1887
Volume 54, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0035-3906
  • E-ISSN: 1600-0811
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This paper takes into account a particular set of Italian Complex Prepositions signaling the agent of an action (e.g. ‘by’, ‘by’). Italian exhibits several types of complex prepositions revealing a different involvement of the Agent: in particular, these complex lexemes can introduce and distinguish the participants who (i) plan and intentionally conceive an action, (ii) perform it and/or (iii) have a coercive power over its performing.

The contribution aims to: (i) distinguish these Italian complex prepositions according to their functions, meanings, and the degree of involvement of the participant they introduce; (ii) analyze the collocational features and the syntactic environments where these lexemes occur; (iii) individuate possible correlations between their frequency of occurrence and the grammatical value; (iv) analyze their diachronic evolution across different historical phases; (v) put into relation the synchronic restrictions with the original syntactic environment within which the complex prepositions have been reanalyzed.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/rro.00019.piu
2019-07-22
2019-10-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Baroni, M., S. Bernardini, F. Comastri, L. Piccioni, A. Volpi, G. Aston & M. Mazzoleni
    (2004): Introducing the La Repubblica corpus: a large, annotated, TEI(XML)-compliant corpus of newspaper Italian, in: Lino, M. T., M. F. Xavier, F. Ferreira, R. Costa & R. Silva (eds.): Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, (LREC 2004, Lisbon, May 26th-28th 2004). ELRA – European Language Resources Association, Paris, pp.1771–1774.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bosque, I.
    (eds.) (2006): Diccionario combinatorio práctico del español contemporáneo. Las palabras en su context. SM, Madrid.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bybee, J.
    (2006): From Usage to Grammar: The Mind’s Response to Repetition. Language, 82,4, pp.711–733. 10.1353/lan.2006.0186
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2006.0186 [Google Scholar]
  4. (2011): Usage-based Theory and Grammaticalization, in: Narrog, H. & B. Heine (eds.): The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp.69–78.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Casadei, F.
    (2001): Le locuzioni preposizionali. Struttura lessicale e gradi di lessicalizzazione. Lingua e Stile, 36,1, pp.21–36.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Comrie, B.
    (1981): Language Universals and Linguistic Typology. Blackwell, Oxford.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. (1989): Language Universals and Linguistic Typology, 2nd ed.Blackwell, Oxford.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Cruse, A. D.
    (1973): Some thoughts on agentivity. Journal of Linguistics, 9, pp.11–23. 10.1017/S0022226700003509
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700003509 [Google Scholar]
  9. Diewald, G.
    (2002): A model for relevant types of contexts in grammaticalization, in: Wischer, I. & G. Diewald (eds.): New Reflections on Grammaticalization. John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam and Philadelphia, pp.103-120. 10.1075/tsl.49.09die
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.49.09die [Google Scholar]
  10. Dowty, D.
    (1991): Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language, 67(3), pp.547–619. 10.1353/lan.1991.0021
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1991.0021 [Google Scholar]
  11. Fagard, B.
    (2010): Espace et grammaticalisation. L’évolution sémantique des prépositions dans les langues romanes. Éditions Universitaires Européennes, Sarrebruck.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Fagard, B. & W. De Mulder
    (2007): La formation des prépositions complexes: grammati- calisation ou lexicalisation?. Langue Française, 156, pp.9–29.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Ganfi, V. & V. Piunno
    (2017): Preposizioni complesse in italiano antico e contemporaneo. Grammaticalizzazione, schematismo e produttività. Archivio Glottologico Italiano, CII,2, pp.184–204.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Garcia, D. D. & B. C. Dias da Silva
    (2015): PrepNet.Br: a Semantic Network for Prepositions, in: Proceedings of Symposium in Information and Human Language Technology. Sociedade Brasileira de Computação, Natal, pp.75–79.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Giacalone Ramat, A.
    (1994): Fonti di grammaticalizzazione. Sulla ricategorizzazione di verbi e nomi come preposizioni, in: Cipriano, P., P. Di Giovine & M. Mancini (eds.): Miscellanea di studi linguistici in onore di Walter Belardi. Il Calamo, Roma, vol.II, pp.877–896.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Goldberg, A.
    (1995): Constructions. A construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structures. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. (2006): Constructions at work. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Hoffmann, S.
    (2004): Are Low-Frequency Complex Prepositions Grammaticalized? On the Limits of Corpus Data – and the Importance of Intuition, in: Lindquist, H. & C. Mair (eds.): Corpus Approaches to Grammaticalization in English. John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam and Philadelphia, pp.171–210. 10.1075/scl.13.09hof
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.13.09hof [Google Scholar]
  19. Hofmann, S.
    (2005): Grammaticalization and English complex prepositions. A corpus-based study. Routledge, London and New York.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Hopper, P. J.
    (1996): Some recent trends in grammaticalization. Annual Review of Anthropology, 25, pp.217–236. 10.1146/annurev.anthro.25.1.217
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.25.1.217 [Google Scholar]
  21. Hopper, P. J. & Traugott, E. C.
    (2003): Grammaticalization. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 10.1017/CBO9781139165525
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139165525 [Google Scholar]
  22. Klégr, A.
    (2002): English Complex Prepositions of the Type in Spite of and Analogous Sequences. A Study & Dictionary. The Karolinum Press, Prague Charles University.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Lehmann, C.
    (1996): Control in Yucatec Maya, in: François, J. (ed.): La sémantique des relations actancielles à travers les langues. UMR du CNRS “LanDisCo” & Université des Sciences Humaines, Strasbourg, pp.105–127.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. (2002): New reflections on grammaticalization and lexicalization, in: Wischer, I. & G. Diewald (eds.): New Reflections on Grammaticalization. Proceedings from the International Symposium on Grammaticalization. 17–19June 1999, Potsdam, Germany (Typological Studies in Language, 49.). John Benjamins, Amsterdam and Philadelphia, pp.1–18. 10.1075/tsl.49.03leh
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.49.03leh [Google Scholar]
  25. (2017): Grammaticalization and automation, JournaLIPP, 5, pp.33–48.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Quirk, R. & Mulholland, J.
    (1964): Complex prepositions and related sequences, English Studies (Supplement: Festschrift for R. W. Zandvoort), 45, pp.64–73.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Piunno, V.
    (2016): CombiNet. A Corpus-based Online Database of Italian Word Combinations, in: Kernerman, I., I. Kosem, S. Krek & L. Trap-Jensen (eds.): GLOBALEX 2016. Lexicographic resources for human language technology. Portorož, 24 maggio 2016, Paris, ELRA – European Language Resources Association, pp.45–51.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Quirk, R., S. Greenbaum, G. Leech & J. Svartvik
    (1985): A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. Longman, London and New York.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Ramat, P.
    (1992): Thoughts on degrammaticalization. Linguistics, 30, pp.549–560. 10.1515/ling.1992.30.3.549
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1992.30.3.549 [Google Scholar]
  30. Saint-Dizier, P.
    (2005): PrepNet: A framework for describing prepositions: Preliminary investigation results, in: Bunt, H., J. Geertzen & E. Thijsse (eds.) Proceedings of the Sixth International Workshop on Computational Semantics (IWCS’05). Tilburg, The Netherlands, pp.145–157.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Simone, R.
    (2017): Word as a stratification of formats, in: D’Alessandro, R., G. Iannàccaro, D. Passino & A. M. Thornton (eds.): Di tutti i colori. Studi linguistici per Maria Grossmann. Utrecht University, Utrecht, pp.335–347.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Simone, R. & D. Cerbasi
    (2000): Types and Diachronic Evolution of Romance Causative Constructions, Romanische Forschungen, pp.441–473.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Simone, R. & V. Piunno
    (2017): Combinazioni di parole che costituiscono entrata. Rappresentazione lessicografica e aspetti lessicologici, Studi e saggi linguistici, LV, pp.13–44.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Veland, R.
    (2011): Le locuzioni preposizionali a(d) opera di, per opera di, per mano di in italiano contemporaneo: funzionamento sintattico e proprietà semantiche, Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie, 128,3, pp.537–552.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Voghera, M.
    (1994): Lessemi complessi: percorsi di lessicalizzazione a confronto, Lingua e Stile. 29,2, pp.185–214.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. (2004): Polirematiche, in: Grossmann, M. & F. Rainer (eds.): La formazione delle parole in italiano. Max Niemeyer Verlag, Tübingen, pp.56–69.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Corpus La Repubblica:
  38. Morfologia dell’Italiano in DIAcronia
    Morfologia dell’Italiano in DIAcroniawww.corpusmidia.unito.it
  39. Tesoro della Lingua Italiana delle Origini
    Tesoro della Lingua Italiana delle Originitlio.ovi.cnr.it/TLIO/
  40. Opera del Vocabolario Italiano
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/rro.00019.piu
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/rro.00019.piu
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Agent marking , diachronic analysis , grammaticalization and Italian complex prepositions
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error