Comparing advanced L2 and heritage language learners’ Spanish grammars

References

1. Alarcón, I.
   (2011) Spanish gender agreement under complete and incomplete acquisition: Early and late bilinguals’ linguistic behavior within the noun phrase. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 14(3), 332–350. doi: 10.1017/S1366728910000222
   https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728910000222 [Google Scholar]
2. Anderson, J.
   (2008) Towards an integrated second-language pedagogy for foreign and community/heritage languages in multilingual Britain. Language Learning Journal, 36(1), 79–89. doi: 10.1080/09571730801988553
   https://doi.org/10.1080/09571730801988553 [Google Scholar]
3. Arroyo Hernández, I.
   (2007) Didáctica y adquisición de las construcciones existenciales y locativas con haber y estar: Instrucción basada en el procesamiento (Master’s Thesis). Antonio de Nebrija University, Madrid.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Au, T. K. , Knightly, L. M. , Jun, S. A. , & Oh, J. S.
   (2002) Overhearing a language during childhood. Psychological Science, 13(3), 238–243. doi: 10.1111/1467‑9280.00444
   https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00444 [Google Scholar]
5. Beaudrie, S.
   (2009) Receptive bilinguals’ language development in the classroom: The differential effects of heritage versus foreign language curriculum. In M. Lacorte & J. Leeman (Eds.), Español en Estados Unidos y otros contextos de contacto: Sociolingüística, ideología y pedagogía (pp.325–346). Madrid/Frankfurt: Iberoamericana/Vervuert Verlag.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Beaudrie, S.
   (2012) Introduction: Developments in Spanish heritage language placement. Heritage Language Journal, 9(1), i–xi.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Beaudrie, S. , Ducar, C. , & Potowski, K.
   (2014) Heritage language teaching: Research and Practice. New York: McGraw Hill Education.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Benati, A.
   (2004) The effects of processing instruction and its components on the acquisition of gender agreement in Italian. Language Awareness, 13(2), 67–80. doi: 10.1080/09658410408667087
   https://doi.org/10.1080/09658410408667087 [Google Scholar]
9. Benmamoun, E. , Montrul, S. , & Polinsky, M.
   (2013) Heritage languages and their speakers: Opportunities and challenges for linguistics. Theoretical Linguistics, 39(3–4), 129–181.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Bowles, M.
    (2011) Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge: What can heritage language learners contribute?Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33(2), 247–271. doi: 10.1017/S0272263110000756
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263110000756 [Google Scholar]
11. Bowles, M. & Montrul, S.
    (2009) Instructed L2 acquisition of differential object marking in Spanish. In R. P. Leow , H. Campos , & D. Lardiere (Eds.), Little words: Their history, phonology, syntax, semantics, pragmatics and acquisition (pp.199–210). Georgetown: Georgetown University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Burgo, C.
    (2015) Grammar instruction techniques in the Spanish heritage classroom. Paper presented in theSpanish in the US conference, NYC.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Carreira, M.
    (2007) Teaching Spanish in the US: Beyond the one-size-fits-all paradigm. In K. Potowski & R. Cameron (Eds.), Spanish in contact: Policy, social and linguistic inquiries (pp.61–80). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/impact.22.07car
    https://doi.org/10.1075/impact.22.07car [Google Scholar]
14. Carreira, M.
    (2013) Advanced proficiency: A practitioner’s perspective on this special Issue. The Heritage Language Journal, 10(2), 1–14.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Carreira, M. , & Kagan, O.
    (n.d.). Teaching heritage languages: An online workshop. Retrieved fromstartalk.nhlrc.ucla.edu/default_startalk.aspx.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Collentine, J.
    (1998) Processing instruction and the subjunctive. Hispania, 81, 576–87. doi: 10.2307/345673
    https://doi.org/10.2307/345673 [Google Scholar]
17. Collentine, J.
    (2010) The acquisition and teaching of the Spanish subjunctive: An update on current findings. Hispania, 93(1), 39–51.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Correa, M.
    (2010) Heritage language learner programs and life after the classroom: A not so critical approach. Journal of Linguistics and Language Teaching, 1(2), 221–240.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Correa, M.
    (2011) Heritage language learners of Spanish: What role does metalinguistic knowledge play in their acquisition of the subjunctive?In L. Ortiz (Ed.), Selected proceedings of the 13th Hispanic linguistics symposium (pp.128–138). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Correa, M.
    (2014) Heritage language learners in linguistics courses: At a major (but fixable) disadvantage. Language, Culture, and Curriculum, 27(2), 107–120. doi: 10.1080/07908318.2014.897713
    https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2014.897713 [Google Scholar]
21. D’Amico, M. L.
    (2013) Approaching the direct object pronouns: How much grammatical form is necessary in instruction?. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 3(4), 319–329. doi: 10.4236/ojml.2013.34041
    https://doi.org/10.4236/ojml.2013.34041 [Google Scholar]
22. De Groot, C.
    (2005) The grammars of Hungarian outside Hungary from a linguistic typological perspective. In A. Fenyvesi (Ed.), Hungarian language contact outside Hungary (pp.351–370). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/impact.20.18gro
    https://doi.org/10.1075/impact.20.18gro [Google Scholar]
23. Ellis, R.
    (2002) The place of grammar instruction in the second/foreign language curriculum. In S. Fotos & E. Hinkel (Eds.), New perspectives on grammar teaching in second language classrooms (pp.17–34). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Ellis, R.
    (2006) Current issues in the teaching of grammar: An SLA perspective. Tesol Quarterly, 40(1), 83–107. doi: 10.2307/40264512
    https://doi.org/10.2307/40264512 [Google Scholar]
25. Farley, A.
    (2000) The relative effects of processing instruction and meaning-basedoutput instruction on L2 acquisition of the Spanish subjunctive. (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Farley, A.
    (2004) Processing instruction and the Spanish subjunctive: Is explicit information needed?In B. VanPatten (Ed.), Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary, (pp.227–239). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Fenyvesi, A.
    (2000) The affectedness of the verbal complex in American Hungarian. In A. Fenyvesi & K. Sándor (Eds.), Language contact and the verbal complex of Dutch and Hungarian: Working papers from the 1st Bilingual Language Use Theme Meeting of the Study Centre on Language Contact November 11–13, 1999, Szeged, Hungary (pp.94–107), Szeged: JGyTF Press.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Fernández, C.
    (2008) Reexamining the role of explicit information in processing instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30(3), 277–305. doi: 10.1017/S0272263108080467
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263108080467 [Google Scholar]
29. Fortune, A.
    (2005) Learners’ use of metalanguage in collaborative form-focused L2 output tasks. Language Awareness, 14(1), 21–38. doi: 10.1080/09658410508668818
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09658410508668818 [Google Scholar]
30. Gallego, M.
    (2014) Second language learners’ reflections on the effectiveness of dictogloss: A multi-sectional, multi level analysis. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 4(1), 33–50. doi: 10.14746/ssllt.2014.4.1.3
    https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2014.4.1.3 [Google Scholar]
31. Guillelmon, D. , & Grosjean, F.
    (2001) The gender marking effect in spoken word recognition: The case of bilinguals. Memory & Cognition, 29(3), 503–511. doi: 10.3758/BF03196401
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196401 [Google Scholar]
32. Gudmestad, A.
    (2006) L2 variation and the Spanish subjunctive: Linguistic features predicting mood selection. In C. A. Klee & T. L. Face (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 7th Conference on the Acquisition of Spanish and Portuguese as First and Second Languages (pp.170–184). Sommerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Henshaw, F.
    (2012) How effective are affective activities?: Relative benefits of two types of structured input activities as part of a computer-delivered lesson on the Spanish subjunctive. Language Teaching Research, 16(3), 393–414. doi: 10.1177/1362168812436919
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168812436919 [Google Scholar]
34. Izumi, S.
    (2002) Output, input enhancement, and the noticing hypothesis: An experimental study on ESL relativization. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24(4), 541–577. doi: 10.1017/S0272263102004023
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263102004023 [Google Scholar]
35. Keating, G. D. , VanPatten, B. , & Jegerski, J.
    (2011) Who was walking on the beach?: Anaphora resolution in Spanish heritage speakers and adult second language learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33(2), 193–221. doi: 10.1017/S0272263110000732
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263110000732 [Google Scholar]
36. Kirk, R. W.
    (2013) The effects of processing instruction with and without output: Acquisition of the Spanish subjunctive in three conjunctional phrases. Hispania, 96(1), 153–169. doi: 10.1353/hpn.2013.0009
    https://doi.org/10.1353/hpn.2013.0009 [Google Scholar]
37. Knightly, L. M. , Jun, S. , Oh, J. S. , & Au, T. K.
    (2003) Production benefits of childhood overhearing. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America, 114(1), 465–474. doi: 10.1121/1.1577560
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1577560 [Google Scholar]
38. Kondo-Brown, K.
    (2004) Do background variables predict students’ scores on a Japanese placement test?: Implications for placing heritage language learners. Journal of the National Council of Less Commonly Taught Languages, 1, 1–19.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Leeser, M. J.
    (2004) Learner proficiency and focus on form during collaborative dialogue. Language Teaching Research, 8(1), 55–81. doi: 10.1191/1362168804lr134oa
    https://doi.org/10.1191/1362168804lr134oa [Google Scholar]
40. Lightbown, P. M.
    (1991) What have we here?: Some observations on the effect of instruction on L2 learning. In R. Phillipson , E. Kellerman , L. Selinker , M. Sharwood Smith , & M. Swain (Eds.), Foreign/second language pedagogy research (pp.197–212). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Llombart-Huesca, A.
    (2012) A modular approach to Spanish for heritage language learners courses. Hispania, 95(3), 509–522.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Lynch, A.
    (2008) The linguistic similarities of Spanish heritage and second language learners. Foreign Language Annals, 41(2), 252–381. doi: 10.1111/j.1944‑9720.2008.tb03292.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2008.tb03292.x [Google Scholar]
43. Mikulski, A. M.
    (2010) Receptive volitional subjunctive abilities in heritage and traditional foreign language learners of Spanish. The Modern Language Journal, 94(2), 217–233. doi: 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2010.01018.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2010.01018.x [Google Scholar]
44. Montrul, S.
    (2000) Transitivity alternations in L2 acquisition: toward a modular view oftransfer. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22(2), 229–273. doi: 10.1017/S0272263100002047
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100002047 [Google Scholar]
45. Montrul, S.
    (2002) Incomplete acquisition and attrition of Spanish tense/aspect distinctions in adult bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 5(1), 39–68. doi: 10.1017/S1366728902000135
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728902000135 [Google Scholar]
46. Montrul, S.
    (2006) On the bilingual competence of Spanish heritage speakers: Syntax, lexical semantics and processing. International Journal of Bilingualism, 10(1), 37–69. doi: 10.1177/13670069060100010301
    https://doi.org/10.1177/13670069060100010301 [Google Scholar]
47. Montrul, S.
    (2008) Incomplete acquisition in Spanish heritage speakers: Chronological age or interfaces vulnerability?In H. Chan , H. Jacob , & E. Kapia (Eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp.299–310). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Montrul, S.
    (2009) Incomplete acquisition of tense-aspect and mood in Spanish heritage speakers. The International Journal of Bilingualism, 13(2), 239–269. doi: 10.1177/1367006909339816
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006909339816 [Google Scholar]
49. Montrul, S.
    (2010) Current issues in heritage language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 30(1), 3–23. doi: 10.1017/S0267190510000103
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190510000103 [Google Scholar]
50. Montrul, S.
    (2011) Morphological errors in Spanish second language learners and heritage speakers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33(2), 155–161. doi: 10.1017/S0272263110000719
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263110000719 [Google Scholar]
51. Montrul, S.
    (2012) Is the heritage language like a second language?EuroSLA Yearbook, 12(1), 1–29. doi: 10.1075/eurosla.12.03mon
    https://doi.org/10.1075/eurosla.12.03mon [Google Scholar]
52. Montrul, S.
    (2013) How “native” are heritage speakers. The Heritage Language Journal, 10(2), 15–39.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Montrul, S. , Bhatt, R. , & Bhatia, A.
    (2012) Erosion of case and agreement in Hindi heritage speakers. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 2(2), 141–176. doi: 10.1075/lab.2.2.02mon
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.2.2.02mon [Google Scholar]
54. Montrul, S. , & Bowles, M.
    (2008) Negative evidence in instructed heritage language acquisition: A preliminary study of differential object marking. In M. Bowles , R. Foote , S. Perpiñán , & R. Bhatt (Eds.). Selected proceedings of the 2007 Second Language Research Forum (pp.252–262). Somerville, MA: Casacadilla Press.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Montrul, S. , & Bowles, M.
    (2010) Is grammar instruction beneficial for heritage language learners?: Dative case marking in Spanish. The Heritage Language Journal, 7(1), 47–73.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Montrul, S. , Davidson, J. , De La Fuente, I. , & Foote, R.
    (2014) Early language experience facilitates the processing of gender agreement in Spanish heritage speakers. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 17(1), 118–138. doi: 10.1017/S1366728913000114
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728913000114 [Google Scholar]
57. Montrul, S. , Foote, R. , & Perpiñán, S.
    (2008a) Gender agreement in adult second language learners and Spanish heritage speakers: The effects of age and context of acquisition. Language Learning58(3), 503–553. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2008.00449.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2008.00449.x [Google Scholar]
58. Montrul, S. , Foote, R. , & Perpiñán, S.
    (2008b) Knowledge of wh-movement in Spanish L2 learners and heritage speakers. In M. Almazán , J. Bruhn de Garavito , & E. Valenzuela (Eds.), Selected papers from the 8th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium (pp.93–106). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
    [Google Scholar]
59. Montrul, S. , & Ionin, T.
    (2012) Dominant language transfer in Spanish heritage speakers and second language learners in the interpretation of definite articles. The Modern Language Journal, 96(1), 70–94. doi: 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2012.01278.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2012.01278.x [Google Scholar]
60. Nation, I.
    (2011) Second language speaking. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning: Vol.2, (pp.444–454). New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
61. O’Grady, W. , Kwak, H. , Lee, O. M. , & Lee, M.
    (2011) An emergentist perspective on partial language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33(2), 223–245. doi: 10.1017/S0272263110000744
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263110000744 [Google Scholar]
62. Pearson, L.
    (2006) Patterns of development in Spanish L2 pragmatics acquisition: An analysis of novice learners’ production of directives. The Modern Language Journal, 90(4), 473–495. doi: 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2006.00427.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2006.00427.x [Google Scholar]
63. Polinsky, M.
    (2006) Incomplete acquisition: American Russian. Journal of Slavic Linguistics, 14, 192–265.
    [Google Scholar]
64. Polinsky, M.
    (2008) Without aspect. In G. Corbett & M. Noonan (Eds.). Case and grammatical relations, (pp.263–282). Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1075/tsl.81.13pol
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.81.13pol [Google Scholar]
65. Potowski, K.
    (2005) Fundamentos de la enseñanza del español a los hablantes nativos en los Estados Unidos. Madrid: Arco Libros.
    [Google Scholar]
66. Potowski, K. , & Carreira, M.
    (2004) Teacher development and national standards for Spanish as a heritage language. Foreign Language Annals, 37(3), 427–437. doi: 10.1111/j.1944‑9720.2004.tb02700.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2004.tb02700.x [Google Scholar]
67. Potowski, K. , Jegerski, J. , & Morgan‐Short, K.
    (2009) The effects of instruction on linguistic development in Spanish heritage language speakers. Language Learning, 59(3), 537–579. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2009.00517.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00517.x [Google Scholar]
68. Potowski, K. , Parada, M. & Morgan-Short, K.
    (2012) Developing an online placement exam for Spanish heritage speakers and L2 students. Heritage Language Journal, 9(1), 51–76.
    [Google Scholar]
69. Robinson, P.
    (2001) Task complexity, task difficulty, and task production: Exploring interactions in a componential framework. Applied Linguistics, 22(1), 27–57. doi: 10.1093/applin/22.1.27
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/22.1.27 [Google Scholar]
70. Roca, A. , & Gutiérrez, J.
    (2000) Sociolinguistic considerations. InAmerican Association of Teachers of Spanish and Portuguese (Ed.), Professional development series handbook for teachers K-16: Spanish for native speakers: Vol. 1, (pp.21–28). Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt College.
    [Google Scholar]
71. Russell, V.
    (2012) Learning complex grammar in the virtual classroom: A comparison of processing instruction, structured input, computerized visual input enhancement, and traditional instruction. Foreign Language Annals, 45(1), 42–71.
    [Google Scholar]
72. Russell, V.
    (2014) A closer look at the output hypothesis: The effect of pushed output on noticing and inductive learning of the Spanish future tense. Foreign Language Annals, 47(1), 25–47. doi: 10.1111/flan.12077
    https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12077 [Google Scholar]
73. Samaniego, F. A. , Rojas, N. , Alarcón, M. E. , & Rodríguez, F.
    (2013) El mundo 21 hispano. Boston: Cengage Learning.
    [Google Scholar]
74. Song, M. , O’Grady, W. , Cho, S. , & Lee, M.
    (1997) The learning and teaching of Korean in community schools. In Y. -H. Kim (Ed.), Korean Language in America 2: Vol.2 (pp.111–127). Manoa, HI: American Association of Teachers of Korean.
    [Google Scholar]
75. Sorace, A.
    (2000) Differential effects of attrition in the L1 syntax of near-native L2 speakers. In S. C. Howell , S. A. Fish , & T. Keith-Lucas (Eds.), BUCLD 24: Proceedings of the 24th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp.719–725). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
    [Google Scholar]
76. Swain, M.
    (1985) Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp.235–253). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
    [Google Scholar]
77. Swain, M.
    (1993) The output hypothesis: Just speaking and writing aren’t enough. Canadian Modern Language Review, 50(1), 158–164.
    [Google Scholar]
78. Swain, M.
    (1995) Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook & B. Seidlhofer (Eds.), Principles and practice in applied linguistics: Studies in honour of H.G. Widdowson (pp.125–144). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
79. Swain, M.
    (1998) Focus on form through conscious reflection. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp.64–81). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
80. VanPatten, B.
    (1993) Grammar teaching for the acquisition‐rich classroom. Foreign Language Annals, 26(4), 435–450. doi: 10.1111/j.1944‑9720.1993.tb01179.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.1993.tb01179.x [Google Scholar]
81. VanPatten, B.
    (1996) Input processing and grammar instruction: Theory and research. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
    [Google Scholar]
82. VanPatten, B.
    (2002) Processing instruction: An update. Language Learning, 52(4), 755–803. doi: 10.1111/1467‑9922.00203
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00203 [Google Scholar]
83. VanPatten, B.
    (2004) Input processing in second language acquisition. In B. VanPatten (Ed.), Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary (pp.5–31). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
84. VanPatten, B. , & Cadierno, T.
    (1993) Explicit instruction and input processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15(2), 225–243. doi: 10.1017/S0272263100011979
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100011979 [Google Scholar]
85. VanPatten, B. & Fernández, C.
    (2004) The long-term effects of processing instruction. In B. VanPatten (Ed.), Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary, (pp.273–289). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
86. VanPatten, B. , Inclezan, D. , Salazar, H. , & Farley, A. P.
    (2009) Processing instruction and dictogloss: A study on object pronouns and word order in Spanish. Foreign Language Annals, 42(3), 557–575. doi: 10.1111/j.1944‑9720.2009.01033.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2009.01033.x [Google Scholar]
87. VanPatten, B. , & Oikkenon, S.
    (1996) Explanation versus structured input in processing instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18(4), 495–510. doi: 10.1017/S0272263100015394
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100015394 [Google Scholar]
88. VanPatten, B. , & Sanz, C.
    (1995) From input to output: Processing instruction and communicative tasks. In F. Eckman , D. Highland , P. Lee , J. Mileham , & R. Weber (Eds.), Second language theory and pedagogy (pp.169–186). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
89. Wong, W.
    (2004) The nature of processing instruction. In B. VanPatten (Ed.), Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary (pp.33–63). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]