1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Register Studies
  4. Online First Articles
  5. Online First Article
image of A register approach to specialized word list creation
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Specialized word lists (SWLs) can help language learners acquire domain-specific vocabulary; however, there are few such lists for legal domains despite the growing demand for resources in this area. Additionally, in list design and construction, register is rarely considered a meaningful component of design or validation despite the fact that register is one of the most meaningful predictors of linguistic variation, including lexical variation. The present study begins to fill these gaps by expanding on the Contracts Word List (Hanks, Hashimoto, & Egbert 2024) in creating subregister specific lists for 54 types of contracts (CWL+). SWLs within the Contracts Word List were generated relying heavily on text-dispersion keyness analysis (Egbert & Biber 2019), and their usefulness was validated through percent coverage statistics and register analysis. This study illustrates the usefulness of keyness analysis in word list creation and the constructive role that register can play in the design and evaluation of SWLs.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/rs.25004.lar
2025-05-02
2025-05-14

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/rs.25004.lar
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alder, M.
    (2012) The Plain Language Movement. InLawrence M. Solan, and Peter M. Tiersma (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Language and Law (pp.–). Oxford Academic. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199572120.013.0006
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199572120.013.0006 [Google Scholar]
  2. Anesa, P.
    (2007) Vagueness and precision in contracts: A close relationship. Linguistica e Filologia, , –. 10.6092/LEF_24_P7
     https://doi.org/10.6092/LEF_24_P7 [Google Scholar]
  3. (2019) Towards a conceptualization of legal English as a lingua franca. International Journal of English Linguistics, (), –. 10.5539/ijel.v9n6p14
     https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v9n6p14 [Google Scholar]
  4. Arndt, R.
    (2022) A specialized vocabulary list from an original corpus of digital science resources for middle school learners. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, , . 10.1016/j.jeap.2022.101187
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2022.101187 [Google Scholar]
  5. Balogh, D.
    (2019) The role of genres and text selection in legal translator training. Studies in Logic, Grammar, and Rhetoric, (), –. 10.2478/slgr‑2019‑0015
     https://doi.org/10.2478/slgr-2019-0015 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bhatia, K. L.
    (2010) Textbook on legal language and legal writing. Universal Law Publishing.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Biber, D.
    (2012) Register as a predictor of linguistic variation. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, (), –. 10.1515/cllt‑2012‑0002
     https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2012-0002 [Google Scholar]
  8. Biber, D., & Conrad, S.
    (2019) Register, genre, and style. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108686136
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108686136 [Google Scholar]
  9. Biber, D., & Egbert, J.
    (2023) What is register?: Accounting for linguistic and situational variation within and outside of text varieties. Register Studies, (), –. 10.1075/rs.00004.bib
     https://doi.org/10.1075/rs.00004.bib [Google Scholar]
  10. Breeze, R.
    (2015) Teaching the vocabulary of legal documents: a corpus-driven approach. ESP Today, (), –.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Brezina, V., & Gablasova, D.
    (2017) How to produce vocabulary lists? Issues of definition, selection and pedagogical aims: A response to Gabriele Stein. Applied Linguistics, (), –. 10.1093/applin/amx022
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amx022 [Google Scholar]
  12. Brysbaert, M., New, B., & Keuleers, E.
    (2012) Adding part-of-speech information to the SUBTLEX-US word frequencies. Behavior Research Methods, , –. 10.3758/s13428‑012‑0190‑4
     https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-012-0190-4 [Google Scholar]
  13. Cao, M., & Zhao, W.
    (2019) A corpus-based analysis of business contract English registers. International Journal of English Linguistics, (), –. 10.5539/ijel.v9n3p158
     https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v9n3p158 [Google Scholar]
  14. Chandler, D., & Hashimoto, B.
    (2024) Here-, there-, and every where-: Exploring the role of pronominal adverbs in legal language. Applied Corpus Linguistics, (). 10.1016/j.acorp.2024.100087
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acorp.2024.100087 [Google Scholar]
  15. Coxhead, A.
    (2000) A new academic word list. TESOL Quarterly, (), –. 10.2307/3587951
     https://doi.org/10.2307/3587951 [Google Scholar]
  16. Coxhead, A., & Demecheleer, M.
    (2018) Investigating the technical vocabulary of plumbing. English for Specific Purposes, , –. 10.1016/j.esp.2018.03.006
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2018.03.006 [Google Scholar]
  17. Davies, E.
    (2004) Register distinctions and measures of complexity in the language of legal contracts. InJ. Gibbons, V. Prakasam, K. V. Tirumalesh, & H. Nagarajan (Eds.), Language in the Law, (pp.–). New Delhi: Orient Longman
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Egbert, J., & Biber, D.
    (2019) Incorporating text dispersion into keyword analyses. Corpora, (), –. 10.3366/cor.2019.0162
     https://doi.org/10.3366/cor.2019.0162 [Google Scholar]
  19. Egbert, J., Biber, D., & Gray, B.
    (2022) Designing and evaluating language corpora: A practical framework for corpus representativeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316584880
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316584880 [Google Scholar]
  20. Ferreira, F.
    (2003) The misinterpretation of noncanonical sentences. Cognitive Psychology, (), –. 10.1016/S0010‑0285(03)00005‑7
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0285(03)00005-7 [Google Scholar]
  21. Gardner, D., & Davies, M.
    (2014) A new academic vocabulary list. Applied Linguistics, (), –. 10.1093/applin/amt015
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amt015 [Google Scholar]
  22. Geng, Q.
    (2018) Cultural frame and translation of pronominal adverbs in legal English. International Journal of Society, Culture & Language, (), –. https://www.ijscl.com/article_32642.html
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Gilquin, G. & Granger, S.
    (2010) How can data-driven learning be used in language teaching?InA. O’Keeffe & M. McCarthy (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of corpus linguistics (pp.–). London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203856949‑26
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203856949-26 [Google Scholar]
  24. Grabowski, Ł.
    (2015) Keywords and lexical bundles within English pharmaceutical discourse: A corpus-driven description. English for Specific Purposes, , –. 10.1016/j.esp.2014.10.004
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2014.10.004 [Google Scholar]
  25. Green, C., & Lambert, J.
    (2018) Advancing disciplinary literacy through English for academic purposes: Collocations and word families for eight secondary subjects. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, , –. 10.1016/j.jeap.2018.07.004
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2018.07.004 [Google Scholar]
  26. Greene, J. W., & Coxhead, A. J.
    (2015) Academic vocabulary for middle school students: Research-based lists and strategies for key content areas. Newburyport: Brookes Publishing.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Goźdź-Roszkowski, S.
    (2011) Patterns of linguistic variation in American legal English. Lausanne: Peter Lang. 10.3726/978‑3‑653‑00659‑9
     https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-653-00659-9 [Google Scholar]
  28. Goulart, L., Gray, B., Staples, S., Black, A., Shelton, A., Biber, D., Egbert, J., & Wizner, S.
    (2020) Linguistic perspectives on register. Annual Review of Linguistics, , –. 10.1146/annurev‑linguistics‑011718‑012644
     https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011718-012644 [Google Scholar]
  29. Hanks, E., Hashimoto, B., & Egbert, J.
    (2024) The contract word list: Integral vocabulary for reading and writing English contracts. English for Specific Purposes, , –. 10.1016/j.esp.2024.03.002
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2024.03.002 [Google Scholar]
  30. Hart, O., & Holstrom, B.
    (1987) The theory of contracts. InT. F. Bewley (Ed.), Advances in economic theory (pp.–). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CCOL0521340446.003
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521340446.003 [Google Scholar]
  31. Hashimoto, B. J.
    (2021) Is frequency enough?: The frequency model in vocabulary size testing. Language Assessment Quarterly, (), –. 10.1080/15434303.2020.1860058
     https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2020.1860058 [Google Scholar]
  32. Hashimoto, B., & Egbert, J.
    (2019) More than frequency? Exploring predictors of word difficulty for second language learners. Language Learning, (), –. 10.1111/lang.12353
     https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12353 [Google Scholar]
  33. Hessler, J. B., Brieber, D., Egle, J., Mandler, G., & Jahn, T.
    (2019) Applying psycholinguistic evidence to the construction of a new test of verbal memory in late-life cognitive decline: The Auditory Wordlist Learning Test. Assessment, (), –. 10.1177/1073191117690603
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191117690603 [Google Scholar]
  34. Hill, C. A.
    (2001) Why contracts are written in legalese. Chicago-Kent Law Review, (), –. https://scholarship.kentlaw.iit.edu/cklawreview/vol77/iss1/5
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Hyland, K., & Tse, P.
    (2007) Is there an “academic vocabulary”?. TESOL Quarterly, (), –. 10.1002/j.1545‑7249.2007.tb00058.x
     https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1545-7249.2007.tb00058.x [Google Scholar]
  36. Kamrotov, M., Talalakina, E., & Stukal, D.
    (2022) Technical vocabulary in languages for special purposes: The corpus-based Russian economics word list. Lingua, , . 10.1016/j.lingua.2022.103326
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2022.103326 [Google Scholar]
  37. Kankaanranta, A., & Planken, B.
    (2010) Belf competence as business knowledge of internationally operating business professionals. The Journal of Business Communication, (), –. 10.1177/0021943610377301
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0021943610377301 [Google Scholar]
  38. Kilgarriff, A.
    (1997) Using word frequency lists to measure corpus homogeneity and similarity between corpora. Fifth Workshop on Very Large Corpora. Presented at theVLC1997. Retrieved fromhttps://aclanthology.org/W97-0122
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Kurzon, D.
    (1997) ‘Legal language’: Varieties, genres, registers, discourses. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, (), –. 10.1111/j.1473‑4192.1997.tb00111.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.1997.tb00111.x [Google Scholar]
  40. Kyle, K., Crossley, S., & Berger, C.
    (2018) The tool for the automatic analysis of lexical sophistication (TAALES): version 2.0. Behavior Research Methods, , –. 10.3758/s13428‑017‑0924‑4
     https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-017-0924-4 [Google Scholar]
  41. Laso, N. J., & Salazar, D.
    (2013) Collocations, lexical bundles and SciE-Lex: A review of corpus research on multiword unites of meaning. InI. Verdaguer, N. J. Laso, & D. Salazar (Eds.), Biomedical English: A corpus-based approach (pp.–). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.56.01las
     https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.56.01las [Google Scholar]
  42. Lei, L., & Liu, D.
    (2016) A new medical academic word list: A corpus-based study with enhanced methodology. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, , –. 10.1016/j.jeap.2016.01.008
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2016.01.008 [Google Scholar]
  43. McCrobie, D.
    (1986) An analysis of acronyms in written text. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society Annual Meeting, (), –. 10.1177/154193128603000920
     https://doi.org/10.1177/154193128603000920 [Google Scholar]
  44. Martinez, E., Mollica, F., & Gibson, E.
    (2022) Poor writing, not specialized concepts, drives processing difficulty in legal language. Cognition, , –. 10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105070
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105070 [Google Scholar]
  45. Mattila, H. E. S.
    (2016) Comparative legal linguistics: Language of law, Latin and modern lingua Francas (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315573106
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315573106 [Google Scholar]
  46. Marotta-Wurgler, F.
    (2007) What’s in a standard form contract? An empirical analysis of software license agreements. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, (), –. 10.1111/j.1740‑1461.2007.00104.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-1461.2007.00104.x [Google Scholar]
  47. Mellinkoff, D.
    (1963) The language of the law. Boston: Little Brown & Co.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Mudraya, O.
    (2006) Engineering English: A lexical frequency instructional model. English for Specific Purposes, (), –. 10.1016/j.esp.2005.05.002
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2005.05.002 [Google Scholar]
  49. Mroczyńska, K.
    (2020) A dictionary of legal English collocations as an aid for mastering the legal English genre. Linguistics Beyond and Within (LingBaW), , –. 10.31743/lingbaw.11836
     https://doi.org/10.31743/lingbaw.11836 [Google Scholar]
  50. Nation, I. S. P.
    (2016) Making and using word lists for language learning and testing. John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/z.208
     https://doi.org/10.1075/z.208 [Google Scholar]
  51. Paquot, M.
    (2007) Towards a productively-oriented academic word list. InJ. Walinski, K. Kredens, & S. Gozdz-Roszkowski (Eds.), Practical applications in language and computers (pp.–). Lausanne: Peter Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Pojanapunya, P., & Watson Todd, R.
    (2018) Log-likelihood and odds ratio: Keyness statistics for different purposes of keyword analysis. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, (), –. 10.1515/cllt‑2015‑0030
     https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2015-0030 [Google Scholar]
  53. Qi, P., Zhang, Y., Zhang, Y., Bolton, J., & Manning, C. D.
    (2020) Stanza: A python natural language processing toolkit for many human languages. Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: System Demonstrations, –. Online: Association for Computational Linguistics. 10.18653/v1/2020.acl‑demos.14
     https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.acl-demos.14 [Google Scholar]
  54. Radović, T., & Manzey, D.
    (2019) The impact of a mnemonic acronym on learning and performing a procedural task and its resilience toward interruptions. Frontiers in Psychology, , . 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02522
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02522 [Google Scholar]
  55. Rayson, P.
    (2003) Matrix: A statistical method and software tool for linguistic analysis through corpus comparison [Unpublished doctoral thesis]. Lancaster University.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Rousseau, D. M., & Parks, J. M.
    (1993) The contracts of individuals and organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, , –.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Roxenhall, T., & Ghauri, P.
    (2004) Use of the written contract in long-lasting business relationships. Industrial Marketing Management, (), –. 10.1016/j.indmarman.2003.10.015
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2003.10.015 [Google Scholar]
  58. Römer, U.
    (2009) The inseparability of lexis and grammar: Corpus linguistic perspectives. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, (), –. 10.1075/arcl.7.06rom
     https://doi.org/10.1075/arcl.7.06rom [Google Scholar]
  59. Sanden, G. R., & Kankaanranta, A.
    (2018) “English is an unwritten rule here”: Non-formalised language policies in multinational corporations. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, (), –. 10.1108/CCIJ‑02‑2018‑0026
     https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-02-2018-0026 [Google Scholar]
  60. Scott, M., & Tribble, C.
    (2006) Textual patterns: Key words and corpus analysis in language education (Vol.). Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing. 10.1075/scl.22
     https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.22 [Google Scholar]
  61. Shi, P.
    (2022) On the linguistic features of business contracts. Presented at the2022 8th International Conference on Humanities and Social Science Research (ICHSSR 2022), Chongqing, China. 10.2991/assehr.k.220504.305
     https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.220504.305 [Google Scholar]
  62. Sönning, L.
    (2024) Evaluation of keyness metrics: Performance and reliability. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, (), –. 10.1515/cllt‑2022‑0116
     https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2022-0116 [Google Scholar]
  63. Tenedero, P. P.
    (2015) 2 Linguistic analysis of trading agreements: Insights for plain writing in Philippine contracts. Philippine Journal of Linguistics, , –.
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Tiersma, P. M.
    (1999) Legal language. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Townley, A.
    (2021) The use of discourse maps to teach contract negotiation communicative practices. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, (), –. 10.1177/2329490621994217
     https://doi.org/10.1177/2329490621994217 [Google Scholar]
  66. Wang, J., Liang, S. L., & Ge, G. C.
    (2008) Establishment of a medical academic word list. English for Specific Purposes, (), –. 10.1016/j.esp.2008.05.003
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2008.05.003 [Google Scholar]
  67. Ward, J.
    (2009) A basic engineering English word list for less proficient foundation engineering undergraduates. English for Specific Purposes, (), –. 10.1016/j.esp.2009.04.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2009.04.001 [Google Scholar]
  68. Watson Todd, R.
    (2017) An opaque engineering word list: Which words should a teacher focus on?. English for Specific Purposes, , –. 10.1016/j.esp.2016.08.003
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2016.08.003 [Google Scholar]
  69. Webb, S. A., & Sasao, Y.
    (2013) New directions in vocabulary testing. RELC Journal, (), –. 10.1177/0033688213500582
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688213500582 [Google Scholar]
  70. Witman, P.
    (2005) The art and science of non-disclosure agreements. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, (), –. 10.17705/1CAIS.01611
     https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.01611 [Google Scholar]
  71. Xu, Y., & Casal, J. E.
    (2023) Navigating complexity in plain English: A longitudinal analysis of syntactic and lexical complexity development in L2 legal writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, , . 10.1016/j.jslw.2023.101059
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2023.101059 [Google Scholar]
  72. Yang, M.-N.
    (2015) A nursing academic word list. English for Specific Purposes, , –. 10.1016/j.esp.2014.05.003
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2014.05.003 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/rs.25004.lar
Loading
A register approach to specialized word list creation
John Benjamins ; https://doi.org/10.1075/rs.25004.lar
/content/journals/10.1075/rs.25004.lar
/content/journals/10.1075/rs.25004.lar
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: text dispersion keyness ; specialized word lists ; register ; contract vocabulary ; English for specific purposes ; legal language

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error