic assessment and pedagogy. InJing Chen & Chao Han (Eds.), Testing and assessment of interpreting (pp.–). Springer Nature. 10.1007/978‑981‑15‑8554‑8_6
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8554-8_6 [Google Scholar]
  76. Yuan, F. & Ellis, R.
    (2003) The effects of pre-task planning and on-line planning on fluency, complexity and accuracy in L2 monologic oral production. Applied Linguistics, (), –. 10.1093/applin/24.1.1
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/24.1.1 [Google Scholar]
  77. Zhang, Y., & Elder, C.
    (2014) Investigating native and non-native English-speaking teacher raters’ judgements of oral proficiency in the college English test-spoken English test (CET-SET). Assessment in education: Principles, Policy & Practice, (), –. 10.1080/0969594X.2013.845547
     https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2013.845547 [Google Scholar]
  78. Zielinski, B.
    (2006) The intelligibility cocktail: An interaction between speaker and listener ingredients. Prospect, , –. https://research-management.mq.edu.au/ws/portalfiles/portal/16998022/mq-34985-Publisher+version+%28open+access%29.pdf
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/resla.22044.yen
Loading
The effect of fluency training on interpreter trainees’ speech fluency, comprehensibility, and accentedness
John Benjamins ; https://doi.org/10.1075/resla.22044.yen
/content/journals/10.1075/resla.22044.yen
/content/journals/10.1075/resla.22044.yen
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: comprensibilidad del habla ; accentedness ; interpreter trainees ; estudiantes de interpretación ; speech comprehensibility ; acentuación ; entrenamiento de fluidez ; fluidez del habla ; speech fluency ; fluency training

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error