1887
Volume 1, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2542-9477
  • E-ISSN: 2542-9485

Abstract

Abstract

This article focuses on how register considerations informed and guided the design of the spoken component of the British National Corpus 2014 (Spoken BNC2014). It discusses why the compilers of the corpus sought to gather recordings from just one broad spoken register – ‘informal conversation’ – and how this and other design decisions afforded contributors to the corpus much freedom with regards to the selection of situational contexts for the recordings. This freedom resulted in a high level of diversity in the corpus for situational parameters such as and , each of which was captured in the corpus metadata. Focussing on these parameters, this article provides evidence for functional variation among the texts in the corpus and suggests that differences such as those observed presently could be analysable within the existing frameworks for analysis of register variation in spoken and written language, such as multidimensional analysis.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/rs.18013.lov
2019-09-25
2019-10-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/rs.18013.lov.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/rs.18013.lov&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Adolphs, S., Brown, B., Carter, R., Crawford, P., & Sahota, O.
    (2004) Applying corpus linguists in a health care context. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 9–28. 10.1558/japl.1.1.9.55871
    https://doi.org/10.1558/japl.1.1.9.55871 [Google Scholar]
  2. Aston, G., & Burnard, L.
    (1998) The BNC Handbook: Exploring the British National Corpus with SARA. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Biber, D.
    (1988) Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511621024
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621024 [Google Scholar]
  4. (1989) A typology of English texts. Linguistics27, 3–43. 10.1515/ling.1989.27.1.3
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1989.27.1.3 [Google Scholar]
  5. (2004) Conversation text types: A multi-dimensional analysis. InG. Purnelle, C. Fairon, & A. Dister (Eds.), Le poids des mots: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on the Statistical Analysis of Textual Data (pp.15–34). Louvain: Presses Universitaires de Louvain.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Biber, D., & Conrad, S.
    (2009) Register, genre, and style. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511814358
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511814358 [Google Scholar]
  7. Crowdy, S.
    (1995) The BNC spoken corpus. InG. Leech, G. Myers, & J. Thomas (Eds.), Spoken English on computer: Transcription, mark-up and annotation (pp.224–234). Harlow: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Cummins, F., Grimaldi, M., Leonard, T., & Simko, J.
    (2006) The CHAINS corpus: CHAracterizing INdividual Speakers. InSpeech Informatics Group of SPIIRAS (Ed.), Proceedings of SPECOM’2006 (Speech and Computer 11th International Conference) (pp.431–435). St Petersburg: Anatolya Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Davies, M.
    (2019) The TV and Movie corpora. Retrieved from https://corpus.byu.edu/files/tv_movie_corpora.pdf (February 2019).
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Handford, M.
    (2007) The genre of the business meeting: A corpus-based study (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Nottingham.
  11. Hardie, A.
    (2012) CQPweb – combining power, flexibility and usability in a corpus analysis tool. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics17(3), 380–409. 10.1075/ijcl.17.3.04har
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.17.3.04har [Google Scholar]
  12. Hawtin, A.
    (forthcoming). The Written British National Corpus 2014: Design, compilation and analysis (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Lancaster University.
  13. Love, R.
    (forthcoming). Overcoming challenges in corpus construction: The Spoken British National Corpus 2014. New York, NY: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Love, R. & Anthony, L.
    (in preparation). A case for improving the textual and sub-textual analysis of corpora.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Love, R., Dembry, C., Hardie, A., Brezina, V., & McEnery, T.
    (2017) The Spoken BNC2014: Designing and building a spoken corpus of everyday conversations. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 22(3), 319–344. 10.1075/ijcl.22.3.02lov
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.22.3.02lov [Google Scholar]
  16. Seidlhofer, B., Breiteneder, A., Klimpfinger, T., Majewski, S., Osimk-Teasdale, R., Pitzl, M. -L., & Radeka, M.
    (2013) The Vienna-Oxford International Corpus of English (version 2.0 XML). https://www.univie.ac.at/voice/page/download_voice_xml (April 2018).
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Thompson, P., & Nesi, H.
    (2001) The British Academic Spoken English (BASE) Corpus Project. Language Teaching Research, 5(3), 263–264.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/rs.18013.lov
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/rs.18013.lov
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): BNC2014 , British English , corpora , corpus design and spoken language
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error