1887
Volume 52, Issue 2
  • ISSN 0035-3906
  • E-ISSN: 1600-0811
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

The article proposes a new reading of with the intent to combine Postcolonial and Animal Studies, beyond the common emphasis on the notion of victim, and to resist the allegorical interpretations of the novel. Firstly, I demonstrate that during the “administrated island”, Robinson imposes an order based on the correlation among capitalism, colonialism and Oedipal sexuality, as if humanity as such could be reduced to the features of Western societies. Then, I explore how the novel relocates the boundaries between the human and the nonhuman, challenging the exclusive identification of alterity to a human face. Finally, I focus on the new relation with otherness (both human and animal) experienced by the two characters: a kind of intersubjectivity based on the play, which is a practice that does not presuppose the knowledge of the other and exceeds the traditional categorical antithesis, such as truth/falsity, good/evil, nature/culture.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/rro.52.2.07men
2017-12-08
2019-12-11
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Armstrong, Ph
    (2002): The Postcolonial Animal. Society and Animals, 10, 4, pp.413–419. doi: 10.1163/156853002320936890
    https://doi.org/10.1163/156853002320936890 [Google Scholar]
  2. (2008): What Animals Mean in Modern Fiction. Routledge, London-New York.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Attridge, D.
    (2004): J. M. Coetzee and the Ethics of Reading. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago-London.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bhabha, H. K.
    (1994): On Mimicry and Man. The Ambivalence of Colonial Discourse, in: Id. The Location of Culture. Routeledge, London-New York, pp.85–92.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Baudrillard, J.
    (1981): Les Bêtes. Territoire et métamorphoses, in: Id. Simulacres et simulation. Galilée, Paris, pp.187–204.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Berger, J.
    (1992): Why Look at Animals, in: Id. About Looking. Vintage, New Yord, pp.3–28.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Bouloumié, A.
    (1988): Michel Tournier. Le roman mythologique. Corti, Paris.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. (2010): Le double animal dans l’oeuvre de Michel Tournier, in: Poirier, J. (éd.): L’animal littéraire. Des animaux et des mots. Éditions universitaires de Dijon, Dijon, pp.109–119.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Bradley, K. , P. Cartledge
    (éds.) (2001): The Cambridge World History of Slavery. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Caillois, R.
    (1958): Les Jeux et les hommes. Gallimard, Paris.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Coetzee, J. M.
    (1987): Foe. Penguins Books, London.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. (1999): The Lives of Animals. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Davis, C.
    (1988): Michel Tournier. Philosophy and Fiction. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Defoe, D.
    (2007): Robinson Crusoe. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Deleuze, G.
    (1972): Michel Tournier et le monde sans autrui, in: Tournier, M. Vendredi ou les limbes du Pacifique. Gallimard, Paris, pp.257–283.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Deleuze, G. , F. Guattari
    (1975): Kafka. Pour une littérature mineure. Les Éditions de Minuit, Paris.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. (1980): Mille Plateaux. Capitalisme et schizophrénie. Les Éditions de Minuit, Paris.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Deleuze, G. , C. Parnet
    (1996): L’Abécédaire. Dir. Boutang, P. -A. Vidéo Éditions Montparnasse, France. DVD.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. (1996): Dialogues. Flammarion, Paris.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Derrida, J. , E. Roudinesco
    (2001): De quoi demain. Galilée, Paris.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Derrida, J.
    (2006): L’animal que donc je suis. Galilée, Paris.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Engélibert, J. -P.
    (1997): La Postérité de Robinson Crusoé. Un mythe littéraire de la modernité 1954–1986. Droz, Genève.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. de Fontenay, E.
    (1998): Le Silence des bêtes. La philosophie à l’épreuve de l’animalité. Fayard, Paris.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Foucault, M.
    (1976): L’Histoire de la sexualité I. La volonté de savoir. Gallimard, Paris.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Gauvin, L.
    (1999): La Bibliothèque des Robinson. Études française, XXXV, 1, pp.79–93. doi: 10.7202/036127ar
    https://doi.org/10.7202/036127ar [Google Scholar]
  26. Guichard, N.
    (1989): Michel Tournier, autrui et la quête du Double. Didier, Paris.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Haraway, D.
    (2008): When Species Meet. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis-London.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Hegel, G. W. F.
    (1939): Phénoménologie de l’esprit. Trad. de Jean Hyppolite . Aubier, Paris.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Hutcheon, L.
    (2006): A Theory of Adaptation. Routeledge, London-New York.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Huizinga, J.
    (1951): Homo Ludens. Essai sur la fonction sociale du jeu. Gallimard, Paris.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Krell, J.
    (1994): Michel Tournier et l’accent grave du jeu. Littérature, 94, pp.25–36. doi: 10.3406/litt.1994.2328
    https://doi.org/10.3406/litt.1994.2328 [Google Scholar]
  32. Kojève, A.
    (1992): Introduction à la lecture de Hegel. Gallimard, Paris [1947].
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Kyloušek, P.
    (1992): La Mythopoïesis de Michel Tournier. Études Romanes de Brno, XXII, 1, pp.19–31.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. (2004): Le Roman mythologique de Michel Tournier. Masarykova Univerzita v Brně, Brno.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Lehtovuori, E.
    (1995): Les voies de Narcisse ou le problème du miroir chez Michel Tournier. Suomalainen Tiedeakatemia, Helsinki.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Lévi-Strauss, C.
    (1973): Anthropologie structurelle deux. Plon, Paris.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Lyotard, J. -F.
    (1984): Le Différend. Éditions de Minuit, Paris.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Petit, S.
    (1991): Michel Tournier’s Metaphysical Fictions. John Benjamins, Amsterdam-Philadelphia. doi: 10.1075/pumrl.37
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pumrl.37 [Google Scholar]
  39. Platten, D.
    (1999): Michel Tournier and the Metaphor of Fiction. Liverpool University Press, Liverpool. doi: 10.5949/UPO9781846313561
    https://doi.org/10.5949/UPO9781846313561 [Google Scholar]
  40. Poirier, J.
    (1985): Approche de… Vendredi ou les limbes du Pacifique. Éd. de l’Aléï.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Ricœur, P.
    (2004): Parcours de la reconnaissance. Stock, Paris.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Rivera, A.
    (2010): La bella, la bestia e l’umano. Sessismo e razzismo senza escludere lo specismo. Ediesse, Roma.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Reynolds, J.
    (2008): Deleuze’s Other-Structure: Beyond the Master-Slave Dialectic, but at What Cost?. Symposium. The Canadian Journal of Continental Philosophy, 12, 1, pp.67–88.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Sankey, M.
    (1981): Meaning through Intertextuality: Isomorphism of Defoe’s Robinson Crusoe and Tournier’s Vendredi ou les limbes du Pacifique . Australian Journal of French Studies, XVIII, 1, pp.77–88. doi: 10.3828/AJFS.1981.7
    https://doi.org/10.3828/AJFS.1981.7 [Google Scholar]
  45. Salkin Sbiroli, L.
    (1987): Michel Tournier: la séduction du jeu. Slatkine, Genève-Paris.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Sartre, J. -P.
    (1976): L’Être et le Néant . Essai d’ontologie phénoménologique. Paris: Gallimard, Paris [1943].
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Sontag, S.
    (2007): Against Intepretation, in Jumonville, N. (éd.): The New York Intellectuals Reader. Routledge, New York, pp.243–54.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Spiegel, M.
    (1996): The Dreaded Comparison: Human and Animal Slavery. Mirror Books, New York.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Spivak, G. C.
    (1999): A Critique of Postcolonial Reason. Harvard University Press, Cambridge-London.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Tournier, M.
    (1972): Vendredi ou les limbes du Pacifique. Gallimard, Paris.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. (1977): Le Vent paraclet. Gallimard, Paris.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. (2012): Michel Tournier se raconte. Les grands entretiens de Bernard Pivot. Gallimard, Institut National de l’Audiovisuel et France 5. Web. 27Fév. 2016.
  53. Young, R.
    (2003): Postcolonialism. A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press, Oxford. doi: 10.1093/actrade/9780192801821.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780192801821.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  54. Zourabichvili, F.
    (1997) Qu’est-ce qu’un devenir pour Gilles Deleuze. Conférence prononcée à Lyon, 27 mars 1997. Online: horlieu-editions.com/brochures/zourabichvili-qu-est-ce-qu-un-devenir-pour-gilles-deleuze.pdf.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/rro.52.2.07men
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): allegory , alterity , Animal Studies , play , Postcolonial Studies and Tournier
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error