Volume 2, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2542-9477
  • E-ISSN: 2542-9485



In this paper our focus is on analyzing register variation within fiction, rather than between fiction and other registers. By working with subcorpora that separate text within and outside of quotation marks, we appromixate fictional speech and narration. This enables us to identify and compare linguistic features with regard to different situational contexts in the fictional world. We focus in particular on the novels of Charles Dickens and a reference corpus of other 19th-century fiction. Our main method for the register analysis is Multi-dimensional Analysis (MDA) for which we draw on altogether four dimensions from two previous MDAs. The linguistic distinctions we identify highlight similarities between fictional speech and involved registers such as face-to-face communication, and between narration and more informational and narrative prose. In addition to the detailed information on register features that characterize speech and narration, the paper raises more general questions about the ability of register studies to deal with situational contexts within fiction.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license.

Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...



  1. Axelsson, K.
    (2009) Research on fiction dialogue: Problems and possible solutions. InA. H. Jucker, D. Schreier and M. Hundt (Eds.), Corpora: Pragmatics and discourse. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 189–201. 10.1163/9789042029101_011
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789042029101_011 [Google Scholar]
  2. Biber, D. & Conrad, S.
    (2009) Register, Genre, and Style. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108686136. 10.1017/CBO9780511814358
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511814358 [Google Scholar]
  3. Barlow, M.
    (2016) WordSkew. Linking corpus data and discourse structure. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 21(1), 105–115. 10.1075/ijcl.21.1.05bar
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.21.1.05bar [Google Scholar]
  4. Bhatia, V. K.
    (2014) Analysing genre: Language use in professional settings. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315844992
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315844992 [Google Scholar]
  5. Biber, D.
    (1988) Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511621024
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621024 [Google Scholar]
  6. (1993) Representativeness in corpus design. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 8(4), 243–257. 10.1093/llc/8.4.243
    https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/8.4.243 [Google Scholar]
  7. (2006) University language: A corpus-based study of spoken and written registers. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.23
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.23 [Google Scholar]
  8. (2014) Using multi-dimensional analysis to explore cross-linguistic universals of register variation. Languages in Contrast, 14(1), 7–34. 10.1075/lic.14.1.02bib
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lic.14.1.02bib [Google Scholar]
  9. Biber, D., Connor, U. & Upton, T. A.
    (2007) Discourse on the move: Using corpus analysis to describe discourse structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.28
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.28 [Google Scholar]
  10. Biber, D., & Egbert, J.
    (2018) Register variation online. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316388228
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316388228 [Google Scholar]
  11. Biber, D., & Finegan, E.
    (1994) Multi-dimensional analyses of authors’ styles: Some case studies from the eigtheenth century. InD. Ross & D. Brink (Eds.), Research in humanities computing (pp.3–17). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. (2001) Diachronic relations among speech-based and written registers in English. InS. Conrad & D. Biber (Eds.), Variation in English: Multi-dimensional studies (pp.66–83). New York, NY: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Burrows, J. F.
    (1987) Computation into criticism: A study of Jane Austen’s novels and an experiment in method. Oxford: Clarendon.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Clarke, I., & Grieve, J.
    (2017) Dimensions of abusive language on Twitter. InProceedings of the First Workshop on Abusive Language Online (pp.1–10), Vancouver, Canada (August4 2017) 10.18653/v1/W17‑3001
    https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/W17-3001 [Google Scholar]
  15. Conrad, S. & Biber, D.
    (2001) Variation in English: Multi-dimensional studies. New York: Routledge.
  16. Culpeper, J. & Kytö, M.
    (2010) Early modern English dialogues: Spoken interactions as writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Davies, M., & Gardner, D.
    (2010) A frequency dictionary of contemporary American English. New York, NY: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. De Haan, P.
    (1996) More on the language of dialogue in fiction. ICAME Journal, 20, 23–40.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Egbert, J.
    (2012) Style in nineteenth century fiction: A multi-dimensional analysis. Scientific Study of Literature, 2(2), 167–198. 10.1075/ssol.2.2.01egb
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.2.2.01egb [Google Scholar]
  20. (2015) Publication type and discipline variation in published academic writing: Investigating statistical interaction in corpus data. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 20(1), 1–29. 10.1075/ijcl.20.1.01egb
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.20.1.01egb [Google Scholar]
  21. Egbert, J., Biber, D., & Davies, M.
    (2015) Developing a bottom-up, user-based method of web register classification. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 66(9): 1817–1831. 10.1002/asi.23308
    https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23308 [Google Scholar]
  22. Egbert, J., & Schnur, E.
    (2018) Missing the trees for the forest: The role of the text in corpus and discourse analysis. InA. Marchi & C. Taylor (Eds.), Corpus approaches to discourse: A critical review. New York, NY: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315179346‑8
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315179346-8 [Google Scholar]
  23. Flowerdew, L.
    (2003) A combined corpus and systemic-functional analysis of the problem-solution pattern in a student and professional corpus of technical writing. TESOL Quarterly, 37(3), 489–511. 10.2307/3588401
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3588401 [Google Scholar]
  24. (2008) Corpus-based analyses of the problem-solution pattern: A phraseological approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.29
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.29 [Google Scholar]
  25. Gavins, J.
    (2007) Text world theory. An introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. 10.3366/edinburgh/9780748622993.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9780748622993.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  26. Gray, B.
    (2011) Exploring academic writing through corpus linguistics: When discipline tells only part of the story (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Northern Arizona University.
  27. Hoey, M.
    (2001) Textual interaction: An introduction to written discourse anlaysis. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Hubbard, E. H.
    (2002) Conversation, characterization and corpus linguistics: Dialogue in Jane Austen’s Sense and Sensibility. Literator, 23(2), 67–85. 10.4102/lit.v23i2.331
    https://doi.org/10.4102/lit.v23i2.331 [Google Scholar]
  29. Leech, G. & Short, M.
    (2007) Style in fiction: A linguistic introduction to English fictional prose. 2nd edition. Harlow: Pearson.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Kyto, M., Rudanko, J., & Smitterberg, E.
    (2000) Building a bridge between the present and the past: A corpus of 19th-century English. ICAME journal, 24, 85–98.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Mahlberg, M.
    (2013) Corpus stylistics and Dickens’s fiction. London: Routledge. doi:https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203076088
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Mahlberg, M & Stockwell, P
    (2016) Point and CLiC: Teaching literature with corpus stylistic tools. InM. Burke, O. Fialho & S. Zyngier (Eds.), Scientific approaches to literature in learning environments (pp.251–267). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/lal.24.13mah
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lal.24.13mah [Google Scholar]
  33. Mahlberg, M., Stockwell, P., de Joode, J., Smith, C., & O’Donnell, M. Brook
    (2016) CLiC Dickens – Novel uses of concordances for the integration of corpus stylistics and cognitive poetics. Corpora, 11(3), 433–463. 10.3366/cor.2016.0102
    https://doi.org/10.3366/cor.2016.0102 [Google Scholar]
  34. Mahlberg, M., Wiegand, V., Stockwell, P., & A. Hennessey
    (2019a) Speech-bundles in the 19th-century English Novel. Language and Literature, 28(4), 326–353. 10.1177/0963947019886754
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947019886754 [Google Scholar]
  35. Mahlberg, M., Wiegand, V., Lentin, J.,
    (2019b) CLiC User Guide v2.0.1 documentation. Retrieved from: clic.bham.ac.uk/docs/ (19, August 2019).
  36. Mooi, E., & Sarstedt, M.
    (2010) Data. InR. Stahlbock, S. F. Crone, & S. Lessmann (Eds.), A concise guide to market research (pp.25–44). Berlin: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑642‑12541‑6_3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12541-6_3 [Google Scholar]
  37. Norris, J.
    (2015) Discriminant analysis. InL. Plonsky (Ed.), Advancing quantitative methods in second language research. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315870908‑13
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315870908-13 [Google Scholar]
  38. O’Donnell, M. B., Scott, M., Mahlberg, M., & Hoey, M.
    (2012) Exploring text-initial words, clusters and concgrams in a newspaper corpus. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 8(1), 73–101.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Oostdijk, N.
    (1990) The language of dialogue in fiction. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 5(3), 235–241. 10.1093/llc/5.3.235
    https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/5.3.235 [Google Scholar]
  40. Page, N.
    (1988) Speech in the English novel. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press International. 10.1007/978‑1‑349‑19047‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-19047-8 [Google Scholar]
  41. Paltridge, B.
    (1996) Genre, text type, and the language learning classroom. ELT Journal, 50(3), 237–243. 10.1093/elt/50.3.237
    https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/50.3.237 [Google Scholar]
  42. Poulsen, J., & French, A.
    (2008) Discriminant function analysis. Retrieved from: userwww.sfsu.edu/~efc/classes/biol710/discrim/discrim.pdf (23October 2017).
  43. Rosso, M. A.
    (2008) User-based identification of web genres. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(7), 1053–1072. 10.1002/asi.20798
    https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20798 [Google Scholar]
  44. Römer, U.
    (2010) Establishing the phraseological profile of a text type: The construction of meaning in academic book reviews. English Text Construction, 3(1), 95–119. 10.1075/etc.3.1.06rom
    https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.3.1.06rom [Google Scholar]
  45. Scott, M., & Tribble, C.
    (2006) Textual patterns. Key words and corpus analysis in language education. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.22
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.22 [Google Scholar]
  46. Semino, E., & Short, M.
    (2004) Corpus stylistics: Speech, writing and thought presentation in a corpus of English writing. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203494073
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203494073 [Google Scholar]
  47. Staples, S., & Biber, D.
    (2015) Cluster analysis. InL. Plonsky (Ed.), Advancing quantitative methods in second language research. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315870908‑11
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315870908-11 [Google Scholar]
  48. Sorensen, K.
    (1989) Narration and speech-rendering in Dickens. Dickens Quarterly, 6(4), 131.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Swales, J.
    (1990) Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S.
    (2007) Using multivariate statistics. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
    [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): 19th-century fiction; Charles Dickens; fictional speech; narration; register variation
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error