The role of situation in individual style

References

1. Balasubramanian, B.
   (1982) An objective approach to the linguistic style of press advertisements in English. Bulletin of the Deccan College Post-Graduate and Research Institute, 411, 11–15.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Biber, D.
   (1988) Variation across speech and writing. New York: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511621024
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621024 [Google Scholar]
3. Biber, D.
   (2006) University language: A corpus-based study of spoken and written languages. Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.23
   https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.23 [Google Scholar]
4. Biber, D.
   (2011) Corpus linguistics and the study of literature: Back to the future?Scientific Study of Literature, 1(1), 15–23. 10.1075/ssol.1.1.02bib
   https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.1.1.02bib [Google Scholar]
5. Biber, D., & Conrad, S.
   (2019) Register, genre, and style. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108686136
   https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108686136 [Google Scholar]
6. Biber, D., & Finegan, E.
   (1994) Multi-dimensional analyses of authors’ styles: Some case studies from the eighteenth century. Research in Humanities Computing, 31, 3–17.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Bloch, B.
   (1948) A set of postulates for phonemic analysis. Language, 24(1), 3–47. 10.2307/410284
   https://doi.org/10.2307/410284 [Google Scholar]
8. Carter, R.
   (2004) Language and creativity. The art of common talk. London: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Carter, R.
   (2007) Response to special issue of Applied Linguistics devoted to language creativity in everyday contexts. Applied Linguistics, 28(4), 597–608. 10.1093/applin/amm046
   https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amm046 [Google Scholar]
10. Cheung, I.
    (2017) Plain language to minimize cognitive load: A social justice perspective. IEEE Transactions of Professional Communication, 60(4), 448–457. 10.1109/TPC.2017.2759639
    https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2017.2759639 [Google Scholar]
11. Clarke, I. & Grieve, J.
    (2019) Stylistic variation on the Donald Trump Twitter account: A linguistic analysis of tweets posted between 2009 and 2018. PLoS ONE, 14(9): e0222062. 10.1371/journal.pone.0222062
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222062 [Google Scholar]
12. Cvrček, V., Laubeová, Z., Lukeš, D., Poukarová, P., Řehořková, A., & Zasina, A.
    (2020) Author and register as sources of variation: A corpus-based study using elicited texts. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 25(4), 461–488. 10.1075/ijcl.19020.cvr
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.19020.cvr [Google Scholar]
13. Egbert, J.
    (2012) Style in nineteenth century fiction. A multidimensional analysis. Scientific Study of Literature, 2(2), 167–198. 10.1075/ssol.2.2.01egb
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.2.2.01egb [Google Scholar]
14. Egbert, J., & Biber, D.
    (2020a) It’s just words, folks. It’s just words. Donald Trump’s distinctive linguistic style. InU. Schneider & M. Eitelmann (Eds.), Linguistic inquiries into Donald Trump’s language from ‘fake news’ to ‘tremendous success’ (pp.17–40). New York: Bloomsbury Publishing. 10.5040/9781350115545.0007
    https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350115545.0007 [Google Scholar]
15. Egbert, J., & Biber, D.
    (2020b) Key feature analysis – A simple, yet powerful method for comparing text varieties. Corpora, 18(1), 121–133. 10.3366/cor.2023.0275
    https://doi.org/10.3366/cor.2023.0275 [Google Scholar]
16. Egbert, J., & Gracheva, M.
    (2023) Linguistic variation within registers: Granularity in textual units and situational parameters. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 19(1), 115–143. 10.1515/cllt‑2022‑0034
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2022-0034 [Google Scholar]
17. Egbert, J., & Shnur, E.
    (2018) The role of the text in corpus and discourse analysis: missing the trees for the forest. InC. Taylor & A. Marchi (Eds.), Corpus approaches to discourse (pp.159–173). New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315179346‑8
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315179346-8 [Google Scholar]
18. Esser, J.
    (1993) Quantitative methods in stylistics and definitions of style. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen, 94(3/4), 297–312.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Fehrman, C.
    (2020) Author in chief: The untold story of our presidents and the books they wrote. New York: Avid Reader Press/Simon & Schuster.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Halliday, M.
    (1971) Linguistic function and literary style: an inquiry into William Golding’s The Inheritors. InR. Carter & P. Stockwell (Eds.), The language and literature reader (pp.330–365). New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Hardy, D., & Durian, D.
    (2000) The stylistics of syntactic complements: Grammar and seeing in Flannery O’Connor’s fiction. Style, 341, 92–116. www.jstor.org/stable/10.5325/style.34.1.92
    [Google Scholar]
22. Hart, R.
    (1980) Verbal style and the presidency. Cambridge: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Hoey, M.
    (2001) Textual interaction: An introduction to written discourse analysis. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Johnstone, B.
    (1996) The linguistic individual: Self-expression in language and linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780195101843.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195101843.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
25. Jordan, K., Pennebaker, J., & Ehrig, C.
    (2018) The 2016 U.S. presidential candidates and how people tweeted about them. Sage Open, 8(3), 1–8. 10.1177/2158244018791218
    https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244018791218 [Google Scholar]
26. Kowal, S., O’Connell, D., Forbush, K., Higgins, M., Clarke, L., & D’Anna, K.
    (1997) Interplay of literacy and orality in inaugural rhetoric. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 26(1), 1–31. 10.1023/A:1025043620499
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025043620499 [Google Scholar]
27. Kuosmanen, S.
    (2015) “With friends and former foes”: The functional roles of international collaborative partners and their relationships with the United States in inaugural addresses of American presidents since 1949. SKY Journal of Linguistics, 281. https://www.linguistics.fi/julkaisut/SKY2015/SKYJoL28_Kuosmanen.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
28. Leech, G., & Short, M.
    (1981) Style in fiction: A linguistic introduction to English fictional prose. Harlow: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Marko, K., Reitbauer, M., & Pickl, G.
    (2022) Same person, different platform: Challenges and implications for forensic authorship analysis. An exploratory study of Instagram and Twitter users. Register Studies, 4(2), 202–231. 10.1075/rs.22006.mar
    https://doi.org/10.1075/rs.22006.mar [Google Scholar]
30. Moerk, E.
    (1970) Quantitative analysis of writing styles. Journal of Linguistics, 6(2), 223–230. 10.1017/S0022226700002620
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700002620 [Google Scholar]
31. Pinker, S.
    (2014) The sense of style. London: Penguin Books.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Slatcher, R., Chung, C., Pennebaker, J., & Stone, L.
    (2007) Winning words: Individual differences in linguistic style among U.S. presidential and vice-presidential candidates. Journal of Research in Personality, 411, 63–75. 10.1016/j.jrp.2006.01.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2006.01.006 [Google Scholar]
33. Scheffler, T., Kern, L.-A., & Seemann, H.
    (2022) The medium is not the message: Individual level register variation in blogs vs. tweets. Register Studies, 4(2), 171–201. 10.1075/rs.22009.sch
    https://doi.org/10.1075/rs.22009.sch [Google Scholar]
34. Swales, J.
    (1990) Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]