1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Register Studies
  4. Volume 3, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 3, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2542-9477
  • E-ISSN: 2542-9485
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

A number of studies have found that grammatical differences across registers are more extensive than those across dialects. However, there is a paucity of research examining intervarietal register change, exploring how registers change differently over time in different regional varieties. The present study addresses this diachronic deficit, focusing on grammatical developments – from the early 20th to the early 21st century – in corpora representing three written registers and two speech-based registers in Australian, British and American English. We conducted a factor analysis on 68 lexicogrammatical features to identify six dimensions of register variation, and subsequently investigated the diachronic change of the five registers across these dimensions. We interpret our findings in terms of the differential effects of broad social changes on individual registers, in light of existing findings on trends of change in different registers and varieties.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/rs.20003.col
2021-06-03
2023-09-24

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/rs.20003.col
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aarts, B., Close, J., Leech, G., & Wallis, S.
    (2013) The verb phrase in English: Investigating recent language change with corpora. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139060998
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139060998 [Google Scholar]
  2. Atkinson, D.
    (2001) Scientific discourse across history: A combined multi-dimensional/rhetorical analysis of the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. InS. Conrad & D. Biber (Eds.), Variation in English: Multidimensional studies (pp.45–65). London: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Biber, D.
    (1988) Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511621024
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621024 [Google Scholar]
  4. Biber, D., & Conrad, S.
    (2009) Register, genre and style. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511814358
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511814358 [Google Scholar]
  5. Biber, D., & Finegan, E.
    (1989) Drift and the evolution of English style: A history of three genres. Language65(3), 487–517. 10.2307/415220
     https://doi.org/10.2307/415220 [Google Scholar]
  6. (2001) Diachronic relations among speech-based and written registers in English. InS. Conrad & D. Biber (Eds.), Variation in English: Multidimensional studies (pp.66–83). London: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Biber, D., & Gray, B.
    (2016) Grammatical complexity in academic English: Linguistic change in writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511920776
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511920776 [Google Scholar]
  8. Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S. & Finegan, E.
    (1999) Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Blair, D.
    (1993) Australian English and Australian national identity. InG. Schulz (Ed.), The languages of Australia (pp.62–70). Canberra: Highland Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Collins, P.
    (2015) Diachronic variation in the grammar of Australian English: Corpus-based explorations. InP. Collins (Ed.), Grammatical change in English world-wide (pp.15–42). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.67.02col
     https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.67.02col [Google Scholar]
  11. Collins, P., & Yao, X.
    (2018) Colloquialisation and the evolution of Australian English: A cross-varietal and cross-generic study of Australian, British and American English from 1931 to 2006. English World-Wide39(3), 253–277. 10.1075/eww.00014.col
     https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.00014.col [Google Scholar]
  12. (2019) AusBrown: A new diachronic corpus of Australian English. ICAME Journal43, 3–29. 10.2478/icame‑2019‑0001
     https://doi.org/10.2478/icame-2019-0001 [Google Scholar]
  13. Desmond, V.
    (1911) The awful Australian. Sydney: Shepherd: J. Andrews and Co.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Fritz, C.
    2007a From Plato to Aristotle – investigating early Australian English. Australian Journal of Linguistics24: 57–97. 10.1080/0726860032000203218
     https://doi.org/10.1080/0726860032000203218 [Google Scholar]
  15. 2007b From English in Australia to Australian English: 1788–1900. Frankfurt: Peter Lang. 10.3726/978‑3‑653‑01830‑1
     https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-653-01830-1 [Google Scholar]
  16. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M.
    (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal6(1), 1–55. 10.1080/10705519909540118
     https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118 [Google Scholar]
  17. Hundt, M., Röthlisberger, M., & Seoane, E.
    (2019) Predicting voice alternation across academic Englishes. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory. Ahead of print doi:  10.1515/cllt‑2017‑0050
     https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2017-0050 [Google Scholar]
  18. Hundt, M., Schneider, G., & Seoane, E.
    (2016) The use of the be-passive in academic Englishes: Local vs global usage in an international language. Corpora11(1), 29–61. 10.3366/cor.2016.0084
     https://doi.org/10.3366/cor.2016.0084 [Google Scholar]
  19. Kruger, H., & Smith, A.
    (2018) Colloquialisation versus densification in Australian English: A multidimensional analysis of the Australian Diachronic Hansard Corpus (ADHC). Australian Journal of Linguistics38(3), 293–328. 10.1080/07268602.2018.1470452
     https://doi.org/10.1080/07268602.2018.1470452 [Google Scholar]
  20. Kruger, H., & Van Rooy, B.
    (2018) Register variation in written contact varieties of English: A multidimensional analysis. English World-Wide39(2), 214–242. 10.1075/eww.00011.kru
     https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.00011.kru [Google Scholar]
  21. Kruger, H., Van Rooy, B., & Smith, A.
    (2019) Register change in the British and Australian Hansard (1901–2015), Journal of English Linguistics. 47(3), 183–220. 10.1177/0075424219857114
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0075424219857114 [Google Scholar]
  22. Leech, G., Hundt, M., Mair, C., & Smith, N.
    (2009) Change in contemporary English: A grammatical study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511642210
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511642210 [Google Scholar]
  23. Mair, C., & Hundt, M.
    (1999) “Agile” and “uptight” genres: The corpus-based approach to language change in progress. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics4, 221–242. 10.1075/ijcl.4.2.02hun
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.4.2.02hun [Google Scholar]
  24. Mollin, S.
    (2007) The Hansard hazard: Gauging the accuracy of British parliamentary transcripts. Corpora2(2), 187–210. 10.3366/cor.2007.2.2.187
     https://doi.org/10.3366/cor.2007.2.2.187 [Google Scholar]
  25. Moore, B.
    (2008) Speaking our language: The story of Australian English. Sydney: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. R Core Team
    R Core Team (2019) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Reeve, J.
    (1989) Community attitudes to Australian English. InP. Collins & D. Blair (Eds.) Australian English: The language of a new society (pp.111–126). Brisbane: University of Queensland Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Revelle, W.
    (2018) Psych: Procedures for personality and psychological Research. Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, USA, https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=psychVersion = 1.8.12.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Schneider, E.
    (2007) Postcolonial English: Varieties around the world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511618901
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511618901 [Google Scholar]
  30. Seal, G.
    (1999) The lingo: Listening to Australian English. Sydney: UNSW Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Westin, I.
    (2002) Language change in English newspaper editorials. Amsterdam: Rodopi. 10.1163/9789004334007
     https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004334007 [Google Scholar]
  32. Wilkes, G.
    (1978) A dictionary of Australian colloquialisms. Sydney: Sydney University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Yao, X., & Collins, P.
    (2019) Developments in Australian English grammar from 1931 to 2006: A comparative, aggregate approach to dialectal variation and change. Journal of English Linguistics47(2), 120–149. 10.1177/0075424219837337
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0075424219837337 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/rs.20003.col
Loading
Diachronic register change
Register Studies 3, 33 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1075/rs.20003.col
/content/journals/10.1075/rs.20003.col
/content/journals/10.1075/rs.20003.col
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): American English; Australian English; British English; lexicogrammar; multidimensional analysis; register change

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error