1887
image of The Pluperfect and its discourse potential in contrast
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This paper intends to compare the functions of the Pluperfect in discourse from a comparative perspective, taking into account the use of this particular tense form in three different Romance languages, namely French, Italian and Spanish. In particular, it tries to elucidate in what way the Pluperfect contributes to the building and structuring of discourse segments or, to put it differently, how it helps to create coherent units of discourse and interacts with other units on a more comprehensive structural level. The analysis also focuses on the interplay of the Pluperfect with competing past tense forms, the perfective Simple Past and the Perfect. The account put forward in this article tries to present a unified analysis by resorting to the tense-in-discourse framework developed by .

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/rro.20008.pro
2020-05-06
2020-05-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Altshuler, D.
    (2010) Temporal interpretation in narrative discourse and event internal reference (PhD dissertation). New Brunswick: Rutgers University.
  2. Altshuler, D. & S. Melkonian
    (2014): In defense of reference time. Semantics-Syntax Interface, 1,2, pp.133–149.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Apothéloz, D. & B. Combettes
    (2011): Saillance et aspect verbal: le cas du plus-que-parfait. In: Inkova, O. (ed.): Saillance. Aspects linguistiques et communicatifs de la mise en évidence dans un texte, vol 1. Besançon: Presses universitaires de Franche-Comté, pp.225–246.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. (2016): La variation plus-que-parfait ~ passé simple dans les analepses narratives. In: Gaudy-Campbell, I. & Y. Keromnes, (eds.): Variation, invariant et plasticité langagière. Besançon: Presses Universitaires de Franche-Comté, pp.53–66.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bary, C. L.
    (2009): Aspect in Ancient Greek, A Semantic Analysis of the Aorist and Imperfective (PhD dissertation).
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Becker, M. & J. Egetenmeyer
    (2018): A prominence-based account of temporal discourse structure. Lingua, 214, pp.28–58. 10.1016/j.lingua.2018.08.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2018.08.002 [Google Scholar]
  7. Benveniste, E.
    (1966/1974): Problèmes de linguistique générale. Vol. I & II (Bibliothèque des Sciences humaines, nrf). Paris: Gallimard.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Bertinetto, P.-M.
    (2010): Non-conventional uses of the Pluperfect in the Italian (and German) literary prose. Quaderni del laboratorio di linguistica, 9,2, pp.1–26.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Combettes, B.
    (2008): Cohérence discursive et faits de langue: le cas du plus-que parfait. Verbum, XXX/2–3, pp.181–197.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Cornia, U.
    (2008): Le storie di mia zia (e di altri parenti). Milano: Feltrinelli.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Eggs, E.
    (2014): Zum Gebrauch des Plusquamperfekts im Französischen und Spanischen. ZFSL, 124,2, pp.114–152.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Kamp, H.
    (2013): Deixis in discourse. Reichenbach on temporal reference. In: von Heusinger, K., ter Meulen, A. (Eds.), Meaning and the Dynamics of Interpretation. Brill, Leiden. (= Current Research in the Semantics/Pragmatics Interface 29), pp.105–159. 10.1163/9789004252882_006
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004252882_006 [Google Scholar]
  13. Kamp, H. & J. van Genabith & U. Reyle
    (2011): Discourse representation theory. In: Gabbay, D. M. & F. Guenthner (eds.): Handbook of Philosophical Logic, 2nd ed., vol.15. Dordrecht et al.: Springer, pp.125–394. 10.1007/978‑94‑007‑0485‑5_3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0485-5_3 [Google Scholar]
  14. Kamp, H., & U. Reyle
    (1993): From Discourse to Logic. Introduction to Modeltheoretic Semantics of Natural Language, Formal Logic and Discourse Representation Theory, Pt. 2 (Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy, 42). Dordrecht et al.: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Kamp, H. & C. Rohrer
    (1983): Tense in texts. In: Bäuerle, R. & C. Schwarze & A. von Stechow (eds.): Meaning, Use, and Interpretation of Language. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter, pp.250–269. 10.1515/9783110852820.250
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110852820.250 [Google Scholar]
  16. Klein, W.
    (1994): Time in Language. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Lhafi, S.
    (2012): Zum Plusquamperfekt im Französischen und Spanischen. Kontrastive Untersuchung aus textlinguistischer Perspektive. Frankfurt a. M.: Lang. 10.3726/978‑3‑653‑01801‑1
    https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-653-01801-1 [Google Scholar]
  18. (2015): Rôle du plus-que-parfait français dans l’élaboration du texte: l’influence du mode d’énonciation sur le choix du plus-que-parfait. ZfSL, 125,3, pp.243–260.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. (2016): Rendements textuels du plus-que-parfait français et son homologue espagnol. In: Berrendonner, A. & M.-B. Mosegaard Hansen & R. Zafiu (eds.): Actes du XVIIe Congrès international de linguistique et de philologie romane (Nancy, 15–20 juillet 2013). Section 10: Linguistique textuelle et analyse du discours. Nancy: ATILF, pp.133–144.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Reichenbach, H.
    (1966): Elements of Symbolic Logic. New York et al.: Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Smith, C.
    (2003) Modes of discourse. The local structure of texts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511615108
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615108 [Google Scholar]
  22. Toussaint, J.-Ph.
    (1988): L’appareil photo. Paris: Les Éditions de minuit.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. (1989): La cámara fotográfica. Panorama de narrativas (Traducción de Javier Albiñana). Barcelona: Editorial Anagrama.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Weinrich, H.
    (1982): Textgrammatik der französischen Sprache. Stuttgart: Klett.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. (2001): Tempus. Besprochene und erzählte Welt. Neu bearbeitete Auflage. München: Beck.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/rro.20008.pro
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/rro.20008.pro
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: discourse; comparison of Romance languages; tense; tense in discourse; Pluperfect
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error