1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Register Studies
  4. Online First Articles
  5. Online First Article
image of A systemic functional-corpus approach to mapping generic structure
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

In systemic functional linguistics (SFL), register is understood as the product of the interplay among context, meaning, and grammar. While various methodological approaches have explored this relationship, few studies demonstrate how corpus methods can enhance the explanatory power of SFL’s multi-stratal model of register. This paper presents a corpus-assisted analysis of contemporary Slovenian Catholic sermons, using Hasan’s model of register as the analytical framework. A small, specialized corpus of televised sermons was compiled, grammatically annotated, and analysed using computational tools that generated discourse semantic patterning graphs. The analysis focuses on visualizing semantic shifts and structural movements within and across texts to identify genre-relevant structures. The findings are interpreted in terms of ethical reasoning and argumentation, highlighting distinctive generic features of the texts. Beyond genre-specific insights, the study offers a methodological contribution to genre analysis by demonstrating how linguistic inquiry can be grounded in semantic criteria and operationalized through corpus tools.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/rs.24007.biz
2026-02-06
2026-03-07

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/rs.24007.biz
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Adam, M.
    (2017) Persuasion in religious discourse: Enhancing credibility in sermon titles and openings. Discourse and Interaction, (), –. 10.5817/DI2017‑2‑5
     https://doi.org/10.5817/DI2017-2-5 [Google Scholar]
  2. Adams, J. E.
    (1990) Truth Applied. Application in Preaching. Michigan: Grand Rapids.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Agersnap, A., Johansen, K. H., & Kristensen-McLachlan, R. D.
    (2022) Unveiling the character gallery of sermons: A social network analysis of 11,955 Danish sermons. Nordic Journal of Comparative Religion, (), –. 10.33356/temenos.100454
     https://doi.org/10.33356/temenos.100454 [Google Scholar]
  4. Attridge, H. W.
    (1989) The Epistle to the Hebrews. Philadelphia: Fortress Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Baumann, D. J.
    (1972) An Introduction to Contemporary Preaching. Michigan: Grand Rapids.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Bednarek, M.
    (2008) Emotion talk across corpora. Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230285712
     https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230285712 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bhatia, V. K.
    (1993) Analysing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings. London: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Biber, D.
    (1995) Dimensions of register variation. A cross-linguistic comparison. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511519871
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511519871 [Google Scholar]
  9. (2019) Text-linguistic approaches to register variation. Register Studies, (), –. 10.1075/rs.18007.bib
     https://doi.org/10.1075/rs.18007.bib [Google Scholar]
  10. Biber, D., & Conrad, S.
    (2019) Register, genre, and style. (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108686136
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108686136 [Google Scholar]
  11. Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Reppen, R.
    (1998) Corpus linguistics: Investigating language structure and use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511804489
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511804489 [Google Scholar]
  12. Bizjak, A.
    (1994) Sermons as a genre [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Macquarie University.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. (2005) Strukturalno-pomenska analiza pridige kot žanra [Structure and meaning in sermonic discourse]. Slavistična Revija, (), –.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Bizjak Končar, A.
    (2008) Contemporary sermons. From grammatical annotation to rhetorical design. Odense Working Papers in Linguistics, , –.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Butt, D.
    (1988) Randomness, order and the latent patterning of text. InD. Birch & M. O’Toole (Eds.), Functions of Style (Open Linguistics Series) (pp.–). London: Pinter Publishers.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Chafe, W.
    (1994) Discourse, Consciousness, and Time: The Flow and Displacement of Conscious Experience in Speaking and Writing. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Cheong, E-Y.
    (1999) Analysis of sermons delivered by Korean, Filipino and American pastors. The view of genre analysis. RELC Journal, (), –. 10.1177/003368829903000203
     https://doi.org/10.1177/003368829903000203 [Google Scholar]
  18. Cloran, C.
    (1994) Rhetorical Units and Decontextualization: An Enquiry into some Relations of Context, Meaning and Grammar (Monographs in Systemic Linguistics, 6). Nottingham: Department of English Studies, University of Nottingham.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Cornut, F., Giroux, H., & Langley, A.
    (2012) The strategic plan as a genre. Discourse & Communication, (), –. 10.1177/1750481311432521
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481311432521 [Google Scholar]
  20. Dzameshi, A. K.
    (1995) Social motivations for politeness behavior in Christian sermonic discourse. Anthropological Linguistics, (), –.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Egbert, J., Biber, D., & Gray, B.
    (2022) Designing and evaluating language corpora: A practical framework for corpus representativeness. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316584880
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316584880 [Google Scholar]
  22. Ethelston, G.
    (2009) Appraisal in evangelical sermons: the projection and functions of misguided voices. Text & Talk, (), –. 10.1515/TEXT.2009.035
     https://doi.org/10.1515/TEXT.2009.035 [Google Scholar]
  23. Flowerdew, L.
    (2012) Corpus-based discourse analysis: Research and practice in applied linguistics. London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Halliday, M. A. K.
    (1976) System and function in language. London. Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. (1977) Text as semantic choice in social context. InT. A. van Dijk & J. S. Petöfi (Eds.), Grammars and Descriptions (pp.–). Berlin: De Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. (1978) Language as Social Semiotic. London. Arnold.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. (1985) An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. (1989) Register variation. InM. A. K. Halliday & R. Hasan, Language, context, and text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective (pp.–). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M.
    (2014) An Introduction to functional grammar. (4th ed.). London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203783771
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203783771 [Google Scholar]
  30. Halliday, M. A. K., McIntosh, A., & Strevens, P.
    (1964) The Linguistic sciences and language teaching. London: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Hasan, R.
    (1978) Text in the systemic-functional model. InW. U. Dressler (Ed.), Current trends in textlinguistics (pp.–). Berlin: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110853759.228
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110853759.228 [Google Scholar]
  32. (1984) The Nursery tale as a genre. Nottingham Linguistic Circular, , –.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. (1989) The identity of a text. InM. A. K. Halliday & R. Hasan, Language, context, and text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective (pp.–). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Humphrey, S.
    (2017) Academic literacies in the Middle Years: A framework for enhancing teacher knowledge and student achievement. London: Routledge
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Hyland, K.
    (2005) Metadiscourse: Exploring interaction in writing. London & New York: Continuum.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Jakopin, P., & Bizjak, A.
    (1997) O strojno podprtem oblikoslovnem označevanju slovenskega besedila [On machine assisted POS tagging of Slovene texts]. Slavistična revija, (), –.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Jakopin, P., & Bizjak Končar, A.
    (2008) Part-of-speech tagging of Slovenian: 12 years after. InT. Erjavec & J. Žganec Gros (Eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth Language Technologies Conference (pp.–). Institut Jožef Stefan.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Kennedy, G. A.
    (2001) Klasična retorika ter njena krščanska in posvetna tradicija od antike do sodobnosti [Classical rhetoric and its Christian and secular tradition from ancient to modern times]. Ljubljana: Založba ZRC, ZRC SAZU.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Kohnen, T.
    (2007) Text types and the methodology of diachronic speech act analysis. InS. Fitzmaurice & I. Taavitsainen (Eds.), Topics in English linguistics: Methods in historical pragmatics, (pp.–). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Malmström, H.
    (2014) Engaging the congregation: The place of metadiscourse in contemporary preaching. Applied Linguistics, (), –. 10.1093/applin/amu052
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amu052 [Google Scholar]
  41. (2015) Preaching in uncertain terms: The place of hedging language in contemporary sermonic discourse. Functions of Language, (), –. 10.1075/fol.22.3.02mal
     https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.22.3.02mal [Google Scholar]
  42. (2018) ‘Academese’, ‘church chat’ and the fear of alienating the congregation: Exploring church preaching as a lexical environment. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice, (), –. 10.1558/jalpp.33771
     https://doi.org/10.1558/jalpp.33771 [Google Scholar]
  43. Martin, J. R.
    (1985) Factual Writing: Exploring and Challenging Social Reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. (1992) English Text: System and Structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.59
     https://doi.org/10.1075/z.59 [Google Scholar]
  45. (1996) Register and genre: Modelling social context in functional linguistics — Narrative genres. Discourse Analysis: Proceedings of the International Conference on Discourse Analysis. University of Lisbon, Portugal: Colibri/Portugese Linguistics Association.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. (1999) Modelling context: a crooked path of progress in contextual linguistics. InM. Ghadessy (Ed.), Text and context in functional linguistics, (pp.–). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.169.05mar
     https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.169.05mar [Google Scholar]
  47. Martin, J. R., & Rose, D.
    (2008) Genre Relations: Mapping Culture. London: Equinox Publishing.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Matthiessen, C. M. I. M.
    (2015) Register in the round: registerial cartography. Functional Linguistics, (), –. 10.1186/s40554‑015‑0015‑8
     https://doi.org/10.1186/s40554-015-0015-8 [Google Scholar]
  49. (2019) Register in systemic functional linguistics. Register Studies, (), –. 10.1075/rs.18010.mat
     https://doi.org/10.1075/rs.18010.mat [Google Scholar]
  50. McDonald, J. I. H.
    (1980) Kerygma and Didache. The articulation and structure of the earliest Christian message. London: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511520419
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511520419 [Google Scholar]
  51. McEnery, T., & Wilson, A.
    (1996) Corpus linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Meagher, P. K.
    (1979) Encyclopedic dictionary of religion. Philadelphia: Corpus Publications.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Neumann, S.
    (2013) Contrastive register variation. A quantitative approach to the comparison of English and German. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110238594
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110238594 [Google Scholar]
  54. O’Day, G. R., & Long, T. G.
    (1993) Listening to the word. Studies in honor of Fred B. Craddock. Nashville: Abingdon Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. O’Donnell, M. B.
    (1999) The Use of annotated corpora for New Testament discourse analysis: A survey of current practice and future prospects. InS. E. Porter & J. T. Reed (Eds.), Discourse analysis and the New Testament. Approaches and results (Journal for the Study of the New Testament. Supplement Series 170. Studies in New Testament Greek 4) (pp.–). Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Perelman, C. B.
    (1993) Kraljestvo retorike [The realm of rhetoric]. Maribor: Znanstveno in publicistično središče.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Pleizier, T.
    (2017) Homiletic transitions in the Netherlands: The spirit, human language and real preaching. International Journal of Homiletics, (), –. 10.21827/ijh.2017.39435
     https://doi.org/10.21827/ijh.2017.39435 [Google Scholar]
  58. Sunstein, C. R.
    (1996) Legal reasoning and political conflict. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780195100822.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195100822.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  59. Teich, E.
    (2003) Cross-linguistic variation in system and text: A methodology for the investigation of translations and comparable texts. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110896541
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110896541 [Google Scholar]
  60. Thompson, G., & Hunston, S.
    (2000) Evaluation: An introduction. InS. Hunston & G. Thompson (Eds.), Evaluation in text (pp.–). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780198238546.003.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198238546.003.0001 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/rs.24007.biz
Loading
A systemic functional-corpus approach to mapping generic structure
John Benjamins ; https://doi.org/10.1075/rs.24007.biz
/content/journals/10.1075/rs.24007.biz
/content/journals/10.1075/rs.24007.biz
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: sermons ; text classification ; discourse semantics ; corpus linguistics ; Slovenia ; systemic functional linguistics

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error