1887
Volume 54, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0035-3906
  • E-ISSN: 1600-0811
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Some complex prepositions (CPs) have long stories of grammaticalization behind them. In Portuguese, such is the case of the CPs that have started from simple elements such as or . In the present paper, I will observe the changes that have given rise to present-day Pt , , , , among other complex formations. It will be seen that spatial signaling (place or direction) plays an important role on the development of these prepositions, but that a tendency to neutralization of semantic differences may lead more recent forms to convey meanings already expressed by older forms, which in turn may spur the emergence of even more complex formations (, , …). Increased complexity, however, seems to bring redundancy with it, a fact that calls for a satisfactory explanation. The complexification process is accompanied by context extension, from spatial to the temporal, and from these to more abstract realms (cause, condition, circumstance, …). As is to be expected from prepositions that are frequently used, they compete with other units, with which they may at first be in a complementary relation, but whose affinities in distribution and meaning may cause their replacement in the long run ( versus , ). Finally, another important phenomenon concerning these formations is their capacity to expand beyond their category, giving rise to morphologically related nouns and verbs.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/rro.00018.pin
2019-07-22
2019-11-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. CdP
    CdP – Davies, Mark/ Michael Ferreira (2006-) Corpus do Português: 45 million words, 1300s-1900s. [www.corpusdoportugues.org]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. CRPC – Corpus de Referência do Português Contemporâneo (versão v2.1, Portugal only)
    CRPC – Corpus de Referência do Português Contemporâneo (versão v2.1, Portugal only). Centro de Linguística da Universidade de Lisboa (CLUL). [alfclul.clul.ul.pt/CQPnet/]
  3. DDGM – Dicionario de dicionarios do galego medieval. Corpus lexicográfico medieval da lingua galega
    DDGM – Dicionario de dicionarios do galego medieval. Corpus lexicográfico medieval da lingua galega. [sli.uvigo.es/DDGM/]
  4. Adler, S.
    (2008): French compound prepositions, prepositional locutions and prepositional phrases in the scope of the absolute use, in: Kurzon, D. & S. Adler (eds.): Adpositions: Pragmatic, semantic and syntactic perspectives. John Benjamins, Amsterdam & Philadelphia, pp.17–35. 10.1075/tsl.74.03adl
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.74.03adl [Google Scholar]
  5. Ali, M. S.
    (71971 [1921–23]): Gramática Histórica da Língua Portuguesa. Edições Melhoramentos, São Paulo.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Brinton, L. J. & E. C. Traugott
    (2005): Lexicalization and Language Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 10.1017/CBO9780511615962
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615962 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bybee, J.
    (2007): Frequency of use and the organization of language. Oxford University Press, Oxford. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195301571.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195301571.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  8. (2010): Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 10.1017/CBO9780511750526
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511750526 [Google Scholar]
  9. Cifuentes Honrubia, J. L.
    (2003): Locuciones prepositivas – sobre la gramaticalización preposicional en español. Universidad de Alicante, Alicante.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Fagard, B. & A. Mardale
    (2007): Systèmes prépositionnels des langues romanes: la notion de partie du discours en diachronie, in: Trotter, D. (ed.): Actes du XXIVe Congrès International de Linguistique et de Philologie Romanes. Niemeyer, Tübingen. 10.1515/9783110923599.91
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110923599.91 [Google Scholar]
  11. Fagard, B. & W. De Mulder
    (2010): Devant : Évolution sémantique d’une préposition en français. CMLF 2010 Proceedings. doi:  10.1051/cmlf/2010185
    https://doi.org/10.1051/cmlf/2010185 [Google Scholar]
  12. Grice, H. P.
    (1989 [1975]): Logic and Conversation, in: Grice, H. P.: Studies in the Way of Words. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, & London, pp.22–40.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Heine, B., U. Claudi & F. Hünnemeyer
    (1991): Grammaticalization. A Conceptual Framework. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago & London.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Helbig, G. & J. Buscha
    (2001): Deutsche Grammatik. Ein Handbuch für den Ausländerunterricht. Langenscheidt, Berlin.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Hoffmann, S.
    (2005): Grammaticalization and English Complex Prepositions. A corpus-based study. Routledge, London & New York.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Hopper, P. J. & E. C. Traugott
    (20032 [1993]): Grammaticalization. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 10.1017/CBO9781139165525
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139165525 [Google Scholar]
  17. Keller, R.
    (1994): On language change. The invisible hand in language. Routledge, London & New York.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Lehmann, C.
    (this volume). Complex spatial prepositions from Latin to Castilian.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. (1995b [1982]): Thoughts on grammaticalization. Lincom Europa, Munich.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. (2002): New reflections on grammaticalization and lexicalization, inDiewald, G. & I. Wischer (eds.): New Reflections on Grammaticalization. John Benjamins, Amsterdam & Philadelphia, pp.1–18. 10.1075/tsl.49.03leh
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.49.03leh [Google Scholar]
  21. Libert, A. R.
    (2013): Adpositions and Other Parts of Speech. Peter Lang, Bern.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Nunes, J. J.
    (1989 [1919]): Compêndio de Gramática Histórica Portuguesa. Clássica Editora, Lisboa.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Penny, R.
    (32014 [1991]): Gramática Histórica del Español. Ariel, Barcelona.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Pinto de Lima, J.
    (2014): Grammaticalization of complex prepositions in European Portuguese, in: Pinto de Lima, J.: Studies on Grammaticalization and Lexicalization. Lincom Europa, Munich, pp.163–183.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Quirk, R., S. Greenbaum, G. Leech & J. Svartvik
    (1985): A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. Longman, London.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Schwenter, S. A. & E. C. Traugott
    (1995): The Semantic and Pragmatic Development of Substitutive Complex Prepositions in English, in: Jucker, A. H. (ed.): Historical Pragmatics. John Benjamins, Amsterdam & Philadelphia, pp.243–273. 10.1075/pbns.35.16sch
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.35.16sch [Google Scholar]
  27. Traugott, E. C.
    (1982): From propositional to textual and expressive meanings: some semantic-pragmatic aspects of grammaticization, in: Lehmann, W. P. & Y. Malkiel (eds.): Perspectives on Historical Linguistics. John Benjamins, Amsterdam & Philadelphia, pp.245–271. 10.1075/cilt.24.09clo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.24.09clo [Google Scholar]
  28. (1989): On the Rise of Epistemic Meanings in English: An Example of Subjectification in Semantic Change. Language, 57, pp.33–55.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. (1995): Subjectification in Grammaticalization, in: Stein, D. & S. Wright (eds.): Subjectivity and Subjectivisation in Language. Cambridge University Press, Cambridgepp.37–54. 10.1017/CBO9780511554469.003
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511554469.003 [Google Scholar]
  30. (2003): From subjectification to intersubjectification, in: Hickey, R. (ed.): Motives for Language Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp.124–139. 10.1017/CBO9780511486937.009
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486937.009 [Google Scholar]
  31. (2007): (Inter)subjectification and unidirectionality. Journal of Historical Pragmatics, 8(2), pp.295–309.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. (2010): (Inter)subjectivity and (inter)subjectification: A reassessment, in: Davidse, K., L. Vandelanotte & H. Cuyckens (eds.): Subjectification, Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization, De Gruyter, Berlin & NewYork, pp.29–69. 10.1515/9783110226102.1.29
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110226102.1.29 [Google Scholar]
  33. Traugott, E. C. & E. König
    (1991): The Semantics-Pragmatics of Grammaticalization Revisited, in: Traugott, E. C. & B. Heine (eds.): Approaches to Grammaticalization, Vol.1. John Benjamins, Amsterdam & Philadelphia, pp.189–218. 10.1075/tsl.19.1.10clo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.19.1.10clo [Google Scholar]
  34. Vandeloise, C.
    (1991): Spatial Prepositions. A Case Study from French. University of Chicago Press, Chicago & London.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/rro.00018.pin
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/rro.00018.pin
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): cline , complex preposition , grammaticalization , semantic change , spatial metaphor and subjectification
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error