Caracterización prosódica del inicio, desarrollo y final de noticia

References

1. Balsebre Torroja, A
   (1994) El lenguaje radiofónico. Madrid: Cátedra.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bauman, S
   (2006) Information structure and prosody: Linguistic categories for spoken language annotation. En S. Sudhoff , D. Lenertová , R. Meyer , S. Pappert , P. Augurzky , M. Ina , R. Nicole , & J. Schließer (Eds.), Methods in empirical prosody research (pp.153–180). Berlín/Nueva York: Walter de Gruyter.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Boersma, P. , & Weenink, D
   (2013) Praat: Doing phonetics by computer [Software]. En: www.praat.org.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bolinger, D
   (1989) Intonation and its uses: Melody grammar and discourse. Londres: Edward Arnold.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Braun, B. , & Tagliapietra, L
   (2010) The role of contrastive intonation contours in the retrieval of contextual alternatives. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25(7), 1024–1043. doi: 10.1080/01690960903036836
   https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960903036836 [Google Scholar]
6. Brown, M. , Salverda, A.P. , Gunlogson, C. , & Tanenhaus, M.K
   (2015) Interpreting prosodic cues in discourse context. Language, Cognition, and Neuroscience, 30, 149–166. doi: 10.1080/01690965.2013.862285
   https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2013.862285 [Google Scholar]
7. Büring, D
   (2006) Focus projection and default prominence. En V. Molnár & S. Winkler (Eds.), The architecture of focus (pp.321–346). Berlín: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110922011.321
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110922011.321 [Google Scholar]
8. Calhoun, S
   (2002) Using prosody in ASR: The segmentation of broadcast radio news. Master’s thesis, University of Edinburgh.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Calhoun, S
   (2012) The theme/rheme distinction: Accent type or relative prominence?Journal of Phonetics, 40, 329–349. doi: 10.1016/j.wocn.2011.12.001
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2011.12.001 [Google Scholar]
10. Calhoun, S. , Nissim, M. , Steedman, M. , & Brenier, J
    (2005) A framework for annotating information structure in discourse. EnProceedings of Frontiers in Corpus Annotation II: Pie in the sky (pp.45–52). Ann Arbor, Michigan: Association for Computational Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Cantero Serena, F.J. , & Font-Rotchés, D
    (2009) Protocolo para el análisis melódico del habla. Estudios de Fonética Experimental, 18, 17–32.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Cebrián Herreros, M
    (1992) Géneros informativos audiovisuales: Radio, televisión, periodismo gráfico, cine, vídeo. Madrid: Ciencia 3.
    [Google Scholar]
13. De-la-Mota, C. , & Rodero, E
    (2011) La entonación en la información radiofónica. En A. Hidalgo , Y. Congosto , & M. Quilis (Eds.), El estudio de la prosodia en España en el siglo XXI: Perspectivas y ámbitos (pp.159–176). Valencia: Universitat de València.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Fontcuberta, M
    (1980) Estructura de la noticia periodística. Barcelona: ATE.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Font-Rotchés, D. , & Paloma, D
    (2012) Tendencias entonativas en los titulares de las noticias en catalán. Círculo de lingüística aplicada a la comunicación (clac), 51, 50–80.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Francuz, P
    (2010) The impact of audio information intonation on understanding television news content. Psychology of Language and Communication, 14(1), 71–86. doi: 10.2478/v10057‑010‑0005‑6
    https://doi.org/10.2478/v10057-010-0005-6 [Google Scholar]
17. Grosz, B.J. , & Sidner, C.L
    (1986) Attention, intentions, and the structure of discourse. Computational Linguistics Archive, 12(3), 175–204.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Halliday, M
    (1967) Notes on transitivity and theme in English: Part 2. Journal of Linguistics, 3, 199–244. doi: 10.1017/S0022226700016613
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700016613 [Google Scholar]
19. Hirschberg, J
    (1993) Pitch accent in context: Predicting intonational prominence from text. Artificial Intelligence, 63(1-2), 305–340. doi: 10.1016/0004‑3702(93)90020‑C
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(93)90020-C [Google Scholar]
20. Lombardi Vallauri, E
    (1995) A simple test for theme and rheme in the clause complex. Language Sciences, 17(4), 357–378. doi: 10.1016/0388‑0001(95)00031‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0388-0001(95)00031-3 [Google Scholar]
21. Mas Manchón, L
    (2011) Modelos entonativos para la segmentación automática de unidades-noticia en el discurso informativo. Tesis doctoral. Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Mas Manchón, L
    (2014) Caracterización prosódica del foco de tema y rema en las noticias. Circulo de Lingüística Aplicada, 59, 35–60.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Most, R. , & Saltz, E
    (1979) Information structure in sentences: New information. Language & Speech, 22, 89–95.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Prince, E.F
    (1992) The ZPG letter: Subjects, definiteness, and information-status. En W.C. Mann & S.A. Tomphson (Eds.), Discourse description: Diverse linguistic analysis of a fund-raising text. Ámsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/pbns.16
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.16 [Google Scholar]
25. Rodero, E
    (2003) Locución radiofónica. Madrid: Instituto Oficial de Radio y Televisión.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Rodero, E
    (2013) Peculiar styles when narrating the news: The intonation of radio news bulletins. Estudios sobre el mensaje periodístico, 19(1), 519–532.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Rodero, E
    (2015) The principle of distinctive and contrastive coherence of prosody in radio news: An analysis of perception and recognition. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 39, 79–92. doi: 10.1007/s10919‑014‑0201‑5.
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-014-0201-5 [Google Scholar]
28. Rodero, E
    . (2016). Influence of speech rate and information density on recognition: The moderate dynamic mechanism. Media Psychology, 19(2), 224–242. doi: 10.1080/15213269.2014.1002942
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2014.1002942 [Google Scholar]
29. Rooth, M
    (1992) A theory of focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics, 1(1), 75–116. doi: 10.1007/BF02342617
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02342617 [Google Scholar]
30. Selkirk, E
    (1984) Phonology and syntax: The relation between sound and structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Selkirk, E
    (1995) Sentence prosody: Intonation, stress, and phrasing. En J. Goldsmith (Ed.), The handbook of phonological theory (pp.550–569). Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Snedeker, J. , & Trueswell, J
    (2003) Using prosody to avoid ambiguity: Effects of speaker awareness and referential context. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 103–130. doi: 10.1016/S0749‑596X(02)00519‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-596X(02)00519-3 [Google Scholar]
33. Steedman, M
    (2000) Information structure and the syntax-phonology interface. Linguistic Inquiry, 31(4), 649–689. doi: 10.1162/002438900554505
    https://doi.org/10.1162/002438900554505 [Google Scholar]
34. Taboada, M. , & Mann, W.C
    (2006) Rhetorical structure theory: Looking back and moving ahead. Discourse Studies, 8, 423–459. doi: 10.1177/1461445606061881
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445606061881 [Google Scholar]
35. Vallduví, E. , & Vilkuna, M
    (1998) On rheme and kontrast. Syntax and Semantics, 29, 79–108.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Wagner, M. , & Watson D.G
    (2010) Experimental and theoretical advances in prosody: A review. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25(7-9), 905–945. doi: 10.1080/01690961003589492
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01690961003589492 [Google Scholar]
37. Wichmann, A
    (2000) Intonation in text and discourse. Essex: Pearson Education.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Wichmann, A. , House, J. , & Rietveld, T
    (1997) Peak displacement and topic structure. En A. Botinis , G. Kouroupetroglou , & G. Carayiannis (Eds.), Intonation: Theory, models and applications. Proceedings of a European Speech Communication Association ESCA workshop (pp.329–332). Atenas: ESCA/University of Athens.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Zimba, L.D. , & Robin, D.A
    (1998) The effects of varying signal intensity on the perceptual organization of rhythmic auditory patterns. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 104(4), 2362–2371. doi: 10.1121/1.423747
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.423747 [Google Scholar]