Degrees of grammaticalization and measure constructions in Italian

References

1. Aarts, B.
   (1998): Binominal noun phrases in English. Transactions of the Philological Society, 96, pp.117–158. doi:  10.1111/1467‑968X.00025
   https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-968X.00025 [Google Scholar]
2. Barðdal, J., E. Smirnova, L. Sommerer & S. Gildea
   (2015): Diachronic Construction Grammar, Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi:  10.1075/cal.18
   https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.18 [Google Scholar]
3. Brems, L.
   (2007): The grammaticalization of small size nouns. Reconsidering frequency and analogy. Journal of English Linguistics. 34 (4), pp.293–324. doi:  10.1177/0075424207307597
   https://doi.org/10.1177/0075424207307597 [Google Scholar]
4. Brems, L.
   (2010): Size nouns constructions as collocationally constrained constructions: Lexical and grammaticalized uses. English Language and Linguistics, 14.1, pp.83–109 doi:  10.1017/S1360674309990372
   https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674309990372 [Google Scholar]
5. De Clerck, B. & T. Colleman
   (2013): From noun to intensifier: massa and massa’s in (Flemish) varieties of Dutch. Language Sciences. 36, pp.147–160. doi:  10.1016/j.langsci.2012.04.005
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2012.04.005 [Google Scholar]
6. De Clerck, B. & L. Brems
   (2016): Size noun matter: a closer look at mass(es) of and extended uses of SNs. Language Sciences, 53, pp.160–176. doi:  10.1016/j.langsci.2015.05.007
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2015.05.007 [Google Scholar]
7. Denison, D.
   (2002): History of the sort of construction family. Paper presented atICCG2: Second International Conference on Construction Grammar, Helsinki
   [Google Scholar]
8. Denison, D.
   (2005): The grammaticalisations of sort of, kind of and type of in English. Paper presented atNew Reflections on Grammaticalization 3, University of Santiago de Compostela.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Diewald, G.
   (2002): A model for relevant types of contexts in grammaticalization, in: Wischer, I. & G. Diewald (Eds.): New Reflections on Grammaticalization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp.103–120. 10.1075/tsl.49.09die
   https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.49.09die [Google Scholar]
10. Giacalone Ramat, A.
    (2015): Un sacco di…. ed altre espressioni di quantità nella prospettiva della grammaticalizzazione, in: Busà, M. G. & S. Gesuato (a cura di): Lingue e Contesti. Studi in onore di Alberto M. Mioni. Padova: CLEUP, pp.583–596.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Giacalone Ramat, A., C. Mauri & P. Molinelli
    (2013): Synchrony and diachrony. A dynamic interface. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi:  10.1075/slcs.133
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.133 [Google Scholar]
12. Goldberg, A. E.
    (2006): Constructions at work. The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Heine, B.
    (2002): On the role of context in grammaticalization, in: Wisher, I. & G. Diewald (Eds.): New Reflections on Grammaticalization, Amsterdam, New York: John Benjamins, pp.83–101. doi:  10.1075/tsl.49.08hei
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.49.08hei [Google Scholar]
14. Heine, B., U. Claudi & F. Hünnemeyer
    (1991): Grammaticalization. A Conceptual Framework. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Himmelmann, N.
    (2004): Lexicalization and grammaticalization: Opposite or orthogonal?in: Bisang, W., N. Himmelmann & B. Wiemer (Eds): What Makes Grammaticalization? A Look from its Fringes and its Components. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp.19–40.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Hopper, P. H. & E. C. Traugott
    (2003): Grammaticalization, 2nd ed., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:  10.1017/CBO9781139165525
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139165525 [Google Scholar]
17. Israel, M.
    (2004): The pragmatics of polarity, in: Horn, L. R. & G. Ward: The Handbook of Pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell, pp.701–722.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Lehmann, C.
    (1995 [1982]): Thoughts on grammaticalization: a Programmatic Sketch. Arbeiten des Kölner Universalien Projektes, Nr. 48. Köln: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft. Reprinted: München 1995: LINCOM EUROPA
    [Google Scholar]
19. Masini, F.
    (2016): Binominal constructions in Italian of the NP1-di-NP2 type: towards a typology of Light Noun Constructions. Language Sciences, 53, pp.99–113. doi:  10.1016/j.langsci.2015.05.010
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2015.05.010 [Google Scholar]
20. Meillet, A.
    (1912) : L’évolution des formes grammaticales. Scientia12, no.26. Reprinted inMeillet, A. (1958): Linguistique historique et linguistique générale, Paris: Champion.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Mihatsch, W.
    (2016): Type-noun binominals in four Romance languages. Language Sciences, 53, pp.136–159. doi:  10.1016/j.langsci.2015.05.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2015.05.009 [Google Scholar]
22. Mirto, I. & H. Necker
    (2007): Complex Nominal Determiners, in: Ramat, P. & E. Roma (Eds.): Europe and the Mediterranean as Linguistic Areas. Convergencies from a historical and typological perspective. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp.215–243. doi:  10.1075/slcs.88.11mir
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.88.11mir [Google Scholar]
23. Quirk, R., S. Greenbaum, G. Leech & J. Svartvik
    (1985): A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London/New York: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Rohlfs, G.
    (1969): Grammatica storica della lingua italiana e dei suoi dialetti. Torino: Einaudi.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Traugott, E. C.
    (2008): The grammaticalization of NP of NP constructions, in: Bergs, A. & G. Diewald (Eds.), Constructions and Language Change. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp.21–43.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Traugott, E. C.
    (2010): (Inter)subjectivity and (inter)subjectification. A reassessment, in: Davidse, K., L. Vandelanotte & H. Cuyckens (Eds.): Subjectification, Intersubjectification, and grammaticalization. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter Mouton, pp.29–71. doi:  10.1515/9783110226102.1.29
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110226102.1.29 [Google Scholar]
27. Traugott, E. C.
    (2015): Toward a coherent account of grammatical constructionalization, in: Barðdal, J., E. Smirnova, L. Sommerer & S. Gildea: Diachronic Construction Grammar. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp.51–79. doi:  10.1075/cal.18.02tra
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.18.02tra [Google Scholar]
28. Traugott, E. C. & R. B. Dasher
    (2002): Regularity in semantic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Traugott, E. C. & G. Trousdale
    (2010): Gradience, gradualness and grammaticalization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins doi:  10.1075/tsl.90
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.90 [Google Scholar]
30. Trousdale, G.
    (2014): On the relationship between grammaticalization and constructionalization. Folia Linguistica, 48/2, pp.557–77 doi:  10.1515/flin.2014.018
    https://doi.org/10.1515/flin.2014.018 [Google Scholar]
31. Verveckken, K.
    (2016): Binominal quantifiers in Spanish: syntagmatic and paradigmatic analogy in interaction. Language Sciences, 53, pp.114–135 doi:  10.1016/j.langsci.2015.05.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2015.05.008 [Google Scholar]
32. von Mengden, F. & H. J. Simon
    (2014): What is it then, this Grammaticalization?Folia Linguistica, 48/2, pp.347–360
    [Google Scholar]