oa Multiple Correspondence Analysis, newspaper discourse and subregister

References

1. Baker, P., Gabrielatos, C., & McEnery, T.
   (2013) Discourse Analysis and Media Attitudes: The Representation of Islam in the British Press. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511920103
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511920103 [Google Scholar]
2. Baker, P., & McEnery, T.
   (2019) The value of revisiting and extending previous studies: the case of Islam in the UK press. InR. Scholtz (Ed.), Quantifying Approaches to Discourse for Social Scientists (pp.215–249). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑97370‑8_8
   https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97370-8_8 [Google Scholar]
3. Bednarek, M.
   (2006) Evaluations in Media Discourse: Analysis of a Newspaper Corpus. London: Continuum.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Biber, D.
   (1988) Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511621024
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621024 [Google Scholar]
5. Biber, D., & Conrad, S.
   (2019) Register, Genre and Style (2nd edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108686136
   https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108686136 [Google Scholar]
6. Biber, D., & Gray, B.
   (2013) Being specific about historical change: The influence of sub-register. Journal of English Linguistics, 41(2), 104–134. 10.1177/0075424212472509
   https://doi.org/10.1177/0075424212472509 [Google Scholar]
7. Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E.
   (1999) Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Longman.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Benzécri, J. P.
   (1979) Sur le calcul des taux d’inertie dans l’analyse d’un questionnaire. Cahiers de l’Analyse des Données, 4, 377–378.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Brookes, G., & McEnery, T.
   (2019) The utility of topic modelling for discourse studies: a critical evaluation, Discourse Studies, 21(1), 3–21. 10.1177/1461445618814032
   https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445618814032 [Google Scholar]
10. Carter, R.
    (1988) The language of written sports commentary: soccer – a description. InM. Ghadessy (Ed.), Registers of Written English. Situational Factors and Linguistic Features (pp.16–51). London: Frances Pinter, London.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Clarke, I.
    (2019) Functional linguistic variation in Twitter trolling. International Journal of Speech Language and the Law, 26(1), 57–84. 10.1558/ijsll.34803
    https://doi.org/10.1558/ijsll.34803 [Google Scholar]
12. Clarke, I., Brookes, G. & McEnery, T.
    (Forthcoming). Keywords through time: Tracking changes in press discourses of Islam. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Dunning, T.
    (1993) Accurate methods for the statistics of surprise and coincidence. Computational Linguistics, 19(1), 61–74.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Lê, S., Josse, J., & Husson, F.
    (2008) FactoMineR: An R Package for Multivariate Analysis. Journal of Statistical Software, 25(1), 1–18. 10.18637/jss.v025.i01
    https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v025.i01 [Google Scholar]
15. Le Roux, B., & Rouanet, H.
    (2010) Multiple Correspondence Analysis. London: Sage. 10.4135/9781412993906
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412993906 [Google Scholar]
16. Partington, A.
    (2014) Mind the gaps: The role of corpus linguistics in researching absences. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 19(1), 118–146. 10.1075/ijcl.19.1.05par
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.19.1.05par [Google Scholar]
17. Pinna, A., & Brett, D.
    (2018) Constance and variability: Using PoS-grams to find phraseologies in the language of newspapers. InJ. Kopaczyk & J. Tyrkkö (Eds.), Applications of Pattern-driven Methods in Corpus Linguistics (pp.107–130). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.82.05pin
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.82.05pin [Google Scholar]
18. Richardson, J. E.
    (2004) (Mis)Representing Islam: The Racism and Rhetoric of British Broadsheet Newspapers. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/dapsac.9
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.9 [Google Scholar]
19. Schroeter, M. & Taylor, C.
    (2018) Exploring Silence and Absence in Discourse: Empirical Approaches. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑64580‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64580-3 [Google Scholar]
20. Zou, H., Hastie, T. & Tibshirani, R.
    (2006) Sparse Principal Component Analysis. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 15(2), 265–286. 10.1198/106186006X113430
    https://doi.org/10.1198/106186006X113430 [Google Scholar]