1887
Volume 55, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0035-3906
  • E-ISSN: 1600-0811
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

The goal of this article is the analysis of the empirical properties of change of state verbs which do not specifiy lexically the dimension where change operates – such as ‘increase’, ‘reduce’, ‘increase’ –, and also to examine the theoretical consequences that this class has for our understanding of argument structure, the distinction between light and non-light predicates and the interconnection of structural and conceptual semantics. We will show that these verbs, which we label ‘adimensional predicates’ are sharply different from prototypical change of state verbs, and we argue that their existence supports a distinction between the syntactic structure of a verb of change of state and the conceptual operation that anchors the change to a specific cognitive domain.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/rro.17018.fab
2018-03-29
2020-05-30
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abraham, W.
    (1990): A note on the aspect-syntax interface, en: J. Mascaró & M. Nespor (eds.): Grammar in Progress. Foris, Dordrecht, pp.1–13. 10.1515/9783110867848.1
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110867848.1 [Google Scholar]
  2. Abusch, D.
    (1986): Verbs of change, causation and time. Report CSLI-86-50. Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford University.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Acedo-Matellán, V.
    (2016): The morphosyntax of transitions. Oxford University Press, Oxford. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198733287.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198733287.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  4. Alonso Ramos, M.
    (2004): Las construcciones con verbo de apoyo. Visor, Madrid.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bartsch, S.
    (2004): Structural and functional properties of collocations in English. Gunter Narr Verlag, Tübingen.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bazaco, C.
    (2015): Estar-predication in Spanish. Scales, adjectives and participles. Manuscrito inédito, Ohio University.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Beavers, J.
    (2008): Scalar complexity and the structure of events, en: J. Dölling & T. Heyde-Zybatow (eds.): Event structures in linguistic form and interpretation. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, p.245–265. 10.1515/9783110925449.245
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110925449.245 [Google Scholar]
  8. Bosque, I.
    (2001): On the weight of light predicates, en: J. Herschenson et al. (eds.): Features and interfaces in Romance. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp.23–38. 10.1075/cilt.222.03bos
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.222.03bos [Google Scholar]
  9. (2004): Combinatoria y significado: algunas reflexiones, en: I. Bosque (dir.): REDES. Diccionario combinatorio del español contemporáneo. SM, Madrid, pp.LXXV–CLXXI.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Burzio, L.
    (1986): Italian Syntax. Reidel, Dordrecht. 10.1007/978‑94‑009‑4522‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4522-7
  11. Butt, M.
    (2010): The light verb jungle: still hacking away, en: M. Amberber et al. (eds.): Complex Predicates. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp.48–78. 10.1017/CBO9780511712234.004
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511712234.004 [Google Scholar]
  12. Cetnarowska, B.
    (2001): Adjectival past-participle formation as an unaccusativity diagnostic in English and Polish, en: S. Bendjaballah et al. (eds.): Morphology 2000. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp.59–73.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Cruse, D. A.
    (1980): Antonyms and gradable complementaries, en: D. Kastovsky (ed.): Perspektiven der lexikalischen Semantik. Bouvier Verlag, Bonn.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. De Miguel, E.
    (2009): La teoría del lexicón generativo, en: E. de Miguel (ed.): Panorama de la lexicología. Ariel, Madrid, pp.337–366.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Donnellan, K.
    (1972): Proper names and indentifying descriptions, en: D. Davidson & G. Harman (eds.): Semantics of natural language. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp.356–379. 10.1007/978‑94‑010‑2557‑7_10
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2557-7_10 [Google Scholar]
  16. Fábregas, A.
    (2016): Las nominalizaciones. Visor, Madrid.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Fleischhauer, J. & T. Gamerschlag
    (2014): We’re going through changes: How change of state verbs and arguments combine in scale composition. Lingua, 141, pp.30–47. 10.1016/j.lingua.2013.01.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2013.01.006 [Google Scholar]
  18. Gawron, J. M.
    (2007): Unifying degree-based and mereological accounts of gradual change. Presentación en elCASTL Workshop on the syntax and semantics of measurability, Septiembre de 2007.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Gibert Sotelo, E.
    (2017): Source and negative prefixes: On the syntax-lexicon interface and the encoding of spatial relations. Tesis doctoral, Universitat de Girona.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Hale, K. & S. J. Jeyser
    (1993): On argument structure and the lexical expression of syntactic relations, en: K. Hale & S. J. Keyser (eds.): The view from Building 20. MIT Press, Cambridge (Mass.), pp.59–109.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Hay, J., C. Kennedy & B. Levin
    (1999): Scalar structure underlies telicity in degree achievements. SALT9. 10.3765/salt.v9i0.2833
    https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v9i0.2833 [Google Scholar]
  22. Jackendoff, R.
    (1990): Semantic structures. MIT Press, Cambridge (Mass.).
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Kearns, K.
    (2007): Telic senses and deadjectival verbs. Lingua, 117, pp.26–66. 10.1016/j.lingua.2005.09.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2005.09.002 [Google Scholar]
  24. Kennedy, C.
    (1999): Projecting the adjective. Garland Press, New York.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. (2001): Polar opposition and the ontology of degrees. Linguistics and philosophy, 24, pp.33–70. 10.1023/A:1005668525906
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005668525906 [Google Scholar]
  26. Kennedy, C. & B. Levin
    (2008): Measure of change: the adjectival core of degree achievements, en: L. McNally & C. Kennedy (eds.): Adjectives and adverbs. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp.156–182.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Kennedy, C. & L. McNally
    (2005): Scale structure and the semantic typology of gradable predicates. Language, 81, 2, pp.345–381. 10.1353/lan.2005.0071
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2005.0071 [Google Scholar]
  28. Kripke, S.
    (1980): Naming and necessity. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (Mass.).
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Levin, B.
    (1993): English verb classes and alternations. Chicago University Press, Chicago.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Levin, B. & M. Rappaport Hovav
    (1995): Unaccusativity. MIT Press, Cambridge (Mass.).
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Mateu, J.
    (2002): Argument structure. Relational construal at the syntax-semantics interface. Ph. D. dissertation, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. McNally, L.
    (2016): Modification, en: M. Aloni & P. Dekker (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Formal Semantics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp.442–466. 10.1017/CBO9781139236157.016
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139236157.016 [Google Scholar]
  33. Pavón Lucero, M. & Y. Morimoto
    (2006): Los verbos pseudo-copulativos del español. Arco Libros, Madrid.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Perlmutter, D. M.
    (1978): Impersonal passives and the unaccusative hypothesis. Berkeley Linguistic Society, 4, pp.157–189. 10.3765/bls.v4i0.2198
    https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v4i0.2198 [Google Scholar]
  35. Pustejovsky, J.
    (1995): The generative lexicon. MIT Press, Cambridge (Mass.).
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Rappaport Hovav, M.
    (2014): Building scalar changes, en: A. Alexiadou, H. Borer & F. Schäfer (eds.): The syntax of roots and the roots of syntax. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp.259–281. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199665266.003.0012
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199665266.003.0012 [Google Scholar]
  37. Sanromán, B.
    (2005): Individual-level and stage-level predicates: the Spanish emotion nouns. Vostok-zapad, pp.417–431.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Schäfer, F.
    (2008): The syntax of anti-causatives: external arguments in change-of-state contexts. John Benjamins, Amsterdam. 10.1075/la.126
    https://doi.org/10.1075/la.126 [Google Scholar]
  39. Soames, S.
    (1998): The modal argument: wide scope and rigidified descriptions. Noûs, 32,1, pp.1–22. 10.1111/0029‑4624.00084
    https://doi.org/10.1111/0029-4624.00084 [Google Scholar]
  40. Sobejano, G.
    (1970): El epíteto en la lírica española. Gredos, Madrid.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Strawson, P.
    (1959): Individuals: an essay on descriptive metaphysics. Methuen, London. 10.4324/9780203221303
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203221303 [Google Scholar]
  42. Tenny, C.
    (1994): Aspectual roles and the syntax-semantics interface. Kluwer, Dordrecht. 10.1007/978‑94‑011‑1150‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1150-8 [Google Scholar]
  43. van Hout, A.
    (1996): Event semantics and verb frame alternations. Tesis doctoral, Tilburg University.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Winter, Y.
    (2005): Cross-categorial restrictions on measure phrase modification. Linguistics and philosophy, 28, pp.233–267. 10.1007/s10988‑004‑1469‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-004-1469-4 [Google Scholar]
  45. Wittek, A.
    (2002): Learning the meaning of change-of-state verbs. De Gruyter, Berlin. 10.1515/9783110907988
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110907988 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/rro.17018.fab
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error