1887
Volume 54, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0035-3906
  • E-ISSN: 1600-0811
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

From among the various processes that form prepositions in the history from Latin to Castilian, the investigation concentrates on the formation of prepositional adverbs like Spanish ‘in front (of)’. There are two mechanisms for their formation: (a) An adverb or a preposition is preceded by a superordinate simple local preposition which initially specifies a local relation, but ends up as a reinforcing expansion of its base; and (b) an adverb is converted into a preposition by a following functional preposition which serves as a relationalizer.

In case #a, the syntactic structure is often destroyed by univerbation, and the resulting reinforced preposition is lexicalized. In case #b, the alternation between adverb and relationalized preposition is regular and bidirectional, so that the combination of adverb and relationalizer is normally not univerbated. The exception is given some attention.

As a result, the formation of prepositions of this structure is, at the outset, not a matter of word formation, and such complex prepositions are therefore not compound prepositions, but instead lexicalized univerbations.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/rro.00017.leh
2019-07-22
2019-08-21
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Adams, J. N.
    (2013): Social variation and the Latin language. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge etc.. 10.1017/CBO9780511843433
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511843433 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bauman, J. & R. Torres Cacoullos
    (2016): The generalization of preposition para via fusion and ensuing loss of compositionality. in: Tortora, Ch. & M. den Dikken & I. L. Montoya & T. O’Neill (eds.): Romance linguistics 2013. Selected papers from the 43rd Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL), New York, 17–19 April, 2013. J. Benjamins, Amsterdam & Philadelphia (Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory, 9), pp.39–58. 10.1075/rllt.9.03bau
    https://doi.org/10.1075/rllt.9.03bau [Google Scholar]
  3. Bourdin, Ph.
    (1997): On goal-bias across languages: modal, configurational and orientational parameters, in: Palek, B. (ed.): Typology: prototypes, item orderings and universals. Proceedings of the conference held in Prague August 20–22, 1996. Charles University Press, Praha (Acta Universitatis Carolinae; Philologica, 1996, 3–4, Proceedings of LP ’96), pp.185–218.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Brøndal, V.
    (1950): Théorie des prépositions. Introduction à une sémantique rationnelle. E. Munksgaard, København.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bybee, J. L.
    (2010): Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 10.1017/CBO9780511750526
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511750526 [Google Scholar]
  6. Company Company, C. & Z. Sobrevilla Moreno
    (2014): Las preposiciones de, des y desde, in: Company Company, C. (ed.): Sintaxis histórica de la lengua española. Tercera parte: Adverbios, preposiciones y conjunciones: relaciones interoracionales. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México D.F., pp.1341–1478.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Fagard, B.
    (2006): La grammaticalisation en question: du latin aux langues romanes modernes. Modèles linguistiques53, pp.91–110. 10.4000/ml.523
    https://doi.org/10.4000/ml.523 [Google Scholar]
  8. Fagard, B. & W. De Mulder
    (2007): La formation des prépositions complexes: grammaticalisation ou lexicalisation?Langue Française156, pp.9–29.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Hagège, C.
    (2010): Adpositions. Function-marking in human languages. Oxford University Press, Oxford & New York (Oxford Studies in Typology and Linguistic Theory).
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Hamp, C.
    (1888): Die zusammengesetzten Präpositionen im Lateinischen. Archiv für lateinische Lexikographie und Grammatik5, pp.321–368.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Harrington, K. P.
    (1997): Medieval Latin. Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press (Second ed.rev. byJoseph Pucci). 10.7208/chicago/9780226347639.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226347639.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  12. Haspelmath, M.
    (2011): The gradual coalescence into “words” in grammaticalization, in: Narrog, H. & B. Heine (eds.): The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization. Oxford University Press, Oxford etc. (Oxford Handbooks in Linguistics), pp.324–355.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Hofmann, J. B. & A. Szantyr
    (1965): Lateinische Syntax und Stilistik. C.H. Beck, München (Handbuch der Altertumswissenschaft, 2/2/2).
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Kailuweit, R.
    (2001): Lexeme, Kasusmarker, Relatoren? Überlegungen zu den spanischen Präpositionen unter dem Aspekt der Grammatikalisierung, in: Schäfer-Prieß, B. & H. Klöden & R. Kailuweit (eds.): Grammatikalisierung in den iberoromanischen Sprachen. G. Egert, Wilhelmsfeld, pp.33–62.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Klöden, H.
    (2001): Grammatikalisierung im Bereich der Präpositionen: Spanisch und Französisch im Vergleich, in: Schäfer-Prieß, Barbara & H. Klöden & R. Kailuweit (eds.): Grammatikalisierung in den iberoromanischen Sprachen. Wilhelmsfeld: G. Egert; 63–75.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Kortmann, B. & E. König
    (1992): Categorial reanalysis: the case of deverbal prepositions. Linguistics30, pp.671–697. 10.1515/ling.1992.30.4.671
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1992.30.4.671 [Google Scholar]
  17. Lehmann, Ch.
    (1985): Latin case relations in typological perspective, in: Touratier, Ch. (ed.): Syntaxe et latin. Actes du IIme Congrès International de Linguistique Latine, Aix-en-Provence, 28–31 mars 1983. Université de Provence, Aix-en-Provence, pp.81–104.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. (1992): Yukatekische lokale Relatoren in typologischer Perspektive. Zeitschrift für Phonetik, Sprachwissenschaft und Kommunikationsforschung45, pp.626–641.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. (1998): Regiones espaciales en perspectiva tipológica, in: García-Hernández, B. (ed.): Estudios de lingüística latina. Actas del IX Coloquio Internacional de Lingüística Latina, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 14–18 de abril de 1997. Ed. Clásicas, Madrid, pp.455–466.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. (2002): New reflections on grammaticalization and lexicalization, in: Wischer, I. & G. Diewald (eds.): New reflections on grammaticalization. J. Benjamins, Amsterdam & Philadelphia (TSL, 49), pp.1–18. 10.1075/tsl.49.03leh
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.49.03leh [Google Scholar]
  21. (2013): The nature of parts of speech. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung66/2, pp.141–177.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. (2015): Thoughts on grammaticalization. 3rd edition. Language Science Press, Berlin (Classics in Linguistics, 1).
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Lehmann, Ch. & Ch. Stolz
    (1992): Bildung von Adpositionen im Deutschen. Seminar für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Erfurt, Erfurt (ASSidUE, 6).
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Löfstedt, E.
    (1959): Late Latin. O. Harrassowitz, Wiesbaden; Aschehong (W.Nygaard), Oslo etc. (Instituttet for Sammenlignende Kulturforskning, A/25).
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Luraghi, S.
    (2010): Adverbial phrases, in: Baldi, Ph. & P. Cuzzolin (eds.): New perspectives on historical Latin syntax. Volume 2: Constituent syntax: Adverbial phrases, adverbs, mood, tense. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin (Trends in Linguistics, Studies and Monographs, 180.2), pp.19–107.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Lyons, J.
    (1968): Introduction to theoretical linguistics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 10.1017/CBO9781139165570
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139165570 [Google Scholar]
  27. Norberg, D.
    (1944): Beiträge zur spätlateinischen Syntax. Almqvist & Wiksell, Uppsala; Harrassowitz, Leipzig.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Opfermann, A.
    (2016): Univerbierung. Der passive Wortbildungsmechanismus. Baar, Hamburg (Studien zur historisch-vergleichenden Sprachwissenschaft, 8).
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Pinkster, H.
    (1990): The development of cases and adpositions in Latin, in: Pinkster, H. & I. Genee (eds.): Unity in diversity. Papers presented to Simon C. Dik on his 50th birthday. Foris, Dordrecht, pp.195–209. 10.1515/9783110847420.195
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110847420.195 [Google Scholar]
  30. Ricca, D.
    (2010): Adverbs, in: Baldi, Ph. & P. Cuzzolin (eds.): New perspectives on historical Latin syntax. Volume 2: Constituent syntax: Adverbial phrases, adverbs, mood, tense. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin (Trends in Linguistics, Studies and Monographs, 180.2), pp.109–191.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Rubio, L.
    (1966): Introducción a la sintaxis estructural del latin. Vol. I: Casos y preposiciones. Ariel, Barcelona (Colección “Convivium”, 4).
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Torres Cacoullos, R. & J. Bauman
    (2014): Las preposiciones por, pora y para, in: Company Company, C. (ed.): Sintaxis histórica de la lengua española. Tercera parte: Adverbios, preposiciones y conjunciones: relaciones interoracionales. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México D.F., pp.1479–1564.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Väänänen, V.
    (1967): Introduction au latin vulgaire. Deuxième édition avec anthologie de textes. Klincksieck, Paris (Bibliothèque Française et Romane, A/6) (2. Auflage; 1. Auflage: 1963).
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Vincent, Nigel
    (2017), “Parts and particles. The story of dē”. Los, Bettelou & de Haan, Pieter (eds.), Word order change in acquisition and language contact. Essays in honour of Ans van Kemenade. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: J. Benjamins; 291–310. 10.1075/la.243.13vin
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.243.13vin [Google Scholar]
  35. (2019), “Complex versus compound prepositions: evidence from Gallo-Romance”. Wolfe, Sam & Maiden, Martin (eds.), Variation and change in Gallo-Romance grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 000–000.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/rro.00017.leh
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/rro.00017.leh
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): complex preposition , compounding , lexicalization and univerbation
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error