1887
Volume 1, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2542-9477
  • E-ISSN: 2542-9485
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen elaborates on the Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL) approach to register in this contribution to the inaugural issue of He is Chair Professor of the Department of English at the Hong Kong Polytechnic University, where he pursues a scholarly agenda that includes developing the theory of Systemic Functional Linguistics and applying it to text and discourse analysis, functional grammar, issues related to language evolution and typology, and comprehensive descriptive models of register. Throughout his career, Matthiessen has made major contributions to SFL theories and methods. Among his major works is (1995, International Language Sciences Publishers). More than any other scholar, Matthiessen has expounded on Halliday’s early ideas on register and applied SFL theory to describing models of register variation. He remains an active researcher in the area of register studies which includes his registerial cartography – the comprehensive and systematic description of the registers in a language. Matthiessen’s work has left an indelible mark on the theory and systematic study of patterns of register in language use.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/rs.18010.mat
2019-04-26
2019-10-22
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Barnwell, K. G. L.
    (1969) A grammatical description of Mbembe (Adun Dialect): A Cross River language. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of London.
  2. Bateman, J. A.
    (2008) Multimodality and genre: A foundation for the systematic analysis of multimodal documents. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230582323
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230582323 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bateman, J., & Paris, C.
    (1991) Constraining the deployment of lexicogrammatical resources during text generation: Towards a computational instantiation of register theory. InE. Ventola (Ed.), Functional and systemic linguistics: Approaches and uses (pp.81–106). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110883527.81
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110883527.81 [Google Scholar]
  4. Biber, D.
    (1988) Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511621024
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621024 [Google Scholar]
  5. (1994) An analytical framework for register studies. InD. Biber & E. Finegan (Eds.), Sociolinguistic perspectives on registers (pp.31–56). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. (1995) Dimensions of register variation: A cross-linguistic comparison. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511519871
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511519871 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bowcher, W. L.
    (2001) Play-by-play talk on radio: An enquiry into some relations between language and context. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Liverpool.
  8. Caffarel, A., Martin, J. R., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M.
    (Eds.) (2004) Language typology: A functional perspective. (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 253.) Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.253
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.253 [Google Scholar]
  9. Caldwell, D.
    (2010) Making metre mean: Identity and affiliation in the rap music of Kanye West. InM. Bednarek & J. R. Martin (Eds.), New discourse on language: Functional perspectives on multimodality, identity, and affiliation (pp.59–79). London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. (2014) The interpersonal voice: Applying appraisal to the rap and sung voice. Social Semiotics, 24(1), 40–55. 10.1080/10350330.2013.827357
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2013.827357 [Google Scholar]
  11. Catford, J. C.
    (1965) A linguistic theory of translation. London: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Christie, F., & Derewianka, B.
    (2008) School discourse: Learning to write across the years of schooling. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Christie, F., & Martin, J. R.
    (Eds.) (1997) Genre and institutions: Social processes in the workplace and school. London: Cassell.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Coffin, C.
    (2006) Historical discourse. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Coulthard, M., & Johnson, A.
    (Eds.) (2010) The Routledge handbook of forensic linguistics. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203855607
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203855607 [Google Scholar]
  16. Ellis, J. & Ure, J.
    (1969) Language varieties: Register. Encyclopedia of linguistics, information and control (pp.251–59). London: Pergamon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Ferguson, C. A.
    (1959) Diglossia. Word, 15, 325–340. 10.1080/00437956.1959.11659702
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1959.11659702 [Google Scholar]
  18. (1994) Dialect, register, and genre: Working assumptions about conventionalization. InD. Biber & E. Finnegan (Eds.). Sociolinguistic perspectives on register (pp.15–30). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Freddi, M.
    (2005) Arguing linguistics: Corpus investigation of one functional variety of academic discourse. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 4, 5–26. 10.1016/j.jeap.2003.09.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2003.09.002 [Google Scholar]
  20. Ghadessy, M.
    (Ed.) (1988) Registers of written English: Situational factors and linguistic features. London: Pinter.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. (Ed.) (1993) Register analysis: Theory and practice. London: Pinter.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. (1995) Thematic developments and its relationship to registers and genres. InM. Ghadessy (Ed.), Thematic development in English text (pp.129–146). London: Pinter.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Gibbons, J.
    (2003) Forensic linguistics: An introduction to language in the justice system. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Gregory, M. J.
    (1967) Aspects of varieties differentiation. Journal of Linguistics, 3, 177–198. 10.1017/S0022226700016601
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700016601 [Google Scholar]
  25. Gumperz, J. J.
    (1961) Speech variation as an index in the study of Indian civilization. American Anthropologist, 63(5), 976–988. 10.1525/aa.1961.63.5.02a00060
    https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1961.63.5.02a00060 [Google Scholar]
  26. Halliday, M. A. K.
    (1959) The language of the Chinese “Secret History of the Mongols”. (Publications of the Philological Society 17). Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. (1964) Syntax and the consumer. InC. I. J. M. Stuart (Ed.), Report of the Fifteenth Annual (First International) Round Table Meeting on Linguistics and Language (pp.11–24). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. (1972) Towards a sociological semantics. Working Papers and Prepublications (series C, no. 14). Università di Urbino: Centro Internazionale di Semiotica e di Linguistica.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. (1973) Explorations in the functions of language. London: Edward Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. (1978) Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. London: Edward Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. (1984) Linguistics in the university: The question of social accountability. InJ. E. Copeland (Ed.), New directions in linguistics and semiotics (pp.51–67). Houston, TX: Rice University Studies. 10.1075/cilt.32.07hal
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.32.07hal [Google Scholar]
  32. (1985a) Systemic background. InJ. D. Benson & W. S. Greaves (Eds.), Systemic perspectives on discourse (pp.1–15). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. (1985b) An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. (1985c) Dimensions of discourse analysis: Grammar. InT. A. van Dijk (Ed.), Handbook of discourse analysis (Vol.2, pp.29–56). New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. (1988) On the language of physical science. InM. Ghadessy (ed.), Registers of written English: Situational factors and linguistic features (pp.162–178). London: Pinter.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. (1991a) The notion of ‘context’ in language education. InT. Le & M. McCausland (Eds.), Interaction and development: Proceedings of the international conference, Vietnam, 30 March – 1 April 1991 (pp.1–26). University of Tasmania: Language Education.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. (1991b) Corpus linguistics and probabilistic grammar. InK. Aijmer & B. Altenberg (Ed.), English corpus linguistics: Studies in honour of Jan Svartvik (pp.30–43). London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. (1994) Language and the theory of codes. InA. Sadovnik (Ed.), Knowledge and pedagogy: The sociology of Basil Bernstein (pp.124–142). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. (1996) On grammar and grammatics. InR. Hasan, C. Cloran, & D. Butt (Eds.), Functional descriptions: Theory into practice (pp.1–38). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.121.03hal
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.121.03hal [Google Scholar]
  40. (2002a) Computing meanings: Some reflections on past experience and present prospects. InG. Huang & Z. Wang (Eds.), Discourse and language functions (pp.3–25). Shanghai: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. (2002b) Applied linguistics as an evolving theme. Presented atAILA 2002, Singapore.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. (2005) On matter and meaning: The two realms of human experience. Linguistics and the Human Sciences, 1(1), 59–82.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. (2008) Working with meaning: Towards an appliable linguistics. InJ. J. Webster (Ed.), Meaning in context: Implementing intelligent applications of language studies (pp.7–23). London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R.
    (1985) Language, context and text: A social semiotic perspective. Geelong, Victoria: Deakin University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Halliday, M. A. K., McIntosh, A., & Strevens, P.
    (1964) The linguistic sciences and language teaching. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Halliday, M. A. K., & Martin, J. R.
    (1993) Writing science: Literacy and discursive power. London: Falmer.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M.
    (2006) Construing experience through meaning: A language-based approach to cognition. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. (2014) Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar, 4th ed.London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203783771
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203783771 [Google Scholar]
  49. Hansen-Schirra, S., Neumann, S., & Steiner, E.
    (2012) Cross-linguistic corpora for the study of translations: Insights from the language pair English-German. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110260328
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110260328 [Google Scholar]
  50. Hasan, R.
    (1973) Code, register and social dialect. InB. Bernstein (Ed.), Class, codes and control: Applied studies towards a sociology of language (Vol.2, pp.253–292). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. (1984) Coherence and cohesive harmony. InJ. Flood (Ed.), Understanding reading comprehension: Cognition, language, and the structure of prose (pp.181–219). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. (1989) Semantic variation and sociolinguistics. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 9, 221–275. 10.1080/07268608908599422
    https://doi.org/10.1080/07268608908599422 [Google Scholar]
  53. (1996) The nursery tale as a genre. InC. Carmel, D. Butt, & G. Williams (Eds.), Ways of saying: Ways of meaning: Selected papers of Ruqaiya Hasan (pp.51–72). London: Cassell.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. (1999) Speaking with reference to context. InM. Ghadessy (Ed.), Text and context in functional linguistics: Systemic perspectives (pp.219–328). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.169.11has
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.169.11has [Google Scholar]
  55. Hiippala, T.
    (2014) Multimodal genre analysis. InS. Norris & C. D. Maier (Eds.), Interactions, images and texts: A reader in multimodality (pp.111–123). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. (2015) The structure of multimodal documents: An empirical approach. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315740454
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315740454 [Google Scholar]
  57. (2017) An overview of research within the genre and multimodality framework. Discourse, Context & Media, 20, 276–284. 10.1016/j.dcm.2017.05.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2017.05.004 [Google Scholar]
  58. Huddleston, R. D., Hudson, R. A., Winter, E., & Henrici, A.
    (1968) Sentence and clause in scientific English: Final report of O.S.T.I. Programme. University College London: Communication Research Centre.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Hymes, D.
    (1972) Models of the interaction of language and social life. InJ. J. Gumperz & Dell Hymes (Eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics (pp.35–71). New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Hyon, S.
    (1996) Genre in three traditions: Implications for ESL. TESOL Quarterly, 30, 693–722. 10.2307/3587930
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3587930 [Google Scholar]
  61. Kittredge, R.
    (1987) The significance of sublanguage for automatic translation. InS. Nirenburg (Ed.), Machine translation: Theoretical and methodological issues (pp.59–67). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Kumar, A.
    (2009) A systemic functional description of the grammar of Bajjika. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Macquarie University.
  63. Lavid, J.
    (2000) Cross-cultural variation in multilingual instructions: A study of speech act realisation patterns. InE. Ventola (Ed.) Discourse and community: Doing functional linguistics (pp.71–85). Tübingen: Günter Narr.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Leckie-Terry, H.
    (1995) Language and context: A functional linguistic theory of register. London: Pinter.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Longacre, R. E.
    (1974) Narrative vs other discourse genres. InR. Brend (Ed.) Advances in tagmemics (pp.357–376). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
    [Google Scholar]
  66. (1996) The grammar of discourse. 2nd ed.New York: Plenum. 10.1007/978‑1‑4899‑0162‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0162-0 [Google Scholar]
  67. Longacre, R. E. & Hwang, S. J. J.
    (2012) Holistic discourse analysis. Dallas, TX: SIL International Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Lukin, A., Moore, A., Herke, M., Wegener, R., & Canzhong, W.
    (2008) Halliday’s model of register revisited and explored. Linguistics and the Human Sciences, 40(2), 187–243.
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Malinowski, B.
    (1944) A scientific theory of culture and other essays. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Martin, J. R.
    (1985) Factual Writing: Exploring and challenging social reality. Geelong, Victoria: Deakin University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  71. (1991) Intrinsic functionality: Implications for contextual theory. Social Semiotics, 1(1), 99–162. 10.1080/10350339109360331
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10350339109360331 [Google Scholar]
  72. (1992) English Text: System and structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.59
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.59 [Google Scholar]
  73. (2010) Semantic variation – modelling realisation, instantiation and individuation in social semiosis. InM. Bednarek & J. R. Martin (Eds.), New discourse on language: Functional perspectives on multimodality, identity, and affiliation (pp.11–34). London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Martin, J. R., & Rose, D.
    (2007) Working with Discourse: Meaning beyond the clause. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  75. (2008) Genre relations: Mapping culture. London: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
  76. Matthiessen, C. M. I. M.
    (1993) Register in the round: Diversity in a unified theory of register analysis. InM. Ghadessy (Ed.), Register analysis: Theory and practice (pp.221–292). London: Pinter.
    [Google Scholar]
  77. (1995) Lexicogrammatical cartography: English systems. Tokyo: International Language Sciences Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  78. (2007) “The “architecture” of language according to systemic functional theory: Developments since the 1970s.” InR. Hasan, C. M. I. M. Matthiessen, & J. Webster (Eds.), Continuing discourse on language (Vol.2, pp.505–561). London: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
  79. (2009) Multisemiotic and context-based register typology: Registerial variation in the complementarity of semiotic systems. InE. Ventola & A. J. M. Guijarro (Eds.), The world shown and the world told (pp.11–38). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  80. (2012) Systemic Functional Linguistics as appliable linguistics: Social accountability and critical approaches. D.E.L.T.A. (Revista de Documentação de Estudos em Lingüística Teórica e Aplicada), 28, 437–471.
    [Google Scholar]
  81. (2013) Applying Systemic Functional Linguistics in healthcare contexts. Text and Talk, 33(4–5), 437–466.
    [Google Scholar]
  82. (2014) Appliable discourse analysis. InF. Yan & J. J. Webster (Eds.), Developing Systemic Functional Linguistics: Theory and application (pp.135–205). London: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
  83. (2015a) Register in the round: Registerial cartography. Functional Linguistics, 2(9), 1–48.
    [Google Scholar]
  84. (2015b) Modelling context and register: The long-term project of registerial cartography. InEstudos sistêmico-funcionais: Desdobramentos e interfaces. Revista Letras, 50, 15–90.
    [Google Scholar]
  85. (in press). The Architecture of Language according to Systemic Functional Linguistics. Manuscript.
    [Google Scholar]
  86. Matthiessen, C. M. I. M., & Bateman, J. A.
    (1991) Systemic linguistics and text generation: Experiences from Japanese and English. London: Pinter.
    [Google Scholar]
  87. Matthiessen, C. M. I. M., & Fung, A.
    (forthcoming). Medical Discourse: A registerial overview. Submitted toFunctional Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  88. Matthiessen, C. M. I. M., Lukin, A., Butt, D. G., Cleirigh, C., & Nesbitt, C.
    (2005) Welcome to Pizza Hut: A case study of multistratal analysis. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 19, 123–150. 10.1075/aralss.19.08mat
    https://doi.org/10.1075/aralss.19.08mat [Google Scholar]
  89. Matthiessen, C. M. I. M., & Kashyap, A. K.
    (2014) The construal of space in different registers: An exploratory study. Language Sciences, 45, 1–27. 10.1016/j.langsci.2014.04.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2014.04.001 [Google Scholar]
  90. McEnery, T., & Hardie, A.
    (2012) Corpus linguistics: Method, theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  91. Michel, J., Shen, Y. K., Aiden, A. P., Veres, A., Gray, M. K., The Google Books Team, Pickett, J. P., Hoisberg, D., Clancy, D., Norvig, P., Orwant, J., Pinker, S., Nowak, M. A., Aiden, E. L.
    (2011) Quantitative analysis of culture using millions of digitized books. Science, 331, 176–182. 10.1126/science.1199644
    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1199644 [Google Scholar]
  92. Miller, D. R., & Bayley, P.
    (Eds.) (2015) Hybridity in Systemic Functional Linguistics: Grammar, text and discursive context. London: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
  93. Murcia-Bielsa, S.
    (2000) The choice of directives expressions in English and Spanish instructions: a semantic network. InE. Ventola (Ed.). Discourse and community: Doing functional linguistics (pp.117–146). Tübingen: Günter Narr.
    [Google Scholar]
  94. Mwinlaaru, I. N.
    (2017) A systemic functional description of the grammar of Dagaare. Unpublished PhD dissertation, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University.
  95. O’Halloran, K. L.
    (2005) Mathematical discourse: Language, symbolism and visual images. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  96. Parodi, G.
    (Ed.) (2010) Discourse genres in Spanish: Academic and professional connections. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.40
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.40 [Google Scholar]
  97. Patpong, P.
    (2005) A systemic functional interpretation of Thai grammar: An exploration of Thai narrative discourse. Unpublished PhD dissertation. Macquarie University.
  98. Patten, T.
    (1988) Systemic text generation as problem solving. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511665646
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511665646 [Google Scholar]
  99. Reid, T. B. W.
    (1956) Linguistics, structuralism, philology. Archivum Linguisticum, 8, 28–37.
    [Google Scholar]
  100. Robins, R. H., & McLeod, N.
    (1956) Five Yurok songs: A musical and textual analysis. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, 18(3), 592–609. 10.1017/S0041977X00088078
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0041977X00088078 [Google Scholar]
  101. Rose, D., & Martin, J. R.
    (2012) Learning to write, reading to learn: Genre, knowledge and pedagogy in the Sydney School. (Equinox Textbooks & Surveys in Linguistics). London: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
  102. Snell-Hornby, M.
    (1995) Translation studies: An integrated approach, 2nd ed.Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  103. Steiner, E.
    (1988) Language and music as semiotic systems: The example of a folk ballad. InJ. D. Benson, M. J. Cummings & W. S. Greaves (eds.), Linguistics in a systemic perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.39.14ste
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.39.14ste [Google Scholar]
  104. (2004) Translated texts: Properties, variants, evaluations. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  105. Swales, J. M.
    (2011) Worlds of genre-metaphors of genre. InC. Bazerman, A. Bonini, & D. Figueiredo (Eds.), Genre in a changing world (p.3–16). West Lafayette, IN: Parlor Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  106. Teich, E.
    (1999) System-oriented and text-oriented comparative linguistic research: Cross-linguistic variation in translation. Languages in Contrast, 2(2), 187–210. 10.1075/lic.2.2.04tei
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lic.2.2.04tei [Google Scholar]
  107. Teich, E., Degaetano-Ortlieb, S., Fankhauser, P., Kermes, H., & Lapshinova-Koltunski, E.
    (2016) The Linguistic construal of disciplinarity: A data-mining approach using register features. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(7), 1668–1678. 10.1002/asi.23457
    https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23457 [Google Scholar]
  108. Teruya, K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M.
    (2015) Halliday in relation to language comparison and typology. InJ. J. Webster (Ed.), The Bloomsbury Companion to M.A.K. Halliday (pp.427–452). London: Bloomsbury Academic.
    [Google Scholar]
  109. Ure, J.
    (1982) Introduction: Approaches to the study of register range. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 35, 5–23.
    [Google Scholar]
  110. Ure, J. N. & Ellis, J.
    (1977) Register in descriptive linguistics and linguistic sociology. InO. Uribe-Villegas (Ed.), Issues in sociolinguistics (pp.197–243). The Hague: Mouton. 10.1515/9783110806687.197
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110806687.197 [Google Scholar]
  111. Werlich, E.
    (1975) Typologie der texte: Entwurf eines textlinguistischen modells zur grundlegung einer textgrammatik. Heidelberg: Quelle & Meyer.
    [Google Scholar]
  112. Wignell, P.
    (2007) On the discourse of social science. Darwin: Charles Darwin University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  113. Wu, C.
    (2009) Corpus-based research. InM. A. K. Halliday & J. Webster (Eds.), A companion to Systemic Functional Linguistics (pp.128–142). London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  114. Zhang, P. K.
    (2018) Public health education through posters in two world cities: a multimodal corpus-based analysis. Unpublished PhD dissertation. The Hong Kong Polytechnic.
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/rs.18010.mat
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/rs.18010.mat
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error